6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -66. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,046–9,132 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 21:14
9,056
-10
14 Aug 2026, 18:12
9,066
-33
11 Aug 2026, 10:32
9,099
-18
8 Aug 2026, 01:35
9,117
-5
7 Aug 2026, 20:00
9,122
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:52
9,122
first reading
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.8%
avg views ÷ 9,056 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,340
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
29 (30 July 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
38,833
Reactions total
2,964
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2,964 reactions across 29 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5283164400939735184
1,072
36.2%
custom 5469736246974649815
884
29.8%
custom 5422734637443078745
623
21.0%
custom 5240296628711098167
385
13.0%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,964reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 29 we hold a reading for · 48%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @iwannadiestm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
✨месяц без сладкого 12/31
эта заметка теперь кажется мне обязательной. сегодня днем я была уже не такой нервной, кстати. и наконец-то нравилась себе в кадре. решили с коллегой, что приталенный пиджак очень красиво смотрится. и собранные волосы нравятся мне больше!
не думаю, что я так уж психовала именно из-за отсутствия сладкого. скорее это совокупность многих факторов: от решений, которые нужно принять, до общего …
✨месяц без сладкого 11/31
честно не понимаю, что происходит. я вообще не помню, чтобы я была такой нервной и раздражительной, как на этой неделе. мне хочется верить, что это из-за отсутствия глюкозы…
и как-будто все меня доводит до истерики. на работе что-то не получается, дома воды нет третий день, жара и еще всякое. сил нет
✨месяц без сладкого 10/31
как-будто бы и все равно на сладкое. меня другое беспокоит. работа у меня такая - перманентно быть в кадре. из-за этого я то и дело оцениваю свой внешний вид. и вообще мне не нравится все. как-будто вообще есть не надо.
+ я такие нервная в последняя время. не совсем понимаю, с чем связано такое состояние. как-будто выгорание какое-то. хочется расплакаться. воть :)
начала читать «будденброки» томаса манна. пока идет тяжело.
давно у меня не было спокойного дня, чтобы почитать в кофейне. сегодня вот выезд только после обеда.
✨месяц без сладкого 9/31
каюсь, был соблазн съесть мороженое, но я сдержалась. мне помогает такая мысль: я могу сделать это сейчас, но сразу после буду разочарована в себе. и это работает.
а вообще, эти два дня я жутко нервная. на работе меня всё бесит. может это отсутствие глюкозы так влияет? 😔
✨месяц без сладкого 8/31
легко! а вообще тема питания меня выматывает. это так сложно - правильно питаться, добирать белки, углеводы. я вообще могу весь день ничего не есть, а потом плотно поужинать, что не есть хорошо.
от каких продуктов вы отказались в своем рационе?
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @iwannadiestm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Читай-город @chitai_gorod_official · 144,800 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“твой винтажный читатель” (@iwannadiestm), 9,056 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iwannadiestm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
