❗️ Камрады, пришли границы 3-го тура ФизТеха по математике! Все ровно так, как мы предполагали после первого тура, проходные баллы второго тура вот такие: ➡️ Физика для всех классов: Призер 9 баллов Победитель 10 баллов ➡️ Математика для всех классов: Призер — Победитель 10 баллов На естественный вопрос о том, что делать, если вы писали все отборы без нейронок и не прошли на закл? А вот тут организаторы ФизТеха …

Channel
Поступашки - Олимпиады, ЕГЭ, ДВИ
@postupashki
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
31,941subscribers
+951 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001181415520 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @postupashki |
| Created | 4 June 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/postupashki |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 16:45 | 31,941 | +17 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 12:38 | 31,924 | +22 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 03:20 | 31,902 | +9 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 19:20 | 31,893 | +6 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 14:31 | 31,887 | +15 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 19:50 | 31,872 | +1 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 23:00 | 31,871 | -8 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:47 | 31,879 | +24 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 22:27 | 31,855 | -11 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 20:36 | 31,866 | -7 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 22:46 | 31,873 | -3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 21:37 | 31,876 | -7 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 19:27 | 31,883 | -8 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 20:18 | 31,891 | +5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 21:28 | 31,886 | +13 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 19:18 | 31,873 | -13 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:37 | 31,886 | -8 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 23:07 | 31,894 | +18 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:31 | 31,876 | +82 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:31 | 31,794 | first reading |
Engagement
79 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 181 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 26.2%
- avg views ÷ 31,941 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 8,370
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 79 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 79 (23 July 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 159,000 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 12:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 23s
- Average length
- 23s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 2.53%
- 2 of 79 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 2
- posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 8,020
- over 2 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 9,370
- over 77 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2Vtzqw7zqKA | 1 | 18 September 2026 | 18 September 2026 |
| 2sHEdXsRKBrj13jdrEQoDg8bRhzN28LbDbiAzQ354evvoxTWG4bf1JgU | 1 | 30 July 2026 | 30 July 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 79 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (21.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Школьников бесплатно подготовят к ВсОШ Т-Образование запускает онлайн-сборы для школьников 7—11-х классов сразу по пяти направлениям: математике, информатике, физике, искусственному интеллекту и информационной безопасности. Авторы ВсОШ помогут разобрать задания прошлых олимпиад и дадут практические советы. Также участников ждут консультации и пробные олимпиады по физике и информатике. Обсуждать задания с другими шк…
❗️ Товарищи, а вот и разбор отборочного этапа олимпиады Верченко Для всех, кто ещё не записался на нашу осеннюю олимпиадную школу, делюсь основной информацией про отбор: ➡️ Задачи одинаковые (отличаться могут только цифры) ➡️ Отбор идет до 22 ноября ➡️ Задачи несложные, но нужно разобраться ➡️ Всего 6 задач: на все только ответы, без решений ➡️ На всё даётся 240 минут Да, сама олимпиада в этом году в перечне с II …
Будущим студентам и выпускникам вузов на заметку. Forbes опубликовал рейтинг лучших работодателей России за 2026 год. Из 222 компаний только 30 получили высшую, платиновую категорию. В списке не только привычные для молодых специалистов «Альфа-Банк и Т-Банк, но и крупные промышленные компании — «Норникель», АЛРОСА, «Полюс», «Полиметалл». Причём промышленность сегодня-это далеко не только работа непосредственно на про…
❗️ Товарищи, результаты третьего отбора ФизТеха пришли! Результаты по математике доступны, если вы не согласны с результатами, то вы можете подать апелляцию. Для желающих чекнуть официальные решения прикрепил скрины! По границе пока точной инфы нет (будет через несколько дней) скорее всего 10/10 для прохода на закл (задачи были как будто самыми легкими из всех потоков, поэтому шансы на проход ниже 10 бесконечно малы…
❗️ Товарищи, условия олимпиады БИБН! Ну что, все получилось решить? Выглядит все тащибельно, если хотите себя проверить, то изучите короткий идейный разбор в комментах! Обсудить свои решения и задачи можно в комментариях, или у нас в боталке 🔗
❗️ Товарищи, решения всех задач ФизТеха за 11-ый класс! Если вы хотите еще больше деталей, то загляните в наш ТГК с задачками, ну и конечно не забывайте про поступашкинский курс подготовки к перечневым олимпиадам, на котором мы, в том числе, разбираемся со всеми отборочными этапами! А до конца дня действует хорошая скидочка 🎁 P.S. Условия всех задач можно найти в комментариях под постом!
