Channel
@xinwenbg3
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
37,217subscribers
+5,614 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003137013785 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xinwenbg3 |
| Description | 全网曝光热搜事件 ：专注于揭露事实- 曝光真相-最新动态资讯 -生活故事分享-海外华人求助！ ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🔍 缅甸缅北曝光： @anweitt 🔍柬埔寨曝光: @xinwenbg3 🔍柬埔寨头条： @zzyy_6699 🔍东南亚华人曝光: @xw_339 🔍东南亚前线大事件： @wx_533 🔍东南亚新闻曝光: @facai16161616 🔍迪拜华人曝光: @facail16888889 🔍麻豆国产影视: @cosfeng6 💁📲商务合作： @Wt11234 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xinwenbg3 |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @xinwenbg3/10048 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC | @facai16161616/61097 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @xinwenbg3/10056 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC | @facai16161616/61177 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @xinwenbg3/10060 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC | @facai16161616/61217 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @xinwenbg3/10061 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC | @facai16161616/61227 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @facai16161616/61237 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC | @xinwenbg3/10062 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @xinwenbg3/10066 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC | @facai16161616/61277 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @facai16161616 | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @facai16161616 (6–5) |
| @xw_339 | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @xw_339 (8–3) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 14 of the 14 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 15 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @xinwenbg3 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 05:36 | 37,217 | -4,688 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 41,905 | -1,116 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:59 | 43,021 | -713 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:21 | 43,734 | -458 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:58 | 44,192 | -734 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:01 | 44,926 | -1,382 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 46,308 | -1,456 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 47,764 | -812 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 48,576 | -860 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 49,436 | -273 