Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Новая звуковая волна

Channel

Новая звуковая волна

@new_soundwave

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,059subscribers

+200 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001242998348
TypeChannel
Username@new_soundwave
DescriptionКанал Кирилла Owen Pitch SPEED-info в мире музыки Контакты, реклама: @kir_kontora Все мои проекты здесь: https://taplink.cc/owenpitch
Created23 November 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/new_soundwave

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 9 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@new_soundwave/27255 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC@kaifology/171375 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC1.0049 minutes
@new_soundwave/27438 · this entry17 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC@kaifology/1723719 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC1.0046 hours
@kaifology/1723318 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC@new_soundwave/27466 · this entry18 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC1.0085 minutes
@kaifology/177499 Nov 2026, 11:01 UTC@new_soundwave/28810 · this entry10 Nov 2026, 15:25 UTC1.0028 hours
@kaifology/1775510 Nov 2026, 15:52 UTC@new_soundwave/28811 · this entry10 Nov 2026, 15:55 UTC1.004 minutes
@partymust/1406310 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC@new_soundwave/27335 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 08:28 UTC1.0016 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@kaifology14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.995.2 hours@kaifology (11–3)
@partymust15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0010 hours@partymust (10–5)
@swideteli13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002.1 hours@swideteli (9–4)
@bogemasranaya10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004.4 hours@bogemasranaya (8–2)
@princessigorrr8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.995.1 hours@princessigorrr (5–3)
@kabinet_memologa8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004.9 hours@kabinet_memologa (5–3)
@errioxa8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.006.7 hours@errioxa (7–1)
@plachunatechno8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002.9 hours@plachunatechno (6–2)
@skvir5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003.6 hours@skvir (3–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 47 of the 49 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 131 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

7,8598,0597,9596 August 2026 — 7,859 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,859 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,860 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,880 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,876 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,894 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,891 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,872 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,869 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,878 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,875 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,871 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,901 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,905 subscribers26 September 2026 — 7,938 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,933 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,956 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,013 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,017 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,016 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,019 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,013 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,006 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,030 subscribers7 November 2026 — 8,055 subscribers10 November 2026 — 8,059 subscribers6 August 202610 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 96 days, net +200. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,829–8,089 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 00:578,059+4
7 Nov 2026, 01:228,055+25
1 Nov 2026, 03:488,030+24
29 Oct 2026, 00:578,006-7
26 Oct 2026, 05:278,013-6
23 Oct 2026, 15:178,019+3
20 Oct 2026, 09:358,016-1
17 Oct 2026, 13:368,017+4
14 Oct 2026, 15:518,013+57
11 Oct 2026, 09:567,956+23
5 Oct 2026, 03:177,933-5
26 Sept 2026, 05:387,938+33
17 Sept 2026, 16:167,905+4
13 Sept 2026, 03:417,901+30
8 Sept 2026, 23:397,871-4
31 Aug 2026, 08:527,875-3
28 Aug 2026, 17:567,878+9
25 Aug 2026, 20:437,869-3
22 Aug 2026, 12:087,872-19
19 Aug 2026, 01:067,891first reading

Engagement

327 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.51%
avg views ÷ 8,059 subscribers
Avg views / post
605
142 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
142
of 327 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 141 of 142 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held327 (4 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total85,978
Reactions total1,955
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 01:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈13,900
Videos
≈2,770
Links
≈17,300

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
32m 13s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 69 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,120 reactions across 304 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁68416.6%
❤‍🔥47111.4%
custom 632583555964207278046011.2%
🔥41210.0%
custom 63254764445415524102977.21%
😭2816.82%
💯2235.41%
💅2115.12%
🤡1834.44%
🥰1523.69%
💔1373.33%
🕊1052.55%
👌1002.43%
⚡832.01%
🫡721.75%
🍾501.21%
👾491.19%
🖕410.995%
🗿320.777%
😢140.34%
6 further kinds631.53%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 323 of the 327 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,317 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 327 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 327 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @new_soundwave. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 327 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 44 of 142 posts held from the last 30 days (31.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 19:05 UTC295 views20 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

ГАЗ ГАЗ

custom 632583555964207278011💅7🤡2

12 Nov 2026, 16:04 UTC400 views12 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

На BC опубликовали топ музыки за октябрь в самых разных жанрах • The Best Electronic Music • The Best Metal • The Best Contemporary Classical Music • The Best Country Music • The Best Field Recordings • The Best Ambient • The Best Jazz • The Best Punk • The Best Hip-Hop Разбираем!

