Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мудрости Дао Песдын

Channel

Мудрости Дао Песдын

@dao_pesdyn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

3,042subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001832380745
TypeChannel
Username@dao_pesdyn
Created19 October 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dao_pesdyn

Growth

3,0423,0493,045.57 August 2026 — 3,049 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,049 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,045 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,042 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,041–3,050 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:243,042-3
10 Aug 2026, 05:183,045-4
7 Aug 2026, 08:463,049no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:363,049first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.2%
avg views ÷ 3,042 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,220
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (15 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total22,019
Reactions total757
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

841 reactions across 20 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁20424.3%
🔥18722.2%
11413.6%
🙏728.56%
🥰495.83%
💯384.52%
👏333.92%
🕊263.09%
🤣252.97%
👎172.02%
💋141.66%
🤔121.43%
👍101.19%
💊80.951%
😢70.832%
😡50.595%
💘40.476%
🤝40.476%
💅30.357%
20.238%
4 further kinds70.832%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 841reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
120
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
118
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dao_pesdyn. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC350 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

знаете, для того чтобы лечить болезнь, нужно сначала поставить верный диагноз. но всех адекватных врачей у нас отстранили от врачебной деятельности, и оставили только тех кто лечит лоботомией и кровопусканием

💯12🔥1🕊1

7 Aug 2026, 04:08 UTC495 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @skvirPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

😁21

6 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC614 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026

кейс с проебом Колобка в российском прокате хорошо иллюстрирует что весь этот былинный ренессанс не работает пока кто-то не начнет работать на качество. колобок, чебурашка, домовенок кузя — это конечно здорово, но на бездумной эксплуатации знакомых образов далеко не уедешь. а сейчас из-за чьих-то прихотей должен страдать российский зритель и сами кинотеатры которые несут убытки из-за пустых залов

🕊17💯12

2 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC≈1,230 views58 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

детка прости я не твой бывший тюбик с крашенными ногтями и тревожным расстройством. я немного бруталити и немного мускулинити. но твоему отцу это даже понравится ибо он сечет чо такое мужик с яйцами и неухоженной кутикулой. мы отправим вас с матушкой в комнату, а сами сядем на кухне, включим голубые береты для ушной услады, нарежем колбаски сыровяленой, выпьем по рюмочке беленькой и занюхаем немытыми волосами. естест

🔥37😁145🤣2

1 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC≈1,120 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я почти убежден, что ни один карьерный успех не сравнится со статусом лидера секты. Даже если ты президент. Президентов часто ругают, критикуют, свергают, а когда ты лидер секты тебя натурально боготворят (просто почитайте комменты на канале Артура Ситы). Я бы тоже хотел быть лидером какого-нибудь ведического культа. Ты буквально бог, создающий собственный лор и погружающий в него несмышленую паству. Всех мужиков я

🥰32😁6🙏4💅2

31 Jul 2026, 08:21 UTC≈1,250 views62 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Извечные русские вопросы: Откуда есть пошла земля русская? Нестор Печерский В чем спасение России? Виссарион Белинский Почему Россия не Европа? Петр Чаадаев Какова будущность России? Александр Герцен Кому на Руси жить хорошо? Николай Некрасов Какая судьба уготована России? Николай Бердяев Как нам обустроить Россию? Александр Солженицын Чем мы будем заниматься когда закончится СВО? Владимир Путин

😁47😡53💊3👍1👎1👏1🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 04:24 UTC≈1,210 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Умер исполнитель гимна всех сигмабоев. Думаю каждый хоть раз в ночи одиноко курил под этот трек и что-то понимал

🙏278🕊7💔1

29 Jul 2026, 13:28 UTC≈1,490 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026

надо заметить что на данный момент кадыровское казачество — единственный реальный аналог казаков имперского периода. а все эти кубанские и донские войска это ряженые аниматоры пригодные только для забавной фотосессии и концертных гастролей

18😁6👎4💯1

28 Jul 2026, 15:55 UTC≈1,440 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026

мне кажется демографический кризис в россии как то связан с тем что в детстве мы не могли сходу назвать 10 видов птичек

😁27🤣7👏1🤯1

27 Jul 2026, 17:15 UTC≈1,460 views45 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

На самом деле за яркими красками вселенной Рик и Морти скрывается депрессивная история об эскапизме в духе толстовской Исповеди. Неудивительно что этот ситком так хорошо синхронизируется с минорной русской юдолью. Герои, которые постоянно пытаются сбежать от себя и своей реальности. По факту это жизнь Паши Техника без портальной пушки

🔥36🤝4😁2👎1💯1🫡1

26 Jul 2026, 16:17 UTC≈1,310 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026

с другой стороны я понимаю почему многим импонирует Ева Эльфи. простая провинциальная девочка из сибирской глубинки, которая уже много лет трахается исключительно с одним партнером (лесбийское баловство не в счет). по сути в ней целомудрия больше чем в половине наших девчин. исконная традвайф достойная подражания

🙏397

26 Jul 2026, 16:01 UTC≈1,220 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026

подписчик написал что надо топить за Гилтикуса. династический союз с францией нам обеспечен

31💊5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dao_pesdyn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Jul 2026, 15:46 UTCAnonymous Poll368 voters

За кого отдал бы голос?

  1. Татьяна Ким23%
  2. Виктория Боня13%
  3. Ксюша Собчак17%
  4. Катенька Мизулина5%
  5. Инстасамка6%
  6. Ева Эльфи36%
  7. Иришка Чики-Пики16%
  8. Гилтикус36%

The shares total 152%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 390,081 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мудрости Дао Песдын” (@dao_pesdyn), 3,042 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dao_pesdyn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.