Channel
@literalina
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,401subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001586547153 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @literalina |
| Created | 25 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/literalina |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:27 | 6,401 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 6,407 | -12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 6,419 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:30 | 6,423 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 6,423 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (28 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,419 |
| Reactions total | 966 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
966 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5372921842967273227 | 359 | 37.2% | |
| custom 5359696960058054040 | 218 | 22.6% | |
| custom 5321194244696720837 | 184 | 19.0% | |
| custom 5235483727013891137 | 64 | 6.63% | |
| custom 5444924238085516281 | 61 | 6.31% | |
| custom 5222345151472499991 | 37 | 3.83% | |
| custom 5307767743137736847 | 37 | 3.83% | |
| custom 5445247601878266486 | 6 | 0.621% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 966reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
— Мы должны понимать наше существование как можно шире; все, даже неслыханное, должно найти в нем свое место. Вот в сущности единственное мужество, которое требуется от нас: без страха принимать даже самое странное, чудесное и необъяснимое, что нам может встретиться. Райнер Мария Рильке
custom 537292184296727322750custom 535969696005805404027custom 532119424469672083722custom 52223451514724999914
«Танец нимф» Эдуард Биссон
custom 537292184296727322739custom 532119424469672083723custom 535969696005805404020
Моя четвёртая статья для издания ВАК готова 🌟 На данный момент ожидаю публикации пяти своих статей в разных журналах, а пока что напоминаю, что все мои вышедшие работы можно прочитать на eLibrary (SPIN-код: 7172-0677). Если вы занимаетесь научной деятельностью, поделитесь, над какой темой работаете сейчас или работали недавно, будь то статья или ВКР🌿
custom 537292184296727322755custom 523548372701389113721custom 532119424469672083714
До конца августа можно приобрести рекламу на канале со скидкой 🌙 @poetic_vampire — по всем вопросам
custom 535969696005805404022custom 523548372701389113717custom 522234515147249999112
Актуальные выставки в Москве, которые я планирую посетить • Виктор Борисов-Мусатов. Гармония образа (Третьяковская галерея) До 8 ноября 2026 • Цветы. Символ красоты (Третьяковская галерея) До 18 октября 2026 • Иконы. Собрание Павла Третьякова (Третьяковская галерея) До 11 октября • Хрупкое искусство. Пастель из фондов графики XVIII – начала XX века (Третьяковская галерея) До 1 ноября • Школа Званцевой. Лаборатор…
custom 537292184296727322736custom 535969696005805404022custom 532119424469672083712
С какой книгой начинается ваш август? Я продолжаю читать «Письма к молодому поэту» и восхищаться глубокими размышлениями Рильке о жизни, человеке, творчестве и литературе. Душа наполняется светом и силой благодаря этой прекрасной книге.
custom 532119424469672083745custom 535969696005805404022custom 523548372701389113713custom 53729218429672732275
everything is romantic
custom 537292184296727322761custom 532119424469672083719custom 523548372701389113713custom 52223451514724999919
Недавно у Никиты вышло небольшое интервью со мной, где я поделилась некоторыми рассуждениями о классике, творчестве, красоте и эстетике. Прочитать интервью можно в посте: https://t.me/designreallycool/588
custom 537292184296727322722custom 54452476018782664866custom 53211942446967208375custom 53596969600580540401
— Творения искусства всегда безмерно одиноки, и меньше всего их способна постичь критика. Лишь одна любовь может их понять и сберечь, и соблюсти к ним справедливость. Всегда прислушивайтесь только к себе самому и к Вашему чувству, что бы ни внушали Вам рецензии, предисловия и литературные споры; а если Вы все же не правы, то естественное движение Вашей духовной жизни Вас приведет неспешно и со временем к иным воззрен…
custom 535969696005805404044custom 537292184296727322722custom 53211942446967208379
Чайльд Гассам «Лилии». 1910
custom 535969696005805404056custom 537292184296727322724custom 522234515147249999112custom 53077677431377368476
🌜 Запись на рекламу в августе Тематика: литература, искусство, образование, наука, культура. Связь со мной: @poetic_vampire
custom 530776774313773684731custom 532119424469672083717custom 53729218429672732276
— Сияло небо необъятно, И в нём, как стая лёгких снов, Скользили розовые пятна Завечеревших облаков.
custom 544492423808551628161custom 537292184296727322739custom 532119424469672083718custom 53596969600580540404
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @literalina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 196,541 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“эпоха байронизма” (@literalina), 6,401 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/literalina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.