Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Coin Master

Channel

Coin Master

@coinmaster_crypt0

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,467subscribers

-246 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001499828542
TypeChannel
Username@coinmaster_crypt0
DescriptionCoin Master - без воды, только информация, которая поможет тебе заработать. Admin | @CoinMasterCrypto BingX | https://bingx.com/invite/IP8COK Coin Master Boost | https://t.me/boost/coinmaster_crypt0
CreatedBetween 1 May 2020 and 30 April 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/coinmaster_crypt0

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 8 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@coinmaster_crypt0/5976 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 15:24 UTC@crypto_journaI/476231 Jul 2026, 09:51 UTC1.0018 hours
@coinmaster_crypt0/5978 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC@crypto_journaI/47641 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC1.004.1 hours
@coinmaster_crypt0/5988 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC@crypto_journaI/477310 Aug 2026, 05:49 UTC1.0015 hours
@coinmaster_crypt0/6019 · this entry22 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC@crypto_journaI/478823 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC1.0024 hours
@coinmaster_crypt0/6020 · this entry23 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC@crypto_journaI/478924 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC1.0016 hours
@coinmaster_crypt0/6023 · this entry25 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC@crypto_journaI/479025 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC1.007.5 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@crypto_journaI18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.999.0 hoursthis entry (18–0)
@crypadvis16 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.999.0 hoursthis entry (16–0)
@crypto_tappok14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9987 minutesthis entry (14–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 61 comparable posts for this entry, running 22 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 8 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @coinmaster_crypt0 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 8 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

13,46713,71313,5906 August 2026 — 13,713 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,713 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,708 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,707 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,699 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,697 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,695 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,697 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,696 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,693 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,684 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,678 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,668 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,655 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,651 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,644 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,643 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,638 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,634 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,631 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,629 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,627 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,626 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,624 subscribers4 September 2026 — 13,618 subscribers7 September 2026 — 13,609 subscribers10 September 2026 — 13,610 subscribers12 September 2026 — 13,605 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,598 subscribers15 September 2026 — 13,590 subscribers18 September 2026 — 13,584 subscribers30 September 2026 — 13,557 subscribers5 October 2026 — 13,545 subscribers9 October 2026 — 13,533 subscribers13 October 2026 — 13,525 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,523 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,524 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,519 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,521 subscribers20 October 2026 — 13,520 subscribers21 October 2026 — 13,518 subscribers23 October 2026 — 13,515 subscribers24 October 2026 — 13,514 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,510 subscribers26 October 2026 — 13,505 subscribers27 October 2026 — 13,508 subscribers28 October 2026 — 13,507 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,502 subscribers30 October 2026 — 13,488 subscribers31 October 2026 — 13,482 subscribers1 November 2026 — 13,493 subscribers2 November 2026 — 13,492 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,480 subscribers4 November 2026 — 13,476 subscribers5 November 2026 — 13,477 subscribers6 November 2026 — 13,472 subscribers7 November 2026 — 13,471 subscribers8 November 2026 — 13,469 subscribers10 November 2026 — 13,467 subscribers6 August 202610 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 95 days, net -246. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,430–13,750 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 06:0113,467-2
8 Nov 2026, 16:0813,469-2
7 Nov 2026, 13:1713,471-1
6 Nov 2026, 13:4713,472-5
5 Nov 2026, 10:1713,477+1
4 Nov 2026, 10:5813,476-4
3 Nov 2026, 13:1613,480-12
2 Nov 2026, 10:0913,492-1
1 Nov 2026, 08:1913,493+11
31 Oct 2026, 09:0613,482-6
30 Oct 2026, 06:3613,488-14
29 Oct 2026, 07:0013,502-5
28 Oct 2026, 05:2913,507-1
27 Oct 2026, 07:4613,508+3
26 Oct 2026, 06:2713,505-5
25 Oct 2026, 06:0913,510-4
24 Oct 2026, 06:1713,514-1
23 Oct 2026, 08:2913,515-3
21 Oct 2026, 02:3113,518-2
20 Oct 2026, 03:1913,520first reading

Engagement

100 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.7%
avg views ÷ 13,467 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,600
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 100 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 34 of 36 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held100 (22 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total129,530
Reactions total3,553
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 07:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,750
Videos
≈3
Links
≈238

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

8,626 reactions across 98 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,68931.2%
❤1,86121.6%
💯1,08112.5%
🔥6988.09%
👏4975.76%
🤯3854.46%
😱2743.18%
🤔2552.96%
🤝1732.01%
👀1481.72%
🌚1421.65%
👌1111.29%
🐳570.661%
🤨500.58%
🙏460.533%
🏆410.475%
😎390.452%
🫡290.336%
🎉190.22%
🥰180.209%
3 further kinds130.151%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 98 of the 100 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,626 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 100 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 100 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @coinmaster_crypt0. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 100 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 36 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 16:19 UTC≈1,910 views47 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

$ETH достиг уровня коррекции Фибоначчи 0.618✅👀 Независимо от того, куда цена пойдёт дальше, не купить хотя бы часть ETH на споте по текущим ценам - большая ошибка☝️

