Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Вотяков | Саморазвитие

Channel

Вотяков | Саморазвитие

@votyakov_ar_life

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,391subscribers

+325 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001777140387
TypeChannel
Username@votyakov_ar_life
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/votyakov_ar_life

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,0547,4177,235.57 August 2026 — 7,066 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,063 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,054 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,057 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,055 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,069 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,080 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,083 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,069 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,090 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,116 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,129 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,146 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,148 subscribers26 September 2026 — 7,177 subscribers4 October 2026 — 7,283 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,331 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,397 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,412 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,417 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,414 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,416 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,406 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,395 subscribers7 November 2026 — 7,391 subscribers7,3917 August 20267 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 92 days, net +325. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,000–7,471 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 15:107,391-4
4 Nov 2026, 12:577,395-11
1 Nov 2026, 19:367,406-10
29 Oct 2026, 10:457,416+2
26 Oct 2026, 11:367,414-3
20 Oct 2026, 14:397,417+5
17 Oct 2026, 18:087,412+15
14 Oct 2026, 20:367,397+66
11 Oct 2026, 04:417,331+48
4 Oct 2026, 23:427,283+106
26 Sept 2026, 06:207,177+29
17 Sept 2026, 01:007,148+2
13 Sept 2026, 00:217,146+17
9 Sept 2026, 11:217,129+13
3 Sept 2026, 22:387,116+26
31 Aug 2026, 12:437,090+21
28 Aug 2026, 19:127,069-14
25 Aug 2026, 18:337,083+3
22 Aug 2026, 16:387,080+11
19 Aug 2026, 13:037,069first reading

Engagement

57 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.9%
avg views ÷ 7,391 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,990
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 57 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held57 (11 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total49,657
Reactions total776
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 13:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,102 reactions across 57 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤97046.1%
🔥52825.1%
custom 52516353208976862761909.04%
🎉1366.47%
🤯954.52%
😍763.62%
👍482.28%
🥰311.47%
😎281.33%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,102 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (8.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 18:50 UTC907 views17 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Твой мозг работает ПРОТИВ Тебя. Что? Но мы же тут все... саморазвиваемся и прокачиваем мозг. Не может же он? А вот да. Это существо регулярно предаёт тебя, а ты даже не замечаешь этого. Когда, как, и как этого избежать — обсудим уже завтра на стриме. Как обычно, в 19:30 по мск. 👉 https://youtube.com/live/IiyJfT6hsnA?feature=share 👉 https://youtube.com/live/IiyJfT6hsnA?feature=share 👉 https://youtube.com/live/IiyJf…

❤7🔥6🤯4

5 Nov 2026, 16:44 UTC≈1,160 views13 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Уже 8 ноября стартует следующий поток курса ZFG Пока вы офигевали от осени и смотрели рациональные чтения, я вовсю готовился к следующему потоку курса по внедрению системы ZFG. ZFG - Zero Focus Given - моя новая система тайм-менеджмента, которая помогает вести дела также эффективно как 9 Списков, но без дотошного оверхэда, викревью и прочих мелочей, из-за которых система со временем ломается. На этот раз поток пос…

🔥7❤4🤯2

5 Nov 2026, 05:26 UTC≈1,270 views27 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

А вы всё ещё не смотрите мой ютуб? Я там квантовое программирование объясняю, между прочим🔥

😍16❤8custom 52516353208976862763

4 Nov 2026, 19:40 UTC≈1,440 views43 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Ты всё ещё думаешь, что понимаешь, как думают нейросети? Позавчера вышла статья, которая полностью меняет то, как мы воспринимаем работу ИИ. Как ты считаешь, нейронки думают? Думаешь, им нужны слова или данные-примеры? Нифига. Современные ЛЛМки умеют напрямую работать с весами других моделей. То есть, производить тонкую настройку другой нейронки просто смотря на... огромный набор цифр. Обычно как мы получали эти …

❤20🤯15custom 52516353208976862768

4 Nov 2026, 16:58 UTC≈1,450 views30 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Комментарии к старым стримам

😎21❤9

4 Nov 2026, 13:16 UTC≈1,490 views22 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Я в видео оставил несколько пасхалок...точнее танцующих ящериц для СДВГ. Сможете найти их всех? Присылайте скриншоты в комментарии👇

