Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Елена Вальяк

@elena_valiak

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

43,459subscribers

-38 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001251931971
TypeChannel
Username@elena_valiak
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/elena_valiak

Growth

43,45943,50343,4817 August 2026 — 43,497 subscribers7 August 2026 — 43,496 subscribers8 August 2026 — 43,501 subscribers9 August 2026 — 43,494 subscribers10 August 2026 — 43,489 subscribers11 August 2026 — 43,492 subscribers12 August 2026 — 43,503 subscribers13 August 2026 — 43,487 subscribers15 August 2026 — 43,459 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43,452–43,510 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 02:0543,459-28
13 Aug 2026, 15:4743,487-16
12 Aug 2026, 13:1543,503+11
11 Aug 2026, 15:4143,492+3
10 Aug 2026, 13:4143,489-5
9 Aug 2026, 16:0143,494-7
8 Aug 2026, 13:3343,501+5
7 Aug 2026, 11:5543,496-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:0143,497first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.1%
avg views ÷ 43,459 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,420
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held24 (12 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total148,440
Reactions total7,443
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 00:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
44s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8,770 reactions across 24 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5,52963.0%
🔥1,07612.3%
❤‍🔥1,00111.4%
👍8149.28%
😍1441.64%
🥰991.13%
🍓750.855%
💋320.365%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,770reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC≈2,430 views86 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Как перестроить мышление, чтобы относиться к еде спокойно, а не как к единственному запретному удовольствию? Рекомендую следующие программы: https://alphacentr.ru/catalog/rabota_i_dengi/725/ https://alphacentr.ru/catalog/korrektsiya_vesa/711/ https://alphacentr.ru/catalog/korrektsiya_vesa/721/ https://alphacentr.ru/catalog/korrektsiya_vesa/616/ https://alphacentr.ru/catalog/korrektsiya_vesa/348/ https://alphace

53❤‍🔥19👍8🔥6

Signed Елена Вальяк

13 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC≈3,590 views250 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Да, согласна с теми, кто прокомментировал мой прошлый пост, что в качестве эксперимента, чтобы изучить себя, и как влияет на тело нагрузка, то или иное питание, количество выпитой жидкости и дни цикла у женщин, весы могут быть полезны. Но при этом важно вставать на весы не с надеждой, что вес будет меньше, а с чисто исследовательским интересом. В другом случае весы будут только мешать, сбивать с толку, демотивироват

136👍44🔥38🍓19❤‍🔥13

Signed Елена Вальяк

13 Aug 2026, 06:25 UTC≈4,200 views128 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Моя подруга купила весы, потому что хочет похудеть. Почему весы - это абсолютно бесполезная и порой даже вредная вещь при похудении?

👍7634🔥15😍3

Signed Елена Вальяк

11 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC≈5,250 views798 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, друзья, я приступаю к записи сеансов гипноза и аффирмаций на тему женского здоровья. Я уже давно анонсировала эту тему, и даже собиралась сделать совместный проект с подругой, включить в курс нутрициологию и спорт. Но хорошо подумав, все-таки приняла решение остаться в своем привычном профессиональном поле. Я дам психологическую помощь и поддержку, помогу изменить внутренние установки о своей женской природе,

457❤‍🔥173🔥99👍41🥰22🍓5😍1

Signed Елена Вальяк

10 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC≈5,950 views336 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Дорогие друзья! Благодарю всех, кто принял участие в коллективной медитации вчера!🙏 Нас так много! И спасибо, что делитесь своими впечатлениями! Мне очень важно видеть обратную связь, понимать, как получилась новая работа, и что можно изменить или добавить в следующий раз. А тем, кто не смог вчера прийти из-за разницы во времени, приглашаю сегодня собраться и вместе прослушать эту медитацию в 17:00 мск. Вот ссылка