💯25👍12❤4🐳4👏1🤯1

10 Nov 2026, 13:02 UTC≈2,160 views42 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🇺🇸 Платформа токенизированных ценных бумаг, связанная с NYSE (Нью-Йоркской фондовой биржей), будет использовать Avalanche ($AVAX) для клиринга и расчётов🔥 Это действительно крупное событие. Раньше подобные новости могли отправить монету на +200–300% буквально за одну свечу. Но в нынешних рыночных условиях даже такие новости практически не вызывают реакции🤷‍♂️

👌26❤6💯6👏3😎1

9 Nov 2026, 20:22 UTC≈2,540 views92 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Сейчас я склоняюсь к бычьему сценарию, поскольку с момента вершины бычьего рынка прошло уже 13 месяцев (медвежьи рынки BTC обычно длятся около 12 месяцев)👀 Кроме того, BTC сформировал чёткую импульсную волну 1–5 от летнего минимума, а сейчас мы наблюдаем медленную коррекцию с тестированием 200-дневной скользящей средней в качестве поддержки - так же, как это происходило в 2023 году😏

❤49🔥19🐳8🤯5🙏5🌚2👏2🤔2

9 Nov 2026, 19:10 UTC≈2,650 views112 reactionsread 11 November 2026

В эти даты 4 года назад🥲

👍75❤19🔥11🐳5😎2

9 Nov 2026, 13:13 UTC≈2,760 views108 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

$USDT.D update👀 Еще в сентябре я говорил, что ожидаю коррекцию на крипторынке. Именно это и произошло😎 Цель отскока $USDT.D достигнута✅ Время покупать (на споте)☝️

🤝71❤17🔥8🏆6🌚2😎2🤩1🙏1

9 Nov 2026, 12:56 UTC≈2,710 views90 reactionsread 11 November 2026

«Нам нужен был пробой выше 350-дневной скользящей средней в ближайшие недели» - но этого так и не произошло🤷‍♂️ Теперь цена снова стремительно снижается к минимумам, что определённо не является хорошим сигналом☝️

❤54🙏18💯7🤝3🎉2🏆2🫡2😎2

9 Nov 2026, 07:19 UTC≈2,740 views111 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

$BTC 1D update🧯 Как и ожидалось, мы достигли 200-дневной скользящей средней (MA200)✅😉 Двухмесячная коррекция подходит к концу. Если вы считаете, что мы находимся в начале нового бычьего рынка (что весьма вероятно), то сейчас отличный шанс зайти в рынок, если вы упустили августовский памп. Будем использовать этот шанс!🥂

❤71👏19🔥11💯6🤯2😎2

8 Nov 2026, 16:21 UTC≈2,760 views97 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

$CRV график 1M👀 Мне очень нравится, что $CRV удержал минимум августа 2024 года и в июне 2026 года сформировал масштабную фигуру «Двойное дно» (Double Bottom). На мой взгляд, $CRV без особых проблем достигнет сильного уровня сопротивления на отметке 1.30$📍 🎯 Цель фигуры «Двойное дно» — 6$ (при FDV 15 млрд$).

❤57👍27🙏8👏2🤯2🐳1

7 Nov 2026, 18:48 UTC≈2,900 views135 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

$SUI график 1M update👀 Мы получили коррекцию, о которой я говорил. Месячная свеча закрылась прямо на моём горизонтальном уровне 0.9$✅ Думаю, что и текущий месяц закроется выше этого уровня, оставив длинную нижнюю тень. Если вы упустили возможность купить $SUI раньше, сейчас отличный момент, чтобы начать набирать позицию.

👍96💯17❤6🔥5🌚3❤‍🔥2🐳2👏2

7 Nov 2026, 10:36 UTC≈2,910 views120 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

$BTC график 1D update👀 Мы уже почти у цели👌😎 Сейчас 200-дневная скользящая средняя (MA200) находится на уровне 73200$.

❤85💯14🔥7🌚4🏆3🤔3🤝3🤯1

6 Nov 2026, 15:28 UTC≈3,080 views104 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Ещё один месяц доминирования $PYTH💪 В октябре через него прошло 734 млрд$, или 88,5% всего объёма торговли бессрочными контрактами на RWA. Значительно опережает всех конкурентов🔥

👏79🔥15🤯5❤3🐳1🤝1

6 Nov 2026, 14:49 UTC≈2,890 views87 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

$SOL достиг 200-дневной скользящей средней ✅ RSI перешёл в зону перепроданности. Покупаете на этой просадке?😏

👍69👏13💯4❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 100 posts we hold for @coinmaster_crypt0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Crypto Bullet OFFICIAL
@cryptobulletofficialTG · 21,721
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 5 September 2026
Биржевой Монарх
@BMonarch_official · 42,916
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
MMarketmaker
@mmrktmkr · 40,718
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 28 August 2026
Крипта (деньги)
@Kriptamoney · 38,761
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 30 August 2026
Trade by Booba
@trade_by_booba · 49,723
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Богатейший Ди | Crypto
@richdicrypto · 32,700
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
QuantPro⚡️Trading
@QPROtrading · 23,760
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 September 2026
SoloTrade — Команда Трейдеров
@solotradingss · 24,710
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 September 2026
Илья Соловей
@teamtrade618 · 44,673
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
CryptoCommons 💎
@cryptocommonz · 20,853
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 September 2026
IKIGAI
@ikigaimain · 97,386
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026
DНЕВНИКИ Крипто
@dnevniki_crypto · 32,621
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Coin Master” (@coinmaster_crypt0), 13,467 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coinmaster_crypt0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.