Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Рыдакторы

Channel

Рыдакторы

@boksttttttt

Not marked by Telegram, checked 21 September 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,782subscribers

+469 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002180943579
TypeChannel
Username@boksttttttt
Description18+ Канал о редакторской боли & боли сотрудников книжной индустрии Поделись болью в анонимной форме: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSchKv4rsLYdDk8zHf4YfiK7-sr6fZcx2ccEqe3-5sKp-widLg/viewform
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/boksttttttt

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,3076,7826,544.57 August 2026 — 6,313 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,313 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,312 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,307 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,308 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,322 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,319 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,336 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,343 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,344 subscribers6 September 2026 — 6,360 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,371 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,387 subscribers24 September 2026 — 6,500 subscribers4 October 2026 — 6,638 subscribers10 October 2026 — 6,665 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,680 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,684 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,685 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,709 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,729 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,728 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,741 subscribers4 November 2026 — 6,748 subscribers7 November 2026 — 6,768 subscribers11 November 2026 — 6,782 subscribers7 August 202611 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 96 days, net +469. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,236–6,853 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 09:496,782+14
7 Nov 2026, 12:466,768+20
4 Nov 2026, 21:166,748+7
2 Nov 2026, 01:076,741+13
29 Oct 2026, 20:496,728-1
26 Oct 2026, 16:406,729+20
23 Oct 2026, 15:276,709+24
20 Oct 2026, 17:066,685+1
17 Oct 2026, 16:466,684+4
14 Oct 2026, 10:376,680+15
10 Oct 2026, 17:366,665+27
4 Oct 2026, 20:216,638+138
24 Sept 2026, 23:596,500+113
14 Sept 2026, 22:196,387+16
11 Sept 2026, 18:006,371+11
6 Sept 2026, 21:376,360+16
2 Sept 2026, 06:526,344+1
30 Aug 2026, 13:486,343+7
27 Aug 2026, 09:236,336+17
24 Aug 2026, 08:266,319first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 8 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
74.0%
avg views ÷ 6,782 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,020
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held35 (8 February 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total75,260
Reactions total3,195
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 17:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
96
Videos
56
Links
43

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

6,914 reactions across 35 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1,20017.4%
💯82111.9%
🙈80811.7%
❤72910.5%
💔6789.81%
👀4386.33%
🤯3765.44%
😢3735.39%
🌚3495.05%
🤔2183.15%
🔥2072.99%
😱1862.69%
😭1482.14%
🕊1211.75%
👍610.882%
👏600.868%
😨540.781%
☃360.521%
🤝220.318%
❤‍🔥130.188%
5 further kinds160.231%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,914 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 13:42 UTC≈2,860 views183 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Последний месяц активно разбирала самотек — какую же трешанину туда чаще всего присылают. Просто нет слов!!! Исходя из наших последних ред.коллегий могу сказать, что сейчас релевантны: 1. Даркромансы 2. Уютные детективы или хиллинг истории 3. Азиатский сеттинг (хоть и кажется, что уже идет на спад, но это только кажется..) 4. Славянский сеттинг (ретелинг, былины, сказки, Русь, мифы) 5. Молодежные ром…

🌚85🙈64😭15💯11😁3❤2👍2🕊1

6 Nov 2026, 05:50 UTC≈3,310 views132 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Согласна!! Боль еще какая! Пришлось даже отказать одной редакторше в вакансии - во всех прошлых проектах прослеживались один и те же художники и явная дружба с ними. После собеса поняла, что в случае, если ее наймем, то и у нас появятся бесконечные обложки этих художников…

👀71🙈34❤11🤔9😨3👍1👏1🕊1

6 Nov 2026, 02:41 UTC≈3,380 views228 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Есть такой тип коллег, которые как найдут какого-нибудь художника и давай во всех своих проектах его пихать (привет Полине, Алекс, Награни). В итоге у вас в редакции куча однообразных изданий. Мне такой подход не близок и кажется провальным. Полгода назад возглавила редакцию и как по мне приняла единственно верное решение - теперь с одним художником мы работаем не больше двух раз в год с перерывом в 6 месяцев (не счи…

🔥118💯49👏27🙈17😁5☃3❤3🌚2

29 Oct 2026, 08:50 UTC≈5,800 views146 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Недавно было принято решение, что если один из молодёжных импринтов нашей редакции не выйдет из застоя в течение семи месяцев, то будет запущен процесс масштабного ребрендинга и смены направления. Однако никаких конкретных шагов для выхода из застоя предпринято не было. Просто надеемся на чудо… В импринте регулярно выходят книги, но все либо ассортимент, либо те на которые делают ставку, но они не дают нужного выхлоп…

🤔55😭45😁17🕊8💔7🙈6🙏5❤2

29 Oct 2026, 05:50 UTC≈5,140 views117 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Издательство «Питер» — моя римская империя. Как ни зайду на хедхантер, там всегда висят вакансии от этого издательства. Причем не редактор или корректор, а практически всегда какие-нибудь руководящие должности. Кто знает, что там происходит? Реально такая текучка? Куда деваются люди..