249❤‍🔥59🔥14😍14

Signed Елена Вальяк

9 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC≈6,600 views500 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Друзья, сегодня в 21:00 мск приглашаю вас на коллективную медитацию. Мы будем сосредоточиваться на мире и покое, который есть в каждом человеке. Действие медитации многократно усиливается, когда одновременно медитирует много людей. Это создает единое энергетическое поле, которое начинает воздействовать на окружающий мир. Есть исследования, подтверждающие, что если даже только 1 процент населения города направляет сво

344❤‍🔥74🔥52👍24🥰6

Signed Елена Вальяк

7 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC≈6,500 views182 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Я знаю, что есть люди, которым кажется, что если они перестанут подстегивать себя чувством вины, стыдом или стремлением к совершенству, то у них вообще не будет стимула к работе. Это на так, и в этом отзыве - подтверждение!✅ Если у человека отпадает необходимость доказывать что-то кому-то, уходит страх, чувство вины и стыда, то работа превращается в свободное творчество. Освобождается масса чистой энергии, которую м

115🔥37🍓14👍9❤‍🔥7

Signed Елена Вальяк

6 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC≈6,910 views802 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Если меня нет в ленте, значит я записываю новую медитацию😁 Записала и теперь редактирую. 🤗Весь этот процесс очень кропотливый, но я уже на финишной прямой. Для новой медитации я взяла текст медитации покоя моего учителя по эриксоновскому гипнозу Михаила Романовича Гинзбурга. Дописала, расширила и сделала свою адаптацию. Получилось, по моему очень красиво и гармонично. Эту медитацию будет полезно слушать людям, кот

493🔥159😍57❤‍🔥38🥰18🍓16👍11💋10

Signed Елена Вальяк

3 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC≈8,650 views555 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

А мы с Бруно похожи, как думаете? Я точно знаю, что он похож на моего мужа - у них обоих красивая борода!😁 В породу грифон я влюбилась, как только случайно увидела в Инете. Я искала мифологическое животное гриффон, чтобы его нарисовать. Не помню, рассказывала ли, что я хорошо рисую. И вот вдруг поиск выдал мне этих удивительных собачек, похожих на бородатых человечков) И я захотела такого себе! И ни дня ни проходи

342❤‍🔥121👍55🔥25🥰12

Signed Елена Вальяк

2 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC≈8,730 views554 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Дорогие друзья! Благодарю всех, кто принял участие в голосовании! Получается, что больше всего людей соберется в 21:00 по Москве. Значит, планируем медитацию мира на 21:00 мск в воскресенье 9 августа. Также я видела, что люди в других часовых поясах не смогут в это время принять участие. Можно договориться и провести вторую волну коллективной медитации, например, в 17 мск в понедельник 10 августа. Ну а я пошла р

387👍100❤‍🔥29😍22🔥16

Signed Елена Вальяк

29 Jul 2026, 14:09 UTC≈9,740 views504 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Posted without readable text

330❤‍🔥94👍47💋17🔥16

Signed Елена Вальяк

29 Jul 2026, 09:17 UTC≈8,770 views76 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Poll

Когда вам удобнее провести коллективную медитацию?

  1. Воскресенье в 11:00 мск17%
  2. Воскресенье в 17:00 мск12%
  3. Воскресенье в 19:00 мск22%
  4. Воскресенье в 21:00 мск40%
  5. Воскресенье в 9:00 мск18%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

76

Signed Елена Вальяк

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @elena_valiak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@elena_valiak edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Jul 2026, 09:17 UTCAnonymous Poll1,390 voters approx.

Когда вам удобнее провести коллективную медитацию?

  1. Воскресенье в 11:00 мск17%
  2. Воскресенье в 17:00 мск12%
  3. Воскресенье в 19:00 мск22%
  4. Воскресенье в 21:00 мск40%
  5. Воскресенье в 9:00 мск18%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 347,935 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ада Кондэ - личный канал - Ada Conde
@Adaconde1 · 126,047
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Елена Вальяк” (@elena_valiak), 43,459 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elena_valiak.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.