👥 Задания отбора Высшей Пробы! В этот раз нам дали тест! Ну что как ваши впечатления? Все решили, товарищи?

Channel
Поступашки - Олимпиады, ЕГЭ, ДВИ
@postupashki
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
31,333subscribers
+343 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001181415520 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @postupashki |
| Description | Вся основная информация про школьные олимпиады, ЕГЭ и ДВИ По всем вопросам: @menshe_treh Группа ВК: https://vk.com/postypashki Наш сайт: https://postypashki.ru/ Канал: https://www.youtube.com/Postupashki |
| Created | 4 June 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/postupashki |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 19:19 | 31,333 | +165 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:57 | 31,168 | -36 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:21 | 31,204 | +46 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:20 | 31,158 | +44 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 31,114 | -3 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:59 | 31,117 | +69 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 21:16 | 31,048 | +62 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 15:22 | 30,986 | +13 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:37 | 30,973 | +35 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:26 | 30,938 | +14 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:26 | 30,924 | +13 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 30,911 | +8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 30,903 | +9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:48 | 30,894 | -29 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:52 | 30,923 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 30,922 | +11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 30,911 | -24 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:35 | 30,935 | -12 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 30,947 | +11 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 30,936 | first reading |
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 84 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 23.8%
- avg views ÷ 31,333 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 7,450
- 17 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 17
- of 47 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 47 (23 July 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 126,580 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 03:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,040
- Videos
- ≈85
- Links
- ≈1,030
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 23s
- Average length
- 23s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 4.26%
- 2 of 47 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 2
- posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 7,930
- over 2 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 9,140
- over 45 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2Vtzqw7zqKA | 1 | 18 September 2026 | 18 September 2026 |
| 2sHEdXsRKBrj13jdrEQoDg8bRhzN28LbDbiAzQ354evvoxTWG4bf1JgU | 1 | 30 July 2026 | 30 July 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 27 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
❗️ Товарищи, а вот и разбор отборочного этапа олимпиады «Изумруд» Для всех, кто ещё не записался на нашу осеннюю олимпиадную школу, делюсь основной информацией про отбор: ➡️ На отборочном этапе есть прокторинг ➡️ Отбор идет до 19 января, но не тянем ➡️ Задачи классические, но простые ➡️ Всего 10 задач, каждая по 10 баллов ➡️ На всё даётся 60 минут, поэтому чекать разбор обязательно Да, сама олимпиада в этом году в…
❗️ БВИ отменят, а прием в ВУЗы полностью сломается в 2027 году! Я получил сегодня около дюжины сообщений с подобным посылом, но давайте не волноваться и аккуратно разбираться в ситуации. Вчера Минобрнауки опубликовало проект изменений порядка приёма и проект изменения перечня вступительных испытаний. Сразу важное: пока это проект, а не окончательно утверждённые правила. Но если изменения примут в нынешнем виде (про …
