😀😃 高赔率 😆🥹😅😂 彩票168统一开奖,公平公开公正。 😆🥹😅😂 168系列彩票 澳洲幸运10 ✔️幸运飞艇 六合彩 游戏齐全,AG视讯,PG电子。 ✔️支持 usdt 存取款 大额无忧 ,不限ip 5️⃣5️⃣5️⃣5️⃣ 99789.vip 彩娱乐9960 邀请码 25303 5️⃣5️⃣5️⃣5️⃣ 10999.vip 彩娱乐51 邀请码 93961 彩娱乐,十年信誉台,百万无忧!彩票请下注9码以下,如遇网址打不开可使用vpn或用谷歌浏览器尝试 😘😘客服 :@wu_xiaoqi 🔊😀😀😀😀😀😀 😍😍😍😍 😃😀😃😀😃

Channel
东南亚大爆料(曝光)
@bbsooo
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
90,674subscribers
-18,953 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001500679252 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bbsooo |
| Description | #东南亚 #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #缅甸 #泰国 #迪拜 热门曝光、新闻频道,安危事件,曝光爆料 东南亚必备的曝光频道 商务合作: @zxx16 投稿机器人 @bbsoobot |
| Created | Between 1 July 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bbsooo |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:39 | 90,674 | -3,088 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 93,762 | -3,746 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:59 | 97,508 | -3,170 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 01:41 | 100,678 | -5,690 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:56 | 106,368 | +4,272 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:02 | 102,096 | -4,516 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:20 | 106,612 | -2,536 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:27 | 109,148 | -7,569 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:43 | 116,717 | +12,928 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:25 | 103,789 | -8,109 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 111,898 | -2,615 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 114,513 | +12,837 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 101,676 | -11,999 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 113,675 | +10,306 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 103,369 | -7,108 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:29 | 110,477 | -1,288 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 111,765 | -18 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 111,783 | -4,845 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 116,628 | -296 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:22 | 116,924 | first reading |
Engagement
750 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.34%
- avg views ÷ 90,674 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,120
- 470 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.052%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 470
