8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1,121. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 98,961–100,418 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 10:07
99,129
-312
11 Aug 2026, 10:32
99,441
-175
10 Aug 2026, 11:24
99,616
-264
9 Aug 2026, 13:11
99,880
-70
8 Aug 2026, 15:08
99,950
-68
7 Aug 2026, 12:13
100,018
-231
6 Aug 2026, 09:30
100,249
-1
6 Aug 2026, 08:19
100,250
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 13 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
52.2%
avg views ÷ 99,129 subscribers
Avg views / post
51,700
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
22 (13 May 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
362,200
Reactions total
4,731
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
264
Videos
17
Links
653
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
48s
Average length
48s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10,803 reactions across 22 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5,718
52.9%
🔥
2,339
21.7%
👍
1,839
17.0%
👏
907
8.40%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,803reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
46
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 22 we hold a reading for · 68%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pechova. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 May 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Блядь, как же хуёво - второй день без алкашки, впереди ещё девять таких дней. Проблема даже не в том, что хочется выпить, а в том, что начинают ощущаться все мои болячки. Несколько дней назад наебнулся ногой об кровать и словил огромный синяк. Пока был бухим, даже не чувствовал его, теперь болит пиздец.
Кроме того, я моментально простыл - вчера меня знобило и темпаратурило, сегодня ещё и горло першит. А ещё вы охуее…
Вот наша ключевая зацепка. Эта шестёрка (люди поумнее на интервью не поехали) живёт в Нячанге, представляется Максимом (ясен хуй, что его зовут как угодно, но не Максим). У агента 228 есть его голос без обработки. Уверен, что он успел сделать пару фоток, но наш Манипенни ака Димависки сейчас без мобильного интернета, поэтому связи с агентом 228 у меня пока нет. Это хуепутало говорит, что ему 22 года, и он сбежал из Р…
Финал по Озону и его похищению. После просмотра видоса Ларина я на 100% уверен в том, что Озона реально кошмарят охуевшие всжшники. Агент 228 провёл нихуёвую работу, но мне кажется, что Нячанг поглотил его. Вместо спасения Озона он упорно продолжает защищать азиатку, которая мб и не при делах, но кому вообще на неё не похуй? Чел, который представился "другом" Озона, сидел в балаклаве с изменённым голосом и нёс полную…
Апдейт по похищению Озона. Как вы помните, недавно на стриме мы разрабатывали операцию по спасению рядового Романа. Как бы мне не хотелось найти более подходящего исполнителя, единственным согласившимся оказался Дмитрий Ларин. Через Диму Виски я передал ему все сведения, которые нам удалось собрать на стриме. Ларин снял отель в 300 км от Озона, напялил на себя прикид в стиле фильма "Таксист" и отправился на встречу с…
Саша Стоун баллотируется в депутаты
Ранее блогер победил в предварительном голосовании на выборах в Мособлдуму, а теперь подал документы в избирком для регистрации в качестве кандидата.
«Для меня это новый этап и большая ответственность. Впереди много работы, встреч и совместных решений», — написал он.
Вот енто я понимаю карьерный путь! Из блогеров в поп-мма, из поп-мма - в депутаты. Сейчас, кстати, в депутаты поп…
Сатира раскритиковали после видео с поцелуем 16-летней фанатки. Ролик с концерта Кокошки быстро разлетелся по TikTok и вызвал споры в сети.
Одни пользователи назвали момент милым и не увидели в нем ничего предосудительного, другие сочли поступок неприемлемым из-за несовершеннолетнего возраста девушки. Сам Сатир заявил, что это был дружеский поцелуй в щеку и что девушка не была против.
Я вчера на стриме видел, как С…
Разработчики Pokemon Go передали американскому военному подрядчику 30 миллиардов сканов местности, которые собрали игроки
Как сообщает нидерландская газета Trouw со ссылкой на военных экспертов, эти данные используют для обучения 3D-моделей и создания точных пространственных карт. Они обеспечат надёжную навигацию для боевых беспилотников дальнего действия даже при отсутствии сигнала GPS.
Сами создатели игры всё отр…
Инцелы скоро В С Ё: в России предложили признать движение инцелов экстремистским, и Генпрокуратура уже рассматривает соответствующий запрос от общественников.
Инцелы — это люди, которые не могут найти сексуального партнёра и винят в своём воздержании женщин. Активисты считают, что взгляды участников движения радикальны и противоречат традиционным ценностям.
Так как эта идеология пришла из Канады, инициаторы также п…
❤342👏97🔥49👍21
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @pechova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@pechova edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 89,831 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Соляноторий @PathOfMisanthrope · 190,821 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Печень Ховы” (@pechova), 99,129 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pechova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
