Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Фуфайки Клок

@for5oclock

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

8,883subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001132869648
TypeChannel
Username@for5oclock
DescriptionВ жизни нет ничего важнее мемов. @QuickQueue_bot - публикация в канале по расписанию @for5oclock_bot - предложения, ВП @kolyambiapictures
Created16 July 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/for5oclock

Growth

8,8738,8858,8796 August 2026 — 8,884 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,885 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,873 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,883 subscribers8,8836 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,871–8,887 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 02:148,883+10
9 Aug 2026, 03:548,873-12
6 Aug 2026, 13:508,885+1
6 Aug 2026, 03:218,884first reading

Engagement

153 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.83%
avg views ÷ 8,883 subscribers
Avg views / post
696
153 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.95%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
153
of 153 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 146 of 153 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held153 (5 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total106,476
Reactions total2,014
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
43,900
Videos
32,900
Links
1,340

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
22m 59s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 52 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,829 reactions across 129 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁40121.9%
29015.9%
custom 536873339945014410626214.3%
🤣18310.0%
🥰1699.24%
💯1628.86%
🔥542.95%
👍452.46%
💊412.24%
😢331.80%
🤡231.26%
❤‍🔥150.82%
140.765%
👏130.711%
🤯130.711%
🤮120.656%
custom 5271726628152577724100.547%
😱100.547%
🤩90.492%
🏆80.437%
18 further kinds623.39%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 146 of the 153 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,014reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 153 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC193 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Когда размер ноги примерно 40-43-40

🤣5

12 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC438 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Так можно и обка**ться (звук)

😁6

12 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC574 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤯8🤣43💊2

12 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC533 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @dnoswetVideo

Свет в твоём Дне

custom 536873339945014410610🤡1

12 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC638 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁73🤡1

12 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC601 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @coachstaffPhoto

🤘🏻Тренерский Штаб

😁7custom 53687333994501441062🤮1

12 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC662 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 536873339945014410610💊4

Showing the 12 most recent of 153 posts we hold for @for5oclock. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTCAnonymous Poll34 voters

Какая?

  1. 115%
  2. 26%
  3. 36%
  4. 40%
  5. 515%
  6. 612%
  7. 76%
  8. 815%
  9. 926%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 153 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 15,010 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

На хвосте принесла
@verkablog · 35
4 posts
Котьи новости
@kottti666 · 385
2 posts
Бомжатня
@bomjatnya · 40
1 post
Calendula extract
@calendulaextract · 75
1 post
Диск с приколами
@cdlulz · 8,012
1 post
чайный пакетик
@chai_tg · 8,849
1 post
From nowhere with love
@fromnowherewith_love · 25
1 post
god loves ugly
@god_lovesugly · 19,446
1 post
Густопсовые мемы
@gustopsach · 15,083
1 post
HardMeme Cafe
@hardmemecafe · 9,130
1 post
Мемологиня
@kabinet_memologini · 7,549
1 post
Как продавать онлайн| Юля Кравцова
@kravtsova_ecom · 100
1 post
Литературные беруши
@literushi · 1,687
1 post
Шутки за 299.99
@lowpricedjokes · 153
1 post
Уютненькое Луркоморье | Lurkopub
@lurkomorepub · 7,121
1 post
manarek
@manarek · 14,955
1 post
Министерство Мемов
@memasiz · 7,030
1 post
Долбильня 24/7
@MemDoze · 12,216
1 post
Meme, Kürwa!
@meme_kurwa · 9,503
1 post
Директор твоего очка
@nachalnik_tvoego_o4ka · 21,306
1 post
Хахашечная
@only_haha · 6,380
1 post
отборное говно
@otbornoyegovno · 4,499
1 post
Параноев ковчег
@paranoevkovcheg · 8,662
1 post
Плохой Владлен
@plohoy_vladlen · 4,211
1 post
Верните мне мой 6547
@poluustav · 802
1 post
Выживаю и ем
@readfit · 16
1 post
Леонардо Ди Ванче
@skvir · 20,430
1 post
Генератор искусств
@stable_diffusion_pics · 4
1 post
Свидетели и Егоры
@swideteli · 21,677
1 post
Yobanation🎰
@theyobanation · 9,868
1 post
Тоже хочу канал
@tozhehochucanal · 112
1 post
твитач
@twitachgold · 7,370
1 post
technoporn
@wibbily_wobbly_timey_wimey · 24
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Фуфайки Клок” (@for5oclock), 8,883 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/for5oclock.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.