Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 7 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 18 of the 18 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 568 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
65 measurements spanning 98 days, net -5,401. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 93,562–100,583 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 10:15
94,372
-105
10 Nov 2026, 09:59
94,477
-74
8 Nov 2026, 11:07
94,551
-79
7 Nov 2026, 04:11
94,630
-63
6 Nov 2026, 05:36
94,693
-43
5 Nov 2026, 06:57
94,736
-54
4 Nov 2026, 06:49
94,790
-50
3 Nov 2026, 08:29
94,840
-51
2 Nov 2026, 06:07
94,891
-48
1 Nov 2026, 04:58
94,939
-48
31 Oct 2026, 06:17
94,987
-62
30 Oct 2026, 03:39
95,049
-52
29 Oct 2026, 00:47
95,101
-66
27 Oct 2026, 20:41
95,167
-61
26 Oct 2026, 21:19
95,228
-36
25 Oct 2026, 23:49
95,264
-35
24 Oct 2026, 20:58
95,299
-67
23 Oct 2026, 20:20
95,366
-53
22 Oct 2026, 21:48
95,419
-47
21 Oct 2026, 21:21
95,466
first reading
Engagement
921 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 215 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.45%
avg views ÷ 94,372 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,370
256 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
256
of 921 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 255 of 256 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
921 (5 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
351,229
Reactions total
5,521
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 08:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5h 03m
Average length
3m 00s
Measured directly from 101 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
17,238 reactions across 919 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
9,574
55.5%
🔥
1,806
10.5%
💯
1,452
8.42%
😢
1,249
7.25%
✍
883
5.12%
👏
589
3.42%
👌
583
3.38%
🥰
335
1.94%
😍
227
1.32%
😱
167
0.969%
🤬
159
0.922%
🕊
121
0.702%
🎉
72
0.418%
🤩
21
0.122%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 919 of the 921 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,238 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 921 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 920 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @islamhis4. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 921 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 10 of 256 posts held from the last 30 days (3.91%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
تبدأ قصتنا عندما نزل القائد المسلم طارق بن زياد على سواحل الجزيرة الخضراء في جنوب الأندلس، على رأس جيش صغير قوامه 12 ألف مقاتل ، معظمهم من البربر حديثي العهد بالإسلام ، قادمين من شمال أفريقيا .
كانت وُجهتهم مملكة القوط الغربيين ، وهي أمة جرمانية من الشمال استوطنت إسبانيا منذ القرن الخامس الميلادي، وكانت تُعدّ من أقوى القوى العسكرية في أوروبا الغربية آنذاك، ولم تتعرض لهزيمة واحدة قط منذ أكثر من قرنين .
أول مواجهة لل…
في 19 يوليو من سنة 711م حدث الفتح العظيم ...
في وادي لكة تواجه جيش مسلم تعداده 12 ألفا، وجيش نصراني تعداده 187 ألفا [وفق المصادر الغربية] و استشهد 3000 مسلم ، بينما تم إفناء جيش النصارى كاملا .
👇👇👇
إن أخوف ما أخافه على أهل الإسلام.."همم مغشوشة"!
تنادي بما لا تعتقد..
وتنهى عما تفعل..
وتنصح بما تهمل ..
وتعد بما لا تفي...
تحب أن تحمد بما لم تفعل..
تتأنق في التسلق وتهون من الذنب ..
تعشق الأضواء فتطرب لذكرها..
وتلهث خلف مجدها ..
ظاهرها الجد والبذل..
وباطنها الغش والجشع..
لا تعرفونها ولكن الله يعرفها..
وجعلنا بعضكم لبعض فتنة..!
#قبس_من_خاطر
الشهيد بإذن الله تعالى ناصر صالح، أحد ابناء أبين باليمن، ارتقى في ميادين العزة والشرف والبطولة مدافعاً عن دينه وعرضه من أذناب ايران الحوثيين هؤلاء شهدائنا يامجوس شهداء جنة الفردوس بإذن سبحانه وتعالى..
أخذ صورته أحد أتباع الحوثي ونشرها مستغرباً لماذا يموت من يصفونهم بالمرتزقة والد. و. ا. عش ويرى في وجوههم السماحة والرضاء بينما أصدقائه من الحوثيين عندما يذهب لرؤية جثثهم تكون وجوههم مخيفه!!
رحمه الله تعالى وجزاه الله عن…
🔸 كان يقال :
لمن في جيش مسيلمة الكذاب ، هل تصدق مسيلمة ؟
فيقول : والله أننا نعلم أن مسيلمة كذاب ولكن كاذب ربيعة أحب لنا من صادق مضر .
هذا مثال من التاريخ عندما يخالف الإنسان ضميره من أجل العصبية القبيلة والقومية الزائفة تسمع مثل هذه الاقوال .
