Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for World Military News

Channel

World Military News

@Wor_mil_news

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,277subscribers

+159 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001684600294
TypeChannel
Username@Wor_mil_news
Created16 September 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Wor_mil_news

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

18,11818,27718,197.57 August 2026 — 18,118 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,118 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,127 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,139 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,137 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,144 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,139 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,127 subscribers15 August 2026 — 18,134 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,148 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,137 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,140 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,151 subscribers21 August 2026 — 18,167 subscribers23 August 2026 — 18,199 subscribers24 August 2026 — 18,192 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,191 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,194 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,197 subscribers28 August 2026 — 18,189 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,197 subscribers30 August 2026 — 18,199 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,203 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,192 subscribers2 September 2026 — 18,201 subscribers3 September 2026 — 18,200 subscribers5 September 2026 — 18,204 subscribers8 September 2026 — 18,198 subscribers11 September 2026 — 18,224 subscribers13 September 2026 — 18,252 subscribers15 September 2026 — 18,250 subscribers16 September 2026 — 18,257 subscribers19 September 2026 — 18,277 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net +159. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,094–18,301 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 07:4118,277+20
16 Sept 2026, 23:0118,257+7
15 Sept 2026, 01:4118,250-2
13 Sept 2026, 08:0018,252+28
11 Sept 2026, 13:2218,224+26
8 Sept 2026, 23:5818,198-6
5 Sept 2026, 17:4118,204+4
3 Sept 2026, 18:4018,200-1
2 Sept 2026, 12:2518,201+9
1 Sept 2026, 11:1218,192-11
31 Aug 2026, 14:0318,203+4
30 Aug 2026, 12:1318,199+2
29 Aug 2026, 12:2418,197+8
28 Aug 2026, 15:2718,189-8
27 Aug 2026, 14:0318,197+3
26 Aug 2026, 17:2318,194+3
25 Aug 2026, 17:2618,191-1
24 Aug 2026, 20:2518,192-7
23 Aug 2026, 04:0618,199+32
21 Aug 2026, 15:0918,167first reading

Engagement

213 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.11%
avg views ÷ 18,277 subscribers
Avg views / post
569
69 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
69
of 213 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 67 of 69 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held213 (5 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total39,231
Reactions total766
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 08:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 03m
Average length
53s

Measured directly from 73 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,792 reactions across 209 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
59921.5%
👍53819.3%
🔥44415.9%
😁39214.0%
🫡2458.78%
😡2037.27%
💯1475.27%
😎742.65%
👎501.79%
❤‍🔥411.47%
😢381.36%
🤯150.537%
💔60.215%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 209 of the 213 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,792 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 213 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 07:30 UTC99 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🇮🇷⚡️🇺🇸The wreckage of a $30 million US MQ-9 drone shot down by the IRGC over Khomein last night has been put on display in Iran’s Markazi Province. Yesterday, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps reported destroying its 50th American MQ-9 drone. The interesting point is the image of the US National Guard logo on the drone, which can be an indication of the lack of drones in the US Air Force. which is forced to use

👍3

2 Sept 2026, 22:45 UTC652 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🇮🇷 Iranian Minister of Health: Yesterday evening, as a result of attacks carried out by the United States on Iranian territory, 18 people were killed, and 108 civilians were injured. 🌟Subscribe / Send news / Boost

😢13💔1

2 Sept 2026, 14:50 UTC539 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🇺🇸⚡️🇮🇷Based on a closer examination of the missile debris left from the recent strike on a residential home, it appears that the munition used was not a SLAM‑ER. The remaining fragments match much more closely with the body of the AGM‑154C JSOW. In the red box, a control fin can be seen, which corresponds to one of the tail control fins of the JSOW. In the yellow box, a section of the missile’s body is visible that

💯41👍1

2 Sept 2026, 14:45 UTC410 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @jharnousVideo

🇮🇷☄️🇺🇸🇧🇭A released satellite image shows signs of a possible strike on a structure at the headquarters of the U.S. Navy’s Fifth Fleet in Manama, Bahrain. Iran’s military had attacked this base last night using explosive‑laden drones. 😆Subscribe

