#老挝新闻 老挝再向中国移交118名中国籍人员,113人涉嫌电诈 10月2日,老挝向中方移交118名中国籍人员,其中113人涉嫌参与电信网络诈骗,另外5人涉嫌非法入境。 这批人员包括116名男性和2名女性,在老挝琅南塔省磨丁国际口岸完成交接,随后由中方接收。 此次移交的绝大多数人员涉及电诈案件,相关人员回国后将由中方继续依法调查处理。 频道广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😀😀😀😀😀😀 👉UU8国际,等你来掀翻全场! ——————————————— 🔔东南亚新闻-通缉-曝光社 ✈️ 点击投稿

Channel
东南亚新闻-通缉-曝光社🌏
@dnyxinwen668
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
40,493subscribers
-21,552 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001612132018 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dnyxinwen668 |
| Description | 东南亚新闻-通缉-曝光社🌏 本频道只负责曝光悬赏,真假自行甄别 🔗东南亚,新闻-曝光疑难杂症来问我 投稿曝光商务合作: @ASevexi77777 供需广告发布联系: @ASevexi77777 东南亚新闻-通缉-曝光社🌏 🔗: @dnyxinwen668 #缅甸 #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #迪拜 #东南亚 #老挝 #阿富汗 #阿联酋 #马来西亚 #头条 #曝光 #吃瓜 #缅北 #博彩 #新闻发布 #行业新闻 #博彩热点 #曝光骗子 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dnyxinwen668 |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 40,493 | -7,548 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:18 | 48,041 | -47 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 01:37 | 48,088 | -421 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:55 | 48,509 | -1,900 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:01 | 50,409 | -649 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 21:39 | 51,058 | -160 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 21:18 | 51,218 | -364 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 51,582 | -129 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:45 | 51,711 | -1,934 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:44 | 53,645 | -259 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:13 | 53,904 | -129 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 54,033 | -44 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 54,077 | -350 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:25 | 54,427 | -6,040 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:13 | 60,467 | -39 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 60,506 | -43 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:12 | 60,549 | -44 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:22 | 60,593 | -163 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 60,756 | -178 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 60,934 | first reading |
Engagement
942 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 12.3%
- avg views ÷ 40,493 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,970
- 552 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.047%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 552
- of 942 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 152 of 552 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 942 (12 August 2026 – 3 October 2026) |
| Views total | 2,742,422 |
| Reactions total | 385 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Oct 2026, 23:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈30,800
- Videos
- ≈3,390
- Links
- ≈12,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2h 44m
- Average length
- 52s
Measured directly from 191 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
386 reactions across 153 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎉 | 53 | 13.7% | |
| 👍 | 50 | 13.0% | |
| 🤩 | 48 | 12.4% | |
| 🥰 | 45 | 11.7% | |
| ❤ | 39 | 10.1% | |
| 🔥 | 32 | 8.29% | |
| ⚡ | 24 | 6.22% | |
| 💯 | 23 | 5.96% | |
| 👏 | 19 | 4.92% | |
| 😁 | 18 | 4.66% | |
| 😍 | 18 | 4.66% | |
