Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Инфлюэнсарыня

Channel

Инфлюэнсарыня

@influencelady

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,627subscribers

-128 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001611541164
TypeChannel
Username@influencelady
Created26 June 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/influencelady

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,6276,7556,6916 August 2026 — 6,755 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,755 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,752 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,744 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,740 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,719 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,712 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,700 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,690 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,687 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,680 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,670 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,653 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,645 subscribers26 September 2026 — 6,627 subscribers6 August 202626 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 51 days, net -128. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,608–6,774 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 16:186,627-18
17 Sept 2026, 14:176,645-8
13 Sept 2026, 07:376,653-17
9 Sept 2026, 05:176,670-10
3 Sept 2026, 15:396,680-7
31 Aug 2026, 16:456,687-3
28 Aug 2026, 21:126,690-10
26 Aug 2026, 03:236,700-12
23 Aug 2026, 07:176,712-7
19 Aug 2026, 21:066,719-21
12 Aug 2026, 23:336,740-4
9 Aug 2026, 20:126,744-8
7 Aug 2026, 05:016,752-3
6 Aug 2026, 10:216,755no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:586,755first reading

Engagement

87 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 87 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
26m 09s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 35 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,437 reactions across 82 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1,03042.3%
❤40716.7%
🔥27811.4%
❤‍🔥25910.6%
💯823.36%
🏆813.32%
💩783.20%
👀632.59%
🤮522.13%
🍾351.44%
👏291.19%
👎170.698%
🆒150.616%
🎉110.451%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 83 of the 87 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,437 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 87 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 87 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @influencelady. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 87 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC289 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Вы посмотрите, какая мразота! Она опускает момент того, что импланты на видео сделаны неправильно, и тем самым прогревает свои услуги. Она вкачивает гель в ягодицы и грудь. Я напоминаю, что инъекции в ягодницы и грудь, приводят в некрозам. Эта сука будет сидеть в тюрьме. *скрин из запрещенной сети

💯4

19 Aug 2026, 23:57 UTC342 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Та самая пенка, которую ты сплевываешь после чистки зубов

😁2

19 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC692 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

На что делает ставку бренд? Для меня загадка.

😁2

19 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC692 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Будет ли следующим амбассадором YOU WANNA Иришка Чики Пики?

😁4❤1

19 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC698 viewsread 20 August 2026
Video

Literally коллекция YOU WANNA x Анастасия Волочкова ИМХО

19 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC748 views9 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

А что за хуй с Кимусей? Она не слезла с черной иглы?

❤7😁2

19 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC803 views20 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Надеюсь, это рассылка от Татьяны Ким

😁20

19 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC799 views8 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Дофаминовый вечер🥰🥰

❤‍🔥7❤1

19 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC821 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Че по Медовому спасу, девочки?

😁5❤1

19 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC925 views13 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Девчонки, вы часто спрашиваете кто же прикрывает мою роскошную грудь… я нашла для вам мастера – Катрин Рейн! Все пестисы изготовлены вручную. Потрясающее качество, обеспечивающее долгий срок службы аксессуара!

❤‍🔥9❤3💩1

19 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC≈1,100 views19 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Канье Вест в Петербурге. Доставайте сервизы из серванта!

😁19

Showing the 12 most recent of 87 posts we hold for @influencelady. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Захар Гринов
@zahargrinov · 51,485
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 September 2026
БОГЕМА ПИТЕРСКАЯ (светский вестник Москвы)
@bogemasranaya · 30,632
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 7 September 2026
Король Артур
@realgoodmann · 40,837
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026
Леонардо Ди Ванче
@skvir · 21,132
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 24 September 2026
NASTIKA
@nnastika · 26,081
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
ЦП🐴
@tsi_po · 21,475
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 23 September 2026
Maisto
@igormaisto · 103,538
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
Ruslan203
@rus203 · 22,203
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 September 2026
КОЛОКОЛ
@kolokol_media · 64,676
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Инфлюэнсарыня” (@influencelady), 6,627 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/influencelady.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.