Channel
@stylewithmary
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,871subscribers
-57 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001213091606 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stylewithmary |
| Description | Персональный стилист, шмоточный обозреватель и не только💔 услуги стилиста: http://stylewithmary.ru ютуб: https://www.youtube.com/@stylewithmaryy инст: https://instagram.com/matveeva___mary contact: @matveevamary КНД: https://clck.ru/3EaZRH |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stylewithmary |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 19,871 | -9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 19,880 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:51 | 19,883 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 19,886 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 19,895 | -14 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 19,909 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 19,918 | -10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 19,928 | first reading |
35 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 35 (5 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 17,591 |
| Reactions total | 379 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
333 reactions across 29 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 142 | 42.6% | |
| 💘 | 103 | 30.9% | |
| 🤩 | 44 | 13.2% | |
| 🥰 | 44 | 13.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 379reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Украшений много не бывает, а когда они ещё и идеально комбинируются между собой, создавая уникальный выход, то в шкатулке их должно быть предостаточно! Darkrain запустили распродажу до 16 августа в онлайн и офлайн формате, где можно приобрести аксессуары с 30% скидкой. Серги-хупы, массивные кольца, минималистичные колье и ребристые кольца дополняют любой образ и собирают его. Советую заглянуть в гости к бренду, чт…
💘3🔥1🥰1
Столик на одного в моем домашнем ресторане 🤍 Советую попробовать сочетание брынза (моцарелла) + тунец в собственном соку на подложке из томатов. Выходит очень сытно и вкусно, а ещё можно заправить тыквенным маслом и добавить оливки. У меня теперь есть тарелочки с морской тематикой и круглые плейсматы.
🥰8
До создания своего тк-канала я была подписана преимущественно на каналы, которые пишут о моде 🛍️ С шопоголик из Москвы меня связывают только положительные моменты, потому что читаю я его уже более 8 лет…. Однажды я подошла к Оксане и сказала лично, что была в числе первых читательниц и до сих пор продолжаю находить там ценные вещи. Например, вот эти тапки сразу упали в корзину. А еще Оксана, так же как и я, недавн…
💘6🔥3🥰2
Не знаю, как вы, но лично я планирую продлевать ощущение лета дофаминовыми украшениями🍭 Собрала для вас бюджетные находки бижутерии, которые сработают как fashion-допинг: кольцо колье браслет кольцо браслет
🤩7💘3🔥2
Сегодня хочу быть для вас максимально полезной и ввожу новую рубрику - #разборкорзины Вы присылаете скрином сообщение о том, что вы хотите купить в ближайшее время. Это может быть абсолютно любая вещь: от базовой футболки до сумки, обуви или трендовой позиции, на которую вы давно смотрите. А я даю по ней обратную связь как стилист: насколько вещь актуальна, стоит ли она своих денег, легко ли её интегрировать в гард…
💘9
Мой осенний вишлист - от одежды до товаров для дома! Кожаный бомбер хочу взять его на замену кожаной куртке, потому что такой формат верхней одежды уже немного исчерпал себя и глаз от нее устал; Туфли уже вижу как сочетаю их с белыми колготками и создаю образы на контрастах с использованием текстурных материалов; Антикварная витрина очень хочу приобрести шкаф на кухню, в котором буду хранить хрусталь, красивый сер…
🔥7🥰2🤩1
Люблю вечера, когда среди недели выбираемся с друзьями на ужин 🙂↔️ Вчера наш выбор пал на проект Уиллиама Ламберти Uilliam’s, который уносит нас в уютную Италию. Мы опробовали много блюд, но я хочу выделить два своих фаворита: брускетта с камчатским крабом и лазанья. Камерное пространство с красивым интерьером точно заслуживает вашего внимания 🤍
💘10🔥4🥰2
Какую же красоту сейчас делают российские бренды 💔 Все лавры сегодня безусловно забирает кампейн Pre-Fall от Level44. Буду кратка: это просто вау! От визуала до образов – хочется рассматривать каждый кадр и срочно примерять всё на себя…
💘13🔥4
Я тут вспомнила, что забыла поделиться с вами своим пятничным образом дня 🐆 Сначала случился вкусный ужин с дегустацией оранжевого вина, далее с подругой отправились на прогулку и зашли в супер камерный бар - вода. Очень часто у клиентов возникает вопрос: а что надеть в бар с друзьями? Ответ прост - берем все свои красивые вещи, туфли, добавляем акцентные аксессуары и образ готов ⭐️ Топ - lime Юбка - nume Туфли - …
🥰9💘6🔥3
Хочу/могу: найдена бюджетная альтернатива акцентной сумке Celine🐍 490 267 рублей vs 6 599 рублей Ставьте 🤩, если добавили бы эту модель в свой гардероб!
🤩7💘5
Я редко рассказываю о зарубежном глянце, хотя знаю, что многим эта тема действительно интересна. Если хочется следить за тем, что выходит в Vogue, Elle, Tatler и независимых изданиях вроде DAZED, вам будет полезен канал Radio Moda. Там каждую неделю публикуются полные номера журналов, а недавно вышло полноценное видео с разбором и переводом французского Vogue — для тех, кто хочет глубже понимать контекст индустрии.
💘7🔥5
Звание «лука дня» сегодня однозначно улетает Еве Саид🤎 Этот кардиган украл мое сердце – ждем явки & пароли…А бермуды Anfi и такое красивое сочетание оттенков сделали образ еще интереснее. Всё вроде бы просто, но как же красиво смотрится вместе!
🔥9🤩4💘2
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @stylewithmary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 194,735 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“На полном обвесе с Мари” (@stylewithmary), 19,871 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stylewithmary.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.