Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for LIBANIRAN

Channel

LIBANIRAN

@libaniran

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,615subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001090955318
TypeChannel
Username@libaniran
Descriptionکامل ترین پایگاه مستقل اطلاع رسانی پیرامون مسائل لبنان 🇱🇧 در این پایگاه به موضوعات مختلف لبنان پرداخته شده است. تماس با ادمین: @LibaniranAdmin
Created14 August 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/libaniran

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@libaniran/9728 · this entry12 Aug 2026, 06:57 UTC@kriyaassess/7219412 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC1.0077 minutes
@libaniran/9761 · this entry22 Aug 2026, 05:29 UTC@kriyaassess/7266222 Aug 2026, 07:22 UTC1.001.9 hours
@libaniran/9766 · this entry25 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC@kriyaassess/7284425 Aug 2026, 18:56 UTC1.007.1 hours
@libaniran/9767 · this entry25 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC@kriyaassess/7284525 Aug 2026, 18:57 UTC1.0023 minutes
@libaniran/9923 · this entry11 Oct 2026, 11:42 UTC@kriyaassess/7540411 Oct 2026, 11:49 UTC1.007 minutes
@libaniran/9754 · this entry19 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC@AmAj24/17620219 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC0.9926 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@kriyaassess14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0065 minutesthis entry (13–1)
@AmAj247 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.971.6 hoursthis entry (7–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 99 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 August 2026 to 9 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

7,5577,6817,6196 August 2026 — 7,620 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,620 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,611 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,604 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,588 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,583 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,582 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,577 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,567 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,568 subscribers7 September 2026 — 7,557 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,661 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,658 subscribers25 September 2026 — 7,660 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,681 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,671 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,661 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,659 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,652 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,649 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,641 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,638 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,624 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,619 subscribers9 November 2026 — 7,615 subscribers7,6156 August 20269 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 96 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,538–7,700 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 23:227,615-4
6 Nov 2026, 22:087,619-5
3 Nov 2026, 18:297,624-14
1 Nov 2026, 04:507,638-3
25 Oct 2026, 21:287,641-8
23 Oct 2026, 07:587,649-3
20 Oct 2026, 06:367,652-7
17 Oct 2026, 12:577,659-2
14 Oct 2026, 20:117,661-10
11 Oct 2026, 07:377,671-10
5 Oct 2026, 02:167,681+21
25 Sept 2026, 20:167,660+2
15 Sept 2026, 20:017,658-3
12 Sept 2026, 04:217,661+104
7 Sept 2026, 11:027,557-11
2 Sept 2026, 08:177,568+1
30 Aug 2026, 15:347,567-10
28 Aug 2026, 02:187,577-5
22 Aug 2026, 09:277,582-1
18 Aug 2026, 17:037,583first reading

Engagement

104 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.7%
avg views ÷ 7,615 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,050
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 104 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held104 (2 August 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total19,867
Reactions total285
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 01:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈6,130
Videos
≈2,080
Links
≈1,110

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
43m 37s
Average length
1m 24s

Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,080 reactions across 96 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍39336.4%
❤31028.7%
🤬11710.8%
💔847.78%
🔥343.15%
👎312.87%
😍131.20%
😢131.20%
😁111.02%
👌100.926%
🤓100.926%
🎉90.833%
🥰90.833%
🐳80.741%
🤩80.741%
🤔50.463%
🤣50.463%
💯40.37%
😴40.37%
👀10.093%
1 further kind10.093%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 98 of the 104 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,089 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 104 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 14:31 UTC387 views17 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

«بدون برق و بدون آب»: گروه هکری حامی ایران، اسقاطیل را تهدید کرد گروه هکری «حنظله» صدها هزار اعلامیه تهدیدآمیز را در صندوق‌های پستی سراسر تل‌آویو توزیع کرد. پیام این گروه به اسقاطیل این است که اگر بار دیگر به زیرساخت‌های انرژی ایران حمله کند، نیروگاه‌ها، پالایشگاه‌ها و تأسیسات آب‌شیرین‌کن آن هدف قرار خواهند گرفت. «حنظله» صبح دوشنبه تهدید جدیدی علیه اسقاطیل منتشر کرد؛ این بار نه فقط در فضای مجازی. ده‌ها نفر از عوامل…

👍16😴1

4 Nov 2026, 05:46 UTC854 views20 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

شکست جمهوری‌خواهان جنگ طلب در انتخابات آمریکا. نه محکم مردم آمریکا به جنگ هرچند با تغییر دو حزب، سیاست کلی آمریکا در دوستی یا دشمنی با کشورها تغییر نمی‌کند اما مردم آمریکا نه محکمی به جنگ طلبی ترامپ و حامیانش گفتند. خلیل حرب کارشناس لبنانی نوشت: من نمی‌خواهم امیدهایتان را ناامید کنم، اما یادآوری مهم است: «نسل‌کشی»ای که در غزه مجاز شمرده شد، در دوره دموکرات‌ها بود.. ده‌ها میلیاردی که به‌سرعت به دشمن داده شد، در دور…