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:08 | 49,709 | -438 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 50,147 | -499 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 50,646 | -335 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 50,981 | -31 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 51,012 | -23 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:56 | 51,035 | -10 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 51,045 | +19,637 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:12 | 31,408 | -15 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 31,423 | -33 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 31,456 | first reading |
942 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 108 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 942 (7 August 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 386,434 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 12:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 278 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
❗️【群友投稿：本人曾在 KS 体育入职，之前办公地点为海悦23楼】❗️ 当初公司明确表示“15号发工资，不拖欠”。后来因西港严打，公司调整为20号发工资，这一点我们当时也表示理解。 但现在已经到了10月份，本人8月份工资”至今仍未发放。不管是在职员工还是已经离职的员工，付出劳动后，依法应当拿到属于自己的工资 所以在这里正式询问 KS老板以及C部老板YC总：请明确告知，8月份拖欠的工资到底什么时候发？请给出具体的发放时间，而不是继续让员工无期限等待。我们理解公司可能存在各种情况 但理解不代表可以无限期拖欠工资。员工正常工作、完成任务，公司就应该按照约定结算工资。本人目前的诉求非常简单：只想拿回自己应得的工资。另外，关于公司办公及居家办公相关情况，本人手中留有相关资料，包括柬埔寨居家办公场地、兰卡办公场地的精准定位及视频等信息，相关资料均已留存。如果后续工资问题仍然没有得到解决，本人将根据实际情况，进一步整理并提交相关证据和资…
❗️【网友提醒：给在菲的中国网络直播公司 一个提醒】❗️ 提醒在菲正在做直播。直播类诈骗。打着主播名号引流的。直播带货的。团播。色播。甚至哪怕直播类公司。不正规走正常收支的，有线下交易的。 最近菲政府正在出台政策予以整顿。打击。以防诈骗行业重返 很多公司自已以为可以利用外表直播公司 媒体公司 新闻公司的正规营业执照绕过检查。但是国内不傻。菲国也是个见钱眼开的地方。不少公司甚至直接在tiktok上面做。难道不知道字节跳动是哪里管的？真以为数据没监控？ 近期阿尔法的先例 后续还有不少公司也在检查 甚至搜查令名单内。还望各个公司好自为之。几个月前菲某参议员就提醒过这些网络直播乱像。现如今也是有典型被抓了。暴雷了。那这个行业就会列为监管范围了。还请个自好自为之。 正常的直播公司。艺人公司。是可以经营的。只是很多公司绕开了监管。税收。甚至发生了人口买卖跟情色交易。好好的一个行业。不要搞得乌烟瘴气的。也请慎重合法从业。 ➡️ 投…
❗️【网友投稿：漂泊在东南亚第七年 我妈的一通电话把我整崩溃了】❗️ 我混东南亚灰产快七年，从菲律宾到柬埔寨再辗转缅东、金三角，钱赚了些，护照翻烂了，可夜里醒来心里永远空一块 前几天妈打电话，声音发抖却说得很清楚：要是你生得好一点，吃穿用度什么都有，被欺负有人撑腰，你也不会去混社会。我现在看开了，不怪你，你也别怪我。这些年我尽力了。你和我都是命，没得办法。要是真有下辈子，你把眼睛擦亮点，莫要再做我这个没出息老妇人的儿了。” 我当时拿着手机，一个字都说不出。挂了电话蹲在阳台哭得像个娃娃，三十几岁的人了。 这些年我骗自己说为了让爸妈过好日子，可过年回不去，电话只报喜不报忧。妈生病我只能转账，连床边都没守过。爸现在只敢问我“安全不安全”，再也不敢多问一句我在干嘛。灰产这碗饭，吃的是心安，吐的是良心。外面光鲜，里面全是刀。情感的缺失像慢性毒药，把我活活变成一个连自己都讨厌的人。 她不怪我，我却没法不怪自己。 兄弟们，如果你们也…
❗️【泰国抓获中国籍大麻走私嫌疑人，账户流水超5000万泰铢】❗️ 泰国移民局联合缉毒委员会逮捕中国籍“MR WANG”，被指为贩毒集团头目及“幕后资助人”，涉嫌藏匿泰国并向中国走私大麻，账户资金流水超过5000万泰铢 据泰国警方介绍，MR WANG 被指是一个跨国毒品犯罪团伙的重要成员，主要负责提供资金、采购毒品及大批量大麻，并通过海运方式走私至中国。据调查，其每批运输的大麻数量超过80公斤，由于中国市场的售价远高于泰国，相关犯罪活动具有较高的经济利益。 此次调查源于中国方面与泰国缉毒部门之间的情报协作。泰国缉毒委员会驻北京办公室此前向泰方通报，一名涉重大毒品案件的中国籍嫌疑人 MR WANG 已逃入泰国并藏匿。 泰国执法人员随后通过移民系统及生物识别信息进行调查，发现 MR WANG 于2026年6月22日经沙敦府移民口岸入境泰国，当时持旅游签证。此后，他申请转换为泰籍妻子担保的签证，目前相关居留许可尚未到期。 经…