- of 750 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 106 of 470 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 750 (7 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 997,186 |
| Reactions total | 109 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 23:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈39,100
- Videos
- ≈5,560
- Links
- ≈21,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 27m 31s
- Average length
- 55s
Measured directly from 30 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
131 reactions across 126 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎉 | 20 | 15.3% | |
| ⚡ | 18 | 13.7% | |
| ❤ | 16 | 12.2% | |
| 👏 | 15 | 11.5% | |
| 🤩 | 14 | 10.7% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 9.16% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 9.16% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 7.63% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 6.11% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.53% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.763% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.763% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.763% | |
| 😴 | 1 | 0.763% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 130 of the 750 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 750 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#马来西亚新闻:62岁女子被骗逾18.7万美金,子谎称可协助申请新加坡永久居民身份 一名62岁的马来西亚女子疑遭诈骗集团诱骗,以办理新加坡永久居民身份为名,先后被骗走762,700令吉(约18.7万美元)。 柔佛州新山南区警区主任阿兹鲁·希沙姆·莫哈末·沙菲在9月23日发表声明证实此案。据《海峡时报》报道,受害者于2025年12月首次在脸书(Facebook)看到一则声称可提供移民协助的广告,随后拨打广告中列出的新加坡电话号码。 她之后与一名自称能够协助办理相关手续的人士联系。对方起初声称申请费用只需300新元(约236美元),但随后不断以各种理由要求她支付更多款项。 警方表示,受害者在5月5日至8月31日期间,先后进行了123次转账,将个人积蓄汇入多个由嫌疑人提供的银行账户,累计金额达762,700令吉。 由于对方持续索要款项,受害者最终产生怀疑,并意识到自己可能受骗,随后向警方报案。 警方调查相关银行账户后,证实…
巴域32间出租屋被查,5处窝点涉电诈被查封 9月25日,柴桢省巴域市统一指挥力量在副省长孟恩的带领下,对巴域市32间出租排屋展开行政检查。 执法人员共发现35名外籍人员(含4名女性),涉及越南、中国、缅甸三国。 检查中,警方在5处出租屋内查获大量电子设备,包括电脑、手机及Wi-Fi设备等,发现涉嫌网络诈骗的证据。 目前,所有嫌疑人和物证已移交柴桢省警察局反技术犯罪办公室,涉案场所已被暂时查封,案件正在依法处理中。
🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 香港六合彩特码49倍|真人返水1%|电子/棋牌/捕鱼返水1.5%|十三水/德州 无抽佣 🤩亿级域名|78.COM 🤩官方飞投|充提自由 🤩NO钱包担保3亿U|可查验! 😀 东南亚大事件联合担保🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩(电子) 📱官方频道:@DF78 ➡️关注领VIP 🔝大品牌,实力派:78.COM 本身就是最好的辨识度。 ✅️香港六合彩 · 独家盈利无上限! 🤩所有的特码🤩🤩倍,封顶赔率! 🤩连码三中三🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩连码四中四🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩百家乐全网最高返水🤩% 🤩电子|棋牌|捕鱼返水🤩.🤩% 🤩十三水|德州自主组队,无抽佣; 🏆百家乐真人视讯台红🤩🤩万U; 💥新人超会赢,精彩时刻分享: 🥇六合彩 玩家用7个号码组合下注连码三全中(35注)➕四全中(35注),每注100U,结果开出4个号码。命中4注878倍及一注10000倍大奖,稳稳落袋135万U; 🥈PG电子 9月4号,壹玩家游戏中爆出268万U大奖,本金…
