Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 👑 فـريـق ألـعـبـاقرة للـتـداول 👑

Channel

👑 فـريـق ألـعـبـاقرة للـتـداول 👑

@TradingGeniuses

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

40,950subscribers

-4,267 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002059797124
TypeChannel
Username@TradingGeniuses
Descriptionقناة ألـعـبـاقـرة تحليل دقيق 🔥 قرارات بثقة حيث يتحول التداول الي فن واحتراف 🏆 > فرص يومية 🔍 إدارة ذكية للمخاطر 💰 📈 📊 تحليلات فنية وتوصيات قوية📈 💡 دعم مستمر لكل الأعضاء وأجوبة على استفساراتكم التواصل مع المشرف حصرا @AYMAN_SYR مع ألـعـبـ
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/TradingGeniuses

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (3 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@TradingGeniuses/4628 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC@bi1trading/8049 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC1.00under a minute
@bi1trading/80610 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC@TradingGeniuses/4630 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC1.00under a minute
@bi1trading/81110 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC@TradingGeniuses/4633 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@bi1trading8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@bi1trading (5–3)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 3 of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 82 comparable posts for this entry, running 8 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @TradingGeniuses — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

40,95045,21743,083.512 August 2026 — 45,217 subscribers12 August 2026 — 45,178 subscribers13 August 2026 — 45,139 subscribers15 August 2026 — 45,058 subscribers16 August 2026 — 44,954 subscribers17 August 2026 — 44,904 subscribers18 August 2026 — 44,828 subscribers19 August 2026 — 44,778 subscribers20 August 2026 — 44,719 subscribers22 August 2026 — 44,645 subscribers23 August 2026 — 44,560 subscribers25 August 2026 — 44,501 subscribers26 August 2026 — 44,422 subscribers27 August 2026 — 44,392 subscribers28 August 2026 — 44,338 subscribers29 August 2026 — 44,267 subscribers30 August 2026 — 44,221 subscribers31 August 2026 — 44,174 subscribers1 September 2026 — 44,099 subscribers2 September 2026 — 44,043 subscribers3 September 2026 — 43,968 subscribers6 September 2026 — 43,853 subscribers9 September 2026 — 43,669 subscribers11 September 2026 — 43,573 subscribers13 September 2026 — 43,467 subscribers15 September 2026 — 43,401 subscribers17 September 2026 — 43,298 subscribers25 September 2026 — 42,914 subscribers4 October 2026 — 42,542 subscribers9 October 2026 — 42,360 subscribers13 October 2026 — 42,177 subscribers14 October 2026 — 42,113 subscribers15 October 2026 — 42,068 subscribers16 October 2026 — 42,033 subscribers17 October 2026 — 41,995 subscribers18 October 2026 — 41,951 subscribers19 October 2026 — 41,883 subscribers20 October 2026 — 41,849 subscribers21 October 2026 — 41,800 subscribers22 October 2026 — 41,757 subscribers23 October 2026 — 41,707 subscribers24 October 2026 — 41,670 subscribers25 October 2026 — 41,631 subscribers26 October 2026 — 41,593 subscribers27 October 2026 — 41,544 subscribers28 October 2026 — 41,513 subscribers29 October 2026 — 41,456 subscribers30 October 2026 — 41,427 subscribers31 October 2026 — 41,400 subscribers1 November 2026 — 41,360 subscribers2 November 2026 — 41,328 subscribers3 November 2026 — 41,293 subscribers4 November 2026 — 41,251 subscribers5 November 2026 — 41,209 subscribers6 November 2026 — 41,162 subscribers7 November 2026 — 41,115 subscribers9 November 2026 — 41,076 subscribers10 November 2026 — 41,027 subscribers12 November 2026 — 40,950 subscribers12 August 202612 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 93 days, net -4,267. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,310–45,857 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 17:4540,950-77
10 Nov 2026, 14:5041,027-49
9 Nov 2026, 03:1641,076-39
7 Nov 2026, 22:4741,115-47
6 Nov 2026, 23:1141,162-47
5 Nov 2026, 21:2441,209-42
4 Nov 2026, 22:1841,251-42
3 Nov 2026, 21:2441,293-35
2 Nov 2026, 19:2041,328-32
1 Nov 2026, 21:3041,360-40
31 Oct 2026, 20:0041,400-27
30 Oct 2026, 19:5741,427-29
29 Oct 2026, 20:0141,456-57
28 Oct 2026, 21:2141,513-31
27 Oct 2026, 23:1841,544-49
26 Oct 2026, 22:0441,593-38
25 Oct 2026, 20:3941,631-39
24 Oct 2026, 17:2741,670-37
23 Oct 2026, 18:0641,707-50
22 Oct 2026, 16:4641,757first reading

