БЛАГОТВОРИТЕЛЬНЫЙ ФОНД
помощи бездомным животным и животным, пострадавшим от человеческой жестокости
Москва
Сайт https://kusochekschastya.ru
Инфопомощь: https://t.me/KC_kotinder
Админ (по всем вопросам): @hvostians
Мы в РКН https://clck.ru/3Kp6gz
Created
2 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
30 measurements spanning 40 days, net -105. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,777–25,915 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 12:38
25,793
-8
13 Sept 2026, 21:41
25,801
-8
12 Sept 2026, 02:01
25,809
+2
9 Sept 2026, 20:20
25,807
-16
6 Sept 2026, 14:20
25,823
-13
4 Sept 2026, 04:15
25,836
-8
1 Sept 2026, 13:25
25,844
-3
31 Aug 2026, 14:24
25,847
-2
30 Aug 2026, 13:26
25,849
-7
29 Aug 2026, 14:34
25,856
-8
28 Aug 2026, 10:57
25,864
-1
26 Aug 2026, 15:57
25,865
+8
25 Aug 2026, 13:44
25,857
+1
24 Aug 2026, 13:58
25,856
-11
22 Aug 2026, 20:33
25,867
-5
21 Aug 2026, 08:45
25,872
+4
20 Aug 2026, 10:35
25,868
-3
19 Aug 2026, 11:46
25,871
-4
18 Aug 2026, 13:44
25,875
-7
17 Aug 2026, 17:05
25,882
first reading
Engagement
287 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.98%
avg views ÷ 25,793 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,570
95 posts measured
Reaction rate
24.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
95
of 287 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held
287 (5 August 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total
244,547
Reactions total
60,671
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 06:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈18,500
Videos
≈7,100
Links
≈9,200
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 55m
Average length
47s
Measured directly from 147 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
177,253 reactions across 276 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🙏
88,421
49.9%
❤
50,494
28.5%
😭
15,158
8.55%
custom 5456626860030961569
8,198
4.63%
😢
5,211
2.94%
❤🔥
4,214
2.38%
🥰
2,208
1.25%
😍
1,966
1.11%
🤗
760
0.429%
🤝
249
0.14%
😘
168
0.095%
💘
139
0.078%
custom 5303220914664523953
67
0.038%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 287 of the 287 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 183,824 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 287 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4,129
across the posts below
Posts paid on
270
of 287 we hold a reading for · 94%
Most on one post
286
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kusochekschastya_ru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 287 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Сбитый автомобилем котик Мася по-прежнему в очень тяжелом состоянии, но уже хотя бы не на реанимационном столе. Очень красивый Мася, видимо, помесь с абиссинцем...
Друзья, мы очень просим оказать любую помощь больнице, чтобы она могла продолжать работу. В течение последних нескольких дней идёт очередной спад сборов пожертвований и охватов в соцсетях😔 если честно, буквально неделю назад нам казалось, что хуже быть уж…
Слепую Птичку ещё котёнком нашли в подъезде. Все это время она живет в Доме инвалидов и очень ждёт свою семью...
Подписаться на канал
Подписаться на рассылку фонда
Мы в макс
И вот еще на ночь 😔
Ещё несколько дней назад с ним было всё относительно нормально, если вообще можно так сказать о котике, который вынужден выживать на заброшенном складе в Москве.
А потом его состояние резко ухудшилось — голова неестественно повернута набок. Малышу срочно нужен осмотр у ветеринара. Неизвестно что произошло, но оставлять там нельзя.
До этого котика никому нет дела. Он просто пытается выжить, а люди…
Капучинка начала сама кушать. Перестала крутиться вокруг себя и из симптомов теперь только трясущаяся время от времени голова, вправо-влево...
Друзья, мы продолжаем сбор средств и будем признательны за любую возможную сумму с вашей стороны🙏
Помочь по СБП
Подписаться на канал
Подписаться на рассылку фонда
Мы в макс
Котик Мася, сбитый машиной, к сожалению, пока без динамики😔 несмотря на всю ужасность ситуации, врачи делают для него всё, что возможно...
