Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for speculative_fiction | Василий Владимирский

Channel

speculative_fiction | Василий Владимирский

@SpeculativeFiction

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

4,696subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001254529747
TypeChannel
Username@SpeculativeFiction
Created28 May 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SpeculativeFiction

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “speculative_fiction — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

4,6964,7004,6986 August 2026 — 4,697 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,697 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,700 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,698 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,696 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,695–4,701 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 10:534,696-2
11 Aug 2026, 17:254,698-2
8 Aug 2026, 21:264,700+3
6 Aug 2026, 03:524,697no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:334,697first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.3%
avg views ÷ 4,696 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,420
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held24 (29 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total34,101
Reactions total1,167
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,140 reactions across 23 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥32028.1%
👍23220.4%
😁22920.1%
21318.7%
😢716.23%
💔696.05%
💩30.263%
😱30.263%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,167reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC791 views58 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Вот и Джона Краули («Маленький, большой», «Эгипет») не стало. Один раз с ним встречались, на «Портале-2007». Печаль.

💔36😢211

9 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC≈1,070 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Что ж, по итогам первой половины 2026 года книги Стругацких на 16 месте по востребованности среди художественной литературы. Между Лией Арден и Рэем Брэдбери, лол. Ну, посмотрим, что там в конце года получится.

🔥15😁156😢2👍1

9 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC≈1,060 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026

В личке справедливо указывают, что в среднем выживаемость у охотников и собирателей была выше, чем у первых земледельцев. И это, безусловно, верно – с одним нюансом: пока охотников было мало, а дичи много. Это определенно не случай навахо. Ну и стоит учесть, что они пришли на готовенькое и позаимствовали уже вполне развитые скотоводческие и земледельческие технологии, а не проходили все этапы неолитической революции

👍31🔥8

9 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC≈1,050 views76 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Когда автор, принадлежащей к условной «западной культуре» - европеец, русский, американец и т.д. – пытается залезть в голову к представителю «коренного народа», часто получается кринж. А когда человек письменной культуры к человеку культуры дописьменной, кринж получается всегда, без исключений, автоматически. Перечитываю сейчас «Глаз кота» Роджера Желязны, там главный герой индеец-навахо, чтящий традиции своего народ

👍46🔥1711💩1😱1

8 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC≈1,120 views90 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Да, кстати, специально посмотрел: "жутко малоизвестный писатель" из отзыва ☝️☝️☝️ - это Тед Чан. Ну, знаете, тот, по которому снято "Прибытие" Вильнёва. Вот уж действительно, кто о нем слышал...

😁82😢8

8 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC≈1,140 views85 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#о_нас_пишут – в смысле, пишут о книге «Картографы рая и ада» читатели и слушатели на «Яндекс.Книгах». Все отзывы прекрасные, я прямо разрываюсь. Но мой фаворит видимо все-таки Андрей: как говорится, краткость – сестра таланта.

😁63😢10🔥6👍32💩1

6 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC≈1,510 views68 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Полезная книжка – «Ухрония» Эммануэля Каррера. Просто эталонное сочетание интеллектуальной ленности, некомпетентности и снобизма. Прямо не на шутку меня выбесила, чего непросто добиться. Люблю книги, которые вызывают сильные чувства. Подробности воспоследуют, уже пишу.

😁48🔥16😢2😱2

5 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC≈1,650 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Тем временем К.А.Терина уверенно теснит Салмана Рушди. 👇👇👇 Горжусь знакомством! Не с Рушди.

🔥168

5 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC≈1,570 views101 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @anyret_a_kPhoto

осторожно, этот пост написан прямиком из ахуя: мой сборник рассказов Black Hole Heart and Other Stories (перевёл на анлийский Алекс Шварцман, издали “Fairwood Press”) — в шорт-листе World Fantasy Awards 2026

🔥7323👍5

4 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC≈1,920 views60 reactionsread 12 August 2026

С другой стороны, обнаружил, что не могу читать романы «на злобу дня». Даже хорошие (ну, если верить на слово коллегам, которые их все-таки прочитали, тезке Книгобаре например). Понимаю, почему авторы их сочиняют, понимаю, почему читатели их читают (хотя вроде бы уже меньше, утомились). И пусть пишут и читают, не осуждаю. Но нет. Хочется не эскапизма, конечно, не пресловутого бегства от реальности, будь она трижды пр

👍3514😢9😁2

4 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC≈1,540 views60 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Отношения с технооптимизмом у меня сложные. Да и вообще с оптимизмом. На выходных забрал в СДЭКе внезапный подарок от организаторов конкурса «Инженеры слова». А вчера, возвращаясь из ближайшего лабаза, прочитал на двери подъезда, что в связи с какими-то там испытаниями в нашем доме на 4 дня отключают горячую воду. Вторая четверть XXI века, товарищи, яблони на Марсе цветут пышным цветом. И во всю колосятся. Но как че

🔥27👍16😁134

3 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC≈1,530 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @bratrazumPhoto

http://bvi.rusf.ru/fx/fx031.pdf

13

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @SpeculativeFiction. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 65,454 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Яндекс Книги
@booksyandex · 146,814
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q15065018 on Wikidata, read 16 August 2026
LabelVasily Vladimirsky
Official sitehttp://vvladimirsky.narod.ru/

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

4 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Владимирский, Василий Андреевич (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…=== * «Картографы рая и ада» (АСТ, Редакция Елены Шубиной, 2025) {[https://t.me/SpeculativeFiction/6458 Рец.]} == Примечания == {{примечания}} == Ссылки…”
read 16 August 2026
Казменко, Сергей Вадимович (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…участников которого называл Казменко [[Василий Владимирский]]https://t.me/SpeculativeFiction/6529. Похоронен на Бабигонском кладбище (г. Петродворец)…”
read 16 August 2026
Колупаев, Виктор Дмитриевич (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…самобытных советских фантастов" называл его [[Василий Владимирский]]https://t.me/SpeculativeFiction/6509. == Библиография == === Книги === * Случится…”
read 16 August 2026
Пищеблок (роман) (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…три-четыре авторских листа. Но божичьки, как же оно все затянуто"https://t.me/SpeculativeFiction/6517. {{конец скрытого блока}} ==Адаптации и сиквелы…”
read 16 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“speculative_fiction | Василий Владимирский” (@SpeculativeFiction), 4,696 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SpeculativeFiction.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.