У нас нет никаких платных продуктов (сигналов, платного обучения, доверительного управления), мы не пишем первыми!
Контент на канале не является финансовой рекомендацией.
📦Связь с нашим администратором: @T3RVDV
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net -1,191. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45,408–46,957 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 23:21
45,587
-163
19 Sept 2026, 06:21
45,750
-60
16 Sept 2026, 20:21
45,810
-43
14 Sept 2026, 22:02
45,853
-21
13 Sept 2026, 05:38
45,874
-29
11 Sept 2026, 06:17
45,903
-72
8 Sept 2026, 09:40
45,975
-76
5 Sept 2026, 00:59
46,051
-45
3 Sept 2026, 05:58
46,096
-27
2 Sept 2026, 01:18
46,123
-29
1 Sept 2026, 00:05
46,152
-29
30 Aug 2026, 21:45
46,181
-20
30 Aug 2026, 01:02
46,201
-17
29 Aug 2026, 01:37
46,218
-26
27 Aug 2026, 22:04
46,244
-25
27 Aug 2026, 01:23
46,269
-38
26 Aug 2026, 00:03
46,307
-23
24 Aug 2026, 20:35
46,330
-60
23 Aug 2026, 02:52
46,390
-36
21 Aug 2026, 15:15
46,426
first reading
Engagement
99 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.98%
avg views ÷ 45,587 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,090
53 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
53
of 99 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held
99 (15 July 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total
216,980
Reactions total
4,070
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Sept 2026, 20:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,610
Videos
≈801
Links
≈2,010
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
56m 27s
Average length
3m 46s
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,443 reactions across 99 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,167
42.6%
🤝
1,732
23.3%
💯
1,484
19.9%
⚡
767
10.3%
🎉
293
3.94%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 99 of the 99 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,443 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 99 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
По BTC сейчас важный момент:
Мы пришли снимать ликвидность с локального минимума (уровень 82 800$). Но максимальная боль при выносе лонговой ликвидности находится ниже- примерно на уровне 82 160$. То есть запас для нисходящего движения ещё есть.
Что нужно сделать, чтобы цена снова пошла наверх? Думаю, что нужно пробиваться выше диапазона 83 115-83 400$, тогда логика "выбили лишних лонгистов и отправляемся наверх бе…
Все пишут о взломе биржи Битгет на 350 миллионов долларов.
Паника, страх, ужас? Ну, нет.
Такие суммы для крупных бирж сейчас не являются прям большими. Для нас с вами это кажется огромной потерей, но биржи запросто с этим справляются, им даже не приходится закрывать вывод средств для пользователей.
Вспомните, прошлой зимой Байбит взломали на 1,5 миллиарда. И что? Биржа как работала, так и работает. Средства пользо…
Максимальная боль ликвидаций на монетах.
То есть это уровни, где произойдёт максимальное количество ликвидаций, что на руку маркетмейкеру. Цена ходит от ликвидности к ликвидности.
Смотреть можно тут: https://www.coinglass.com/liquidation-maxpain
Обратите внимание, что максимальные ликвидации лонгов находятся ближе, чем ликвидации шортов.
🤝
Большинство держателей альткоинов до сих пор в минусе.
В профите только около 25% держателей альтов (синяя линия). Обычно, пик роста приходится на моменты, когда большинство холдеров в профите.
Получается, что до этого момента ещё далеко?
На самом деле, многие альты никогда не взлетят даже на самом мощном буллране, вы должны это понимать. Многие монеты уйдут в небытие. Так что, если вы что-то покупаете вдолгосрок,…
Сейчас от максимумов, которые образовали после роста, корректируемся.
Я думаю, что нащупаем локальную поддержку и дальше пойдём снова вверх, делая отскок, хотя бы до уровня выпадения. Касается и Биткоина, и альтов.
Логика такая, что V-образных разворотов практически не бывает (в данном случае буква v перевернутая- ʌ).
То есть мало ситуаций, когда мы выросли и потом резко пошли вниз и больше не тестируем уровень, от…
Showing the 12 most recent of 99 posts we hold for @teamtrade618. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Blockchain Usa Official ( Binance ) 🐋 @BCUSAReal · 148,636#89
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
SoloTrade — Команда Трейдеров @solotradingss · 25,666 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 September 2026
Артём Звёздин - обучение трейдингу @uiartemzvezdin · 75,972 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
Дмитрий Кокорев | Инвестиции @kokorevinvest · 102,782 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
Андрей Меркулов | Покупаю → Ремонтирую → Сдаю @andrewmerkulov · 26,392 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 September 2026
Профессор Клинков @professorklinkov · 79,484 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
Игорь Андреев |Трейдинг|Волновой анализ @igorcryptotrader · 30,099 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 September 2026
Трейдинг в благости - Игорь Павленко @blagotrading · 71,398 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
Крипта на доступном @easymarketcrypto · 69,556 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 August 2026
Pentagon Channel | DYOR @PentagonChannel · 20,180 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 September 2026
Арденский | Трейдинг и психология @arden_YT · 20,342 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 27 September 2026
Павел Казанцев | О Крипте @cryptokazancev · 39,547 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 2 September 2026
Скринеры рынка ~ Анонсы и информация @screeners_info · 21,882 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 September 2026
Мысли Вайкоффа @wyckoffcompany · 68,173 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
Кошелек с Биткоинами | Алексей Чечукевич @wallet_with_bitcoins · 86,686 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 August 2026
COINNEWS @coinnewsru · 25,132 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 September 2026
FOMOHOMO @FOMOHOMO · 27,120 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 September 2026
MMarketmaker @mmrktmkr · 42,229 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 28 August 2026
Богатейший Ди | Crypto @richdicrypto · 34,333 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
Pursuit4Million|Андрей Соболев @P4M_channel · 32,981 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
IKIGAI @ikigaimain · 98,186 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026
Gerchik Trading Ecosystem @AlexanderGerchik · 75,002 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
Профессор Альтов 🥸 @profaltov · 27,663 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
Trade by Booba @trade_by_booba · 50,323 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
SANCHO D.T. @SANCHO_DT · 65,539 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 50 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Илья Соловей” (@teamtrade618), 45,587 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/teamtrade618.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.