📌لذلك نهانا الإسلام عن هذه العصبية
والجسد الذي لا يمرض ولا يبلى ولا يموت ..
والحب والزواج الحقيقي الذي لا ينضب ولا يفتر ولا ينتهي والذي يبحث عنه الجميع خاصة النساء بدون مشاكل ومُنغصات وهم وغم، وحزن ، وكدر!!
وكل ما تشتهي نفسك في أمور تعرفها والمزيد الذي لا تعرفه ولم تراه أو تسمع عنه من قبل ..
وفوق كل هذا هو رؤية الله رؤية حقيقية كاملة تنظر إليه، وتسمعه بدون وسيط أو ترجمان !
من الجنون أن تعتقد أن ثمن ذلك النعيم هو أن ....
تعمل ..
وتتزوج ..
وتنجب أولاداً…
جنون ..!!
قمة العته والجنون أن تعتقد أن ثمن جنة عرضها السموات والأرض بها ما لا عين رأت ولا أذن سمعت ولا خطر على قلب بشر ..وبها النعيم الذي لا ينتهي ..
والشباب الذي لا يهرم ..
👇👇👇👇
المماليك في اللغة هم الرقيق أو العبيد ومع أن لفظ المماليك يعتبر عاما على معظم الرقيق، إلا أنه في تاريخنا الإسلامي له مدلول خاص.
وتبدأ قصة المماليك منذ أيام الخليفة العباسي المأمون وأخيه المعتصم؛ حيث استجلبا أعدادا ضخمة من الرقيق، واستخدموهم كفرق عسكرية؛ للاعتماد عليهم في تدعيم نفوذهما.
ومع مرور الوقت أصبح المماليك هم الأداة العسكرية الرئيسية في كثير من البلاد الإسلامية، وعندما قامت الدولة الأيوبية كان أمراؤها يعتمدون…
المماليك من رقيق وعبيد إلى أمراء وسلاطين"
دولة سلاطين المماليك .. دولة قامت على أكتاف الرقيق ثم تولت زعامة الأمة لفترة من الزمن فماذا قدم المماليك للأمة الإسلامية؟
👇👇👇👇
👍5✍1💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 921 posts we hold for @islamhis4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@islamhis4 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
1 October 2026
Most recent edit
6 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 27 posts on @islamhis4 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
26 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
5
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
هل استفدتم من المحاضرة الخامسة:
طفولة النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم؟
نعم86%
نوعا ما14%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 921 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
من صفحات التاريخ @tareehk1 · 35,409 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 September 2026
الأندلس تأريخ وحضارة @tarikh897 · 31,147 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 September 2026
تاريخنا الإسلامي @altareikh · 34,378 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 2 September 2026
الدُّرَرُ البَاهِرَاتُ @Drr_baherat · 42,362 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 August 2026
التاريخ الإسلامي @alkelafa · 43,440 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
زاوية التاريـخ📜 @Tarekh101 · 26,781 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 September 2026
محمد الجيلاني @u222c · 81,752 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 17 August 2026
طرائف الأعرابّ️ ️ @fadakrr · 34,638 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
سوريا للأستثمار 💚✌️ @Huran209 · 29,051 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 15 September 2026
رقيقة القلب @tender_hearted_1 · 28,377 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 9 September 2026
كتب pdf _ مكتبة عطر الإلكترونية @Etr_MB · 110,284 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
كتب مدفوعة _كتب مجانية pdf _مكتبة الكترونية @MB_BOo0K · 36,783 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 31 August 2026
كتابي المُفضّلpdf 📚 @mybook_z · 68,225 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
مكتبة إقرأ الإلكترونية pdf 📚 @books_p · 172,771 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 12 August 2026
🍃لله ثم للتاريخ🍃 @llilahthumlilttrikh · 25,303 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 September 2026
أسرار نفسية، تطوير وتحفيز @psychology_F · 295,326 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 10 August 2026
قصة ما قبل النوم 💙 @sleepstory · 27,278 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 September 2026
👑 فـريـق ألـعـبـاقرة للـتـداول 👑 @TradingGeniuses · 40,950 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 28 August 2026
مَلاذُ القَارِئ 📖📚 @BBO0OK · 52,811 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
تعلم البرمجة @oBarmej · 224,934 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 11 August 2026
شذرات فلسطينية 🇵🇸 @ShatharatPal · 116,523 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026
طور لغتك الانجليزية @englishlearn36 · 82,782 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 17 August 2026
● قَنَاة | صَبُور الهَاشِمِيّ @PATIENT_77 · 21,393 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 21 September 2026
بحر الكتب العلمية @librarypdf1 · 452,360 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 42 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“التاريخ الإسلامي islamic history” (@islamhis4), 94,372 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/islamhis4.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.