10 measurements spanning 9 days, net +589. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 74,011–74,776 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 17:27
74,688
+112
14 Aug 2026, 07:39
74,576
+124
13 Aug 2026, 03:15
74,452
+78
12 Aug 2026, 05:03
74,374
+49
11 Aug 2026, 07:23
74,325
+20
10 Aug 2026, 09:45
74,305
+44
9 Aug 2026, 08:31
74,261
+65
8 Aug 2026, 06:13
74,196
+48
7 Aug 2026, 05:46
74,148
+49
6 Aug 2026, 12:31
74,099
first reading
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.29%
avg views ÷ 74,688 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,190
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.66%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 31 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held
31 (4 August 2026 – 16 August 2026)
Views total
185,710
Reactions total
4,931
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,920
Videos
≈1,160
Links
≈2,160
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 24s
Average length
2m 24s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,931 reactions across 30 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,667
54.1%
🔥
962
19.5%
😁
624
12.7%
❤
560
11.4%
👎
84
1.70%
🕊
34
0.69%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,931reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 30 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @uiartemzvezdin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Нефть дорожает, а рубль и российский рынок всё равно падают. Старая формула сломалась.
В новом обзоре разбираю, почему дорогая нефть больше не спасает рубль, куда исчезает экспортная валютная выручка и чего ждать дальше от доллара, Мосбиржи и Сбера.
Рубль уже около 85. Что дальше — 87 или разворот?
YouTube
RuTube
Вконтакте
Dzen
Друзья, команда Днепр активизировалась последнее время, ребята уже научились отправлять сгенерированные ИИ голосовухи и кругляшки со мной.
Вот мои контакты, сохраните на всякий случай:
https://t.me/artemzvezdin
https://max.ru/uiartemzvezdin
https://vk.com/artem_zvezdin
https://www.tiktok.com/@artemzvezdin
+79628886663 (только МАХ или СМС)
Я первый никогда не начинаю диалог. Запасных и дублирующих аккаунтов у м…
Закрывается набор в месячный марафон по скальпингу с торговлей на реальном счёте онлайн.
На марафоне, за месяц, с обратной связью и домашками, обучим вас скальпинг-стратегиям, в том числе и методам разгона счёта.
По итогу получаете:
- Торговую систему, проверенную и одобренную учителем.
- Полные знания стратегий скальпинга.
- Видео-запись всех встреч с доступом навсегда.
Старт 18 августа.
Оплатить и принять учас…
Нас несколько лет пугают крахом Америки, Европы, Китая и вообще всей мировой экономики.
Я решил не читать очередные прогнозы, а посмотреть на цифры. США, Европа, Китай, Индия, Африка, нефть, доллар — и в конце картина получилась совсем не такой, какой я ожидал.
Где действительно назревают проблемы, а где нас просто пугают кризисом?
YouTube
VKvideo
RuTube
Dzen
Запись на марафон - https://finzvezda.com/marafo…
Как торговать ложный пробой
Ложный пробой становится интересным не в момент пересечения уровня, а тогда, когда цена возвращается обратно и показывает, что удержаться за границей не получилось. Именно реакция после пробоя помогает отличить отказ рынка от нового ценового диапазона.
Если после сильного движения цена закрепилась далеко от уровня и перешла во флет, это чаще говорит о принятии новых значений. Рассматрива…
14 августа мы празднуем 28-летие легендарной фразы "твёрдо и чётко".
Эту фразу сказал Борис Ельцин на вопросы журналистов - будет ли девальвация? Ельцин сказал, что что девальвации НЕ БУ ДЕТ твёрдо и чётко, а через 3 дня Сергей Кириенко - объявил девальвацию и дефолт по облигациям.
Точка входа: почему одного пробоя недостаточно
Сильный уровень не обязан сразу останавливать цену. Его могут проколоть, ненадолго пробить и быстро вернуть обратно. Поэтому входить в сделку только потому, что свеча пересекла линию, значит брать на себя лишний риск.
Более надёжный сценарий складывается последовательно:
Цена несколько раз реагирует на уровень, подтверждая его значимость.
Происходит пробой сильным дви…
С такими инвесторами на фондовом рынке я точно бедным не буду.
Уже миллион раз говорил - ну не покупайте вы Полюс золото, если хотите сыграть на росте золота.
У нас есть и фьючерсы золотые, и спотовое золото, и опционы. Нет же. Надо обязательно как мухи на г. слететься на покупку акций золотодобывающих компаний, в надежде, что это г. вырастет из-за роста золота.
Ну идиоты же. На рынке нет никакой корреляции между …
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
🔣В среду 19 августа в 19-00 МСК🔣 пройдет групповое занятие, на котором куратор нашей Школы покажет мастер-класс по торговле криптовалютой. Торговля будет вестись на симуляторе (плеере), так что за два часа занятия мы успеем проторговать сразу несколько дней и обсудить все возможные точки входа.
По ходу занятия Вы вместе с куратором совершите массу сделок, используя два самых лучших метода для заработка на рын…
5 ловушек волатильности
Резкие движения цены привлекают возможностью быстро заработать. Кажется, что достаточно поймать сильный импульс, и сделка сразу принесёт хорошую прибыль.
Но именно в такие моменты рынок особенно легко заставляет действовать поспешно: входить без подтверждения, нарушать торговый план и закрывать позицию под влиянием страха.
На карточках разобрал пять распространённых ловушек волатильности и …
Нашёл 3 акции, которые рынок пока толком не заметил.
В новом выпуске разбираю, где уже появляется крупный капитал, где начинается разворот и какие уровни могут стать следующими целями.
Внутри — HeadHunter, ДомРФ и Ozon Pharma.
Причём одна из бумаг выглядит особенно интересно перед ближайшим отчётом.
Видео уже на канале 👇
YouTube
VKvideo
RuTube
Dzen
Сделали такую заднюю обложки моей книги. С котом Гошей.
Как вам ?
Книга будет через месяца 2 на всех маркетплейсах, если не сгорит конечно 😐
👍289🔥100❤27👎11
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @uiartemzvezdin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 207,154 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
IKIGAI @ikigaimain · 98,892 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Артём Звёздин - обучение трейдингу” (@uiartemzvezdin), 74,688 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uiartemzvezdin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.