😁94🤔18🕊4🌚1

25 Oct 2026, 12:42 UTC≈6,920 views273 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Скажу свое непопулярное мнение: требовать продвижения от издательства - это как требовать от хлебобулочной рекламы плюшек. Издательство занимается отбором, редактурой, корректурой, обложкой (полным циклом рождения книги). И это огромный массив работы и затрат. При этом книги «пекутся» постоянно и под разные ца и запросы. Ожидать, что издательство будет вкладывать в раскрутку каждой книги или обвинять, что издательств…

🙈146😁41🔥17❤14🌚13💯13😨11👀8

24 Oct 2026, 17:57 UTC≈6,660 views471 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Три года назад издала вполне успешную дилогию ру-автора. Признаться честно, в редакции были готовы с большим удовольствием дальше работать с автором, и были все шансы на продвижение и увеличенный тираж. Однако на три года автор пропала и вот сейчас только принесла дописанную рукопись. Сказать откровенно, в книге уже не заинтересованы. Спрос на книги писательницы прошел. Сейчас если только начинать с нуля или даже лу…

🙈243🤯139😁45🌚23😨8❤6👍4🕊2

22 Oct 2026, 09:15 UTC≈6,170 views305 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Слушаю вебинар с участием писателей. Начался со феминитивов «резидентка», «спикерка», «авторка». Я — старовер. Чувствую, долго не протяну. Диалог организаторов: — Даш, прокомментируешь? — Да, только я — Дарья. Можно быть вот писателем и вдали от этой «тусовки»? Такие деловые, а двух слов связать не могут авторки)

😁145💯63👀24👏19🙈16🌚14❤9😨8

21 Oct 2026, 17:50 UTC≈6,100 views111 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Возвращаюсь со второй частью издательских перестановок и настоящей болью любого редактора. Пожалуй, чистейший эксклюзив, который прошел очень тихо внутри тусовки, но одна писательница публично слила скрин с предложением издания, официально подтверждающий эту информацию, поэтому решила поделиться и продолжить рубрику. Алана — бывший создатель и руководитель/главный редактор издательств «Маракуйя» и «Мангата» — покин…

😱64❤16🌚14❤‍🔥5😁5🤔3👍2🕊2

21 Oct 2026, 05:01 UTC≈5,370 views234 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Новый тренд буктока: рыдающая писательница. Пишу без негатива к писательнице (только лучи и поддержка!). Это не ирония, а новый тренд среди авторов. После того как писательница выложила ролик со слезами на глазах от накрученных негативных отзывов, он везде залетел. В комментариях ее пришли поддерживать топовые звезды от актеров до Когроманова. А люди массово начали слать поддерживающие скрины с заказанной книгой. По…

🤯123👀38😁27🙈22😢9🤔7❤5👏1

20 Oct 2026, 07:05 UTC≈4,430 views110 reactionsread 12 November 2026

10 лет работы в книжных издательствах и долго хотела поменять сферу. Почти сменила называется.. ушла в книжные онлайн сервисы… отработала в Букмейте, Сторител, Строках, Билайн книгах, и сейчас вот ВБ книги. Лучшее, пожалуй, было в Строках. До смены руководства были большие планы и амбиции. Сейчас без слез не взглянешь, все-таки когда ты просто издавала книги в роли главреда, а не управляла айтисервисом, не могут отку…

❤40😢34💔15😁8🤔6💯2🕊2😭2

19 Oct 2026, 15:10 UTC≈4,420 views299 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Очень люблю читать блоки благодарностей наших авторов — тех, чьи тексты ты правила: убирала шероховатости, иногда вносила довольно серьёзную правку, без которой текст был бы нечитаемым; согласовывала несколько вариантов обложек, над которыми работал дизайнер, и макет, который создавал верстальщик, и т. д. Но в блоке благодарностей обычно написано: «Спасибо моему мужу/жене/собаке, без которого/которой эта книга не су…

❤144🙈66💯47😁13🌚9🤔9😢4💔2

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @boksttttttt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Литрес Авторы (Литрес Самиздат) | Литрес Чтец
@LitResPublishing · 20,520
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 September 2026
з Одеси з морквою
@OdesaCarrot · 24,051
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 16 September 2026
Издательство МИФ
@mifbooks · 54,939
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
МИФ.Курсы
@MIFcourses · 26,501
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 September 2026
Парс и фоны
@parslivres · 25,480
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
Черным-бело | Новое молодежное фэнтези
@chernym_belo · 20,009
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 October 2026
Толще твиттера
@biggakniga · 26,240
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 September 2026
Книжный Лис 🦊📚
@booksfox · 47,808
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Рыдакторы” (@boksttttttt), 6,782 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/boksttttttt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.