Channel
@rubleva_kinesio
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,231subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001681521912 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rubleva_kinesio |
| Created | 25 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rubleva_kinesio |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 1,231 | +8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:20 | 1,223 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 1,224 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:05 | 1,224 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,378 |
| Reactions total | 257 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
257 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 94 | 36.6% | |
| 🔥 | 67 | 26.1% | |
| 🎉 | 35 | 13.6% | |
| 🤣 | 23 | 8.95% | |
| 😁 | 19 | 7.39% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 3.50% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 1.95% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 1.56% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.389% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 257reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А мы ждём приказа о зачислении. И все, дальше это меня никак не касается 😂😜 Поздравляю всех поступивших на бюджет и посылаю лучи поддержки тем, кто поступает на платку. Вам еще до 25 августа ждать. Сочувствую 🙈 А, ещё желаю удачи тем, у кого есть надежда на зачисление на бюджет на дополнительном этапе 9 августа
❤12
Пенсионеры эволюционируют)) Скоро они еще и десятки миллионов у мошенников начнут отжимать))
🔥4
Пенсионер обманул мошенников и отдал им сумку с газетами вместо денег. Все произошло в Тольятти. Безработная женщина вступила в сговор с аферистами и выполняла роль курьера. Она пыталась похитить у 77-летнего мужчины 2,4 миллиона рублей. Но тот понял, что имеет дело с мошенниками. И в итоге передал ей пакет с нарезанными листами из газет и журналов. 🔹 Подписаться на РИА Новости
👏9
Почему бы не выполнить просьбу хороших людей)) Вот тут есть все про поступление и отвечают на любые вопросы))
Всем привет! На связи Георгий Конев (G K), неизменный и незаменимый эксперт канала @stepbyshag и хранитель чата (по мнению наших подписчиков). Знаете, именно эта приемная кампания ощущается как какой-то невероятный, эмоциональный марафон, особенно в части баллов и публикации ранжированных списков)). И даже несмотря на все блокировки и препоны на пути Telegram, мы всё равно здесь, вместе с вами! Каждый год смотрю в …
Там ещё круче..... В Алтайском крае произошёл невероятный случай. Мужчина скакал на лошади и заметил, что за ним гонится медведь. Он остановился, чтобы привязать лошадь и дать зверю бой, как вдруг в него ударила молния. Тело почти полностью парализовало, но он смог уползти, стреляя в воздух, чтобы отпугнуть хищника. Когда сердце останавливалось, он сам делал себе массаж — и выжил. Об этом рассказал глава Минздрава …
🤣8🔥1
Только что видела новость: "Молния ударила в участника СВО, когда за ним гнался медведь на Алтае"🙈😂
😁10⚡4
Еще вам в копилку "в этом году весь бюджет заняли олимпиады и льготники". 1. На биофаке МГУ из 32 льготных мест заняли 14 На геологическом из 40 заняли 10 На химфаке, ВМК, мехмате и физфаке похожая картина. Все остальное вернулось в общий конкурс. При том, что изначально квоты занимают 20 процентов. То есть реально они заняли менее 10 и половина там имели такие баллы, что они и без квот бы прошли. То есть на сам…
😁9👍5❤4
Для тех, кто ходит на индивидуальные консультации. В ближайшие несколько дней я сделаю расписание на сентябрь. Здесь сообщу. Пока отмашки не дам, не записывайтесь, даже если видите свободные места, потому что это может быть не окончательный вариант
А еще, знаете, в чем прелесть полевых факультетов МГУ?)) Из-за того, что у них в июне-июле полевые и производственные практики, у них учеба заканчивается в апреле, а сессия в мае)) На месяц раньше всех остальных. А в июне они уже сидят на природе, или еще в каком-то приятном месте, и хорошо проводят время 😂 Катя, когда узнала об этом, при выборе очередного запасного направления все время интересовалась, полевой л…
❤20🔥8
А еще никто не хочет сдавать ДВИ и 4 ЕГЭ, и поэтому конкуренция падает уже на этом этапе)) Даже три ЕГЭ и ДВИ не хотят))
❤10
А факультет Почвоведения, например, среди всего прочего, готовит лучших микробиологов, хороших химиков-аналитиков, специалистов по радиоэкологии, оценке земель и тп)) И туда в обязательном порядке нужны только биология и русский. И на выбор химия, физика, математика, инфа и география. Ну и ДВИ по биологии. Хотя как раз на Почве есть направления, где практически одна химия, если кто фанат
❤15
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rubleva_kinesio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 898,697 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@rubleva_kinesio named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Рублёва_Психолог. Про стресс и антистресс))” (@rubleva_kinesio), 1,231 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rubleva_kinesio.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.