Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for التاريخ الإسلامي islamic history

Channel

التاريخ الإسلامي islamic history

@islamhis4

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

94,372subscribers

-5,401 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001243786934
TypeChannel
Username@islamhis4
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/islamhis4

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 7 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@islamhis4/27070 · this entry24 Aug 2026, 07:14 UTC@kalt_alarab/1091724 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC1.0022 minutes
@islamhis4/27123 · this entry28 Aug 2026, 07:54 UTC@kalt_alarab/1109528 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC1.003.1 hours
@islamhis4/27139 · this entry29 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC@kalt_alarab/1119329 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC1.0031 minutes
@islamhis4/27167 · this entry31 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC@kalt_alarab/1130831 Aug 2026, 18:54 UTC1.0081 minutes
@islamhis4/27906 · this entry11 Nov 2026, 11:56 UTC@kalt_alarab/1272911 Nov 2026, 12:53 UTC1.0058 minutes
@islamhis4/27907 · this entry11 Nov 2026, 11:59 UTC@kalt_alarab/1273011 Nov 2026, 12:54 UTC1.0055 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@kalt_alarab15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0081 minutesthis entry (15–0)
@aqedamenhag10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9915 hoursthis entry (9–1)
@DrlaylaH9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9911 days@DrlaylaH (9–0)
@For_myself_20225 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9924 hoursthis entry (5–0)
@alkelafa5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.972 days@alkelafa (3–2)
@ArabAffairsTV5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0014 hours@ArabAffairsTV (5–0)
@mi7bara16 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0061 minutesthis entry (13–3)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 18 of the 18 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 568 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

94,37299,77397,072.56 August 202612 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 98 days, net -5,401. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 93,562–100,583 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 10:1594,372-105
10 Nov 2026, 09:5994,477-74
8 Nov 2026, 11:0794,551-79
7 Nov 2026, 04:1194,630-63
6 Nov 2026, 05:3694,693-43
5 Nov 2026, 06:5794,736-54
4 Nov 2026, 06:4994,790-50
3 Nov 2026, 08:2994,840-51
2 Nov 2026, 06:0794,891-48
1 Nov 2026, 04:5894,939-48
31 Oct 2026, 06:1794,987-62
30 Oct 2026, 03:3995,049-52
29 Oct 2026, 00:4795,101-66
27 Oct 2026, 20:4195,167-61
26 Oct 2026, 21:1995,228-36
25 Oct 2026, 23:4995,264-35
24 Oct 2026, 20:5895,299-67
23 Oct 2026, 20:2095,366-53
22 Oct 2026, 21:4895,419-47
21 Oct 2026, 21:2195,466first reading

Engagement

921 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 215 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.45%
avg views ÷ 94,372 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,370
256 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
256
of 921 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 255 of 256 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held921 (5 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total351,229
Reactions total5,521
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 08:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5h 03m
Average length
3m 00s

Measured directly from 101 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

17,238 reactions across 919 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍9,57455.5%
🔥1,80610.5%
💯1,4528.42%
😢1,2497.25%
✍8835.12%
👏5893.42%
👌5833.38%
🥰3351.94%
😍2271.32%
😱1670.969%
🤬1590.922%
🕊1210.702%
🎉720.418%
🤩210.122%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 919 of the 921 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,238 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 921 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 920 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @islamhis4. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 921 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 10 of 256 posts held from the last 30 days (3.91%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 08:37 UTC73 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026

تبدأ قصتنا عندما نزل القائد المسلم طارق بن زياد على سواحل الجزيرة الخضراء في جنوب الأندلس، على رأس جيش صغير قوامه 12 ألف مقاتل ، معظمهم من البربر حديثي العهد بالإسلام ، قادمين من شمال أفريقيا . كانت وُجهتهم مملكة القوط الغربيين ، وهي أمة جرمانية من الشمال استوطنت إسبانيا منذ القرن الخامس الميلادي، وكانت تُعدّ من أقوى القوى العسكرية في أوروبا الغربية آنذاك، ولم تتعرض لهزيمة واحدة قط منذ أكثر من قرنين . أول مواجهة لل…

✍1

12 Nov 2026, 08:32 UTC87 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

في 19 يوليو من سنة 711م حدث الفتح العظيم ... في وادي لكة تواجه جيش مسلم تعداده 12 ألفا، وجيش نصراني تعداده 187 ألفا [وفق المصادر الغربية] و استشهد 3000 مسلم ، بينما تم إفناء جيش النصارى كاملا . 👇👇👇

