Channel
@kaspersky_ege
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,646subscribers
-67 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001240128182 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kaspersky_ege |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kaspersky_ege |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 9,646 | -17 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 9,663 | -44 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 9,707 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 9,713 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 9,713 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 30 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (31 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 22,672 |
| Reactions total | 104 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
104 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 52 | 50.0% | |
| 👀 | 14 | 13.5% | |
| 😭 | 14 | 13.5% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 11.5% | |
| 🫡 | 8 | 7.69% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 3.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩Поступить с каждым годом всё сложнее и вы готовы к этому разговору Когда я сдавал ЕГЭ в 2014 году, на него всем было пофиг. К нему готовились только единицы, самые заряженные, и то после пинков учителей и репетиторов. Лично я в школе сдал ЕГЭ не прям вау, но поступил на бюджет во все 5 вузов, куда подавал документы. Сейчас ребята прям на нервах ждут приказы, даже если поступают не в топ вузы Сейчас это звучит, ка…
кто
❤3
Недавно с вами обсуждали, как искать ошибки в коде… А какие ошибки вообще бывают? Почти всех, кто только начинает прогать, объединяет invalid syntax 😁 На самом деле ошибки как раз подсказывают, что именно в коде пошло не так и где искать проблему 🌟 Так что собрал самые распространённые ошибки, с которыми вы можете столкнуться, прогая на питончике
Всё, что мы увидим в демоверсии, будет учтено в курсе! Базово про свой курс я говорю так: Я — говорю что делать Вы — делаете То есть, вам не нужно будет париться ни над какими документами, сайтами и тд, вы просто следуете курсу и ботаете на 90+ баллов 🔥 Записаться на курс со скидкой от 1000₽
Демоверсия ЕГЭ — это пробный вариант экзамена, который полностью повторяет структуру и содержание реального ЕГЭ. Для чего ее выпускают? Демоверсия помогает понять, как вообще выглядит экзамен, его структуру и сложность — инфа пишется на компе, в ней 27 заданий, есть на работу с икселем, вордом, есть то, что решается руками, а есть то, что только кодом ⌨️ Ещё можно отследить изменения — становится ли экзамен проще? …
❤3
Знаете что такое демоверсия?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
А знаете ли вы, что... ...простые комбинации клавиш на компьютере могут здорово упростить жизнь! 😱 Так что сохраняйте себе, чтобы не забыть Записаться на курс
❤12
☝️ полезные курсы для тех, кто идёт в вуз А ещё в каждом есть 3-х дневный беслпатный доступ! Можете залететь и посмотреть движ. Курсы проходят чисто в тг для лёгкости и удобства
Курс "Физика для вуза" “Физика для вуза” -- это основы физики для комфортной учебы в вузе. На нём разберём основные моменты физики, которые позволят легко вкатиться в университетскую программу.
С++ для вуза от Коли Касперского Основы языка С++ для университетской программы. Изучаем необходимые знания и навыки для комфортного обучения в вузе
А вообще можно сделать ещё проще! 🌷 У тех, кто залетел ко мне на курс, есть легенда-наставник, умный человек, который нашел уже тысячи таких ошибок! Все-все наставнички написали егэ на 85+ и прошли невероятный отбор, поэтому они-то уж точно знают, как сделать твою подготовку эффективнее и приятнее 🐱 Наставник поможет разобраться в материале и коде, сэкономив твоё время А для тех кто еще не на курсе, самое время з…
Просчитался… Но где… Я уверен - все, кто решал задачи кодом, хоть раз задавались вопросом: «а как быстро найти ошибку в программе, чтобы не сидеть над ней час?» На самом деле сидеть над поиском ошибки дольше 20-30 минут вообще не советую Не получается найти проблему - отвлекись, чайку попей, в окно посмотри, а потом вернись и свежим взглядом посмотри на код ещё раз. Ну или можно заново попробовать его написать 😱 …
❤10
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @kaspersky_ege. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Знаете что такое демоверсия?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какое из утверждений о неравномерном кодировании является верным?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Для букв составили код: А - 0 Б - 10 В - 110 Г - 11
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Условие Фано - это
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 696,506 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Коля Касперский | Информатика ЕГЭ | Вебиум” (@kaspersky_ege), 9,646 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kaspersky_ege.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.