👾6custom 63254764445415524104🔥2

12 Nov 2026, 15:21 UTC285 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️🚫 ❌❌❌ ❌❌❌❌❌❌ отправная точка в серии шоукейсов kontrkult х Griboedov, посвященной звуку и тону отрезка календаря ebm, dark disco, new beat, dark techno & immersive performance ❌❌❌❌ ❌❌❌❌❌❌ ❌❌❌❌❌❌ ❌❌❌❌❌❌ ❌❌❌❌ ⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️Воронежская 2а ⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️⚪️⚪️⚪️tickets

💅1

12 Nov 2026, 14:35 UTC287 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

20.11 АНДЕР — лаборатория звука, клуб в клубе Ритмы в этот раз собираем в подземелье легенд и янгблад Питерского андера CEKTA SEROTONIN CRISIS KATSURA ANNIE MIKHAIL BONDAR от классического техно в хардгрувчик плавно перетекающий в хард бочку, а под утро есть все шансы на притрансованные вибрации 👉 билеты тут

💅1

12 Nov 2026, 13:47 UTC418 views23 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Неиронично ребята из Коробки винила продолжают греть гоев В этот раз с кабанчиков планируют стричь бабки за прослушивание саундтреков к шестой GTA. Не, ну если спрос есть — базара нет. Я и представить не мог, что в 2026 году можно на изи сделать небольшую кассу буквально из воздуха. Самое смешное, что видать есть немало людей, которые готовы платить за этот сомнительный опыт 500-900 рублей. Для сравнения, билет в Г…

😁16😡3custom 63258355596420727803🖕1

12 Nov 2026, 13:43 UTC680 views6 reactionsread 13 November 2026

И ждать его закрытия в 2027 году

💯6

12 Nov 2026, 13:41 UTC≈1,350 views15 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Блин, вот бы пойти в listening-бар, выпить неприлично дорогой cocktail, закусить bruschetta с охуевшей рыбой и послушать ламповый виниловый саунд какого-нибудь альбома ну очень нишевой группы, музыку к которому писали наркоманы в гараже лет так 40 назад.

💅10custom 63258355596420727805

12 Nov 2026, 13:31 UTC427 views7 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

На KEXP выступил крутой шугейз-проект из Таиланда — Slowwves Погнали!

❤‍🔥4😁2👌1

12 Nov 2026, 13:13 UTC406 views18 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @koyechto_dailyPhoto

твой бюджет 2500 что выберешь?

😁11👌6🤔1

12 Nov 2026, 11:21 UTC464 views15 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

Ребятки с Music Camp дропнули интервью с Леной Поповой Смотрим!

🔥9custom 63258355596420727803🤡2👌1

12 Nov 2026, 11:04 UTC409 views13 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @mpfloodPhoto

Ради генерации этой картинки было сожжено два дерева в Амазонке, но я считаю, что оно того стоило!

😁12🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 327 posts we hold for @new_soundwave. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@new_soundwave edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 November 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Nov 2026, 12:10 UTCAnonymous Poll343 voters

Во сколько вам удобнее идти на вечеринку?

  1. Четверг, вечер9%
  2. Пятница, вечер37%
  3. Пятница/суббота — классическая ночь до утра59%
  4. Суббота, день или ранний вечер36%
  5. Воскресенье, дневной формат20%

The shares total 161%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3 Nov 2026, 07:36 UTCAnonymous Poll137 voters

Лучший исполнитель 2026 года по версии НЗВ

  1. Пророк Санбой31%
  2. Альбина Сексова23%
  3. Александр Пистолетов18%
  4. Ганвест12%
  5. Иван Золо15%
  6. Колян Должанский9%
  7. Какой-то кудрявый репер (выглядит как нефор, много автотюна)25%

The shares total 133%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 327 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republished by 50 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.

