Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Soo Excited 💅

Channel

Soo Excited 💅

@danaexcited

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,417subscribers

+52 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001928746747
TypeChannel
Username@danaexcited
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/danaexcited

Growth

13,35913,41713,3887 August 2026 — 13,365 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,365 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,359 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,371 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,386 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,402 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,407 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,417 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 9 days, net +52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,350–13,426 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 05:5813,417+10
14 Aug 2026, 14:3613,407+5
13 Aug 2026, 06:4813,402+16
12 Aug 2026, 05:1613,386+15
11 Aug 2026, 04:4213,371+12
8 Aug 2026, 03:3313,359-6
7 Aug 2026, 14:0013,365no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:5913,365first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.4%
avg views ÷ 13,417 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,540
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held26 (4 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total92,120
Reactions total7,471
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 34s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7,471 reactions across 26 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,96126.2%
💯1,34218.0%
🌚1,27417.1%
🔥75010.0%
💅5807.76%
🗿4876.52%
😁3164.23%
💊1471.97%
🍓1151.54%
🤯1021.37%
😭951.27%
👏771.03%
🥴690.924%
🤔640.857%
💔570.763%
💋330.442%
😡20.027%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,471reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 26 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @danaexcited. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC≈2,460 views638 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Дичь какая или семейный отдых на яхте)) 😨 Есть в США такая светская девушка - Брукс Нейдер. Она и для Sports Illustrated снималась, и в "Танцах со звёздами" принимала участие, и с Безосами корешится, и с Тэроном Эджертоном встречалась, и вот сейчас снимается в реинкарнации "Спасателей Малибу" 🍒 Короче, девушка деятельная, яркая, её имя не исчезает из таблоидов, но сюда я её не постила, потому что для русскоязычной

🌚383🗿18529🔥20🤯11🤔4🍓3😁2

14 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC≈2,630 views112 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @whatsgoodbaeVideo

Группа «Стрелки» к Джимми Фэллону сходила с новым треком, про который я уже 2 недели хочу написать пост, но очень лень. Просто знайте (тут я еще думала, что обойдусь тремя предложениями, но, как видите….), что если вам кажется, что на вас пахнуло 2014 годом, вам не кажется - песню написал Эд Ширан))) Как он сам рассказал, случилось это после того, как он в прошлом году услышал «Gnarly», будучи в Мексике, и он загоре

83🔥10🗿9🍓4💋2👏1💅1💯1

13 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈3,250 views267 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Брэд Питт снова пьёт и не любит порно 🤩 Esquire выпустил большое и очень лестное интервью Бреда. Интервьюер оказался фанатом Питта и буквально каждое действие актера описывал с восторгом. Питт признался, что 7 лет не брал ни капли в рот (про сантиметр продолжения не будет), но потом «перестал себя сильно ограничивать». Правда, теперь он уверяет, что пьёт «гораздо сдержаннее», буквально один бокал вина. Брэд бросил

🌚18658🔥8👏4💅4🤔3😁3😭1

13 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC≈3,250 views209 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Кортни Кардашьян снова беременна? Вчера состоялась премьера документального фильма о Трэвисе Баркере, который, кстати, снимался с 2017 года, и пишут, что фильм очень личный и откровенный. Фанаты Blink-182 это для вас) Так вот, сейчас в сети активно обсуждают возможную беременность Кортни из-за того, что на премьере фильма Трэвис активно натирает живот своей жены как волшебную лампу Аладдина. Я не знаю другой причин

🗿125💯4322🤔9🤯4🍓2👏2🥴2

13 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC≈3,310 views183 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Сезон свадеб продолжается…💍 Алессандра Амбросио выходит замуж. Супермодель обручилась с австралийским ювелиром Баком Палмером после двух лет отношений. Алессандра никогда не была замужем, но у нее есть двое взрослых детей от бизнесмена Джейми Мазура. Надеюсь, что свадьба не заставит себя долго ждать, знаем мы таких, которые по 10 лет ходят помолвленные… 💎 SOO EXCITED 💎

