Channel
@facai16161616
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
27,503subscribers
-2,165 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002040555781 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @facai16161616 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/facai16161616 |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @xinwenbg3/100487 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC | @facai16161616/6109 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @xinwenbg3/100567 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC | @facai16161616/6117 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @xinwenbg3/100607 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC | @facai16161616/6121 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @xinwenbg3/100617 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC | @facai16161616/6122 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @facai16161616/6123 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC | @xinwenbg3/100627 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @xinwenbg3/100667 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC | @facai16161616/6127 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @xinwenbg3 | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (6–5) |
| @xw_339 | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @xw_339 (8–3) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 13 of the 13 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 15 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @xinwenbg3. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 08:22 | 27,503 | -2,940 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 14:21 | 30,443 | -1,076 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:20 | 31,519 | -638 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 32,157 | -482 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 32,639 | -739 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 01:40 | 33,378 | +7,236 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 04:21 | 26,142 | -1,341 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:01 | 27,483 | -1,152 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:28 | 28,635 | -521 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:46 | 29,156 | -239 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:48 | 29,395 | -478 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 29,873 | -547 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 30,420 | -219 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 30,639 | -32 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 30,671 | -18 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 30,689 | +1,036 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 29,653 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:38 | 29,652 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:09 | 29,653 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:23 | 29,651 | first reading |
733 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 83 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 733 (7 August 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 164,613 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 05:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 220 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
❗️【群友投稿：曝光鸭脖公司开云维护中心3贝拉组副组柏林、寒心、太阳】❗️ 绩效考核标准反复变，上次225，这次335，符合条件拿不到绩效，规则改来改去，是不是没办法贪污了。排名不敢公开，表格看不懂。你们谁有能力每月裂变2个，很多问题不会处理，怎么上去的自己心里没数。 优秀案例加分，每加2分上不封顶。没数据、没做事的提交就加分，比做事的人分还高，关系好无限加分。真正解决问题看不到，浑水摸鱼、关系好加分。 同样员工，你们随意调休、离岗，工作飞机超50分钟不在线，迟到理由比任何人充分。真正做事看不到，导致员工不处理问题，不在乎会员感受，大哥流失。 每天想泡妹，彰显送苹果18，问题半天不回，已读不回。这次收敛，下次公开所有证据，包括挂靠、钓虾、团建费用、离岗外出。 转来大组后，你们被扶持上去一直搞事。部长、CEO忙，注意不到，你们赌公司核实不到就继续高调。 有没有这些事，心里清楚。 ➡️ 投稿联系： 遥 路😀
❗️【网友投稿：真是万万没想到 西港还有这么多狗推打野】❗️ 马来、印尼马达孟加拉不香吗？ 非得继续留下来刀口舔血？ 个个都是亡命之徒？ 今天我朋友和我说 现在还想在西港敲键盘， 人均均价3万USD刀乐 没这个钱，赶紧收拾包袱走人吧～～ ➡️ 投稿联系： 遥 路😀
❗️【网友求助：王棋 男 33岁，上海音乐学院全职音乐老师】❗️ 9月24日下班后，他驾车前往浦东国际机场，将车辆停在机场停车库，随后独自乘坐春秋航空 9C8755 航班前往泰国曼谷素万那普机场。9月25日傍晚起失联，至今下落不明。 警方初步判断其疑似被骗出境，存在遭遇人口贩运的风险。家属已第一时间报警，并联系外交部12308及中国驻泰国使馆求助，相关报案及求助记录均已留存。 家中仅有年迈母亲，母子相依为命。家属万分焦急，恳请大家帮忙转发扩散，如有任何线索，请及时联系家属或警方。 🙏 只求他平安回家，早日回到母亲身边。 ➡️ 投稿联系： 遥 路😀
❗️【网友爆料：老挝会晒（蓬西萨吉拉塔那蒙坤寺）著名的佛教胜地，方圆1公里，沦为犯罪天堂、电诈窝点】❗️ 附近三个小村庄，聚集了几百名电信诈骗人员。涉及中国、泰国、美国十几个盘口，在当地官员的保护下，已经形成了园区化的规模员。 各个国家联合执法小组赶快行动，将这些犯罪分子绳之以法。还佛教圣地一片净土，还当地百姓一片安宁。 中国警察 泰国警察 FBI 赶快行动吧，打击家庭租房式的小型诈骗园 坐标： 20°13'29.8"N 100°42'55.8"E 20°13'21.8"N 100°43'11.5"E 20°13'52.1"N 100°43'10.5"E ➡️ 投稿联系： 遥 路😀
❗️【马来西亚 柔佛端掉虚假招聘诈骗团伙 15人认罪被罚5.67万 5名中国男子在列】❗️ 9月30日，马来西亚柔佛州新山推事庭审理一起虚假招聘诈骗案，15名男子全部认罪，其中包括5名中国男子。 这伙人通过网络发布虚假招聘信息，以根本不存在的工作机会实施诈骗，主要瞄准美国等海外受害者。 相关犯罪活动发生在9月25日，地点位于柔佛州依斯干达公主城努沙再也East Ledang的两个住宅单位。 15名被告年龄从20多岁至40多岁，包括10名马来西亚男子和5名中国男子。 法院最终判处其中9名马来西亚男子每人罚款3500令吉，另外1名马来西亚男子和5名中国男子每人罚款4200令吉，合计罚款5.67万令吉，15人均已缴清罚款。 ➡️ 投稿联系： 遥 路😀