12 Nov 2026, 07:55 UTC199 views4 reactionsread 12 November 2026

إن أخوف ما أخافه على أهل الإسلام.."همم مغشوشة"! تنادي بما لا تعتقد.. وتنهى عما تفعل.. وتنصح بما تهمل .. وتعد بما لا تفي... تحب أن تحمد بما لم تفعل.. تتأنق في التسلق وتهون من الذنب .. تعشق الأضواء فتطرب لذكرها.. وتلهث خلف مجدها .. ظاهرها الجد والبذل.. وباطنها الغش والجشع.. لا تعرفونها ولكن الله يعرفها.. وجعلنا بعضكم لبعض فتنة..! #قبس_من_خاطر

😢4

11 Nov 2026, 19:05 UTC787 views17 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

تلاوة عطرة ♥

🥰12👍2🔥2💯1

11 Nov 2026, 18:04 UTC888 views4 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

الحد الأدنى ( سر إلهي ) #هيثم_طلعت #بداية_الكون #الإلحاد #الالحاد #شبهات

👍3💯1

11 Nov 2026, 16:51 UTC952 views10 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

يلحـ ـدون ليعبدوا برنامج #هيثم_طلعت #الإلحاد #الالحاد

🔥6👍2💯2

11 Nov 2026, 14:14 UTC≈1,190 views43 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

الشهيد بإذن الله تعالى ناصر صالح، أحد ابناء أبين باليمن، ارتقى في ميادين العزة والشرف والبطولة مدافعاً عن دينه وعرضه من أذناب ايران الحوثيين هؤلاء شهدائنا يامجوس شهداء جنة الفردوس بإذن سبحانه وتعالى.. أخذ صورته أحد أتباع الحوثي ونشرها مستغرباً لماذا يموت من يصفونهم بالمرتزقة والد. و. ا. عش ويرى في وجوههم السماحة والرضاء بينما أصدقائه من الحوثيين عندما يذهب لرؤية جثثهم تكون وجوههم مخيفه!! رحمه الله تعالى وجزاه الله عن…

😢19💯12👍4🔥3🕊3😍2

11 Nov 2026, 13:41 UTC≈1,130 views27 reactionsread 12 November 2026

🔸 كان يقال : لمن في جيش مسيلمة الكذاب ، هل تصدق مسيلمة ؟ فيقول : والله أننا نعلم أن مسيلمة كذاب ولكن كاذب ربيعة أحب لنا من صادق مضر . هذا مثال من التاريخ عندما يخالف الإنسان ضميره من أجل العصبية القبيلة والقومية الزائفة تسمع مثل هذه الاقوال . 📌لذلك نهانا الإسلام عن هذه العصبية

👍17💯10

11 Nov 2026, 11:59 UTC≈1,230 views30 reactionsread 12 November 2026

والجسد الذي لا يمرض ولا يبلى ولا يموت .. والحب والزواج الحقيقي الذي لا ينضب ولا يفتر ولا ينتهي والذي يبحث عنه الجميع خاصة النساء بدون مشاكل ومُنغصات وهم وغم، وحزن ، وكدر!! وكل ما تشتهي نفسك في أمور تعرفها والمزيد الذي لا تعرفه ولم تراه أو تسمع عنه من قبل .. وفوق كل هذا هو رؤية الله رؤية حقيقية كاملة تنظر إليه، وتسمعه بدون وسيط أو ترجمان ! من الجنون أن تعتقد أن ثمن ذلك النعيم هو أن .... تعمل .. وتتزوج .. وتنجب أولاداً…

👌22👍4👏2✍1💯1

11 Nov 2026, 11:56 UTC≈1,070 views8 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

جنون ..!! قمة العته والجنون أن تعتقد أن ثمن جنة عرضها السموات والأرض بها ما لا عين رأت ولا أذن سمعت ولا خطر على قلب بشر ..وبها النعيم الذي لا ينتهي .. والشباب الذي لا يهرم .. 👇👇👇👇

👍5💯2✍1

11 Nov 2026, 08:32 UTC≈1,180 views13 reactionsread 12 November 2026

المماليك في اللغة هم الرقيق أو العبيد ومع أن لفظ المماليك يعتبر عاما على معظم الرقيق، إلا أنه في تاريخنا الإسلامي له مدلول خاص. وتبدأ قصة المماليك منذ أيام الخليفة العباسي المأمون وأخيه المعتصم؛ حيث استجلبا أعدادا ضخمة من الرقيق، واستخدموهم كفرق عسكرية؛ للاعتماد عليهم في تدعيم نفوذهما. ومع مرور الوقت أصبح المماليك هم الأداة العسكرية الرئيسية في كثير من البلاد الإسلامية، وعندما قامت الدولة الأيوبية كان أمراؤها يعتمدون…