136🔥21🍓13👏6💅4🥴3

12 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC≈3,510 views221 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Рианна на обложке Elle 💅 Рири стала героиней сентябрьского номера журнала. В индустрии, известной тем, что женщин перемалывают и выплевывают, заставляя работать до изнеможения, она решила сохранить что-то от себя. Только она знает, когда, или даже если, она снова начнет заниматься музыкой, она не позволит себя торопить или заставлять делать это по чьему-либо графику, кроме своего собственного. То, что она не позво

144🔥37🥴21💋7🍓4💅4👏2💯2

12 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC≈2,950 views256 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Криштиану Роналду и Джорджина Родригес сыграли свадьбу 💍 Кто бы мог подумать, но Криш реально женился через год после того как сделал предложение Джорджине с тем самым булыжником. Счастливые молодожены поделились фотографией своих обручальных колец в запрещенной сети. Торжество прошло без посторонних камер и глаз в Португалии, но никто не говорит, что потом какой-нибудь Вог не огорошит нас эксклюзивом - чтоб Криш н

133💯98🍓14💅6😁3🤔1🤯1

12 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC≈3,230 views540 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

И Дженна Ортега туда же? 😳 Оземпиковые ну или экстремально-похудевшие ряды пополнила мисс Среда. Недавнее интервью Дженны для Esquire, где она рассказала о своей карьере, озадачило многих и не из-за громких проектов, а потому что Дженна сильно изменилась - многим она показалась изможденной и истощенной. В ходе беседы Дженна рассказала, как в детстве ей иногда приходилось проводить весь день без еды и питья на съем

💯449🤯42🌚20🥴7🤔6😭65🍓2

11 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC≈3,480 views348 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Как НЕ надо рекламировать косметику нам показывает Тейт Макрей 💄 Тейт - амбассадор Neutrogena и на днях она показала, как продуктами бренда смывает макияж после концерта) Но есть нюанс - продукты лица её НЕ касались 😆 за исключением патчей Видно, что очищающие салфетки где-то витают в воздухе и на них нет никаких следов макияжа, а крема на коже тем более не видно - Тейт позаботилась о том, что километровая дистанция

🌚203😁4946🗿36🥴5🔥3💊2😡2

11 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC≈3,310 views237 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Генетика - жестокая штука 🗿 На месте братьев этих актеров я бы задала пару вопросов родителям типа «почему ОН, а не я?????» Ну потому что вот как так гены перетасовались, что Йен Сомерхолдер ТАКОЙ, а его старший брат Роберт ну вот такой ДРУГОЙ?? Причем на самом деле-то у него тоже миловидные черты лица, просто его победила скуфизация и облысение, а мб если б он тоже строил сначала модельную, а потом актерскую карье

🔥15843👏19💅6🤯4🍓3🤔3🌚1

10 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC≈3,490 views461 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Лаванда Браун - заядлая онлифанщица!😳 Актриса Джесси Кейв, которая исполнила роль Лаванды Браун из «Гарри Поттера», заработала за 1,5 года на OnlyFans больше, чем за всю свою карьеру в кино. Вот тут рассказывала ещё в прошлом году, что она обосновалась на этой платформе и не жалеет об этом) Актриса, у которой четверо детей, поделилась, что на платформе она зарегистрировалась от отчаяния. Работа в театре нормального

🔥314103🗿17🌚14🤯3😁3🍓2💊2

10 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈3,460 views287 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Обри Плаза стала мамой 💝 Примерно две недели назад Обри родила девочку от актера Кристофера Эбботта (на первом фото, вы его могли видеть в "Уловке 22" и "Бедных-несчастных"). Для обоих это первый ребенок. Вчера папарацци подловили молодую мать с ребенком, когда она выходила из театра. О беременности Обри стало известно в апреле, но радостная новость была омрачена выпадами семьи бывшего мужа в сторону Обри 😒 Брат бы

💯25918🍓2💋2🗿2🌚1🔥1🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @danaexcited. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@danaexcited edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
14 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 918,998 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

so sad so sеху
@welcometomyisland · 250,981
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
Дом Знаменитостей
@thehouseofcelebs · 101,051
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Soo Excited 💅” (@danaexcited), 13,417 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/danaexcited.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.