11 measurements spanning 11 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,723–10,788 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 13:59
10,735
-6
16 Aug 2026, 04:26
10,741
-3
14 Aug 2026, 13:16
10,744
-8
13 Aug 2026, 06:04
10,752
-6
12 Aug 2026, 08:23
10,758
-14
11 Aug 2026, 08:33
10,772
-8
10 Aug 2026, 05:44
10,780
+3
9 Aug 2026, 03:54
10,777
+46
8 Aug 2026, 03:00
10,731
+1
7 Aug 2026, 05:10
10,730
-7
6 Aug 2026, 06:45
10,737
first reading
Engagement
89 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.2%
avg views ÷ 10,735 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,390
89 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
89
of 89 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
89 (4 August 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
212,339
Reactions total
6,075
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
37s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,940 reactions across 71 posts, in 61 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
821
16.6%
🤣
581
11.8%
❤
559
11.3%
🤡
493
9.98%
😁
468
9.47%
custom 6248851689655240475
271
5.49%
custom 5294499970685085923
209
4.23%
🔥
188
3.81%
custom 5222029789203804982
142
2.87%
👍
120
2.43%
🤝
105
2.13%
custom 6251246249886877541
87
1.76%
⚡
84
1.70%
🤗
77
1.56%
😢
68
1.38%
👎
51
1.03%
🙏
50
1.01%
✍
49
0.992%
💩
43
0.87%
🗿
35
0.709%
41 further kinds
439
8.89%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 89 of the 89 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,075reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 89 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Посмотрели на стриме видос с Рабкора "Стратегия российских левых на пятом году СВО". Всё видео унылые леваки, сидящие в Париже кидались обвинениями и выясняли, кто из них мудак, а кто крутой. Обмусоливали какие-то обвинения в адрес друг друга. В чём заключается их стратегия и успехи, никто так и не сказал.
Всё как всегда у леваков.
Из плюсов в комментах вот отметили что ведущая красивая, но других плюсов я не увидел…
Друзья, начинаем, заходим. Посмотрим видео с Рабкора где российские леваки в Париже решают, что же им теперь делать, как приближать революцию в России.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCbyVGlCgNs
В Маастрихте жара, друзья, и до вечера никуда выходить особо не хочется, так что давайте через полчасика запустим стрим и посмотрим видосы леваков про то, что делать прямо сейчас.
Неудачники без друзей и личной жизни, кому нечем заняться днём в теплую летнюю субботу, залетайте.
Кстати, идея для следующего стрима - смотреть охуительные видосы леваков с охуительной аналитикой. Не знаю, Рабкор там, например. Ну так, чисто впечатлиться.
Хотя вероятно это будет слишком уныло.
Хорошая иллюстрация к оппозиции. Сидя в кафе в Париже для туристов и педовок сраться из-за выборов в Удмуртии и думать, что от тебя что-то зависит.
Эти люди же максимально оторваны от реальности и вообще её не осознают.
Помню, слышал пару лет назад от людей из этой левой эмигрантской тусовки что мы вот в Париже не просто же так сидим, мы отсюда будем поднимать и руководить массы протестные в России.
Подняли. Руков…
Посмотрели сегодня на стриме Илью Яшина, где он объясняет, что теперь надо делать оппозиции на выборах после снятия Яблока.
Ну и я прям охуел. Там много хорошего.
1) Яшин заверяет, что Яблоко могло победить на выборах, что антивоенные настроения в России массовые. Обосновывает это тем, что он был на свободе в России в первые месяцы войны и видел, что все против. То, что это было больше четырёх лет назад и ситуация …
Начинаем, друзья, подключайтесь
https://kick.com/bomz-paris
Там Илья Яшин выкатил план, что нам всем делать на выборах, очередной план победы от Ильи Яшина. Предлагаю посмотреть его, а потом перейти к просмотру "Ненависти". Илья Яшин и Ненависть, что может быть лучше?
Во Франции конституционный суд отменил закон, принятый ранее парламентом, запрещающий социальные сети несовершеннолетним до 15 лет. Так как посчитал этот закон нарушающим свободу мнений и коммуникаций.
Собственно, то, о чём мы с Денисом Катаевым говорили всегда. Да, конечно, во Франции есть все те же самые поползновения, что и в России. В России запрещают Яблоку участвовать в выборах, а во Франции запрещают Ле Пених…
Французские СМИ напряглись. Все сейчас платят фотку Путина в пилотке и уебищной флотской форме и трепещут, что Путин готов эскалировать войну.
custom 529449997068508592334😁15🤡6☃2
Showing the 12 most recent of 89 posts we hold for @jesuisravchan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@jesuisravchan edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Право на самоопределение и независимость каких народов и регионов вы поддерживаете?
Чечня34%
Абхазия и Южная Осетия50%
Крым44%
Донбасс41%
Косово33%
Хорватские и боснийские сербы52%
Корсика44%
Новая Каледония40%
Каталония и Страна Басков61%
The shares total 399%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 89 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 42,578 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
SVTV NEWS — Либертарианское СМИ @svtvnews · 113,643 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Бомжи в Париже” (@jesuisravchan), 10,735 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jesuisravchan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