❗️【缅甸以“零容忍”政策打击网络诈骗赌博】❗️ 国家总统吴敏昂莱10月1日在第62届缅甸国家警察部队日纪念活动上表示，网络诈骗赌博被列为完全不可容忍的犯罪，政府正以“零容忍”政策加以打击。 他指出，网络赌博危害民众社会经济生活，政府重视向公众普及网络诈骗手法和风险，并对犯罪分子依法严惩。相关打击网络诈骗的法律已于2026年7月31日颁布。 自2023年10月5日至2026年9月29日，缅甸共逮捕76,486人，其中73,258人已按程序遣返移交相关国家。警方与军方合作，对KK园区635栋涉诈建筑及瑞古科迈村77栋建筑全部拆除清理。总统对此予以表彰。 ➡️ 投稿联系： 遥 路😀
❗️【金边坠楼者身份确认，警方初步认定自杀】❗️ 昨天（10月1日）金边太子寰宇有人坠楼，当时死者身份和具体原因都还不清楚。今天，警方公布了进一步调查结果。 警方称，死者是一名39岁的马来西亚男子。10月1日早上，他独自来到位于金边桑园区的太子寰宇，临时租房住一天。拿到房卡后，他独自乘电梯前往33楼。上午7时26分左右，公寓工作人员突然听到楼外传来巨响，出去查看时发现男子已经坠楼身亡。 警方随后调取监控，确认男子当时独自进入房间。 结合现场勘查、监控录像和法医检验结果，警方初步认定男子为自杀，死因为高处坠落造成头部及身体严重创伤。 ➡️ 投稿联系： 遥 路😀
❗️【菲律宾 三宝颜锡布格省展开反诈骗突袭，至少80名中国公民被查并获救】❗️ 菲律宾国家调查局（NBI）、移民局（BI）和菲律宾武装部队（AFP）近日根据情报线索，在三宝颜锡布格省锡艾镇（Siay）展开反诈骗行动，至少80名中国公民被查并获救。 此次行动是周五早些时候在三宝颜锡布格省同步展开的联合执法行动之一。与此同时，在阿利西亚镇（Alicia），另有约100名中国公民被执法部门查获并获救。据称，这些人员当时在帐篷内从事诈骗活动。 目前，相关人员的具体身份以及是否实际参与诈骗活动，仍有待进一步调查。 ➡️ 投稿联系： 遥 路😀
❗️【柬埔寨西港太子寰宇公寓遭突查，26名外国人被扣】❗️ 10月1日，柬埔寨西哈努克省行政统一指挥委员会联合省警察局专业执法力量，对西哈努克市太子寰宇公寓开展突击检查。 据消息，此次行动地点位于西哈努克市4分区、索卡酒店附近的太子寰宇公寓。 由于公寓内部部分房间为出租房，部分为私人产权房，执法人员进入检查时需要进行协调。行动期间，部分房间处于上锁状态，也有部分房间业主不在现场。 检查过程中，部分外国人员提前发现执法行动并试图逃离，有人从楼上向下逃跑。执法人员随后封锁相关出入口，最终控制并拘留26名外国人，其中包括部分中国籍人员。 据初步调查，被扣人员涉嫌涉及网络技术诈骗（Online Scams）活动，同时部分人员被发现未携带合法有效护照。 行动期间，警方还查扣了笔记本电脑、手机等电子设备及其他相关物证，并将涉案人员及物品带回西哈努克省警察局作进一步调查。 目前，案件仍在依法调查处理，后续情况有待柬埔寨有关部门进…
❗️【妙瓦底“电诈”网络变局：化整为零、转移阵地卷土重来】❗️ 10月1日，据最新调查显示，受前期持续打击影响，缅甸克伦邦妙瓦底地区的部分网络诈骗（俗称“猪仔/电诈”）园区开始改变策略，通过转移阵地、拆分小队、变换运作模式等方式死灰复燃。 过去两个月内，部分涉诈人员及团伙集体迁移至克伦民族军（KNA）总部附近的某个新开发村庄，建立隐蔽据点。 妙瓦底市区及水沟谷（Shwe Kokko）附近山区已不再维持以往“数千人聚集的大型园区”模式，而是转向多点分散、小型化、隐蔽化的流动式作案。 这些网络团伙依然通过 Telegram 等社交平台，以“高薪海外招聘”为诱饵，继续诱骗诱拐外籍年轻人入局。调查发现，针对诈骗所需的数字货币账户、个人隐私信息、话术脚本等黑产资源，仍活跃于各类特定私密网络群组中进行公开或私下买卖。 ➡️ 投稿联系： 遥 路😀
#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 东南亚大事件 「新闻曝光」 📢 东南亚新闻事件曝光吃瓜 📢 东南亚今日头条（新闻吃瓜曝光） 📢 全球新闻事件 📢 全球最新质讯吧 📢 西港新闻|西港大事件|西港曝光|西港头条 📢 亚太缅甸新闻 📢 YouTube 油管新闻频道 📢 中港台时政资讯 📢 全球新闻大事件资讯🌐 ------------------------------ 🤝 加入互推 · 获得曝光，赚邀请奖励
❗️【网友提醒：10月份重点排查护照劳工证签证，排查范围酒店以及公寓，由金边统一指挥部署，大家注意！！！】❗️ ➡️ 投稿联系： 遥 路😀
❗️【菲律宾马卡蒂阿尔法大楼被端后续】❗️ 7楼的人百分百全部放了，老板都捞人出来了 17楼被抓了100多个，这是一个黑公司，上个月曝光过。 17楼的人现在都关在NBI的拘留所，目前还没有上本地新闻，是因为NBI是先抓人后补手续，所以媒体介入会晚一些。 这个事肯定会上新闻的，抓了100多人是大事了。不过NBI也是真的黑，为了搞钱先斩后奏！去抓人那天抓捕令都没有，勒索到钱了再贿赂法院补抓捕令，你说牛逼不牛逼？😂 ➡️ 投稿联系： 遥 路😀
Showing the 12 most recent of 942 posts we hold for @xinwenbg3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 50 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“柬埔寨新闻《柬埔寨曝光》” (@xinwenbg3), 37,217 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xinwenbg3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.