Почему 100-балльники и олимпиадники БРОСАЮТ МФТИ и ВШЭ? 😱 В этом году на IT-направлениях произошел тектонический сдвиг. Ребята с топовыми баллами массово отказываются от исторических гигантов и забирают свои документы. Мы взяли интервью у первокурсников Центрального Университета. Никаких сглаживаний углов — только живая правда от тех, кто сделал этот выбор. О чем рассказали студенты без цензуры: ⚫️Почему историче…
ℹ️ Отборов все больше! Камрады, отборочные туры уже ближе, важный дедлайн уже завтра, поэтому сохраняем себе пост и, конечно не забываем про нашу осеннюю школу по подготовке к олимпиадам 👥 (на ней мы, в частности, разбираем задачи из отборов этого года, которые, судя по тенденции, будут совсем непростыми)! Ладно, давайте к делу: ➡️ Олимпиада Высшая проба (1 уровень) Тут советую прямо не откладывать, регистрация зак…
🧡 МАТЕМАТИКО-ИНЖЕНЕРНЫЙ ПРЕДПРОФИЛЬ С РУДН ДЛЯ 7–8 КЛАССОВ Если вас не устраивает текущий школьный формат, ребёнку тесно в рамках обычной программы и вы хотите уже в 7–8 классе выстроить более сильную образовательную траекторию с фокусом на дальнейшее поступление в вуз — в «Олимп-Плюс» можно совместить школьное обучение с математико-инженерным предпрофилем, разработанным совместно с РУДН. Ребёнок зачисляется в школ…
Как понять, подходит ли тебе IT, ещё до поступления в вуз? Можно попробовать себя в настоящей командной работе, например, на хакатоне «Идея Фикс». За два месяца школьники создадут собственный IT-продукт: ИИ-помощника для учёбы, игровой сервис или инструмент, который помогает учителям справляться с рутинными задачами. И главное, здесь не обязательно уметь программировать. В IT-команде нужны не только разработчики: м…
Камрады, сейчас вы должны задать себе только один вопрос: хотите ли вы заботать олимпиады, взять диплом и поступить в топовые ВУЗы без проблем, без запар и сложностей, пока ЕГЭшники будут пытаться наскрести свои 310 баллов и все равно в итоге облажаются? Если хотите, то лучшего варианта для подготовки, чем осенняя школа по математике вы найти не сможете. Нигде в других местах вас не будут дергать, чтобы вы писали от…
ЕГЭ-2027 меняет правила: чего ждать абитуриентам? Можно хорошо написать ЕГЭ и всё равно не поступить туда, куда рассчитывали. Баллы важны, но без понимания правил приёма и стратегии поступления их может оказаться недостаточно. 24 сентября эксперты школы «Летово» и приемной комиссии МГУ проведут бесплатный вебинар о ЕГЭ и поступлении в 2027 году. Новые демоверсии ЕГЭ уже опубликованы, требования и правила меняются.…
Как научиться "чувствовать" геометрические задачи? Мне кажется, что практически у любого школьника геома идет хуже алгебры: ну вот прямо очень редко можно найти учащихся, которые обладали бы высоким уровнем геометрической культуры или развитой геометрической интуицией. При этом, если посмотреть на дореволюционные/раннесоветские педагогические журналы, то там что-то данная проблема не очень-то поднимается (больше ста…
Запись на трехмесячную осеннюю смену Поступашкинских курсов по математике уже открыта, товарищи! Записываемся 🎉 Хочешь получить диплом перечневой олимпиады, который дает возможность поступить в ВУЗ без экзаменов, или получить 100 баллов за ЕГЭ? Боишься не успеть подготовиться? Или пролететь из-за проваленного отборочного? Тогда тебе к нам! У нас ты получишь: ➡️ 100+ часов занятий разного уровня по всем темам ➡️ …
Чем занимаются аналитики и как им стать Аналитика является популярным вариантом для начала карьера для тех, кто не нашел себя в разработке, кому ближе математика. С аналитике нередко начинают ребята, которым интересен дата сайнс и мл, ибо порог входа сюда намного ниже и все эти навыки в дальнейшем пригодятся в DS. Также по аналогичным причинам с аналитики начинают ребята, которым интересен менеджмент. На рынке труд…
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @postupashki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@postupashki edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 22 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 19 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ну что, камрады, как ваше поступление? Куда учиться пойдете?