🤯14custom 52516353208976862767❤1

4 Nov 2026, 12:22 UTC≈1,540 views13 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Ты правда думал, что Интернет - это доступ к куче информации? | Рациональные чтения Читаем статью с lesswrong с моими комментариями! Думаю, многие из вас уже догадались о какой статье идёт речь - а те, кто ещё нет, бегом смотреть видео!! 👉 https://youtu.be/gTUm-zAN3TY 👉 https://youtu.be/gTUm-zAN3TY 👉 https://youtu.be/gTUm-zAN3TY Как всегда ваши царские ЛАЙКИ и умопомрачительные КОММЕНТАРИИ очень помогают в продвиж…

❤7🔥6

4 Nov 2026, 11:57 UTC≈1,510 views31 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Уже совсем скоро в вашей ютуб ленте...

🔥18🤯8❤5

3 Nov 2026, 14:43 UTC≈1,740 views30 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Зачем люди пьют кофе на работе? И как он вообще влияет на продуктивность и эффективность людей. Может ли он помочь вам в случае, если вы поспали 3 часа вместо заветных 9? Недавно выступил экспертом для статьи в Torrefacto, где ответил на все эти вопросы👇 https://www.torrefacto.ru/blog/coffee-at-work/ Читаем и ставим лайки, господа🔥

❤18🔥12

3 Nov 2026, 01:59 UTC≈1,800 views59 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

С добрым утром Помните 2 недели назад было 32к?

❤42custom 525163532089768627610🔥7

1 Nov 2026, 19:11 UTC≈2,030 views20 reactionsread 7 November 2026

https://votyakov.com/reviews

🔥14🥰6

27 Oct 2026, 15:15 UTC≈3,100 views56 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Артём написал ОГРОМНЫЙ лонгрид, но мне было очень приятно это читать Вот и вы почитайте

❤27🔥20custom 52516353208976862769

Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @votyakov_ar_life. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTCFinal Results503 voters

Важно ли вам, что думают другие люди?

  1. Я считаю, что мало что знаю, поэтому слушаю других в 90% случаев5%
  2. Да, я часто следую тому, что говорят близкие и знакомые люди. Есть примеры, когда прямо следовал5%
  3. Да, я часто следую тому, что говорят близкие, но ограничиваю этот круг близких. Есть примеры в жизни9%
  4. Я прислушиваюсь, но сам принимаю решения. Есть кейсы как следования, так и нет60%
  5. Нет, я прислушиваюсь, но обычно другие люди плохо меня понимают, поэтому действую сам.10%
  6. Нет, прислушиваюсь редко. Делаю всё сам чаще6%
  7. Нет, я не прислушиваюсь даже. Не люблю чужое мнение, делаю всё сам обычно2%
  8. Другое (напишу в комментариях)2%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Поступашки - Олимпиады, ЕГЭ, ДВИ
@postupashki · 31,887
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 6 September 2026
Глеб Соломин 🚀 24.05.2025
@gleb_solomin · 61,705
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026
Young&&Yandex
@Young_and_Yandex · 113,001
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
Поступашки - ШАД, Стажировки и Магистратура
@postypashki_old · 47,077
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 August 2026
Grand Exam - Арсений Филин
@grandexam_ege · 47,628
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
Максим Коваль. ЕГЭ по математике
@MO_EGE · 81,180
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
ШАГ | поступление в Университет
@stepbyshag · 68,450
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
Мастриды
@mustreads · 44,988
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
Таня Коваль. ЕГЭ по русскому языку
@TatiashkaEGE · 62,111
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Никита Мешин | Экстремум | Профильная Математика
@EXtremumMath · 36,483
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 5 September 2026
Т-Образование
@tbank_education · 113,580
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
Профиматика | ЕГЭ по Математике | Игорь Уколов и Влад Вуль
@profimatika · 47,311
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
ОГЭ по математике с Настей
@nagibatorOGE · 34,685
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Вотяков | Саморазвитие” (@votyakov_ar_life), 7,391 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/votyakov_ar_life.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.