Мы продолжаем сбор средств на работу больницы. Вот уже несколько дней как сборы упали и очень сильно😔 просвета пока совсем не видно...
Помочь по СБП
Подписаться на канал
Подписаться на рассылку фонда
Мы в макс
Котик Механик, которого нашли на улице и передали фонду, чувствует себя получше.
Помочь по СБП
Подписаться на канал
Подписаться на рассылку фонда
Мы в макс
Все это время я собиралась с силами, чтобы сообщить, чем закончилась история котенка, которого мы пытались выцарапать всю ночь. Которого положили в воду, больного - видимо, чтобы быстрее умер. Я решила не пересказывать весь этот кошмар, а просто разместить скриншоты переписки. Мы сходили с ума всю ночь - как чувствовали, что прямо сейчас, в моменте, происходит страшное, а мы ничего не можем сделать, потому что на зво…
Друзья, вчерашний котёнок в больнице. Всю ночь длилась эта кошмарная история и в 6.30 пришло наконец сообщение, что малыш в Котяусе. Подробности чуть позже, а пока мы очень просим помочь любым пожертвованием, потому что за вчерашний день мы не собрали почти нисколько...
Помочь по СБП
Подписаться на канал
Подписаться на рассылку фонда
Мы в макс
Котик сердечник Симеон выписался и живёт в котодоме.
Может кто-нибудь захочет подарить ему семью?
Собеседование и анкетирование
▶️ Телефон/WhatsApp: +79067768080
Подписаться на канал
Подписаться на рассылку фонда
Мы в макс
#пост 7056
Город: Москва и МО
Дата: 19.09.2026
Статус: поиск дома, передержки
У 8 котят и кошки-мамы ровно одна неделя на спасение! Женщина, которая их кормит в снт, закрывает сезон и уезжает в следующую субботу. Зимой в этих местах не выжить. Почти никто не приезжает, воду отключают на зиму, да и дачи почти все тут летного типа.
Зимой все котята погибают, взрослые кошки иногда выживают, но живут не больше 3-5 лет.
…
Котик приехал. В прошедшую пятницу его сбила машина, челюсть сворочена, рот не закрывается... Сегодня на смене ВН Шпак, начинается осмотр.
Друзья, мы очень просим у вас любой возможной помощи.
Помочь по СБП
Подписаться на канал
Подписаться на рассылку фонда
Мы в макс
Старенький Гера перенес наркоз ожидаемо плохо😔 не ест сам и у него сильно ослабел глотательный рефлекс. Если за сегодняшний день ситуация не поменяется, то котику придётся устанавливать эзофагостому, а это опять наркоз, хотя и неглубокий и короткий.
И избежать наркоза было никак нельзя, потому что глаз у Геры был совсем ужасный, оттуда начались гнойные выделения пополам с кровью😔
Друзья, мы очень просим подарить бо…
🙏219❤55😭23❤🔥11😢6custom 54566268600309615694
Showing the 12 most recent of 287 posts we hold for @kusochekschastya_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@kusochekschastya_ru edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
23 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А вот интересно - многие ли могут сказать, что их жизнь сложилась идеально, так, как они мечтали?
У меня да13%
У меня нет, но жить хочу и так71%
У меня нет и лучше б помереть10%
Я Онотолий9%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 287 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 86 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Твоя Москва @tvoya_moscwa · 292,653 (as read 15 September 2026)#85
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Angeltails🤍 @angel_tails · 29,450 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 15 September 2026
ПАВЕЛ ПАШКОВ @pavel_v_doroge · 39,618 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
Рязань | События | Новости @Ryazan_narod · 24,832 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 15 September 2026
Голова медузы🪼 @golovameduza · 23,614 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 September 2026
Потеряшки МСК, МО_ХвостатыйПатруль @HvostatPatrul · 32,094 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кусочек счастья для бездомной кошки” (@kusochekschastya_ru), 25,793 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kusochekschastya_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.