- МГУ15%
- МФТИ14%
- ВШЭ12%
- МГТУ6%
- МИФИ7%
- СПБГУ4%
- ИТМО11%
- Другое место32%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 27 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@natalia_zakharova_math · 3,5302 postsВнебрачный сын Буля | ВСБ
@hahhhahahhahah · 1,0971 post@olimp_way / olympberry- разоблачение
@olymp_way · 1,1111 postПоступление на ФЭФМ Физтеха
@roadtothemipt · 21 postSafe Olympic space | Подготовка к олимпиадам по математике
@safe_olympic_space · 1251 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@postypashki_old · 45,53110 postsПоступашки - экономика
@postupashki_economics · 8833 postsБоталка - ЧОК «Поступашки»
@botalkaa · 7,4442 postsЯндекс Образование
@Education_Yandex · 37,9591 postФинунивер | Миссия выполнима
@mission_fa · 5,6611 postНорникель
@nornickel_official · 14,2641 postВсеволод про математику
@VseProMath · 4191 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@DA_shkolkovo · 13,502#1
@postypashki_old · 45,531#2
@mvbplace · 2,372#3
@postupashki_physics · 5,993#4
@vserosnutye · 19,464#5
@kinenergy228 · 1,296#6
@postypashki_mems · 5,887#7
@fcs_hse · 14,370#8
@votyakov_ar_life · 7,177#9
@tbank_education · 113,416#10
@Young_and_Yandex · 111,329#11
@ellphony · 638#12
@yandex_kruzhok · 12,820#13
@olymp_mephi · 15,018#14
@chad_protocol · 11,571#15
@boilingmephi · 29,535#16
@miptschool · 7,541#17
@algoses · 12,093#18
@vyshmath · 16,363#19
@dano_hse · 7,602#20
@miptru · 21,149#21
@msuthefirst · 28,215#22
@centroidall53608 · 842#23
@vsosh_olymp · 5,393#24
@Econ_Talk_NES · 3,983#25
@sbornik_olprog · 2,427#26
@telemathus · 8,755#27
@t_prod · 7,085#28
@olymp_hub · 1,814#29
@fpmi_abitu_news · 1,734#30
@matesha_shad · 5,147#31
@oleconomics · 6,866#32
@miptcapybara · 746#33
@stepbyshag · 69,627#34
@econ_book · 5,566#35
@t_gen_alg · 8,005#36
@mt_circles · 7,792#37
@highalgebra · 490#38
@infkege · 6,791#39
@olymp_bmstu · 10,051#40
@itmoru · 15,801#41
@cshsedpo · 6,009#42
@hse_official · 29,914#43
@olproger · 607#44
@math_olimp_alles · 2,532#45
@MO_EGE · 76,337#46
@grandexam_ege · 48,672#47
@t_central_university · 14,057#48
@olympgeom · 9,700#49
@overmindv · 882#50
@BDataScienceM · 3,710#51
@anton_0reshkin · 2,624#52
@physics_with_3ai4enok · 3,247#53
@votyakov_university · 3,515#54
@trushinbv · 11,471#55
@LyutayaFizika · 4,266#56
@cme_channel · 12,722#57
@Physicist_notes · 4,222#58
@radmirshaikhutdinov · 1,661#59
@itmoenter · 5,062#60
@informatik_bu · 16,749#61
@inside_hse · 20,995#62
@itsmelagnese · 7,552#63
@v_poiskah_productivnosti · 177#64
@geometrykanal · 9,733#65
@averageCFenjoyer · 815#66
@kusaka_daily · 1,514#67
@profimatika · 43,404#68
@TatiashkaEGE · 52,966#69
@profkom_phystech · 5,630#70
@pk_bmstu · 23,773#71
@klshov · 399#72
@vsosh_aa · 3,609#73
@itreap · 239#74
@thesolution_physics · 2,446#75
@arty_botaet · 232#76
@csposvyat2024 · 775#77
@xixixaxadada · 522#78
@cpp784 · 298#79
@gleb_solomin · 59,630#80
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@stepbyshag · 69,627
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
@postypashki_old · 45,531
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 August 2026
@miptru · 21,149
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 September 2026
@grandexam_ege · 48,672
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
@msuthefirst · 28,215
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
@tbank_education · 113,416
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
@Young_and_Yandex · 111,329
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
@boilingmephi · 29,535
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 8 September 2026
@provuz · 29,006
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
@alexei_savvateev · 34,074
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 3 September 2026
@MO_EGE · 76,337
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
@TatiashkaEGE · 52,966
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
@matolimp · 31,697
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 6 September 2026
@hse_official · 29,914
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
@mathmsu · 21,658
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 September 2026
@Education_Yandex · 37,959
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
@codeforces_official · 72,808
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
@infa_vikusya · 44,546
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
@sanyaebonit · 82,508
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
@flash_ege · 45,938
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
@pk_bmstu · 23,773
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
@studyfaculty · 43,981
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 5 September 2026
@egeoge100ballov · 28,794
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
@gleb_solomin · 59,630
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Поступашки - Олимпиады, ЕГЭ, ДВИ” (@postupashki), 31,333 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/postupashki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.