🔥4😎1

2 Sept 2026, 14:16 UTC914 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

🇮🇷⚡️🇺🇸🇮🇶Satellite images from Sentinel, captured today, show a new burn mark at the troop‑deployment area of the U.S. base at Erbil Airport. In the latest imagery, the U.S. Army surveillance aerostat is no longer visible, and scorch marks can be seen near its control station. NASA’s FIRMS satellite service has also confirmed a thermal signature indicating a fire at this location. 🌟Subscribe / Send news / Boost

👍6🔥2🫡1

2 Sept 2026, 12:11 UTC453 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @jharnousPhoto

🇮🇷 11 Additional Vessels were added to Iran's Persian Gulf Strait Authority Non-Compliant Vessels' list: 🇦🇪 UAE-owned Oil Tanker "TARIF" 🇦🇪 UAE-owned LPG Tanker "DELMA" 🇦🇪 UAE-owned Oil Tanker "EL GAIA" 🇦🇪 UAE-owned Bitumen Tanker "ASPHALT ALLIANCE" 🇸🇦 Saudi-owned Oil Tanker "IXORA" 🇸🇦 Saudi-owned Oil Tanker "YAQUT" 🇸🇦 Saudi-owned Oil Tanker "ZAYNAH" 🇸🇦 Saudi-owned Oil Tanker "AJWAD" 🇨🇳 Chinese-owned LPG Tanker "ZIX

7🫡2💯1

2 Sept 2026, 10:36 UTC518 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

🇮🇷⚡️🇺🇸🇧🇭A film attributed to the moment of flight, dive and hit of Shahid 136 UAV in Manama, Bahrain during Iran's attacks on the US base in this country this morning has been released. 🌟Subscribe / Send news / Boost

🔥15👍4

2 Sept 2026, 09:30 UTC≈1,020 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🇷🇺🇮🇷Russia has secretly assisted Iran in developing hypersonic cruise‑missile technology through a covert program codenamed C430L, according to the Financial Times based on leaked Russian correspondence, travel records, and military‑technology documents. 🔹 The program began in 2023 and involves Russia’s state arms exporter Rosoboronexport and the missile manufacturer NPO Mashinostroyenia. Russian specialists analyze

7👍2🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 08:00 UTC426 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🇺🇸⚡️🇮🇷The missile that hit a wedding ceremony in the Kuhestak region of southern Iran, killing 5 civilians (including a child) and injuring 50 others, was an American missile called "SLAM-ER". Boeing, the manufacturer of this cruise missile, claims that it is the most accurate weapon in the US Navy's entire fleet. 🌟Subscribe / Send news / Boost

😡102🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 00:12 UTC567 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026

🔴 The airspace of Kuwait and Bahrain was closed following attacks by Iran. 🌟Subscribe / Send news / Boost

👍112😁1

2 Sept 2026, 00:12 UTC559 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026

🔴 Iran's attacks on American bases in Kuwait. 🌟Subscribe / Send news / Boost

👍112

2 Sept 2026, 00:11 UTC556 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026

🔴 Drone attacks by the Iranian military on a U.S. base in Bahrain. 🌟Subscribe / Send news / Boost

👍112

Showing the 12 most recent of 213 posts we hold for @Wor_mil_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Stay Free
@stayfreeworld · 41,331
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
JHArnous
@jharnous · 26,802
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 September 2026
WarFront Witness
@wfwitness · 81,537
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
AlHaq News | Iran-US War Updates
@AlHaqNews · 32,145
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 5 September 2026
"israel" is a War Criminal 🇵🇸
@wc_israel · 21,365
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 September 2026
Fotros Resistance
@FotrosResistancee · 69,023
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 August 2026
WarfareAnalysis News
@WarfareAnalysis · 31,625
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 5 September 2026
IRNA News Agency 🇮🇷
@Irna_en · 25,975
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 September 2026
Middle East Observer
@me_observer_TG · 38,704
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“World Military News” (@Wor_mil_news), 18,277 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Wor_mil_news.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.