柬电诈人员走机场“VIP通道”,移民警察半年收超20万美元 柬埔寨反贪局(ACU)9月25日公布,德崇国际机场一名移民警察涉嫌收钱为电诈团伙提供入境便利,甚至帮助被列入黑名单、持假护照的外国人进入柬埔寨。今年上半年,他涉嫌经手301宗非法业务,收取超过20万美元。 这名警员名为裴帕彭(Phe Phat Pheng),30岁,警衔为中尉。 据反贪局调查,他为不同入境服务明码标价:商务签证380至420美元、旅游签证120美元、电子商务入境手续900美元,VIP快速通关则收费450美元。客户只需提前发送机票、护照等资料,抵达机场后再提供照片,便有人负责接应和协调入境。 此案是国公省七星海电诈腐败案的延伸调查。反贪局称,这名警员与中国籍涉诈人员张建强(又名蔡有元)有关联,曾协助其团伙成员入境。张建强此前被指向当地乡长行贿,以获取电诈活动的庇护。
柬埔寨劳工证办理出新规 据可靠消息源反馈:自明天起,所有办劳工证者必须要去自己居住地的警察局,开一份居住证明,然后拿原件才可以安排办理劳工证。如若没有,需多加110$作为处理费用。
🇨🇳🇺🇸 重磅:中美达成八点成果共识 新华社华盛顿9月25日电 当地时间9月23日至25日,中国国家主席习近平对美国进行国事访问。其间,两国元首就中美建设性战略稳定关系及重大国际地区问题深入交换意见,达成八点成果共识,包括: 一、双方同意构建“基于尊重、公平、对等的中美建设性战略稳定关系”。 二、双方同意相互支持对方办好亚太经合组织(APEC)领导人非正式会议和二十国集团(G20)领导人峰会。两国元首有意出席对方主办的会议。 三、两国元首同意伊朗应履行不发展核武器的承诺,任何国家或机构都不得对国际水道征收通行费。 四、两国元首忆及中国和美国是二战盟友,并肩作战赢得战争胜利。 五、两国元首认可中美经贸磋商机制积极作用和双方经贸团队磋商成果,包括建立并推进贸易理事会等机制,达成“300亿美元”对等降税安排,延期吉隆坡经贸磋商成果等,并指示予以落实。 六、中美禁毒执法部门合作取得可视化成果。近期,双方密切合作,联合破获多起涉新精神…
🇲🇴花旗下调澳门9月赌收预测至180亿澳门元 称高端中场赌台调查结果为近年最差之一 花旗(花旗集团)发表研究报告指,澳门9月首20日博彩毛收入约122亿澳门元,日均收入约6.1亿澳门元。期内贵宾厅投注额按月下跌约15%至18%,中场博彩收入按月减少约13%至16%。 该行指出,澳门博彩市况或较预期更为疲弱,审慎将9月博彩毛收入预测由190亿澳门元下调至180亿澳门元。按最新估算,澳门第三季博彩毛收入料按年下跌4%。花旗形容,9月澳门高端中场赌台调查结果,是近年最差之一。 报告提到,据该行观察,澳门赌场投注气氛普遍较三个月前世界杯揭幕时冷清。现阶段暂无法确定市况走弱的原因,难以判断是玩家消费意愿下降,还是调查时机因素造成。
#国内新闻:10月1日起,举报资金盘、传销、违规直销有奖,最高奖励100万。 自10月1日起,群众举报资金盘、传销、违规直销相关违法线索可申领奖励。线索经查证属实,最高奖励可达100万元,鼓励广大群众积极揭发各类金融骗局与违法营销活动。 什么是资金盘、传销、违规直销? 资金盘:没有真实实体生意,靠不断拉新人交钱,用后进场人的钱给前面的人分红返利。一旦拉不到新人,资金链断裂,平台直接跑路。民族资产解冻、虚拟币理财、高息项目大多属于资金盘。 传销:以发展人头为核心,靠拉人入伙、交入门费,按发展下线层级拿提成,不是靠卖产品赚钱,属于违法犯罪。 违规直销:正规直销有国家颁发牌照,超出许可范围、拉人头计酬、夸大收益、变相传销的,都属于违规直销。 举报奖励相关条件 实行实名举报,提供完整详实证据,线索为执法机关尚未掌握,核查属实立案后,方可申领奖励。 奖励分阶段核发:线索初步核实有效发放基础奖励;案件成功立案侦查追加奖励;案件最终…
👍1
涉案60亿!特大跨国民族资产解冻诈骗案,3国警方联合全链条告破 近日,公安部统一指挥吉林警方,联合老挝、新加坡、柬埔寨三国境外警方开展跨国同步收网行动,成功破获一起特大跨国“民族资产解冻”诈骗案,涉案总金额超60亿元。本案共计抓获犯罪嫌疑人257名,境外三国警方联手抓获156人,国内多地同步抓捕101人,捣毁诈骗窝点9处,对幕后金主、核心骨干、技术运维、代理团队实现全链条、全覆盖打击,境外涉案人员已陆续被押解回国。 案件核心情况 经查,该犯罪团伙是典型的跨国作案团伙,组织严密、层级清晰、隐蔽性极强。团伙长期盘踞境内外多地分工作案,将诈骗体系拆分引流、授课、操盘、资金转移、技术维护等多个环节,规模化实施电信网络诈骗。 为大肆敛财,团伙摒弃老旧诈骗话术,翻新包装虚假国家惠民项目,捏造“复兴汇金”“养老行动”“中国强农”“民生保障”“中国圆梦”等官方名头,伪造政策文件、福利通知,刻意营造权威、正规的假象。 同时,团伙私自搭建…
🤩1
🇨🇳🇲🇲中缅联合打击电诈:佤邦向中方移交64名涉案人员 近日,依据中缅双边司法警务合作协议,佤邦司法委与中方执法部门在云南孟连勐阿口岸完成新一批涉诈涉案人员移交,共向中方移交64人(含63名中国籍电诈犯罪嫌疑人及1名涉案人员),并同步移交案卷证据与作案工具。 据悉,该批人员此前从其他境外地区流窜至佤邦企图重操旧业。佤邦警方在锁定窝点后展开突击抓捕并成功铲除数个涉诈窝点。目前,案件正由中方有关部门依法进一步侦办。
🔥1
泰缅边境两起中国公民绑架案,作案路线均指向同一地点“Deko Park” 泰国媒体梳理发现,两起涉及中国公民的绑架案件,跨境转运路线高度相似,犯罪链条存在多处重合。 一起是一名中国女子8月23日在甘烹碧府遭遇绑架,车辆途经检查站时,她趁机跳车逃生。事发后泰国警方抓获4名涉案泰国籍嫌疑人,嫌疑人供述受缅甸方面指派,计划将受害人偷渡送往缅甸妙瓦底。 另一起是38岁四川绵竹男子刘修洪,于6月9日抵达曼谷后遭绑架,被犯罪团伙跨境转运至缅甸诈骗园区,失联79天后,在8月26日获救回国。 两案路线均被指经过曼谷—甘烹碧—达府—普帕—莫伊河—Deko Park,途中存在落地接人、人身控制、多次换车、秘密跨境转运等相似作案环节。 报道称,Deko Park坐落于缅甸妙瓦底南部,由DKBA(克伦佛教军)武装管控,紧邻泰缅边境,部分园区建筑从泰国一侧肉眼即可看见。 据消息人士称,该园区内大约关押着上千名来自不同国家和地区的人员。不过园区…
