Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Котики с депрессией

@kittenswithdepression

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

490subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001988954346
TypeChannel
Username@kittenswithdepression
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kittenswithdepression

Growth

4908 Aug 2026, 08:31 — 490 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 19:32 — 490 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 08:318 Aug 2026, 19:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 489–491 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 19:32490no change
8 Aug 2026, 08:31490first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.0%
avg views ÷ 490 subscribers
Avg views / post
176
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (27 May 20267 August 2026)
Views total882
Reactions total16
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 08s
Average length
1m 26s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

123 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9174.0%
😁1915.4%
🔥1310.6%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 123reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC66 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Ваши болезни от нервов - говорили вам такое? 😔🫂

1

Signed Всеволод Ардов, психотерапевт

2 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC157 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Немножко про субъективность "объективных" правил: Расс Харрис говорит: вот в Австралии и ГБ мы ездим по правильной стороне дороги, а вот все остальные - по неправильной :)

😁6

Signed Всеволод Ардов, психотерапевт

25 Jul 2026, 10:28 UTC227 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

Signed Всеволод Ардов, психотерапевт

25 Jul 2026, 08:01 UTC193 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @dnevniki_vinnikVideo

Нейробиология невротизма

2

Signed Всеволод Ардов, психотерапевт

18 Jul 2026, 13:55 UTC239 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

💃 Потанцуем? В Psychological Medicine вышло рандомизированное исследование, которое проверило довольно необычную идею: может ли обучение сальсе уменьшить симптомы депрессии? 🧑‍🤝‍🧑 В исследовании участвовал 121 молодой человек (18–24 года) с легкой или умеренной депрессией. Участников случайным образом распределили в две группы: 🕺 одна посещала занятия сальсой 8 недель; ⏳ другая ждала своей очереди и не получала вм

7

Signed Всеволод Ардов, психотерапевт

11 Jul 2026, 14:31 UTC225 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Takeaways, как говорится :)

🔥4

Signed Всеволод Ардов, психотерапевт

11 Jul 2026, 14:22 UTC217 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Курсы Расса Харриса как отдельный вид искусства :) Доделываю вот курс по СДВГ - грустно даже прощаться!

😁82

Signed Всеволод Ардов, психотерапевт

9 Jul 2026, 18:06 UTC212 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Подавлять мысли не получается и у чата Клода))) «Интересно, что запрет думать о конкретной вещи приводил во время эксперимента к активации ее представлений в J-пространстве. Оказалось, что, как и человеку в аналогичном психологическом тесте, большим языковым моделям сложно «не думать» о мосте Золотые Ворота (который использовали как аналог розового слона или, например, белого медведя), когда их напрямую просят об э

😁32

Signed Всеволод Ардов, психотерапевт

9 Jul 2026, 18:06 UTC233 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @nplusonePhoto

Оказывается, большие языковые модели умеют «думать про себя». Исследователи Anthropic показали, что у LLM есть скрытое пространство, где на короткое время возникают промежуточные понятия и слова, которые используются нейросетью для генерации ответа. Модель может держать эти слова и концепты «в уме» для решения задач, вообще не выводя их в финальный текст — почти как в случае кратковременной памяти у человека. Иссле

Signed Всеволод Ардов, психотерапевт

7 Jul 2026, 16:53 UTC387 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Сделал автоперевод популярного видео Расса Харриса с полезной техникой для работы с самокритикой! Оригинал тут: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=206WtwEyqzg

🔥92

Signed Всеволод Ардов, психотерапевт

5 Jul 2026, 14:39 UTC240 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

После расставания мы теряем не только человека, но и привычную структуру жизни. С точки зрения IPSRT (Interpersonal and Social Rhythm Therapy), депрессия после расставания связана не только с болью утраты, но и с нарушением наших социальных ритмов. Меняется всё: — время пробуждения и сна; — совместные ужины и выходные; — привычка писать кому-то утром и вечером; — ощущение своей роли («партнёр», «любимый человек», «

17😁2

Signed Всеволод Ардов, психотерапевт

4 Jul 2026, 14:16 UTC229 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А вы знаете о VIA тесте для пояснения своих сильных сторон? Расс Харрис тут в новом курсе пишет, что его вполне можно использовать и в терапии: узнаем свои сильные стороны - сталкиваясь с проблемой, например вот при депрессии это может быть выход из дома/перемены - и сверяемся: а какая моя сильная сторона тут могла бы пригодиться и помочь? Ссылочка на тест тут: https://www.viacharacter.org

9

Signed Всеволод Ардов, психотерапевт

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kittenswithdepression. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Jun 2026, 12:47 UTCAnonymous Poll41 voters

А пока голосование для всех: с вас терапевты собирают обратную связь на сессию/терапию регулярно? Формат не важен: устно или через шкалы

  1. Да39%
  2. Нет61%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 908,235 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Котики с депрессией” (@kittenswithdepression), 490 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kittenswithdepression.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.