International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net +159. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,094–18,301 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 07:41
18,277
+20
16 Sept 2026, 23:01
18,257
+7
15 Sept 2026, 01:41
18,250
-2
13 Sept 2026, 08:00
18,252
+28
11 Sept 2026, 13:22
18,224
+26
8 Sept 2026, 23:58
18,198
-6
5 Sept 2026, 17:41
18,204
+4
3 Sept 2026, 18:40
18,200
-1
2 Sept 2026, 12:25
18,201
+9
1 Sept 2026, 11:12
18,192
-11
31 Aug 2026, 14:03
18,203
+4
30 Aug 2026, 12:13
18,199
+2
29 Aug 2026, 12:24
18,197
+8
28 Aug 2026, 15:27
18,189
-8
27 Aug 2026, 14:03
18,197
+3
26 Aug 2026, 17:23
18,194
+3
25 Aug 2026, 17:26
18,191
-1
24 Aug 2026, 20:25
18,192
-7
23 Aug 2026, 04:06
18,199
+32
21 Aug 2026, 15:09
18,167
first reading
Engagement
213 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.11%
avg views ÷ 18,277 subscribers
Avg views / post
569
69 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
69
of 213 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 67 of 69 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
213 (5 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
39,231
Reactions total
766
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 08:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 03m
Average length
53s
Measured directly from 73 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,792 reactions across 209 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
599
21.5%
👍
538
19.3%
🔥
444
15.9%
😁
392
14.0%
🫡
245
8.78%
😡
203
7.27%
💯
147
5.27%
😎
74
2.65%
👎
50
1.79%
❤🔥
41
1.47%
😢
38
1.36%
🤯
15
0.537%
💔
6
0.215%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 209 of the 213 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,792 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 213 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇮🇷⚡️🇺🇸The wreckage of a $30 million US MQ-9 drone shot down by the IRGC over Khomein last night has been put on display in Iran’s Markazi Province.
Yesterday, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps reported destroying its 50th American MQ-9 drone.
The interesting point is the image of the US National Guard logo on the drone, which can be an indication of the lack of drones in the US Air Force. which is forced to use…
🇮🇷 Iranian Minister of Health:
Yesterday evening, as a result of attacks carried out by the United States on Iranian territory, 18 people were killed, and 108 civilians were injured.
🌟Subscribe / Send news / Boost
🇺🇸⚡️🇮🇷Based on a closer examination of the missile debris left from the recent strike on a residential home, it appears that the munition used was not a SLAM‑ER. The remaining fragments match much more closely with the body of the AGM‑154C JSOW.
In the red box, a control fin can be seen, which corresponds to one of the tail control fins of the JSOW. In the yellow box, a section of the missile’s body is visible that …
🇮🇷☄️🇺🇸🇧🇭A released satellite image shows signs of a possible strike on a structure at the headquarters of the U.S. Navy’s Fifth Fleet in Manama, Bahrain.
Iran’s military had attacked this base last night using explosive‑laden drones.
😆Subscribe
🇮🇷⚡️🇺🇸🇮🇶Satellite images from Sentinel, captured today, show a new burn mark at the troop‑deployment area of the U.S. base at Erbil Airport. In the latest imagery, the U.S. Army surveillance aerostat is no longer visible, and scorch marks can be seen near its control station.
NASA’s FIRMS satellite service has also confirmed a thermal signature indicating a fire at this location.
🌟Subscribe / Send news / Boost
🇮🇷⚡️🇺🇸🇧🇭A film attributed to the moment of flight, dive and hit of Shahid 136 UAV in Manama, Bahrain during Iran's attacks on the US base in this country this morning has been released.
🌟Subscribe / Send news / Boost
🇷🇺🇮🇷Russia has secretly assisted Iran in developing hypersonic cruise‑missile technology through a covert program codenamed C430L, according to the Financial Times based on leaked Russian correspondence, travel records, and military‑technology documents.
🔹 The program began in 2023 and involves Russia’s state arms exporter Rosoboronexport and the missile manufacturer NPO Mashinostroyenia. Russian specialists analyze…
🇺🇸⚡️🇮🇷The missile that hit a wedding ceremony in the Kuhestak region of southern Iran, killing 5 civilians (including a child) and injuring 50 others, was an American missile called "SLAM-ER".
Boeing, the manufacturer of this cruise missile, claims that it is the most accurate weapon in the US Navy's entire fleet.
🌟Subscribe / Send news / Boost
🔴 Drone attacks by the Iranian military on a U.S. base in Bahrain.
🌟Subscribe / Send news / Boost
👍11❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 213 posts we hold for @Wor_mil_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Stay Free @stayfreeworld · 41,331 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
JHArnous @jharnous · 26,802 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 September 2026
WarFront Witness @wfwitness · 81,537 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
AlHaq News | Iran-US War Updates @AlHaqNews · 32,145 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 5 September 2026
"israel" is a War Criminal 🇵🇸 @wc_israel · 21,365 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 September 2026
Fotros Resistance @FotrosResistancee · 69,023 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 August 2026
WarfareAnalysis News @WarfareAnalysis · 31,625 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 5 September 2026
IRNA News Agency 🇮🇷 @Irna_en · 25,975 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 September 2026
Middle East Observer @me_observer_TG · 38,704 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“World Military News” (@Wor_mil_news), 18,277 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Wor_mil_news.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.