Джейкоб протрезвел, получается? 😂
😁157🔥23❤🔥8👀6

Channel
@hellyadoree
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,864subscribers
-62 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001668529571 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hellyadoree |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hellyadoree |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 10,864 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 10,867 | -8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:12 | 10,875 | -4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 10,879 | -3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 10,882 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 10,886 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 10,884 | -10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 10,894 | -12 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 10,906 | -7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 10,913 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:41 | 10,915 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 10,914 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:41 | 10,919 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 10,924 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 10,926 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:39 | 10,926 | first reading |
35 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 35 (2 July 2026 – 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 122,730 |
| Reactions total | 8,746 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 05:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
13,807 reactions across 35 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 3,005 | 21.8% | |
| 😁 | 2,064 | 14.9% | |
| 🤯 | 1,768 | 12.8% | |
| 👀 | 1,517 | 11.0% | |
| 😭 | 1,384 | 10.0% | |
| 💔 | 1,120 | 8.11% | |
| 😢 | 983 | 7.12% | |
| 💘 | 694 | 5.03% | |
| 🔥 | 489 | 3.54% | |
| 💅 | 429 | 3.11% | |
| 💋 | 323 | 2.34% | |
| 🍾 | 31 | 0.225% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,807reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hellyadoree. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 July 2026 to 21 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Джейкоб протрезвел, получается? 😂
😁157🔥23❤🔥8👀6
вот это я понимаю CINEMA, а не эти ваши колобки…🕷️
❤🔥356💘65🔥56😭7💋6😁1
Эта бывшая актриса Disney, ставшая певицей мирового уровня (Майли Сайрус), за последние два месяца несколько раз посещала врача-отоларинголога. Вероятно, ей снова нужна операция, чтобы сохранить свой певческий голос Майли 💔💔💔 на сегодня все 💗 рекорд по инсайдам! всем спасибо за активность ✨
😭272💔76😢39👀6
На этой неделе ведущие СМИ наконец обратили внимание на то, о чем я твердил вам целый год. Парень актрисы, которая середина недели (Уэнсдэй/Дженна Ортега), медленно разрушает ее. Ей нужно бежать если честно, ее внешний вид и правда пугает это я еще удачный кадр выбрала…
😢275👀62🤯11❤🔥1
У этой обладательницы «Оскара» есть няня для детей, но она все равно любит создавать образ простой мамы, которая сидит дома (Энн Хэтэуэй). У большинства таких мам нет миллионов на счету, двух личных помощников и личного водителя Энн? Сидит дома? Че т не заметила
😁209👀52🔥16
Футболист из списка А+ скрывающий свою ориентацию (Криштиану Роналду) вот-вот женится (уже). В один прекрасный день его жену (Джорджина) застукают с одним из ее многочисленных любовников, и весь этот фарс раскроется угадайте, про кого выйдет следующее видео на канале 😏😏😏
😭185❤🔥45🤯37😁29👀21
Пока танцор (Рики Альварес) встречался с певицей/актрисой/любительницей пончиков (Ариана Гранде), он также был зарегистрирован на всех сайтах знакомств. И только после того, как в сети появилась их совместная фотография, он внезапно закрыл все свои профили Я писал об этом в последние пару недель, но, похоже, актриса и певица (Ариана) использует своего бывшего парня, чтобы скрыть тот факт, что она спит с очередным же…
👀231❤🔥21🔥7😁5
уже по традиции: сплетни про роднулек 🥺🥺🥺 У известной актрисы/ужасного человека (Блейк Лайвли) есть секретный аккаунт в инсте, где она поливает грязью других Этот актер иностранного происхождения, сыгравший культовую роль в кино (Райан Рейнольдс/«Дэдпул») не может найти работу, потому что он такой мудак, что никто не хочет его нанимать или работать с ним
❤🔥159🤯77😁73👀19
Поговорим о нашем красавчике на коне — в прямом и переносном смысле (Джейкоб Элорди). Он как никогда успешен и гребет деньги лопатой в Голливуде. Известно, что он склонен к саморазрушению, когда дела идут хорошо, и этот раз не стал исключением. Его последняя сделка (Грозовой Перевал) принесла ему самый большой чек на сегодняшний день, и он купается в деньгах, так что празднует так, как умеет — снова под кайфом и с де…
🤯203👀100😁25🔥4❤🔥1
Этот режиссер из списка A+ (Кристофер Нолан) рассказал журналистам, что не пользуется смартфоном, чтобы избежать цифровой зависимости. На самом деле у него есть телефон, и он часами листает ленту, чтобы узнать, что люди говорят о его последнем проекте (Одиссея) как вам, кстати, фильм? 😳
😁272❤🔥49👀24
Любовный контракт второго бывшего супергероя в красном подходит к концу (Эндрю Гарфилд/Моника Барбаро) давайте думать… подсказывайте чё делать…🙃
👀215😁77🔥24
Актер и певец (Джаред Лето) находится под своего рода постоянной защитой федерального правительства. Именно поэтому никто не устраивал ему обысков и не арестовывал его теперь понятно почему его никогда не трогают))
👀237🤯67😭19❤🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @hellyadoree. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“hellyadore” (@hellyadoree), 10,864 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hellyadoree.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.