По свежайшему следу ремастера Ведьмака 3, не просто ж так готовился. Смотрим впечатления и философию на тему смерти атмосферного освещения ради ничего. https://youtu.be/Um7EwzV3kSc
❤62👍12🤡7🌚6

Channel
@kultas_live
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
31,609subscribers
-130 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001570096798 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kultas_live |
| Description | Предложка - @KultasPredloBot Личка (для женщин и фембоев) - @Kulthas Теперь ТОЧНО официальный канал Культаса. Идентификатор блогера - https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=673b690d6afad41667c99faf®istryType=bloggersPermission |
| Created | 5 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kultas_live |
Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Sept 2026, 00:59 | 31,609 | -36 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 21:39 | 31,645 | +5 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 21:19 | 31,640 | +11 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 31,629 | +13 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:55 | 31,616 | +14 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 05:15 | 31,602 | -45 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 21:36 | 31,647 | -14 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:01 | 31,661 | +7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:25 | 31,654 | -12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:22 | 31,666 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 31,670 | +5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 31,665 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:58 | 31,671 | +3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 31,668 | -20 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 31,688 | -10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:58 | 31,698 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 31,703 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 31,708 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 31,709 | +5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 31,704 | first reading |
87 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 92 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 87 (17 July 2026 – 29 September 2026) |
| Views total | 581,070 |
| Reactions total | 13,959 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Sept 2026, 21:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
42,524 reactions across 87 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9,014 | 21.2% | |
| 😁 | 8,797 | 20.7% | |
| 🤣 | 7,721 | 18.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2,300 | 5.41% | |
| 🌚 | 2,216 | 5.21% | |
| 👍 | 2,138 | 5.03% | |
| 🔥 | 2,128 | 5.00% | |
| 🤯 | 1,219 | 2.87% | |
| 🎉 | 1,064 | 2.50% | |
| 🤡 | 950 | 2.23% | |
| 😱 | 735 | 1.73% | |
| 🥰 | 714 | 1.68% | |
| 😢 | 606 | 1.43% | |
| ⚡ | 590 | 1.39% | |
| 💔 | 434 | 1.02% | |
| 💯 | 381 | 0.896% | |
| 🤔 | 354 | 0.832% | |
| 🍌 | 276 | 0.649% | |
| 💩 | 162 | 0.381% | |
| 🤩 | 159 | 0.374% | |
| 11 further kinds | 566 | 1.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 87 of the 87 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42,524 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 87 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
По свежайшему следу ремастера Ведьмака 3, не просто ж так готовился. Смотрим впечатления и философию на тему смерти атмосферного освещения ради ничего. https://youtu.be/Um7EwzV3kSc
❤62👍12🤡7🌚6
Какое совпадение что прям накануне ремастера дочитал первую книгу Ведьмака, так режим выправил что аж впервые за черт знает сколько лет захотелось читать вообще. И вот честно - на одном дыхании, я прям ПОЧУВСТВОВАЛ. Безотносительно того что там сейчас Сапковский говорит и делает, работа отличная. Формат сборника разрозненных рассказов вперемешку с объединяющим - для представления персонажей и мира подходит идеально.…
🔥216❤79⚡15👍11🤡8🌚4🤩3🥴2
Короче, положняк. Так как на Твиче сейчас два страйка висит, один из которых истекает 9 октября, а второй/сегодняшний можно будет снять вручную (но только если он останется последним, то есть уже после истечения предыдущего... вроде, ну как я понял), то рисковать до означенной даты не буду. Оставшуюся очередь будем досматривать НА КИКЕ, с третьей запаской в виде ВК, но надеюсь что не придется. Там еще стрима на 3-4 о…
👍190🙏45😢27❤8🔥8🤡6😱5
А чего не "на заре анаболиков"? Охваты ж меньше.
🔥274😱88🤡51🌚16❤12😁9💩5👍2
В интернете НЕДОВОЛЬСТВО (вы шокированы,я знаю) - оф аккаунт Ведьмака 3 выложил сравнение ремастера с оригиналом на примере знака игни. И мы, походу, продолжаем славную традицию плохих презентаций, которые специально стараются выставить продукт в худшем свете. в данном случае - буквально, потому что футажи будто сняты в разное время дня, и без закатного солнца освещение начинает напоминать UE-слоп. Впрочем, отсутстви…
❤293🌚61👍17🤡15💔4🤣3
Video, posted without a caption
😁473❤🔥95❤36🌚12🤣11💯4🤡3🤨3
Только читая как Bungie предположительно воскрешают Дестини 2 (достают из загашника и оптимизируют старый контент, про разработку нового формулировка крайне мутная и ничего не обещающая) спустя 3 месяца после увольнений и того как Марафон с причмоком отсосал,... ...только ТОГДА Дестиниеб может почувствовать сотую долю эйфории ХОТСоеба спустя 6 лет.
👍234😁110🤣54💯16🤡6❤2🌚2🤔1
Даров! Как твой день? ❤️
🤣451😁65⚡21❤10💩6🔥6🤡6
👤 Strč prst skrz krk
❤235😁187🌚31❤🔥7🤯6🤡3🤣3💩1
Signed Культас Предложка
Photo, posted without a caption
😁336🤣227⚡20😐12🍌8❤7💯3🤡3
Я прошел Вульверину и заставил вас смотреть на это. А теперь смотрите последнее слово по нему, после чего об игре благополучно все забудут. https://youtu.be/da73uwrJuyc
🤣171🍌23❤🔥17❤7😁6🤡3🌭2👍2
Ну по впечатлениям от 2/3 Росомахи сдается что хейт был не заслужен, конечно. Как и любые другие эмоции - у игры личности - хуй, и уникальности - писенька. От предсказуемой брейнд-дед истории, до боевки без глубины, чисто кнопочки понажимать, мозг не задействуя - иногда прикольно выглядит, но только и всего. Через неделю уже все забудут что этот самый эксклюзив Сони в истории существовал вообще. Завтра допройдем коне…
❤246😁127👍32🤡22💩7❤🔥2🏆2🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 87 posts we hold for @kultas_live. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КультасLIVE” (@kultas_live), 31,609 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kultas_live.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.