❤16👌3🤓1

4 Nov 2026, 05:36 UTC635 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @SHAMAT94

✳️ بر اساس نظرسنجی جدیدی که در روزنامه الاخبار منتشر شده، جامعه شیعه لبنان با وجود بحران شدید معیشتی، همچنان مقاومت مسلحانه را بر رفاه اقتصادی اولویت می‌دهد و اعتماد خود را به نهادهای سیاسی رسمی به شدت از دست داده است. 📊 یافته‌های کلیدی نظرسنجی (۱۰۶۵ نفر) · اولویت مقاومت بر معیشت: برای ۶۲.۳٪ از پاسخ‌دهندگان، مهم‌ترین مسئله پایان اشغالگری است. ۴۸.۴٪ معتقدند مقاومت مسلحانه مؤثرترین راه برای آزادسازی زمین و تضمین امن…

❤7

2 Nov 2026, 03:39 UTC792 views12 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @SHAMAT94

⭕️ در فاصله سال‌های ۲۰۱۷ تا ۲۰۲۱، رژیم صهیونیستی با مشارکت فرماندهی جنوبی، شعبه اطلاعات و نیروی هوایی، عملیاتی با نام «ضربه برق» را طراحی کرد. هدف، وارد آوردن «ضربه پیشگیرانه و کوبنده» به حماس بود. برآوردهای اولیه از شهادت ۷۰۰ تا ۸۰۰ نفر از نیروهای نخبه حماس حکایت داشت. این عملیات بر یک خدعه میدانی استوار بود: القای آغاز تهاجم زمینی به غزه برای کشاندن نیروهای نخبه حماس به تونل‌ها و سپس بمباران سنگرشکن آنها. 🔸در …

🔥9❤3

1 Nov 2026, 19:19 UTC778 views25 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @mhrezaa2Photo

یک سرآشپز مشهور لبنانی به نام حسین فیاض امروز در اینستاگرام خود، از طریق انتشار مجموعه‌ای از تصاویر در استوری، اعلام کرد که باغ او در جنوب لبنان امروز هدف حمله هوایی اسقاطیل قرار گرفته است. او نوشت: «رستورانم را (در گذشته) بمباران کردند، پروژه جدیدم را هم، و امروز باغم را در جنوب لبنان بمباران کردند؛ باغی به مساحت ۱۰ هزار مترمربع.» «باغی پر از سبزیجات، میوه‌ها، مرکبات و زیتون. زمینی که حاصل زحماتمان را در آن کاشته …

🤬15💔9❤1

1 Nov 2026, 10:51 UTC719 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @mhrezaa2Photo

ژنرال اسحاق بریک: نتایج انتخابات، گواهی رسمی مرگ اسقاطیل است؛ حمله مجدد به ایران، سراسر خاورمیانه را به آتش خواهد کشید اسحاق بریک، ژنرال بازنشسته ارتش اسقاطیل، در مقاله‌ای به تاریخ ۱ نوامبر ۲۰۲۶ در روزنامه معاریو، با انتقاد شدید از نتایج انتخابات و وضعیت سیاسی، نظامی، اقتصادی و اجتماعی اسقاطیل، هشدار داد که این رژیم دیگر صرفاً با یک بحران سیاسی مواجه نیست، بلکه وارد روند فروپاشی کامل و چندجانبه‌ای شده که به اعتقاد ا…

👍2❤1

30 Oct 2026, 06:34 UTC960 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

چرا به مقاومت کمک می‌کنیم؟ پس از انتشار فیلم نازا توسط خود اسراییلی‌ها اکنون اشپیگل آلمان تحقیقاتی درباره جنایت‌های ضدحقوق بشری اسراییل منتشر کرده است. این جنایت‌های وحشتناک نشان می‌دهد سیاست ایران برای کمک به مقاومت، جهت جلوگیری از توسعه طلبی اسراییل و اشغال مناطق جدید و همسایه شدن با ایران کاملا درست و بجا و بلکه ناکافی بوده است. حتما این فیلم را ببینید. @LIBANIRAN 🇮🇷🇱🇧

❤10👍6

27 Oct 2026, 18:40 UTC≈1,240 views15 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

تندروی تروریست و وعده نابودی ایران بن گویر وزیر امنیت رژیم صهیونیستی امروز پس از آنکه رای خود را به صندوق انداخت وعده داد که دولت فلسطینی را از بین ببرد و سلاح آن را نابود کند. (همان چهار تا کلت و کلاش پلیس!) او گفت آنها را به تونس می‌فرستیم و حماس و حزب‌الله را نابود می‌کنیم و ایران را از بین می‌بریم! با این حال پس از رای گیری آشفته و ترس از نتایج آرا، از خود بیخود شده و به کسانی که به دریا رفته بودند التماس می‌ک…