❗️ Товарищи, а вот и разбор отборочного этапа олимпиады СПбГУ Для всех, кто ещё не записался на нашу осеннюю олимпиадную школу, делюсь основной информацией про отбор: ➡️ Задачи могут меняться ➡️ Отбор идет до 1 декабря, но не тянем ➡️ Задачи классические, но простые ➡️ Всего 4 задачи: на первые 2 ответ, на последние - решения ➡️ На всё даётся 90 минут, поэтому чекать разбор обязательно Да, сама олимпиада в этом го…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Решай ИТ-задачи и получай бонусы при поступлении Олимпиада PROD от Т-Образования и Центрального университета в партнерстве с НИУ ВШЭ приглашает учеников 8—11-х классов познакомиться с промышленной разработкой. Участники попробуют решать задачи по созданию интерфейсов, серверной логике, мобильной разработке и MLOps — направлениям, с которыми работают специалисты ИТ-компаний. Для первого этапа хватит школьных знаний …
❗️ Камрады, пришли границы 2-го тура ФизТеха по математике! Все ровно так, как мы предполагали после первого тура, проходные баллы второго тура вот такие: ➡️ 9 класс: Призер 9 баллов Победитель 10 баллов ➡️ 10 класс: Призер 9 баллов Победитель 10 баллов ➡️ 11 класс: Призер — Победитель 10 баллов На естественный вопрос о том, что делать, если вы не прошли обязательно подписывайтесь на канал и уже в финальном трет…
Showing the 12 most recent of 79 posts we hold for @postupashki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@postupashki edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 22 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 7 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 15 posts on @postupashki as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 27 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 6 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 3 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 5
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ну что, камрады, как ваше поступление? Куда учиться пойдете?
- МГУ15%
- МФТИ14%
- ВШЭ12%
- МГТУ6%
- МИФИ7%
- СПБГУ4%
- ИТМО11%
- Другое место32%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 79 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@natalia_zakharova_math · 3,5392 postsВнебрачный сын Буля | ВСБ
@hahhhahahhahah · 1,0131 post@olimp_way / olympberry- разоблачение
@olymp_way · 1,1091 postПоступление на ФЭФМ Физтеха
@roadtothemipt · 21 postSafe Olympic space | Подготовка к олимпиадам по математике
@safe_olympic_space · 1261 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@botalkaa · 7,60011 postsПоступашки - ШАД, Стажировки и Магистратура
@postypashki_old · 47,20010 postsПоступашки - экономика
@postupashki_economics · 1,3055 postsProblems
@matproblems · 5,1664 postsОлимпиада «Физтех»
@Olymp_Phystech · 7,1934 postsПоступашки - Физика
@postupashki_physics · 6,2353 postsПоступашки - Информатика
@postupashki_prog · 1,8482 postsЯндекс Образование
@Education_Yandex · 38,1251 postФинунивер | Миссия выполнима
@mission_fa · 5,8781 postНорникель
@nornickel_official · 14,2531 postВсеволод про математику
@VseProMath · 4481 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@DA_shkolkovo · 14,963#1
@postypashki_old · 47,200#2
@mvbplace · 2,302#3
@postupashki_physics · 6,235#4
@vserosnutye · 21,442#5
@kinenergy228 · 1,293#6
@postypashki_mems · 5,867#7
@fcs_hse · 14,725#8
@votyakov_ar_life · 7,411#9
@tbank_education · 113,666#10
@Young_and_Yandex · 113,002#11
@ellphony · 624#12
@yandex_kruzhok · 12,699#13
@olymp_mephi · 15,754#14
@chad_protocol · 12,403#15
@boilingmephi · 29,611#16
@miptschool · 7,539#17
@algoses · 12,206#18
@vyshmath · 16,898#19
@dano_hse · 7,932#20
@miptru · 21,510#21