кое-что
@koyechto_daily · 10,259
6 posts
Sound Wave Showcase
@NSWshowcase · 57
4 posts
Свидетели и Егоры
@swideteli · 24,536
4 posts
Errioxa recommends
@errioxa · 7,233
3 posts
Алёша и музло
@alesha_muzlo · 653
2 posts
БОГЕМА ПИТЕРСКАЯ (светский вестник Москвы)
@bogemasranaya · 30,656
2 posts
Raptail
@dj_raptail · 30
2 posts
на старые дрожжи
@drozhzhzhy · 376
2 posts
вечеринка
@ravememe · 9,593
2 posts
resort
@resortagain · 5,477
2 posts
Ftor Industries
@Ftorinc · 94
1 post
Marepoto
@LatAmAShCh · 585
1 post
soft blade (FKA depth and clarity)
@bladesgosoft · 6,752
1 post
Burning man 2027
@burningman2018 · 3,356
1 post
В углу у колонки
@dancingalone · 13,467
1 post
✨dan PM aka danhel💥
@danhel909 · 123
1 post
на донышке
@dniwwwe · 5,965
1 post
Душнила по вызову
@dooooshno · 752
1 post
Feel Zem
@feel_zem · 7
1 post
Quest For Fire
@fireforquest · 30
1 post
Архитектурный детектив (FUV)
@fuvmap · 9,774
1 post
📯Gorn Records, Inc.
@gornrec · 139
1 post
Густопсовые мемы
@gustopsach · 15,125
1 post
Crazy stuff I found online
@internetiscrazy · 111
1 post
IZHITSA electronix
@izhitsa_records · 196
1 post
KIA Dance
@kiadance · 3,442
1 post
Мемасочная
@kingmemas · 2
1 post
кукольный домик
@kudahudet · 9,294
1 post
ljdmsc + grozdia
@ljdmsc · 213
1 post
luminus
@luminustanya · 584
1 post
meta.brother
@metabrother · 94
1 post
edgy errorik
@moominonaway · 83
1 post
MP Flood
@mpflood · 1,949
1 post
наши берега
@murahi · 480
1 post
nooMoon и вселенная артиста
@nmn_universe · 112
1 post
ТУСОВОЧНЫЙ МАСТ - вечеринки тусовки фестивали бары клубы Мск | Спб
@partymust · 17,363
1 post
POLARZONE
@plzrn_band · 112
1 post
rapture fm
@rapturefm · 137
1 post
РУССКАЯ ИПА
@russianipa · 1,372
1 post
SDPS Radio
@sdpsradio · 37
1 post
SEXY SHAMAN
@shamansexy · 695
1 post
Тупа кволити контент
@skazochnoebalie · 22,757
1 post
Леонардо Ди Ванче
@skvir · 20,797
1 post
КАНАЛ: СЛАДКИЙ АНАЛ
@sladkychannel2 · 4,676
1 post
Sonica not Monica
@sonicanotmonica · 821
1 post
The Cringe Times
@thecringetimes · 16,048
1 post
The Machine Method
@themachinemethod · 76
1 post
тöчносäша
@tochnosasha · 119
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Родной звук
@rodzvuk · 36,430
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
Signal Live
@signal_live · 27,085
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
DAILY DVIZH в МСК СПБ - твой гайд по клубам, фестивалям и выставкам
@dailydvizh · 21,661
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 September 2026
DANCE W!TH US | Вечеринки СПб, тусовки Питера, ночные клубы Петербурга
@dancewithus · 21,273
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 September 2026
Леонардо Ди Ванче
@skvir · 20,797
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 24 September 2026
Русский шаффл
@rushuffle · 44,088
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
Первый ночной
@napervom · 45,124
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
Monas+erio
@monasteriomoscow · 21,211
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 October 2026
Северное техно
@northerntechno · 19,219
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 October 2026
БОГЕМА ПИТЕРСКАЯ (светский вестник Москвы)
@bogemasranaya · 30,656
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 7 September 2026
СТВОЛ
@stvolrecords · 21,810
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 September 2026
kontrkult
@kontrkult · 23,002
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 September 2026
Пойдем со мной | СПб
@poidemspb · 22,201
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
ТусаНаТусе
@tusanatuse · 20,531
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 4 October 2026
ИМИ
@imi_live · 27,480
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 September 2026
psycho daily
@psychodaily · 18,918
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 5 October 2026
ГОРИ ЯСНО
@gori_yasno · 21,931
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 September 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Новая звуковая волна” (@new_soundwave), 8,059 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/new_soundwave.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.