Channel
@islamhis4
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
99,386subscribers
-387 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001243786934 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @islamhis4 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/islamhis4 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 99,386 | -69 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 99,455 | -41 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 99,496 | -72 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:14 | 99,568 | -54 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 99,622 | -70 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 99,692 | -53 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 99,745 | -28 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 99,773 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:41 | 99,773 | first reading |
94 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 92 of 93 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 94 (5 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 108,021 |
| Reactions total | 1,493 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,493 reactions across 92 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 953 | 63.8% | |
| 💯 | 162 | 10.9% | |
| 🔥 | 114 | 7.64% | |
| 😢 | 68 | 4.55% | |
| 👏 | 57 | 3.82% | |
| 👌 | 36 | 2.41% | |
| 😍 | 29 | 1.94% | |
| 🥰 | 29 | 1.94% | |
| ✍ | 21 | 1.41% | |
| 🎉 | 15 | 1.00% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 0.402% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.134% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.067% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 92 of the 94 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,493reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 94 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
الموضوع ببساطة هو أن النظام العالمي الشيطاني يعلم جيداً أن سُنن الله لا تتغير ولا تتبدل وأن كما للباطل جولة فالحق له أيضاً .. ويعلمون أن مدة باطلهم قد شارفت على الإنتهاء .. وبما أن أمة الحق الأن تغط بنوم عميق فالنظام الشيطاني يُحاول إستنساخ نظام شيطاني أخر من داخله ومن قلبه بالتخلص من كل القديم وتجديد الدماء والشخصيات والأفكار والقوانين والأنظمة الحاكمة البالية التي سئم وضجر منها الناس وأصبحت لا تُجدي ولا تنفع ولا ت…
🔥3
لحظة حرجة ..!!! 👇👇👇
🔥 هل انتهت قصة طفولة النبي ﷺ عند العامين؟! كانت طفولة النبي ﷺ مرحلةً مليئة بالأحداث والدروس والعناية الإلهية… لكن ما الذي جرى بعد عودته إلى أمه آمنة؟ وما أبرز المحطات التي شكّلت سنوات طفولته؟ وما حقيقة الروايات التي تناقلها المؤرخون حول هذه المرحلة؟ المحاضرة السادسة: طفولة النبي ﷺ (2) سنواصل فيها رحلتنا مع طفولة خير البشر ﷺ، ونقف عند أحداث مهمة، مع التمييز بين الروايات الصحيحة والضعيفة. الخميس 30 صفر 1448هـ المواف…
👍8✍1💯1🔥1
التذكير بالتاريخ الهجري
👍12
يمثل عهد المغول الفترة الذهبية لحكم المسلمين في الهند ، حيث امتدت العلوم والثقافة ، ومختلف مظاهر الحياة الإسلامية ، مع امتداد رقعة الدولة المسلمة ، واشتداد سلطانها وهيبتها ونفوذها . ومن أمثلة العمارة الإسلامية ما قام به الحاكم العبقري : شيرشاه السوري ؛ قال الشيخ أبو الحسن الندوي: أنشأ شيرشاه السوري الشارع الطويل ، مساحته اثنتان وثلاثون وثمانمائة وأربعة آلاف ( 4832 كم ) ، وأسس في كل ثلاثة كيلو مترات رباطاً ، ورتب هناك…
😢10👍5💯1
دولة المغول المسلمة في الهند 932هـ - 1274هـ : العهد الذهبي للمسلمين في الهند » 👇👇👇
👍3💯2
هيثم طلعت | السنة وحي من الله #هيثم_طلعت #عادل_عصمت #الحاد #الالحاد #إنكار_السنة
👍4💯2👏1
المشكلة ليست في أن ندرس تاريخ الأمم الأخرى؛ فمعرفة تاريخ العالم أمر مهم، ولا ينبغي أن نخاف من دراسة الحضارات المختلفة. لكن المشكلة تبدأ عندما نعرف الآخر أكثر مما نعرف أنفسنا. ندرس نابليون كقائد عسكري وفاتح، لكن هل ندرس أيضًا جرائم حملته في مصر والشام؟ هل يعرف الطالب أن الحملة الفرنسية شهدت إعدامات وقمعًا دمويًا، وأن أحداث يافا سنة 1799 ارتبطت بقتل أعداد كبيرة من الأسرى بعد استسلامهم، وفق روايات تاريخية متعددة؟ وهل يع…
👍14💯1
📚 هل ندرس التاريخ… أم ندرس ما اختاره لنا الآخرون؟ لماذا يعرف أبناؤنا تفاصيل عن نابليون وسقراط وأفلاطون وكليوباترا وبوذا، بينما لا يعرف كثير منهم شيئًا عن سلمان الفارسي، وأسماء بنت أبي بكر، وعائشة رضي الله عنها، وصلاح الدين الأيوبي، وعقبة بن نافع، وغيرهم من أعلام الحضارة الإسلامية؟ 👇👇
🎉7👍5🤩2💯1
بابا نويل الحقيقي (سانتا كلوز)... بابا التثليث فوق رؤوس الموحدين 👇👇👇
👍12💯1
يظن بعض جهّال المسلمين عندنا أن (بابا نويل) أو (سانتا كلوز) مجرد شخصية خرافية، وأن هذا الرجل السمين الضحوك، صاحب اللحية البيضاء التي تتدلى على “كرشه” الضخم، إنما هو رمز وهمي تم ابتكاره من أجل إمتاع الأطفال وإدخال البهجة والسرور على أنفسهم في أعياد الميلاد. “فلم لا يجالسه أطفال المسلمين كذلك؟!”، “هل أنتم ضد الفرح ومظاهره؟!”، هكذا يقول بعض أهل الهوى والتقليد لكل ما هو أجنبي، أو كما يردد بعض عوام المسلمين بغفلة وجهل مطب…
👍11💯5
قال شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية: "الزهد: ترَك ما لا ينفع في الآخرة، والورَع: ترْك ما تخاف ضررَه في الآخرة"؛ (مدارج السالكين).
👌9👍4💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 94 posts we hold for @islamhis4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
هل استفدتم من المحاضرة الخامسة: طفولة النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 94 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 355,372 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“التاريخ الإسلامي islamic history” (@islamhis4), 99,386 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/islamhis4.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.