@msuthefirst · 29,584#22
@centroidall53608 · 845#23
@vsosh_olymp · 5,423#24
@Econ_Talk_NES · 4,059#25
@sbornik_olprog · 2,436#26
@telemathus · 8,785#27
@t_prod · 8,452#28
@olymp_hub · 1,775#29
@fpmi_abitu_news · 1,753#30
@matesha_shad · 5,341#31
@oleconomics · 7,145#32
@miptcapybara · 747#33
@stepbyshag · 68,353#34
@econ_book · 5,852#35
@t_gen_alg · 7,904#36
@mt_circles · 7,980#37
@highalgebra · 493#38
@infkege · 6,702#39
@olymp_bmstu · 10,501#40
@itmoru · 15,920#41
@cshsedpo · 5,966#42
@hse_official · 30,035#43
@olproger · 616#44
@math_olimp_alles · 2,587#45
@MO_EGE · 81,482#46
@grandexam_ege · 47,506#47
@t_central_university · 14,352#48
@olympgeom · 9,790#49
@overmindv · 892#50
@BDataScienceM · 3,743#51
@anton_0reshkin · 2,592#52
@physics_with_3ai4enok · 3,317#53
@votyakov_university · 3,476#54
@trushinbv · 11,588#55
@LyutayaFizika · 4,369#56
@cme_channel · 12,826#57
@Physicist_notes · 4,265#58
@radmirshaikhutdinov · 1,647#59
@itmoenter · 5,062#60
@informatik_bu · 17,750#61
@inside_hse · 22,405#62
@itsmelagnese · 7,403#63
@v_poiskah_productivnosti · 173#64
@geometrykanal · 9,810#65
@averageCFenjoyer · 814#66
@kusaka_daily · 1,499#67
@profimatika · 47,712#68
@TatiashkaEGE · 63,681#69
@profkom_phystech · 5,661#70
@pk_bmstu · 23,284#71
@klshov · 381#72
@vsosh_aa · 3,755#73
@itreap · 236#74
@thesolution_physics · 2,393#75
@arty_botaet · 232#76
@csposvyat2024 · 772#77
@xixixaxadada · 543#78
@cpp784 · 302#79
@gleb_solomin · 61,803#80
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@stepbyshag · 68,353
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
@postypashki_old · 47,200
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 August 2026
@miptru · 21,510
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 September 2026
@grandexam_ege · 47,506
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
@msuthefirst · 29,584
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
@tbank_education · 113,666
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
@Young_and_Yandex · 113,002
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
@boilingmephi · 29,611
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 8 September 2026
@provuz · 28,662
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
@sirius_notification · 23,986
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 October 2026
@alexei_savvateev · 35,626
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 3 September 2026
@MO_EGE · 81,482
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
@vserosnutye · 21,442
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 October 2026
@TatiashkaEGE · 63,681
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
@matolimp · 31,905
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 6 September 2026
@hse_official · 30,035
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
@mathmsu · 23,194
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 September 2026
@Education_Yandex · 38,125
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
@codeforces_official · 71,564
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
@infa_vikusya · 47,228
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
@sanyaebonit · 87,476
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
@flash_ege · 45,610
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
@pk_bmstu · 23,284
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
@studyfaculty · 43,541
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Поступашки - Олимпиады, ЕГЭ, ДВИ” (@postupashki), 31,941 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/postupashki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.