| ❤🔥 | 17 | 4.40% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 154 of the 942 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 386 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 942 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 3 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
“TA419”冒充美国AI专家发钓鱼邮件,疑似窃取账号信息 10月2日,路透社报道:网络安全公司Proofpoint确认的黑客组织“TA419”,被怀疑与中国有关。该组织通过冒充AI领域专家和美国前政府官员的身份发送邮件,试图诱骗目标点击链接,从而窃取账号登录信息。 Proofpoint表示,至少从2025年4月开始,TA419就一直针对美国和日本的研究机构、大学、国防企业以及律师事务所等人员展开行动。 据Proofpoint介绍,2026年7月,TA419曾冒充AI政策专家,其中包括白宫科技政策办公室前高级官员Lynne Edwards Parker,向目标人物发送邮件,邀请他们参与AI相关项目。目标回复后,该组织便会进一步发送链接,将对方引导至一个伪造网页,试图骗取其账号登录信息。 路透社确认的目标之一是Alex Engler,他曾任白宫官员,目前担任宾夕法尼亚大学“媒体、技术与民主中心”负责人。Engler告诉路透…
🔥1
#温馨提示:10月份重点排查护照劳工证签证,排查范围酒店以及公寓,由金边统一指挥部署,大家注意!!! 频道广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😀😀😀😀😀😀 👉UU8国际,等你来掀翻全场! ——————————————— 🔔东南亚新闻-通缉-曝光社 ✈️ 点击投稿
#群友投稿:本人曾在 KS 体育入职,之前办公地点为海悦23楼。 当初公司明确表示“15号发工资,不拖欠”。后来因西港严打,公司调整为20号发工资,这一点我们当时也表示理解。 但现在已经到了10月份,本人8月份工资至今仍未发放。不管是在职员工还是已经离职的员工,付出劳动后,依法应当拿到属于自己的工资。 所以在这里正式询问 KS 老板以及 C 部老板 YC 总:请明确告知,8月份拖欠的工资到底什么时候发?请给出具体的发放时间,而不是继续让员工无期限等待。 我们理解公司可能存在各种情况,但理解不代表可以无限期拖欠工资。员工正常工作、完成任务,公司就应该按照约定结算工资。 本人目前的诉求非常简单:只想拿回自己应得的工资。 另外,关于公司办公及居家办公相关情况,本人手中留有相关资料,包括柬埔寨居家办公场地、兰卡办公场地的精准定位及视频等信息,相关资料均已留存。 如果后续工资问题仍然没有得到解决,本人将根据实际情况,进一步整…
😁1
#网友投稿: 昨天,木牌政部门对某处地点进行了突击搜查,并逮捕了数人,具体情况等官方通报。 频道广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😀😀😀😀😀😀 👉UU8国际,等你来掀翻全场! ——————————————— 🔔东南亚新闻-通缉-曝光社 ✈️ 点击投稿
#网友投稿:金边棉芷区桑森库萨寺附近被突袭,现场抓捕了不少人。 频道广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😀😀😀😀😀😀 👉UU8国际,等你来掀翻全场! ——————————————— 🔔东南亚新闻-通缉-曝光社 ✈️ 点击投稿
🤩1
#菲律宾新闻 菲律宾三宝颜省突袭两处疑似诈骗窝点,约200名中国公民被查 菲律宾执法部门近日在三宝颜锡布格省展开联合行动,对阿利西亚镇和西亚伊镇两处疑似网络诈骗活动地点实施突袭,现场发现约200名外籍人员,并查获大量手机及电脑等电子设备。 据当地执法部门初步消息,行动由菲律宾国家调查局(NBI)和移民局等部门参与。两处地点分别位于阿利西亚镇和西亚伊镇,目前相关人员的身份、签证状态以及是否涉及违法活动,仍在进一步核查。 现场情况显示,西亚伊镇一处地点发现约80名中国籍人员;阿利西亚镇另一处地点则发现100多名中国籍人员。执法人员同时发现,部分人员居住在临时搭建的帐篷内。 此次行动中,执法部门在两处地点共查获约2000部手机,以及电脑、笔记本电脑等电子设备。由于现场涉及大量电子设备,当局目前正在进一步调查这些设备的具体用途,以及相关地点是否存在组织化网络犯罪活动。 不过,菲律宾方面也强调,目前不能仅凭人员出现在相关地点,就…
#柬埔寨资讯 这名中国人这下是彻底陷入绝境。10月2日凌晨四点,柬埔寨金边桑园区百适河分区的一间商铺,来了一名中国籍男子。 男子进店之后,装作要买茶叶的样子,跟店主假意闲聊,趁店主注意力分散的时候,偷偷顺走店里的一部手机。拿到手机之后,他不敢多做停留,转身快速逃离现场。 店主很快发现手机被盗,马上报警求助。当地宪兵部队接到警情,立刻展开追捕,顺着线索追踪,没多久就成功把这名男子抓获。 PS:大扫荡下去,推推们都活不下去了 频道广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😀😀😀😀😀😀 👉UU8国际,等你来掀翻全场! ——————————————— 🔔东南亚新闻-通缉-曝光社 ✈️ 点击投稿
#菲律宾新闻 菲律宾三宝颜锡布格省展开反诈骗突袭,至少80名中国公民被查并获救 菲律宾国家调查局(NBI)、移民局(BI)和菲律宾武装部队(AFP)近日根据情报线索,在三宝颜锡布格省锡艾镇(Siay)展开反诈骗行动,至少80名中国公民被查并获救。 此次行动是周五早些时候在三宝颜锡布格省同步展开的联合执法行动之一。 与此同时,在阿利西亚镇(Alicia),另有约100名中国公民被执法部门查获并获救。据称,这些人员当时在帐篷内从事诈骗活动。 目前,相关人员的具体身份以及是否实际参与诈骗活动,仍有待进一步调查。 频道广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😀😀😀😀😀😀 👉UU8国际,等你来掀翻全场! ——————————————— 🔔东南亚新闻-通缉-曝光社 ✈️ 点击投稿
#菲律宾新闻 3名菲律宾女子声称前往越南“度假”,却被移民局拦下,疑似实际目的地是柬埔寨 菲律宾移民局在尼诺·阿基诺国际机场(NAIA)1号航站楼拦下3名菲律宾女子。她们此前声称此次行程是前往越南度假,但移民官调查后发现,她们疑似真正的目的地是柬埔寨。 据菲律宾移民局介绍,执法人员因3人的说法存在疑点,同时发现相关文件存在可疑之处,因此怀疑她们可能是人口贩运的潜在受害者,随后阻止她们登机。 3名女子随后被移交至菲律宾反人口贩运跨机构委员会(Inter-Agency Council Against Trafficking,IACAT),接受进一步调查及相应处理。 与此同时,菲律宾有关部门也正在追查涉嫌招募这3名女子的当地招募人员。 频道广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😀😀😀😀😀😀 👉UU8国际,等你来掀翻全场! ——————————————— 🔔东南亚新闻-通缉-曝光社 ✈️ 点击投稿
#小菲求助 #彩礼 Hello mga mi me and my bf 3 years now we have baby girl already and planning na mag pa kasal okay lang ba 1m dowry na bibigay nya saakin? Sa Philippines palang yun pero magpapakasal ulit kami sa china any idea po magkano nabigay sa inyo after married i know it depends padin pero guve me idea lang po thanks 翻译:大家好,我和我男朋友已经交往3年了,我们已经有一个女儿,现在打算结婚。 请问,如果他给我100万比索作为彩礼,这样可以吗?这是在菲律宾举行婚礼时给的。之后我们还会在中国再举行一次婚礼。 想问…
