Channel
@poinair
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
28,060subscribers
+24 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001150217974 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @poinair |
| Description | سفارش طراحی/خدمات سایت/خرید هاست و سرور @orders_poina 🔹بزرگترین و معتبرترین کانال وردپرس 🔹با کیفیت ترین خدمات وردپرسی در ایران 🔹خرید هاست و سرور 🔹میزبان مجموعهای از بزرگترین سایتهای وردپرسی 🔰سابقه طولانی،کیفیت بالا poina.ir ❌No ADS |
| Created | Between 1 January 2019 and 31 March 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/poinair |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 28,060 | -12 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 28,072 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 28,080 | +6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:41 | 28,074 | +4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 28,070 | +5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:30 | 28,065 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 28,066 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 28,063 | +27 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:50 | 28,036 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:49 | 28,036 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (18 July 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 185,760 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Aug 2026, 04:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
🚨🚨هشدااااااااااار هر چه سریعتر وردپرس 7.0.3 خودتون بروز کنید یه باگ امنیتی باز این نسخه داره باعث دسترسی به ادمین و سرور سایت میشه وردپرس هم هشدار داده هر چه سریعتر اقدام کنید نسخه ایمن 7.0.4 @poinair پوینا
این پلاگین رو نصب کنید https://wordpress.org/plugins/compromise-scanner-for-wp2shell/ و اسکن کنید اگر مشکلات امنیتی یا شل داشتید سریع اقدام کنید @poinair پوینا
🚨🚨🚨هشدار هر چه سریعتر وردپرس ۷.۰.۲ خودتون رو مجدد آپدیت کنید یک باگ خطرناک دیگر برای این نسخه منتشر شده که باعث هک شدن کامل وردپرس میشه آخرین نسخه 7.0.3 @poinair پوینا
اکثر دیتاسنتر ها تیکت و ایمیل ارسال کردن دارن دونه دونه به فنا میرن هر چی هست رو دارن میزنن با ایران اکسس کارتون نمیشه @poinair پوینا
خوده csf یه فایروال و بسته امنیتی هست باعث هک شدن سرور میشه @poinair پوینا
برای esxi و csf و cpanel و mariadb باگ های وحشتناکی اومده که منجر به دسترسی root و هک کامل سرور میشه هر سروری دارید که ماشین مجازی روشه در خطره متاسفانه باگ ها داره زیاد میشه و بعضی باگ ها آنقدر وحشتناک هست که با فایروال هم جلوشو نمیشه گرفت توی این هفته صد ها سرور توی ایران باج افزار گرفتن و کامل هک شدن آپدیت و پچ امنیتی حتما انجام بدید و سطح امنیتتون رو بیشتر کنید @poinair پوینا
انگار انسان ها 25 سال فریب خوردند انسان ها 25 سال در سایت ها برای هوش مصنوعی تولید محتوا کردند تا آنها را آموزش بدهند . آنها میدانستند باید تمام علم دنیا را آنلاین کنن تا هوش مصنوعی روزی آموزش ببنید. ⚠️ مدیر عامل openai گفته به زودی هوش مصنوعی از انسان پیشی خواهد گرفت @poinair پوینا
ایلان ماسک: پول تو سال 2036(ده سال بعد) دیگه مهم نیست! اصلاً پول رو واسه چی میخواید؟ برای خرید کالا و خدمات؛ مثل غذا، خونه، حملونقل و تفریح. حالا اگه رباتها و هوش مصنوعی بتونن بیشتر از چیزی که هر انسانی تو طول عمرش مصرف میکنه، کالا و خدمات تولید کنن، اون وقت دیگه پول به چه دردی میخوره؟ ------ 📌 حرفهای ایران ماسک نشون دهنده اینه که تا رسیدن به اون زمان دنیا با یک تورم شدید روبرو خواهد شد چون هوش مصنوعی برا…
تیکت هم تیکت های قدیم با یکی از هاستینگ های بزرگ صحبت میکردم میگفت کاربرا دیگه مثل قبل تیکت نمیزنن خیلی سخت و طاقت فرسا شده همشون میرن توی هوش مصنوعی داکیومنت دراز درست میکنن میفرستن میگفت فقط باید یه وکیل بگیریم بشینه این تیکت ها بخونه بفهمیم چی میگه میگفت قدیم پیام میومد سایت بالا نمیاد یا کنده الان صبح تا شب دارن سورس و اسکریپت و ... میسازن کلی تیکت دراز و پیام هوش مصنوعی میفرستن که این سورس چرا کار نمیکنه …
تا سال 2035 حدود 20 درصد برق آمریکا رو دیتاسنتر ها مصرف میکنن یعنی 2.5 برابر مصرف برق فعلی کل ایران یعنی تقریبا 250 میلیون سرور البته این 250 میلیون سرور رو با سرور های ایران مقایسه نکنید این 250 میلیون سرور برابری میکنه با 30 40 میلیارد سرور توی ایران برق در آینده تبدیل میشه به یک چیز گران بها و دیتاسنتر ها در حال بلعیدن تمام دنیا هستن از آب و برق و مس و ... و همینطور که جلو میریم دیتاسنتر ها مصرف بیشتری خواهند…
اصلا مشکل نداریم نتمون به بیت نزدیک شده به مگ که دیگه نمیرسیم کیلو هم داریم فراموش میکنیم حتی زمان قطعی کاملم شما میگفتید اختلال نداریم دقیقا به چی میگید اختلال ؟ @poinair پوینا
نت این هاستینگ رو بعد ۶ ماه باز کردن بعضی هاستینگ ها که هنوزم باز نشدن گفتن بزار دو روز قبل از جنگ باز کنیم خوشحال باشن نگن به بقیه رانت دادیم @poinair پوینا
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @poinair. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 63,478 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“متخصص وردپرس | پوینا” (@poinair), 28,060 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/poinair.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.