Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Zornkrieger

Channel

Zornkrieger

@Zornkrieger

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,347subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001551308986
TypeChannel
Username@Zornkrieger
Created30 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Zornkrieger

Growth

2,3442,3602,3526 August 2026 — 2,360 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,360 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,359 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,354 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,344 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,347 subscribers2,3476 August 202615 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 9 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,342–2,362 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:372,347+3
12 Aug 2026, 11:072,344-10
9 Aug 2026, 08:422,354-5
6 Aug 2026, 19:002,359-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:172,360no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:482,360first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 4 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
21s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

168 reactions across 13 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9958.9%
🙏1911.3%
🤬116.55%
🎉105.95%
💩63.57%
🤮52.98%
🤝31.79%
🥰31.79%
👌21.19%
🔥21.19%
🖕21.19%
🤔21.19%
👀10.595%
👍10.595%
👏10.595%
😱10.595%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 16 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 May 2026, 00:12 UTC980 views54 reactionsread 7 August 2026

I’m going to be a father and I have a much higher paying job that I have to be responsible for + me being stupidly ambitious about shit. My niggers I am busy. Also nothing is literally happening and I was bored talking about it. Russia isn’t doing shit and neither is the U.S.

37🎉10🤝3🥰3👏1

5 May 2026, 15:46 UTCviews —

Zornkrieger pinned «Hey everyone, I just got a new job as well as the reasons earlier I was looking to get off telegram, so I’m leaving! I have other things I need to spend my time on. It was a pleasure having this channel with our small group and God bless! ❤️»

5 May 2026, 15:46 UTC≈1,370 views59 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Hey everyone, I just got a new job as well as the reasons earlier I was looking to get off telegram, so I’m leaving! I have other things I need to spend my time on. It was a pleasure having this channel with our small group and God bless! ❤️

42🙏15👌2

5 May 2026, 14:38 UTC≈1,150 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @RezistanceTrench1Photo

🇮🇷⚡️🇦🇪 Confirmed: UAE is under attack 🚩 ResistanceTrench | Boost

4

5 May 2026, 00:15 UTC≈1,020 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @rnintel

🇺🇸🇮🇷⚡️- Unprecedented GPS disruptions in the Persian Gulf.

🤔1

5 May 2026, 00:12 UTC953 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BellumActaNewsPhoto

🇺🇸🪖🗺 — At least 23-27 Tankers (some supposedly with transponders off) are airbone over the CENTCOM area tonight supporting fighters and other assets following Iran’s attack on the UAE.

🤬61💩1🖕1

5 May 2026, 00:12 UTC770 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BellumActaNewsPhoto

🇺🇸🇯🇴🪖🗺 — 9x USAF tankers now airbone over Jordan

5 May 2026, 00:12 UTC546 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @CyberspecNewsPhoto

“The United States and Israel are considering striking Iranian missile launch platforms and an energy facility in response to the Iranian attack on the United Arab Emirates, according to sources cited by the newspaper Israel Hayom.”

💩51🖕1🤔1

5 May 2026, 00:12 UTC462 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @CyberspecNewsPhoto

🇮🇷 Mohammad Marandi, a member of the media team of Iran's negotiating team: The UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Jordan are helping the Trump and Netanyahu regimes prepare an attack on the people of Iran. This is an extreme betrayal. The people of Iran will be merciless.

🤬5🙏2😱1

5 May 2026, 00:11 UTC331 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kalibrated

Lots of US aircraft airborne over Iraq. Looking like the war is about to resume.

🙏21

4 May 2026, 20:57 UTC319 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @rnintel

🇺🇸🇮🇷⚡️- Physical shortages in oil supply are starting to emerge as a result of the Strait of Hormuz closure. - Chevron CEO Mike Wirth.

2

4 May 2026, 19:56 UTC344 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @percyarchivePhoto

⚡️🇯🇴🇺🇸🇮🇱❌🇮🇷 - At least 17 USAF Tankers are airborne. 1 "MQ-4C Triton" UAV is on it's path back to Jordan after a 10+ hour ISR mission in the Persian gulf.

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Zornkrieger. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 709,981 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Zornkrieger” (@Zornkrieger), 2,347 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Zornkrieger.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.