Задать вопрос во Всероснутых:
@vserosnutye_bot
Наш олимпиадний цирк
https://t.me/vserosmem
@Aim_for_the_horizon — покупка рекламы
С вопросом «Почему мой пост не опубликовали?» просьба не писать
TG Атриума:
https://t.me/chemistryatrium
Created
Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net +71. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,590–16,686 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 01:56
16,675
+17
12 Aug 2026, 22:32
16,658
+6
12 Aug 2026, 00:53
16,652
+9
10 Aug 2026, 22:07
16,643
+19
10 Aug 2026, 00:02
16,624
+10
9 Aug 2026, 01:13
16,614
+13
8 Aug 2026, 03:06
16,601
-3
7 Aug 2026, 12:15
16,604
first reading
Engagement
222 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.25%
avg views ÷ 16,675 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,040
222 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
222
of 222 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 169 of 222 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
222 (6 August 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
231,386
Reactions total
1,291
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 03:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,160
Videos
≈92
Links
≈1,190
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,291 reactions across 163 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
639
49.5%
❤🔥
227
17.6%
👎
50
3.87%
custom 5305768148098641065
49
3.80%
⚡
46
3.56%
🔥
38
2.94%
🥰
36
2.79%
👍
32
2.48%
😡
27
2.09%
💘
18
1.39%
🫡
18
1.39%
🌚
14
1.08%
💯
14
1.08%
😁
13
1.01%
🤨
13
1.01%
🤯
8
0.62%
🐳
7
0.542%
🤪
7
0.542%
🤔
6
0.465%
🤬
6
0.465%
13 further kinds
23
1.78%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 169 of the 222 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,291reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 222 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇷🇺 104 медали: итоги международного олимпиадного сезона
Международный олимпиадный сезон подходит к концу, и результаты российских школьников впечатляют. За год ребята выступили на почти всех крупных международных олимпиадах, где встретились сильнейшие ученики со всего мира.
Соревнования охватили самые разные направления: точные науки вроде физики, химии и математики, естественно-научные дисциплины, гуманитарные пр…
#немецкий
Ребят, кто учит языки, как вы учите лексику? Нет такого что нарешиваете задания, но как будто нет эффекта, и в нужный момент все вылетает из головы и пишется наугад?
Немцам повезло, сейчас идет челлендж по подготовке к лексике-грамматике всеросса по немецкому.
Там дают методы подготовки и стратегии решения, чтобы получать 15+ за лексику-грамматику. Присоединяйтесь
Физики, напоминаем, что сегодня — последний день скидок на основные курсы по физике от Атриума 🔄
— Мощный педсостав
— Удобное деление на блоки
— Курс под каждый класс
Ждем вас! 👀
#физика #атриум
#история #шпцм
всем привет!
хочу спросить про про шпцм, если я переведусь туда, то у меня будет шанс попасть в сборную Москвы? смогу ли я продолжать учиться по факту в своей старой школе, а сборной быть онлайн?
#химия
Ребята кто учился в Атриуме, скажите, он хорошо готовит к олимпиадам? Есть шанс пройти на всерос? Стоит ли брать полный курс по химии в 10 классе? Действительно хорошая школа?
#другое
Как бороться со страхом муниципального этапа? Мне все время кажется, что я его завалю, что кто-то лучше готовился/спишет, я не смогу пройти на рег (у нас мало кто проходит) и все силы и средства (а денег вложено не мало) пройдут впустую. Как с этим страхом бороться? Что вы делаете в таких ситуациях? Заранее спасибо за ответы!
#бот
Как ботать, если я отбитый? И каждую неделю на после пятничных спаррингов всё больше и больше отбитый
❤10
Showing the 12 most recent of 222 posts we hold for @vserosnutye. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
# биология
Админ, пропусти пожалуйста
Ребята- биологи, кто покупал/ покупает курс от Атриума, подскажите пожалуйста, как вы поступали : покупали весь курс или покупали какой-то один блок?
Весь сразу20%
Определенный блок10%
Тык70%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Филиал ВШЭ или обычный региональный вуз (лингвистика)?
Филиал ВШЭ46%
УРФУ8%
КФУ15%
Другое1%
Послать родителей и перепоступать в Москву на следующий год53%
Тык14%
The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 222 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 482,296 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ВСЕРОСНУТЫЕ” (@vserosnutye), 16,675 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vserosnutye.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.