Дорогие подписчики, невероятно, но факт — Валерий Меладзе передал привет всем ученикам Astrooma school♍️♈️🪐
🔥92😁29custom 54495998339732034388

Channel
@astrolog_astrooma
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,793subscribers
-535 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001584098139 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @astrolog_astrooma |
| Description | 💫Астролог Оксана Малкова 🎓Школа астрологии Astrooma @astrooma_school 📌В закрепленном ссылки на самые важные посты 🌍 Сайт: astrooma-school.ru ✍️По вопросам консультации, обучения пишите менеджеру https://t.me/Vol_Anastasiia РКН № 4953340848 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 45 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/astrolog_astrooma |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 12:26 | 9,793 | -24 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:18 | 9,817 | -14 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 01:19 | 9,831 | -19 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:58 | 9,850 | -8 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 22:30 | 9,858 | -12 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:05 | 9,870 | -6 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 06:55 | 9,876 | -19 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 07:11 | 9,895 | -23 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 04:37 | 9,918 | -16 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 06:39 | 9,934 | -30 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 21:58 | 9,964 | -56 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 06:16 | 10,020 | -35 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 22:18 | 10,055 | -19 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 10,074 | -28 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:22 | 10,102 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 10,104 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:39 | 10,105 | -9 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 13:57 | 10,114 | -25 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:59 | 10,139 | -5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:13 | 10,144 | first reading |
56 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 56 (7 July 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 35,760 |
| Reactions total | 1,132 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 22:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,392 reactions across 56 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 2,082 | 47.4% | |
| custom 5449599833973203438 | 1,356 | 30.9% | |
| 👍 | 194 | 4.42% | |
| 😍 | 184 | 4.19% | |
| 😁 | 168 | 3.83% | |
| custom 5334701474461006147 | 97 | 2.21% | |
| 🙏 | 84 | 1.91% | |
| 🤩 | 48 | 1.09% | |
| custom 5472164874886846699 | 47 | 1.07% | |
| 💯 | 47 | 1.07% | |
| 👏 | 32 | 0.729% | |
| 💔 | 21 | 0.478% | |
| 🌚 | 13 | 0.296% | |
| custom 5323257963597547255 | 12 | 0.273% | |
| custom 5372846474881146350 | 3 | 0.068% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 0.068% | |
| custom 5192961390414929960 | 1 | 0.023% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,392 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @astrolog_astrooma. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 56 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 July 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (20.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Дорогие подписчики, невероятно, но факт — Валерий Меладзе передал привет всем ученикам Astrooma school♍️♈️🪐
🔥92😁29custom 54495998339732034388
А я тем временем наслаждаюсь золотой осенью в Алматы и знакомлюсь с этим красивым городом ❤️🍂 Есть здесь кто-нибудь из Алматы или других городов Казахстана?
custom 544959983397320343859🔥28😍14custom 54721648748868466995👍1
До чего же приятно получать такие сообщения, радуемся всей командой 🥹🧡 Сегодня вышел 3й урок по элекциям и ученики во всю погружаются в теорию Но я знаю, что есть те, кто не успел попасть на курс. Поэтому уговорила команду дать вам ещё одну, последнюю возможность войти в этот поток! Следующий запуск будет только через год Промокод «ШАНС» подарит вам скидку 5.000₽ на тариф «Профессия» с куратором Действует только …
custom 544959983397320343818🔥12😍3
Давно здесь не было прогнозов на неделю! Ставьте реакции, если рады снова видеть сводку астроновостей 🧡 А пока давайте смотреть, что приготовили нам звёзды на этой неделе! Астрологический прогноз на неделю 🌙 3–8 ноября На этой неделе у нас будет время и для рабочих задач, и для романтики, и даже для большой уборки. Главное – правильно выбрать день для каждого дела. ⭐️3–5 ноября – наводим порядок Начало недели лу…
🔥76custom 544959983397320343854😍10👍4🎉3🙏2
Такой месяц нас ждёт, а я жду вас! ВСТУПИТЬ В КЛУБ Если у вас не открывается ссылка, переходите в бот @Astroma_club_bot и пишите слово «Клуб», бот отправит вам всю информацию о вступлении 🧡
🔥39custom 544959983397320343825😍7
Ноябрь будет месяцем тотального очищения на всех уровнях в клубе «Энергия ASTROOMA» 🧹🫧 Рассказываю подробнее ⬆️
custom 544959983397320343847💯14🔥7
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 544959983397320343824🔥10😍7
Камера, мотор, поехали! 💫🎥 Сегодня за кадром рождается что-то особенное, снимаем один из моих самых любимых продуктов – вебинар «Энергии 2027» 🧡
🔥95custom 544959983397320343842😍17custom 53347014744610061473🤩1
В последнее время участились случаи мошенничества от имени ASTROOMA. Пожалуйста, будьте внимательны и проверяйте, с кем общаетесь и где совершаете оплату 🙏🏻 Чтобы защитить себя, запомните несколько важных правил: 1. Оксана Малкова не пишет первой в личные сообщения. Если вам поступило такое сообщение от имени основателя школы, будьте осторожны. 2. Мы не принимаем оплату на карты физических лиц и не используем стор…
🔥15custom 54495998339732034385🙏2custom 54721648748868466991
Дорогие, всем привет!) Мы совсем скоро начинаем курс по Элекциям и сегодня последний день действия промокода ❤️🙏 Промокод ВРЕМЯ подарит скидку 5.000₽ на любой тариф курса Напоминаю! И жду у нас на учебе 📚🎓 https://astrooma-school.ru/kursy/elektivnaya-astrologiya/
🔥2
До Нового года осталось всего 10 недель. Представляете? 🥹 И я очень хочу, чтобы вы провели их не просто в ожидании праздников, а с пользой для себя и своего будущего 🫂🧡 Анастасия Ковалёва – бриллиант нашей школы, прекрасный астролог и преподаватель – запускает курс по элективной астрологии! Элекции помогают подбирать дату и время для важных событий: свадьбы, покупки квартиры, похода к косметологу и многого другого…
🔥22custom 54495998339732034389😍7
Не успели быть с нами на открытом уроке? Ничего страшного – запись уже ждёт вас 🧡 На встрече познакомились с элективной астрологией, разобрали, чем она отличается от натальной астрологии и прогностики, и на примере посмотрели, как выбирать время для важных событий: от покупок и переговоров до запуска бизнеса. А ещё рассказали о новом потоке курса, обсудили варианты обучения и подготовили для вас приятный подарок в …
🔥18custom 54495998339732034386
Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @astrolog_astrooma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ASTROOMA” (@astrolog_astrooma), 9,793 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/astrolog_astrooma.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.