❗️【西安警方捣毁跑分洗钱团伙】❗️ 西安公安近期通报一起重大“跑分”洗钱案件。警方通过线索研判、长线追踪摸排，成功打掉一个规模化、组织化的涉诈跑分犯罪团伙，捣毁多处隐蔽窝点，抓获全部涉案人员，涉案资金流水高达500余万元。 据碑林分局南院门派出所侦查掌握的线索显示，近期网络上出现一批以高薪、轻松兼职为噱头的引流话术，专门吸引社会闲散人员、年轻群体参与所谓“代收转账、扫码走流水”的兼职工作。 该犯罪团伙组织严密、分工明确，利用大量支付宝商家收款码，替境外电信诈骗、网络赌博等上游黑灰产业代收、分流、洗白赃款，涉嫌帮助信息网络犯罪活动、洗钱等违法犯罪。 为躲避公安机关侦查打击，该团伙将多处作案窝点隐秘设置在西安市未央区公寓楼内，长期闭环运作。团伙成员统一使用大量手机设备和批量收款码，高频快速拆分、转移涉案资金，增加警方溯源追赃难度。 西安碑林警方经过研判、蹲点摸排和数据分析，锁定该团伙藏匿位置、组织架构以及涉案人员行踪。在…
❗️【西港警方打掉多个犯罪团伙 抓获13名嫌疑人含3名中国人】❗️ 西港警方于9月23日至27日开展专项打击行动，连续破获6起刑事案件，抓获13名犯罪嫌疑人。 山谷嫌犯涉案罪名包括加重偷盗（撬锁盗窃摩托车）、普通盗窃（手机及物资）、盗割电线电缆及谋杀未遂、非法持有枪支弹药等。警方现场缴获多辆摩托车、手机、电线、作案工具及部分枪支子弹。 目前，部分追回财物已发还失主，涉案嫌疑人已被移交西港省初级法院检方依法审理。 ➡️ 投稿联系： 遥 路😀
❗️【中国希望扩大东南亚反诈合作：点名缅甸、柬埔寨、泰国、老挝、菲律宾和马来西亚】❗️ 中国外交部亚洲司官员王德新9月28日在北京表示，中方希望继续加强与缅甸及其他东南亚国家合作，共同打击跨境网络诈骗和电信诈骗。 王德新指出，电诈问题不仅涉及缅甸，也涉及柬埔寨、泰国、老挝、菲律宾和马来西亚等国。中方希望有关国家继续支持联合打击行动，扩大区域反诈合作。 此次表态主要强调加强合作，并未公布新的区域联合行动方案或具体时间表。随着诈骗集团不断跨境转移窝点，中方希望通过执法合作、信息共享等方式进一步应对跨国电诈问题。 ➡️ 投稿联系： 遥 路😀
❗️【中国籍通缉犯偷渡越南后企图逃往老挝：凌晨边境落网】❗️ 9月29日凌晨，越南奠边省边防部队在越老边境抓获一名40岁中国籍男子 该男子被指为中国有关部门通缉的在逃人员，并涉嫌非法进入越南后继续向老挝方向逃窜。 据奠边省边防部门披露，当天凌晨4时左右，边防人员在靠近越老边境的一处区域发现并控制该男子。调查显示，他此前通过非法途径进入越南，随后计划从奠边省偷渡进入老挝，再设法前往第三国躲避追捕。 越南方面核查身份后确认，该男子正被中国有关部门通缉。完成相关程序后，越南边防部门已将这名中国籍通缉犯移交中国有关部门处理。 ➡️ 投稿联系： 遥 路😀
✅#推荐频道 🔗 📢 华人海外资讯｜菲龙网新闻曝光 📢 你关心的才是头条新闻 📢 找工作上菲龙网求职招聘 📢 内涵搞笑段子 📢 亚太新闻 🆒🔴商务合作：在下头很硬 ------------------------------ 📢 视野全网曝光台 📢 迪拜大事件曝光 📢 东南亚大事件 📢 菲律宾大事件 📢 柬埔寨大事件 📢 华人大事件 📢 安危大事件 🆒🔴商务合作：视野发布员 - 胖胖 ------------------------------ 📢 每の吃瓜搞笑视频 📢 东南亚新闻曝光 📢 中文头条新闻曝光 📢 91网红主播鉴黄 📢 麻豆国产电影 📢 动漫里番韩国女优 📢 91吃瓜反差新闻 📢 91黑料吃瓜 🆒🔴商务合作：包菜 ------------------------------ 📢 东南亚新闻网 📢 柬埔寨新闻大事件 📢 菲律宾大事件 📢 [每日快报]华人新闻 📢 迪拜新闻 📢 骗子曝光 📢 亚太缅甸新闻 📢 …
❗️【最新消息：西港太子寰宇公寓今天被抓的推推，目前第一批被控制人员已经陆续被警车带离现场】❗️ ➡️ 投稿联系： 遥 路😀
❗️【网友求助】❗️ 此人叫马永强，自2025年11月23日被人安排从广西偷渡到的柬埔寨，途中经过越南当时跟朋友在微信聊天说是去租赁豪车赚大钱。然后被骗去柬埔寨，然在2025年12月3日在抖音给哥哥发求助信息说:"我被别人骗到了柬埔寨，受不了了，快来救我。"然后到如今现在为止一直没有任何一点消息。 这么久没有关于他的消息，父母也是非常牵挂和煎熬。刚去的时候身体比较胖，脸蛋高原红，身体协调力没有正常人那么利索。 小名叫强强或者，不知道在柬埔寨外号叫什么。和老婆已离婚，有一女孩3岁，说这一点是希望如果本人能够看到此消息希望可以尽快联系我。如果有看到的此消息的各位老板或者公司管理以及其他江湖豪杰，亦或本人看到，麻烦请联系我 我们愿意谈赔付。 如若被卖至其他地方也可以联系我们协商赎金，有认识的看到帮忙牵线联络，必有重酬 望各位在东南亚的有义之士留意一下，感激不尽！ 如能找到万分感谢，诚意重酬答谢！ ➡️ 投稿联系： 遥…
Showing the 12 most recent of 733 posts we hold for @facai16161616. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 50 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“缅甸缅北东南亚新闻曝光” (@facai16161616), 27,503 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/facai16161616.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.