Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Инфлюэнсарыня

Channel

Инфлюэнсарыня

@influencelady

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,586subscribers

-169 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001611541164
TypeChannel
Username@influencelady
Created26 June 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/influencelady

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,5866,7556,670.56 August 2026 — 6,755 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,755 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,752 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,744 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,740 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,719 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,712 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,700 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,690 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,687 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,680 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,670 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,653 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,645 subscribers26 September 2026 — 6,627 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,591 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,588 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,594 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,654 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,657 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,650 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,630 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,624 subscribers1 November 2026 — 6,609 subscribers4 November 2026 — 6,604 subscribers7 November 2026 — 6,595 subscribers10 November 2026 — 6,586 subscribers6 August 202610 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 96 days, net -169. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,561–6,780 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 11:086,586-9
7 Nov 2026, 08:156,595-9
4 Nov 2026, 02:416,604-5
1 Nov 2026, 10:266,609-15
29 Oct 2026, 19:116,624-6
26 Oct 2026, 20:566,630-20
23 Oct 2026, 21:286,650-7
21 Oct 2026, 01:376,657+3
17 Oct 2026, 18:196,654+60
15 Oct 2026, 02:106,594+6
11 Oct 2026, 23:596,588-3
5 Oct 2026, 02:186,591-36
26 Sept 2026, 16:186,627-18
17 Sept 2026, 14:176,645-8
13 Sept 2026, 07:376,653-17
9 Sept 2026, 05:176,670-10
3 Sept 2026, 15:396,680-7
31 Aug 2026, 16:456,687-3
28 Aug 2026, 21:126,690-10
26 Aug 2026, 03:236,700first reading

Engagement

129 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.3%
avg views ÷ 6,586 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,080
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 129 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 41 of 42 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held129 (30 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total45,184
Reactions total1,102
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 09:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
37m 40s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 50 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,539 reactions across 123 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1,49142.1%
❤67319.0%
🔥38911.0%
❤‍🔥3389.55%
💯1634.61%
💩1073.02%
👀962.71%
🏆832.35%
🤮681.92%
🍾371.05%
👏361.02%
👎240.678%
🆒210.593%
🎉110.311%
custom 522435728352111314220.057%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 124 of the 129 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,539 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 129 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 129 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @influencelady. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 129 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 42 posts held from the last 30 days (9.52%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 19:16 UTC461 views5 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @beck_eventPhoto

🔮 БЭК ✧ FRIDAY THE 13TH пятница 13-е, экстрасенсорика, румпельштильцхен и мистика на танцполе главное событие ночи — ОЛЕГ ШЕПС, звезда «Битвы экстрасенсов» за диджейским пультом с эксклюзивным сетом встречаемся в SUBSTANCE — с панорамным видом на Москву-реку, бильярдом и хоррор атмосферой программа ночи: 🧛🏼 открытый турнир по бильярду 🧛🏼‍♀️ гадание на таро 🧛🏼‍♂️ призы за лучшие костюмы 🧛🏼 тематическое меню 🧛🏼‍♀️ …

💩3❤1🤮1

8 Nov 2026, 17:04 UTC740 views35 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Хочу такое свидание. Я разве многого прошу?

😁30🔥5

8 Nov 2026, 13:25 UTC898 views34 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Хоть бы на 180 не сгорело))

😁27❤‍🔥4👎2custom 52243572835211131421

8 Nov 2026, 12:42 UTC900 views6 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Что-то типа «Кто меня не любит, тот просто мне завидует». *скрин из запрещенной сети.

❤4💩2

8 Nov 2026, 12:21 UTC925 views32 reactions1 Starread 9 November 2026
Photo

Ну чуть-чуть шлюха, ну а с чем еще носить длинную шубу?

🔥22❤5❤‍🔥4💩1

8 Nov 2026, 10:40 UTC976 views39 reactions1 Starread 9 November 2026
Photo

Шагаю в церковь

❤‍🔥25🔥12🍾2

8 Nov 2026, 09:42 UTC≈1,020 views55 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Короче, решила сделать мясо по-французски. Приехали продукты. Я съела профитроли, запила безалкогольным игристым, в общем-то наелась. Вот такая, блядь, хозяюшка.

❤25😁18❤‍🔥9👏3

8 Nov 2026, 08:38 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 9 November 2026

Папещики, что вы готовите, когда хочется вкусно и несильно заморачиваться? (Не бутеры с сыром и колбасой, пожалуйста)

6 Nov 2026, 21:24 UTC≈1,270 views35 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Пришли сейчас на вечеринку, где девочкам максимум 17 лет. Так непривычно видеть женщин без тюнинга… другой мир просто.

❤23😁10💩1💯1

6 Nov 2026, 17:30 UTC≈1,260 views8 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Рождественская пижамная вечеринка в доме Рика и Кэти Хилтон. Гостей угощали мартини Hunky Dory от Кэти, капсулами Tru Niagen Pro и капельницами Shot NAD+.

🔥7❤1

6 Nov 2026, 14:06 UTC≈1,020 views33 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @tvoya_memovnica1Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁33

6 Nov 2026, 10:17 UTC≈1,150 views15 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Forwarded from @collective111Photo

Добавили новые размеры и цвета, а также худи в топовые позиции. Продолжаем транслировать верные посылы, раздавать стиль и созидать качественный шмот. Ссылка на миролюбивый арт с журавлями. А тут ВСËБУДЕТ Россия и подборка для невыездных.

🤮5🔥4❤3💯2🏆1

Showing the 12 most recent of 129 posts we hold for @influencelady. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Захар Гринов
@zahargrinov · 55,231
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 September 2026
БОГЕМА ПИТЕРСКАЯ (светский вестник Москвы)
@bogemasranaya · 30,685
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 7 September 2026
Король Артур
@realgoodmann · 39,675
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026
Леонардо Ди Ванче
@skvir · 20,797
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 24 September 2026
NASTIKA
@nnastika · 25,993
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
ЦП🐴
@tsi_po · 21,125
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 23 September 2026
Maisto
@igormaisto · 102,865
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
Ruslan203
@rus203 · 21,817
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 September 2026
kolokol
@kolokol_media · 79
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Инфлюэнсарыня” (@influencelady), 6,586 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/influencelady.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.