За 10 лет ничего не поменялось __________ ❤️ DigitalRazor #digitalrazor_meme
👍54😁41❤11🔥1

Channel
@digitalrazor_pc
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
127,609subscribers
-337 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001228486260 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @digitalrazor_pc |
| Description | Про игры, ПК, железо и тех, кто этим живёт Игровые ПК: https://t.me/digitalrazor_catalog1 💬 Консультация: https://t.me/Channel_digitalrazor_bot Реклама: @AdRazor_bot Реестр: https://clck.ru/3GHz37 ВК: https://vk.com/digitalrazor |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/digitalrazor_pc |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 127,609 | -76 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 127,685 | -64 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 127,749 | -49 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 127,798 | -96 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:41 | 127,894 | -24 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 127,918 | -28 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 127,946 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (2 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 171,970 |
| Reactions total | 1,421 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 06:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
1,421 reactions across 27 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 503 | 35.4% | |
| ❤ | 367 | 25.8% | |
| 😁 | 193 | 13.6% | |
| 🔥 | 169 | 11.9% | |
| 🫡 | 105 | 7.39% | |
| 🤡 | 52 | 3.66% | |
| 👎 | 32 | 2.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,421reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
За 10 лет ничего не поменялось __________ ❤️ DigitalRazor #digitalrazor_meme
👍54😁41❤11🔥1
🌦 «Погода» в Windows 11 заняла больше гигабайта памяти Встроенное приложение «Погода» в Windows 11 заняло около 1,2 ГБ оперативной памяти при открытом прогнозе. В диспетчере задач — восемь процессов на базе Chromium. Вместо нативного приложения Microsoft фактически использует сайт в оболочке WebView2. Tom’s Hardware повторил проверку и получил до 1 ГБ. Кроме прогноза приложение загружает интерактивные карты, дополн…
😁34👍11🫡7❤3
🧹 Опять закончилось место на диске, и комп начал тормозить? Но не спешите качать первый попавшийся «оптимизатор» — половина из них только делает вид, что ускоряет систему. ❤️В статье разобрали: • чем встроенная очистка Windows хуже сторонних утилит • почему чистить реестр почти бесполезно (и когда всё-таки стоит) • какие программы реально работают в 2026, а какие просто рисуют красивые цифры Спойлер: лучшая бесплат…
👍24🫡9😁5🔥4❤2
⚡️ Steam вернул деньги за Battlefield 6 после 470 часов игры Пользователь Reddit получил полный возврат $109,24 за Phantom Edition Battlefield 6 после 470 часов в игре. Причина — из меню и быстрого подбора матчей исчезли несколько любимых режимов, включая Rush. По стандартным правилам Steam возврат доступен в течение 14 дней после покупки, если игра запущена меньше чем на два часа. Но площадка разрешает отправлять …
❤41🔥15👍10😁3
🔽 RX 9070 GRE подешевела до $480 пока остальные карты дорожают В американском сетевом магазине электроники Micro Center Radeon RX 9070 GRE появилась за $479,99 при рекомендованной цене $549. Ранее карту также продавали в онлайн-магазине Newegg за $499 по промокоду. Внутри — 12 ГБ GDDR6, 192-битная шина и чип RDNA 4. В тестах Tom’s Hardware карта показала около 87 FPS в 1440p без трассировки. Не максимум на рынке, н…
👍21🔥7❤6
🙂 Коту сделали гамак прямо над игровым ПК Пара геймеров установили на системники вот такие небольшие гамачки. Конструкцию назвали «невраждёбной архитектурой» — в противовес шипам и накладкам, которыми котов обычно пытаются отвадить от техники. Здесь есть и практический смысл. Если у корпуса сверху стоит выдув, гамак оставляет между котом и решёткой зазор: воздух продолжает выходить, а животное не ложится прямо на к…
🔥60👍23😁16❤12🫡2
👀 RTX 5090 перестала быть игровой? Пользователь Reddit предложил больше не считать RTX 5090 игровой видеокартой и убрать её из игровых тестов. Логика проста: 32 ГБ памяти, высокая вычислительная мощность и цена — это уже не для игр, а для рендера и локальных ИИ. Но здесь смешали назначение карты и разумность покупки. RTX 5090 остаётся флагманской GeForce для игр. Именно так её позиционирует сама NVIDIA. Игровые тес…
❤23👍15🫡10
Posted without readable text
👍18❤7🫡6
🎬 Видеокарты с 8 ГБ уже устарели? Каждый год интернет кого-то «хоронит»: то процессоры, то RTX, то целые платформы. Теперь очередь дошла до 8 ГБ видеопамяти. В новом видео разобрали тесты, цифры, кому хватит, а кому пора бежать за новой картой. 🔺 YouTube • ВК Видео 🎁 И по традиции, конкурс в комментариях под видео: расскажи, сколько памяти у твоей видеокарты и как она справляется. Одному комментатору подарим игру…
❤18🔥9🫡6👍3
Posted without readable text
❤19👍8😁5
⚡️ Геймер воткнул вилку не туда. И только спустя время понял, что что-то не так Пользователь Reddit подключал подсветку ПК в темноте и случайно воткнул вилку сразу в две соседние розетки удлинителя. Подвох заметил не сразу. Подсветка заработала только после нормального переподключения. Казалось бы, дело закрыто: просто воткнул не туда. Но не тут-то было. Когда автор поделился этой историей, в комментариях разгорел…
😁53👍14❤5🔥3🤡1
👀 Чел получил по "пожизненной гарантии" всего 17% от стоимости память Crucial Пользователь отправил комплект DDR5 48 ГБ по гарантии — одна плашка умерла. Замену не дали, вернули $241,86, ровно столько он заплатил при покупке. Сейчас такая память стоит около $1 400. Получается, возврат покрывает меньше 20% замены. Причина: Micron закрыла Crucial, запасных модулей нет. Формально гарантию не нарушили — в условиях есть…
👍30❤11🫡11😁8👎2🤡2
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @digitalrazor_pc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 666,714 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DIGITALRAZOR” (@digitalrazor_pc), 127,609 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/digitalrazor_pc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.