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 750 posts we hold for @bbsooo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@cgssbb · 48,294#1
@bx666 · 467,845#2
@tx100 · 158,539#3
@vip35r · 47,471#4
@baoguangqun110 · 37,625#5
@svip40 · 110,383#6
@jpz_888 · 12,661#7
@ZaoTiePH · 3,390#8
@dny2023dbg · 77,822#9
@iiiik · 49,140#10
@xinwen811 · 207,923#11
@bodu08 · 58,821#12
@tghuarenba · 44,364#13
@nnccqq · 38,432#14
@xinwen118 · 114,190#15
@xinhuaribao · 939#16
@dnyawtt · 51,701#17
@dashijian01 · 38,614#18
@feilongwang · 92,276#19
@TGPG999 · 4,748#20
@jianpuzhaidashijian · 44,715#21
@baoguang032 · 21,224#22
@quanqiubaoliao · 172,311#23
@DNYKX · 60,054#24
@feilvbinghuarenriji · 16,900#25
@BG_BG8 · 38,746#26
@jsanj · 1,104#27
@bvl222 · 45,237#28
@hrs166 · 50,473#29
@baoguangba088 · 236,958#30
@bc7890 · 3,879#31
@Dzx199 · 23,311#32
@dnyxst · 70,799#33
@dny718 · 12,842#34
@vipn8888 · 67,457#35
@BG423 · 33,478#36
@gejige · 185,132#37
@BG576 · 432,047#38
@bbb1b · 348,524#39
@xinwen9998 · 282#40
@flbhuarenquan · 68,887#41
@feilvbinhuarenzixun · 72,699#42
@qq2023bg · 63,208#43
@jiuboo · 20,848#44
@hyxw6 · 83,736#45
@vipoo5 · 10,198#46
@ydttbg1 · 29,556#47
@bg888 · 343,655#48
@bg888e · 54,627#49
@gouzaibaoliao · 2,150#50
@baoguangi · 10,675#51
@dny099 · 75,081#52
@aza520 · 3,283#53
@ZYWX6 · 101,169#54
@dibaiTT · 187,895#55
@xinwenTV5 · 7,908#56
@jpz000 · 736#57
@heicaibaog · 83,760 (as read 14 August 2026)#58
@AnWei08 · 52,278#59
@baoguang006 · 8,007#60
@xinwen1 · 104,937#61
@feilvbin198 · 97,008#62
@BG2288 · 81,773#63
@chadnag001 · 55,919#64
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@cgssbb · 48,294
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 9 here — alongside 8 others — read 26 August 2026
@dny2023dbg · 77,822
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 August 2026
@hyxw6 · 83,736
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 August 2026
@qq2023bg · 63,208
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 13 August 2026
@pianzi1 · 53,362
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@XGRIJI · 63,705
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 21 August 2026
@dnyxwtt · 52,104
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026
@db2023dbg · 76,486
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚大爆料(曝光)” (@bbsooo), 90,674 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bbsooo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.