Channel
@solotradingss
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
26,014subscribers
-50 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001291483806 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @solotradingss |
| Description | 🚀 Попасть в закрытый торговый клуб: @solotrade_start_bot 🎁 Получи 100$ на Bybit: https://partner.bybit.com/b/solotrade (код 25328) Контент на канале не является финансовой рекомендацией. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/solotradingss |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 26,014 | -13 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:56 | 26,027 | +16 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 26,011 | -11 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 26,022 | -11 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:59 | 26,033 | -10 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 26,043 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 26,050 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 26,061 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 26,064 | first reading |
38 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 38 (30 July 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 73,400 |
| Reactions total | 1,409 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,409 reactions across 38 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 551 | 39.1% | |
| ❤ | 514 | 36.5% | |
| 🍾 | 177 | 12.6% | |
| 😈 | 91 | 6.46% | |
| 🙏 | 76 | 5.39% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,409reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🧐Четыре волны, четыре каскада — называйте как хотите. И уже три закрытых FVG. Как думаете, идём по аналогичному сценарию или в этот раз нас обманут и сначала сходим снять стопы за верхними EQH — 64 000 или 64 500? ❤️ — всё по стандарту: закрываем очередной FVG и идём вниз к 62 250. 👿 — чувствую манипуляцию: сначала снимаем EQH!
😈30❤15⚡7🍾3
Signed Taras
👀 Вирусный график по BTC — очередные влажные мечты 📊 Суть простая: каждый цикл якобы идёт в одном ритме — 365 дней коррекции, затем 1064 дня параболического роста. Если паттерн снова отработает, коррекция уже подходит к концу, а впереди может ждать новый мощный импульс. 🚀 Выглядит красиво, особенно огромный зелёный прямоугольник справа. Но циклов для такой статистики, мягко говоря, маловато. Поэтому это скорее крас…
❤18⚡8🙏4🍾3😈2
Signed Taras
☕️Доброе утро! 📊Вчера S&P 500 впервые поднялся выше 7 800 пунктов. Инвесторов порадовали данные по инфляции производителей в США: PPI в июле замедлился до 4,7% г/г при прогнозе 4,9%. BTC на позитивный фон почти не отреагировал — времена жёсткой привязки Биткоина к SPX уже прошли. 👉По Биткоину особо добавить нечего: достигли планируемого FF FVG, следующая цель — EQL на 62 290$. При этом держим в уме эквалы 63 640$ …
⚡10❤9🍾3🙏2
Signed Taras
#BTC Чётко по плану на FF FVG. Часть позиции уже зафиксировал, остальные цели — ниже. Эта сделка, как и многие другие, была дана в нашей группе. ____ 🤝 Если хотите- приходите к нам. Это бесплатно. Запускайте бота @solotrade_start_bot и если что вдруг- пишите нашему менеджеру Льву @T3RVDV
⚡12🍾5❤4
Signed Taras
Posted without readable text
❤25⚡15🍾7😈1🙏1
Signed Марина
☕️Доброе утро! 🇺🇸🇮🇷Трамп снова взял Ормузский пролив под контроль, а КСИР был "уничтожен и разбежался". Как жаль, что Иран об этом не в «кугсе», поэтому на рынки это заявление не повлияло. 🤡 📊BTC красиво движется в нисходящем ОФ — или, если кому так больше нравится, формирует три медвежьих флага подряд. Особых предпосылок для разворота в лонг с текущих уровней я не вижу, поэтому продолжаю удерживать шортовую позицию…
⚡13❤7🍾2🙏2😈1
Signed Taras
+125,92% На картинке открытая статистика, которую мы ведём публично уже вот 13 месяцев. Результат: +125,92%. Для нас это прекрасный и стабильный результат. Тьфу-тьфу-тьфу. Причём сделки мы полностью сопровождаем от входа до закрытия. Да, часть сделок публикуется в открытом доступе, а другаая часть публикуется в закрытом сообществе. И 2/3 профита приходится именно на закрытое сообщество. Причём мы сделали всё макс…
⚡19❤16🍾8
Posted without readable text
⚡20❤18🍾10
Signed Pavel
Вот набор Емашек удобный, в настройках можно выключать ненужные: https://ru.tradingview.com/v/48ZWvclR/
❤10⚡7🍾5
Signed Pavel
Кстати, есть прикольная простая стратегия- обычно между EMA50 и EMA 100 есть пространство, пустая зона. И часто, когда есть пробой EMA50 снизу вверх, то цена быстро на импульсе движется к EMA100, заполняя это пространство. На подобии того, как цена двигается от объёмов к объёмам. Ну или даже лучше пользоваться не EMA100, а EMA 200, потому что между EMA50 и EMA100 не такие уж большие пустые пространства. Вот конкре…
⚡16❤15🍾8
Signed Pavel
☕️Доброе утро! 🇺🇸🇮🇷Честно говоря, эта безрезультатная возня с противоречивыми заявлениями Ирана и США достала, думаю, не только меня. Но от их решений зависят цены на биржах и общее геополитическое состояние, поэтому буду держать вас в курсе. После заявлений Ирана о нежелании общаться с Трампом тот заявил, что Иран согласился на все условия США, но боится объявить об этом своему народу. В Пакистане также говорят о с…
⚡17❤12🍾4🙏4
Signed Taras
#BTC Очень похоже на медвежий флаг. При благоприятных условиях после снятия EQH на отметке 64 173$ буду усиливать позицию.
❤16⚡13🍾7😈4
Signed Taras
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @solotradingss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 28,868 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SoloTrade — Команда Трейдеров” (@solotradingss), 26,014 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/solotradingss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.