#柬埔寨新闻 西哈努克市 U Mall 公寓遭突查:26名外国人被扣,涉嫌非法网络赌博及无护照 2026年10月1日,西哈努克省行政统一指挥委员会率领省警察局专业执法力量,对西哈努克市 U Mall 公寓展开大规模突击检查。 此次行动地点位于西哈努克市4分区、索卡酒店附近,具体为原 Prince Mall 商场旧址上方的 U Mall 公寓楼。 由于该公寓内部情况较为复杂,部分房间属于出租房,另一些房间则为私人购买的独立产权房,执法人员在进入和搜查过程中需要进行协调。此外,部分房间处于上锁状态,另有一些房间没有业主在场。 在搜查过程中,一些外国人提前察觉到执法行动,试图逃跑,并纷纷从楼上冲向底层,企图躲避检查。@ye123 不过,执法人员及时部署警力封锁出入口,最终成功控制并拘留26名外国人,其中包括部分中国籍人员。 据初步调查,这些人员涉嫌与网络技术诈骗(Online Scams)有关,同时部分人员身上未携带合法有…
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 942 posts we hold for @dnyxinwen668. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@DNYXSTJL6668 · 10,055#1
@nx123 · 785,762#2
@bx666 · 467,845#3
@Banma_xinwen · 90,625#4
@flb608 · 90,990#5
@jpz0123 · 50,556#6
@BG_BG8 · 38,596#7
@AQzx_1 · 175,586#8
@bodu08 · 58,105#9
@BGSS8 · 1,029#10
@dnyuuu88 · 125,961#11
@dsj665 · 108,595#12
@baoguangba088 · 236,958#13
@hrs166 · 43,319#14
@oxkkk · 11,228#15
@hyxw6 · 83,928#16
@dnyxwtt · 52,104#17
@qqt13 · 204,351#18
@dny099 · 94,952#19
@sii76 · 200,375#20
@GGooGG66 · 150,280#21
@hyxw4 · 77,044#22
@BGS8989 · 89,871#23
@bg888 · 343,655#24
@cc199 · 74,129#25
@DNYTT888 · 472#26
@dnanyakuaibaobgxs · 48,931#27
@dnybgtt · 53,306#28
@dny88 · 63,407#29
@ZYWX6 · 91,542#30
@xigang13 · 63,166#31
@ChiGua8999 · 11,870#32
@tghuarenba · 44,364#33
@baoguang821 · 51,566#34
@DNYBGT · 6,035#35
@TTDR8 · 102,196#36
@bgdsj26 · 122,084#37
@dxdb001 · 6,917#38
@DNYzzz6 · 46,891#39
@kk4568 · 126,337#40
@huich79 · 42,739#41
@gejige · 185,132#42
@jpz9118 · 97,799#43
@xinwen811 · 213,703#44
@DNY181 · 43,807#45
@SB919 · 128,290#46
@jianpuzhaidashijian · 44,661#47
@ygxw3 · 144,774#48
@cctvPH · 180,478#49
@svip40 · 107,808#50
@flb00 · 17,488#51
@feilongwang · 85,847#52
@aa144 · 35,191#53
@tp111 · 52,010#54
@jrdnyxs · 60,168#55
@XGRIJI · 63,705#56
@dubai0 · 77,574#57
@dubaixinwen2 · 221,502#58
@YIYIya689 · 2,971#59
@hyxw2 · 74,960#60
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@hyxw2 · 74,960
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 19 August 2026
@dnyuuu88 · 125,961
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
@jrdnyxs · 60,168
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@hyxw4 · 77,044
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 19 August 2026
@TTDR8 · 102,196
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
@dsj665 · 108,595
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
@bgdsj26 · 122,084
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
@nx123 · 785,762
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 August 2026
@bx66664 · 136,141
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 13 August 2026
@DNYzzz6 · 46,891
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 August 2026
@hyxw6 · 83,928
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 August 2026
@dnyxwtt · 52,104
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026
@dnanyakuaibaobgxs · 48,931
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
@GGooGG66 · 150,280
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 14 August 2026
@cc199 · 74,129
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 August 2026
@jpz0123 · 50,556
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚新闻-通缉-曝光社🌏” (@dnyxinwen668), 40,493 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dnyxinwen668.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.