Channel
@safe_olympic_space
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
101subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002099073742 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @safe_olympic_space |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/safe_olympic_space |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 09:09 | 101 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 100 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 100 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
28 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 17 | 60.7% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 17.9% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 7.14% | |
| 👾 | 2 | 7.14% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 3.57% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 3.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2025 to 5 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сегодняшний пост про пересдачу был не совсем случайным 😅 У меня есть большая новость: группы по олимпиадной математике на следующий год уже набраны, а значит можно двигаться дальше. Я наконец-то открываю свою математическую школу 🚀 В партнерстве с коллегой, кандидатом наук! Вау, что? Да 😎 Основная идея школы — помогать русскоговорящим детям, которые учатся или планируют учиться в международной системе: Европа, США…
💯2
Всем привет! Казалось бы для большинства из вас ЕГЭ уже прошло, но остается чуть меньше недели до дня пересдачи Поэтому сегодня на канале я бы предложил затронуть данную тему Вообще, сразу стоит сказать, что президентская пересдача появилась всего пару лет назад и данных по вариантам, чтобы делать глубокий анализ пока недостаточно Но все-таки хочется поделиться свои видением. Оно у меня обычно совпадает со школково …
🔥2
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
ЗАВТРА ДЕНЬ ЕГЭ Да, это олимпиадный канал. Но каждый год у меня в подготовке есть ребята, которые сдают профильное ЕГЭ (в этом году особенно много, кстати. Болею за каждого из вас, мои петербуржцы❤️). Да другим 11-классникам из России будет полезно. В общем, мои последние наставления: 1. Сегодня день вебов! На лайте, смотрим, повторяем формулы, заряжаемся что завтра придем и просто сделаем все как на разборах. Ссы…
💯2🔥2
Помогу узнать твою готовность к олимпиаде и шансы на победу бесплатно Мини-группы формируются по изначальной базе учеников. Кто-то понимает комбинаторику уже в 8 классе, а кто-то с трудом видит применение теоремы Пифагора в 11 классе. Поэтому перед записью я провожу бесплатную диагностику. 📝Как это работает? 1) Я отправляю тест на оценку уровня. В нем два раздела. Первый — проверка знаний из школьной программы за п…
🔥2👍1
Открыт набор набор на подготовку к олимпиадам по математике 2026/2027 года. Учеников стало слишком много, чтобы мне хватало времени на индивидуальные занятия, поэтому я решил собрать мини-группы. Так, все желающее получат подготовку (при этом по меньшей цене!), а я не разорвусь между уроками. Качество мини-группы не уступает индивидуальным занятиям. Я экспериментировал с разным количеством учеников и пришёл к вывод…
👾2🔥1
Привет! На связи Александр — математик, который готовит к олимпиадам и помогает поступить в вуз мечты. 📖Общий стаж преподавания — 10 лет, мои профессиональные интересы не смогли уместиться в один профиль, поэтому готовлю ребят к разным экзаменам. Например, мои ученики: + Стабильно набирают 85+ баллов на ЕГЭ по профильной математике; + Становятся призерами и победителями российских перечневых олимпиад (Читай — посту…
🔥4⚡1
Врываюсь с постом — поехали 👇 Спойлер: Как видите я перестал выходить сюда даже с оправдательными постами отсутствия активностей и обещаний самому себе. Но это не потому что я бросил интересоваться математикой - вовсе нет. Совмещать нагрузку учебного года и написание постов самому признано непосильной задачей. Но поработать с маркетологом и раскачать все это в планах на лето, конечно, присутствует. На этот раз ни ту…
🔥6👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @safe_olympic_space. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
я хочу почитать о поступлении в Америку/Европу в этом канале
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2025 to 5 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,214,395 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Safe Olympic space | Подготовка к олимпиадам по математике” (@safe_olympic_space), 101 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/safe_olympic_space.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.