👍8💯2🥰2✍1

11 Nov 2026, 08:30 UTC≈1,090 views7 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

المماليك من رقيق وعبيد إلى أمراء وسلاطين" دولة سلاطين المماليك .. دولة قامت على أكتاف الرقيق ثم تولت زعامة الأمة لفترة من الزمن فماذا قدم المماليك للأمة الإسلامية؟ 👇👇👇👇

👍5✍1💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 921 posts we hold for @islamhis4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@islamhis4 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
1 October 2026
Most recent edit
6 October 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 27 posts on @islamhis4 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
26 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
5

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Oct 2026, 10:00 UTCAnonymous Poll73 voters

هل استفدت وتعرفت على عقيدة الحوثيين من خلال سلسلة #الحركة_الحوثية_الرافضية؟

  1. نعم59%
  2. نوعا ما41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Sept 2026, 18:37 UTCAnonymous Poll67 voters

هل استمعت واستفدت من المحاضرة اليوم؟

  1. نعم27%
  2. نوعا ما12%
  3. لا، لم اسمع63%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3 Sept 2026, 19:29 UTCAnonymous Poll69 voters

هل استفدت من المحاضرة التاسعة اليوم؟

  1. نعم30%
  2. نوعا ما9%
  3. لم أتابعها62%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTCAnonymous Poll45 voters

هل استفدت من المحاضرة 06؟

  1. نعم، جدا89%
  2. نوعا ما18%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

6 Aug 2026, 21:47 UTCAnonymous Poll65 voters

هل استفدتم من المحاضرة الخامسة: طفولة النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم؟

  1. نعم86%
  2. نوعا ما14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 921 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

خليل المقداد - القناة العامة
@almukdad · 7,936
#1
مَحْبَرةُ الْعلمِ..🍂
@mi7bara · 29,889
#2
أحداث الشرق الأوسط (أحداث فلسطين - أحداث لبنان - أحداث العراق - أحداث سوريا - أحداث اليمن - أحداث إيران - أحداث الخليج)
@SmiiLee_13 · 6,178
#3
قناة الجزيرة
@ajanews · 1,302,563
#4
قناة/ حُلَّة الحَسناء
@Gb5NmRk · 28,956
#5
فوائد أبي إسماعيل الروسي
@fawaedabiismail · 9,670
#6
النية تسبق العمل
@ALNYATSBOQ · 3,127
#7
المِسْكِيُّ.
@al_mesky · 2,967
#8
شذرات فلسطينية 🇵🇸
@ShatharatPal · 116,523
#9
وصل للأخبار
@waslnews · 11,325
#10
سُني
@sunnay6626 · 8,082
#11
قناة أحمد بن يوسف السيد
@alsayed_ah · 511,226
#12
ردغة الخبال (توثيق أخلاق سفهاء الأحلام)
@elakhlaq · 4,852
#13
شؤون إسلامية - Islamic Affairs
@ArabAffairsTV · 60,282
#14
الموسوعة القرآنية
@QuranPediaApp · 29,529
#15
د. إياد قنيبي
@EyadQunaibi · 224,484
#16
عبدالرَّحمن الغريب
@Kurdish79 · 8,703
#17
مركز الخطابي للدراسات
@alkhattabirw · 44,502
#18
الدُّرَرُ البَاهِرَاتُ
@Drr_baherat · 42,362
#19
#يوميات_حمصي_مهجر
@homseadea · 3,544
#20
الاشاعرة المبتدعة (الاصاغرة)
@alashaeiruh · 9,217
#21
د. ليلى حمدان
@DrlaylaH · 32,755
#22
قناة إحسان العتيبي أبو طارق
@ihsan_alotibie · 3,922
#23
وكالة حديد
@HADIDAGE · 770
#24
غُـــربـاء (لأبي تيمية)
@Ghurabaa_AboTaymia · 395
#25
القناة الإخبارية الدولية
@rsjlb · 45,797
#26
قناة أ. مضر أبوالهيجاء جنين/فلسطين/ جنوب الديار الشامية
@modar_abualhayjaa · 5,258
#27
الـتـقـويـم الـهـجـري 🌙
@TAKUEAM · 737
#28
التاريخ الإسلامي
@alkelafa · 43,440
#29
طرائف الأعرابّ️ ️
@fadakrr · 34,638
#30
تَارِيْخُ الْمُلُوْكِ والأُمَمْ
@muhamedumahhestory · 2,243
#31
في أقل من ثلاث
@aqalmn3 · 10,119
#32
The Hunters القناصون
@thehunterssociety · 5,080
#33
✨قناة أ. نورالدين قوطيط ✨
@qnour123 · 6,514
#34
تنوير اﻷعلام بمخططات اللئام
@DrAbuMossaab · 6,989
#35
مكتبة إقرأ الإلكترونية pdf 📚
@books_p · 172,771
#36
نورس للدراسات
@NORSFS2 · 108,945
#37
قالَت العَرَب
@Arabsaid · 51,523
#38
خَطّاب الدِّمَشقيُّ || الأسَاسيَّة
@MAHER_ALE · 2,722
#39
فوائد في التاريخ
@Altarikhied · 2,798
#40
أصحاب الحديث
@Hadithowners · 16,180
#41
الانتصار لأهل الحديث والآثار
@almaqdisy_al7anbali · 9,972
#42
بالفصحـى💛
@alpahri_90 · 29,200
#43
مراجع مهمه
@mataje3mohem · 875
#44
أسرار نفسية، تطوير وتحفيز
@psychology_F · 295,326
#45
وهم العلمانية الرسمية
@Secularismillu · 9,355
#46
يوسف سمرين
@yousefsom · 11,737
#47
قناة | الغيث الشامي (طالب علم)
@AboObadaShami · 11,979
#48
وكالة نهاوند الاخبارية
@N_N2DRF · 1,284
#49
قناة | أبي جعفر عبدالله الخليفي
@alkulife · 48,917
#50
صدقةٌ جاريةٌ لِشذى وسعد.
@le_shatha · 633
#51
تعاليل ( نواف )
@aldffar · 7,206
#52
المكتبة الأثرية
@PDF90 · 22,342
#53
موسوعة الراقي العراقي العلمية
@alraqi_aliraqii · 378
#54
وأنتم الأعلون
@waantumalaelawn · 2,348
#55
إحياء تراث السلف
@salaftime · 31,899
#56
قَنَاة | عَلَىٰ نَهْجِ أَهْلِ الأَثَـرِ.
@athaar28 · 5,161
#57
قناة || أبي عائشة سامي هوايري
@Abu_Aisha1 · 5,275
#58
أَنتِ الأُمَّـة
@Anti_Omma2 · 1,047
#59
عقيدة أهل السنة
@adam0944 · 2,049 (as read 15 August 2026)
#60
السم الترفيهي
@Alsum_Altarfihy · 5,022
#61
روائع من الأدب العربي
@Rwaea3 · 42,427
#62
أبو الطيّب المتنبي
@abo_altyabb · 34,441
#63