🤬8🤩4👍2❤1

25 Oct 2026, 20:07 UTC≈1,270 views8 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

بنزین غیراستاندارد در سوریه و خرابی خودروها چند روزی است بنزین غیراستاندارد در سوریه توزیع شده و در شهرها و استان‌های مختلف موجب خرابی خودروها و جنجال شده است. وزارت انرژی سوریه پس از چند روز مدعی شد در جریان انتقال بنزین غیراستاندارد از خطوط لوله، خطای عملیاتی رخ داد و بخشی از بنزین با بنزین استاندارد مخلوط و وارد بازار شد؛ و شماری از خودروها آسیب دیدند. به گزارش الاخبار یک راننده گفت پس از سوختگیری، صداهای عجیبی…

👍7❤1

25 Oct 2026, 13:24 UTC≈1,150 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @naajm_irVideo

🔴شعار «نه غزه نه لبنان،جانم فدای ایران» از اینجا نشأت می‌گرفت که ما نمی‌دانیم کشورهای دیگر نیز در خاک لبنان در حال تأثیرگذاری هستند 🔹محمدحسین امیدی، کارشناس مسائل لبنان در گفت‌وگو با رسانه تبیینی نجم: استقلال در لبنان واقعی نیست و به عبارتی یک «استقلال سرابی» است؛ لبنان به واسطه‌ وابستگی‌هایی که به کشورهای مختلف دارد،از آمریکا و عربستان سعودی و فرانسه گرفته تا ترکیه و قطر، تحت تأثیر است. 🔹اگر ما این مناسبات را ندا…

👍5👎2

25 Oct 2026, 13:20 UTC957 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

مزاحمت همیشگی اشغالگران برای مردم هر روز غیر از بمباران، حملات پهپادی، انداختن بمب و مواد آتشزا بر منازل مردم، بمبگذاری منازل و منفجر کردن آنها، دشمن صهیونیستی یک آزار دیگر هم برای مردم دارد. در عربی می‌گویند تمشیط، که به معنای پاکسازی ترجمه شده، اما عمدتا با تیرباران کردن و شلیک تانک به مناطق مختلف انجام می‌شود تا هرگونه تحرک نزدیک را خنثی کنند. @LIBANIRAN 🇮🇷🇱🇧

💔4🤬1

23 Oct 2026, 10:39 UTC≈1,270 views38 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

تحریم کنندگان را تحریم کنید عراق و پاکستان و آذربایجان در حال بستن مرزهای خود به ایران هستند. اما عمدتا از صادرات محصولات ایرانی به کشورشان جلوگیری نمی‌کنند! وقتی عاصم منیر فرمانده ارتش پاکستان (فرماندار نظامی آمریکا و دشمن دموکراسی مردم این کشور) به ایران آمد، ادعا کرد مرز پاکستان با ایران باز می‌شود، اما چنین نشده و فقط بحث واردات گاز و محصولات کشاورزی ایران باز خواهد شد. عراق هم با بستن یک مرز دیگر به دستور آمر…

👍35❤1👎1🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 104 posts we hold for @libaniran. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

جبهه جهانی شباب المقاومة
@sh_almoqawamma · 22,697
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 September 2026
علی عبدی/ دیده‌بان تحرکات کِریا
@kriyaassess · 21,990
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 September 2026
أخٌ‌في‌الله
@mhrezaa2 · 39,750
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
حامد کاشانى
@kashani1395 · 41,586
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
الجزیره به فارسی
@AjaNews_persian · 21,615
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 September 2026
اخبار سوریه به فارسی 𓂆
@SyrianToPersian · 38,777
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
سپاه قدس
@Qods_org · 18,888
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 October 2026
مُحَلِّل
@Mohallell · 25,331
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
IranicTV
@iranictv · 19,152
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 3 October 2026
راهبرد معاصر
@rahbordemoaser · 20,814
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 September 2026
آموزش سواد سایبری
@Cyber_Literacy · 27,940
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
جدال- علی عليزاده
@jedaal · 57,707
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
ParsinTV l پارسین
@ParsinTv · 21,247
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 September 2026
محمدرضا حدادپور جهرمی
@mohamadrezahadadpour · 26,385
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
MESHKAT | مشکات
@Projectmeshkat · 19,308
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 October 2026
🚩 امــــاج - اخبار مقاومت جهان اسلام
@AmAj24 · 20,104
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 29 September 2026
طنز سیاسی دکترسلام
@drsalaam · 33,689
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 September 2026
کانال کربلا
@karballa_ir · 51,845
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 August 2026
کانال رسمی میثم مطیعی
@MeysamMotiee · 32,761
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 4 September 2026
اخبار امارت اسلامی
@emirateislamic · 28,123
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 8 September 2026
صوت | علیرضا پناهیان
@Panahian_mp3 · 28,185
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026
اخبار جهادی (اخبار جنگ)
@akhbarjahadi · 52,096
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
جواد موگویی|حرف بی‌حساب
@javadmogoei · 36,404
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
اخبار سوریه
@syriankhabar · 89,604
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LIBANIRAN” (@libaniran), 7,615 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/libaniran.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.