Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 39 days, net -121. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,930–9,147 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 05:17
9,001
+46
12 Sept 2026, 05:54
8,955
-2
8 Sept 2026, 06:41
8,957
-17
2 Sept 2026, 18:16
8,974
-12
30 Aug 2026, 06:18
8,986
-19
27 Aug 2026, 11:33
9,005
-19
24 Aug 2026, 09:08
9,024
-18
20 Aug 2026, 20:32
9,042
-14
17 Aug 2026, 21:14
9,056
-10
14 Aug 2026, 18:12
9,066
-33
11 Aug 2026, 10:32
9,099
-18
8 Aug 2026, 01:35
9,117
-5
7 Aug 2026, 20:00
9,122
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:52
9,122
first reading
Engagement
62 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 62 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,076 reactions across 62 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5283164400939735184
2,054
33.8%
custom 5469736246974649815
1,913
31.5%
custom 5240296628711098167
979
16.1%
custom 5422734637443078745
671
11.0%
custom 5445162213633457923
459
7.55%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 62 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,076 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
35
across the posts below
Posts paid on
29
of 62 we hold a reading for · 47%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @iwannadiestm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 62 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
✨месяц без сладкого 24/31
что-то в последняя время мне стало так все равно на еду. но питание надо наладить, чтобы привести здоровье в порядок, сложнааа. обязательство пить таблетки три раза в день во время еды хорошо так усложняет мне жизнь
картинки рандомные из галереи
Меня вдохновляет, когда люди кардинально меняют свою профессию уже во взрослом возрасте. Это расширяет горизонт, дает перспективу. Одна из таких людей — моя бывшая коллега по телевизионному цеху, несколько лет назад ставшая психологом.
Анна Платонова пишет для себя той, которая когда-то пошла в терапию, и ничего-ничего не понимала. Все ждала, чтобы подсказали, как надо. Анна признается, что по-прежнему не знает, как…
✨месяц без сладкого 23/31
сегодня был очень продуктивный день. и в поликлинике была. и в зал успела. правда, тренировка была лайтовой. мне нельзя переусердствовать по состоянию здоровья. и работу работала. был забавный казус, во время прямого включения у меня пропала сеть и я не смогла попрощаться с ведущей. впервые у меня такое случилось.
кстати, брат и сестра тоже решили попробовать месяц без сладкого. и уже ноют …
✨месяц без сладкого 22/31
чуть не забыла отчитаться. а вообще грустно: уже некоторое время меня тревожит боль в животе. сходила сегодня на прием. выписали диету и лекарства. мне теперь месяц ничего вкусного нельзя (черт с ним этим сладким, мне нельзя острое 😭)
✨месяц без сладкого 21/31
осталось десять дней. сегодня была мысль о синнабоне, если честно. а вообще, думаю, что продолжу эту аскезу и по завершении месяца 🫰🏻
Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @iwannadiestm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
читающий домик 🛋 @chitayushiydomik · 24,567 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 September 2026
будни читателя🍂 @butterbruh · 22,711 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 September 2026
встретимся в кафе де мари🩰 @mmarssikk · 24,573 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 September 2026
КнигоЛер @val_kk_val · 30,277 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 7 September 2026
Тайное научное общество @maria_elita · 22,951 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 21 September 2026
кофе с книгой @booksandlanguages · 20,457 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 September 2026
Парс и фоны @parslivres · 25,528 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
Николай Жаринов 💀 @litsomel · 30,509 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 7 September 2026
Эрих Мария Ремарк @remark_tsitaty_aforizmy · 20,925 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 September 2026
наташа икигай 🪷 @natashaikigai · 34,453 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 3 September 2026
целую, лера @norvegianwoods · 22,172 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 September 2026
Читай-город @chitai_gorod_official · 142,524 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
Bookspace @anya_bookspace · 27,312 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
Мать стобалльников | Литература ЕГЭ | Фариша Князева | Мария Коршунова | 100балльный репетитор @korshunova100ballov · 27,156 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“твой винтажный читатель” (@iwannadiestm), 9,001 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iwannadiestm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.