19 measurements spanning 20 days, net +109. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,917–13,058 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Aug 2026, 00:15
13,042
+9
25 Aug 2026, 00:32
13,033
+1
23 Aug 2026, 08:55
13,032
+2
21 Aug 2026, 20:05
13,030
+9
20 Aug 2026, 19:53
13,021
-8
19 Aug 2026, 22:05
13,029
+7
18 Aug 2026, 21:39
13,022
+10
17 Aug 2026, 18:15
13,012
+11
16 Aug 2026, 17:04
13,001
+3
15 Aug 2026, 01:27
12,998
+6
13 Aug 2026, 17:45
12,992
+6
12 Aug 2026, 17:06
12,986
+6
11 Aug 2026, 16:53
12,980
+11
10 Aug 2026, 20:18
12,969
+13
9 Aug 2026, 19:02
12,956
+4
8 Aug 2026, 17:33
12,952
+12
7 Aug 2026, 20:01
12,940
+7
6 Aug 2026, 02:32
12,933
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:12
12,933
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 29 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
28.0%
avg views ÷ 13,042 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,650
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.861%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held
25 (29 January 2026 – 25 August 2026)
Views total
25,560
Reactions total
220
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,030
Videos
≈49
Links
≈2,870
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,095 reactions across 23 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
826
75.4%
👍
109
9.95%
👏
26
2.37%
🤩
21
1.92%
🎉
17
1.55%
🥰
17
1.55%
😇
16
1.46%
🙏
16
1.46%
🍾
9
0.822%
👌
9
0.822%
😍
9
0.822%
🏆
5
0.457%
👨💻
5
0.457%
😎
3
0.274%
🫡
3
0.274%
💯
2
0.183%
🆒
1
0.091%
🕊
1
0.091%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,145reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
تو این ویدیو قراره ببینیم چطور میشه با استفاده از هوش مصنوعی (AI) بخش زیادی از کارهای مدیریت سایت رو سریعتر و حتی بهصورت خودکار انجام داد. از تولید و ویرایش محتوا گرفته تا مدیریت وردپرس، برنامهنویسی، رفع مشکلات سایت و انجام کارهایی که قبلاً باید کلی براشون وقت میذاشتیم. اگر سایت داری یا با وردپرس و طراحی سایت کار میکنی، این ویدیو میتونه نگاهت به مدیریت سایت رو کاملاً تغییر بده.
https://mihanwp.com/let-ai-manage…
این روزها تقریباً هر طراح سایتی حداقل یکبار شنیده:
«ممنون، ولی من خودم سایتمو با هوش مصنوعی میسازم.»
اولین بارش یه تلنگره. بار پنجم دیگه استرسه. و اگه چند ماه پشتسرهم بشنویش، کمکم به این فکر میافتی که نکنه واقعاً شغلی که ده سال روش وقت گذاشتی، داره با چهارتا پرامپت جمع میشه.
مشاهده روی سایت:
https://mihanwp.com/will-ai-replace-web-designers/
مشاهده در یوتیوب:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFi3VZ2RfA4
@mihanwp
از این به بعد بدون نیاز به نصب هیچ نرمافزاری، میتونید دورههای آموزشیتون رو مستقیماً از سایت و با تجربهای سریعتر، راحتتر و جذابتر تماشا کنید.
🔗 ورود به پلتفرم آموزشی:
https://mihanwp.com/mwpanel/?tab=6
بعد از استفاده، لطفاً نظرتون رو از طریق فرم بازخورد داخل همین صفحه برامون ارسال کنید. بازخوردهای شما برای بهترشدن این پلتفرم واقعاً ارزشمنده ❤️
@mihanwp
توی این ویدیو یاد میگیرید چطور محصولات مختلف را در ووکامرس بر اساس کیلوگرم، گرم، لیتر و میلیلیتر بفروشید. این روش برای فروش محصولاتی مثل برنج، خشکبار، حبوبات، عرقیات گیاهی، روغن، عطر و ادکلن بسیار کاربردی هست.
https://mihanwp.com/sell-products-by-weight-and-volume-in-woocommerce/
https://youtu.be/MjeC-4KKHOY
@mihanwp
از امروز میتونید توی صفحه بهترین هاست وردپرس، آپتایم شرکتهای مختلف رو از داخل ایران و خارج ایران در لحظه ببینید. ✅
https://mihanwp.com/best-wordpress-hosting/
اینجا هم میتونید اطلاعات دقیقتری دریافت کنید:
https://mihanwp.com/web-hosting-radar/
@mihanwp
همین الان که این متن رو میخونید، خودِ mihanwp.com روی رخش سواره! ما سایت خودمون رو از WP Rocket به رخش کوچ دادیم و ته این مقاله نتیجهشو نشونتون میدیم.
https://mihanwp.com/why-migrate-to-rakhsh/
@mihanwp
🚀 بالاخره بعد از چند ماه توسعه و تست، رخش منتشر شد!
رخش، افزونه افزایش سرعت وردپرس، طراحی شده تا سایت شما سریعتر، سبکتر و بهینهتر اجرا بشه؛ سریع مثل اسب رستم! ⚡️
برای بررسی امکانات و عملکرد رخش، حتماً جدول مقایسه رخش با افزونه WP Rocket را ببینید.
🔗 مشاهده جزئیات و دریافت پلاگین رخش:
https://mihanwp.com/rakhsh/
@mihanwp
پلاگین رخش روی میهن وردپرس نصب شد. 📣 اول رو سایت خودمون تست میکنیم، مطمئن که شدیم رونمایی میکنیم. ✅
محصول جدید میهن وردپرس که قراره سرعت سایتتون رو چند برابر کنه.
@mihanwp
❤41👍5🤩5😍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @mihanwp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@mihanwp edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 305,073 of 1,604,598entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
NovinHub | نوین هاب @novinhub · 54,827 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
تولید محتوا |هوش مصنوعی| زنگ دانش @zangedanesh · 59,476 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
آکادمی آیولرن | هوش مصنوعی و برنامه نویسی @aiolearn · 162,705 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
دانشگاه بازاریابی @iranmarketinguniversity · 102,620 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“میهن وردپرس” (@mihanwp), 13,042 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mihanwp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.