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

من صفحات التاريخ
@tareehk1 · 35,409
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 September 2026
الأندلس تأريخ وحضارة
@tarikh897 · 31,147
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 September 2026
تاريخنا الإسلامي
@altareikh · 34,378
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 2 September 2026
الدُّرَرُ البَاهِرَاتُ
@Drr_baherat · 42,362
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 August 2026
التاريخ الإسلامي
@alkelafa · 43,440
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
زاوية التاريـخ📜
@Tarekh101 · 26,781
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 September 2026
محمد الجيلاني
@u222c · 81,752
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 17 August 2026
طرائف الأعرابّ️ ️
@fadakrr · 34,638
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
سوريا للأستثمار 💚✌️
@Huran209 · 29,051
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 15 September 2026
رقيقة القلب
@tender_hearted_1 · 28,377
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 9 September 2026
كتب pdf _ مكتبة عطر الإلكترونية
@Etr_MB · 110,284
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
كتب مدفوعة _كتب مجانية pdf _مكتبة الكترونية
@MB_BOo0K · 36,783
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 31 August 2026
كتابي المُفضّلpdf 📚
@mybook_z · 68,225
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
مكتبة إقرأ الإلكترونية pdf 📚
@books_p · 172,771
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 12 August 2026
🍃لله ثم للتاريخ🍃
@llilahthumlilttrikh · 25,303
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 September 2026
أسرار نفسية، تطوير وتحفيز
@psychology_F · 295,326
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 10 August 2026
قصة ما قبل النوم 💙
@sleepstory · 27,278
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 September 2026
👑 فـريـق ألـعـبـاقرة للـتـداول 👑
@TradingGeniuses · 40,950
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 28 August 2026
مَلاذُ القَارِئ 📖📚
@BBO0OK · 52,811
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
تعلم البرمجة
@oBarmej · 224,934
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 11 August 2026
شذرات فلسطينية 🇵🇸
@ShatharatPal · 116,523
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026
طور لغتك الانجليزية
@englishlearn36 · 82,782
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 17 August 2026
● قَنَاة | صَبُور الهَاشِمِيّ
@PATIENT_77 · 21,393
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 21 September 2026
بحر الكتب العلمية
@librarypdf1 · 452,360
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 42 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“التاريخ الإسلامي islamic history” (@islamhis4), 94,372 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/islamhis4.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.