Engagement

417 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 178 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.213%
avg views ÷ 40,950 subscribers
Avg views / post
87.1
149 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
150
of 417 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 30 of 149 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held417 (8 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total12,974
Reactions total35
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 21:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
309
Videos
30
Links
217

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
12m 43s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

95 reactions across 81 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7983.2%
🔥55.26%
👏44.21%
👍33.16%
😍22.11%
🐳11.05%
💯11.05%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 83 of the 417 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 417 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 150 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 17:59 UTCviews —

👑 فـريـق ألـعـبـاقرة للـتـداول 👑 pinned «✨ للانضمام إلى مجموعة VIP والتواصل معي مباشرة: 📲 WhatsApp: +90 536 696 6230 ✈️ Telegram: @Bi1_TRADiNG يسعدني تواصلكم وانضمامكم إلينا ❤️»

10 Nov 2026, 17:59 UTC72 viewsread 12 November 2026

✨ للانضمام إلى مجموعة VIP والتواصل معي مباشرة: 📲 WhatsApp: +90 536 696 6230 ✈️ Telegram: @Bi1_TRADiNG يسعدني تواصلكم وانضمامكم إلينا ❤️

Showing the 12 most recent of 417 posts we hold for @TradingGeniuses. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @TradingGeniuses as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
12 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
12 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
18 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTCAnonymous Poll10 voters

اليوم افتح لايف ولا لا صار لنا عم نفتح لايفات من يوم الاثنين ليوم جمعه هل نفتح لايفات ولا لا اعطوني رايكم

  1. اي80%
  2. لا30%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 417 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

عين الميدان
@War2026iran · 753
#1
ناتکوین، ایردراپ CEX، Blum نات پیکسل بلوم ماجور گاتو جمز کتز، ماسک، تپ سواپ بامز ادلیست
@blumjoin · 379
#2
𖦹 نماذج الجامعات الأهلية والحكومية
@SAFWANX · 6,319
#3
🇸🇦 إستثمار السعودية 🇸🇦 والامارات 🇦🇪
@aaaskl · 6,161
#4
بوت | بلوم | ماجور | نوت بيكسل
@ANIME_CENT · 3,496
#5
شغف قارئ
@shaghaf_qaria · 5,390
#6
شذرات فلسطينية 🇵🇸
@ShatharatPal · 116,343
#7
لله نَمْـ𓂆ـضِيْ•~🔻
@allahyolu · 1,070
#8
هدوء ڪاتبـة⇣℡
@O8jol · 760
#9
مذكرات فتاة...🦋🩵
@toooma19 · 1,081
#10
القناص للتداول
@SNIPER_FX123 · 15,477
#11
⚡الــدفــعة الـثـــانــ2ــية⚡
@SecondBATCH21UNV · 743
#12
أسرار نفسية، تطوير وتحفيز
@psychology_F · 295,326
#13
🇦🇪🇸🇦CRYPTO SNIPER قناص الفرص
@PIOY1A · 8,890
#14
SND
@SNDP2P · 31,046
#15
مساء الشتاء ، غيمة ممطرة
@llyl7 · 415,686
#16
كورسات COURSES META
@corses3 · 86,654
#17
معلومات، طبية، صحية
@X0_18 · 51,113
#18
المستقبل- Future
@m8sdtxx · 355,256
#19
الترند الجامعي TU 💛
@gf2023Unive · 77,616
#20
Summary 🇪🇬Channel
@Technoapp11 · 59,687
#21
مُنهك.
@QNQNQP · 27,969
#22
تعلم البرمجة
@oBarmej · 224,934
#23
قناة طبية | د. خالد الغزالي 🥼🩺💊
@khalid_Al_Ghazali · 20,115
#24
محمد الجيلاني
@u222c · 81,752
#25
زول كارير - Zool Career
@zoolcareer · 4,731
#26
تن
@ASEEEM2 · 2
#27
عشوائيات..!
@jjjiig · 125,273
#28
مكتبة إقرأ الإلكترونية pdf 📚
@books_p · 172,622
#29
يَأْتِ بِهَا اللَّهُ ۚ.
@II_C7II · 2,331
#30
" قُطوفُها دانية "
@ki20da · 952
#31
" نَفَائِــس وَ دُرَر "
@nafaesdorar · 998
#32
لنحيا على سنة نبينا [םבםנ ﷺ]🕊
@Maa_alnbei12 · 1,250
#33
- قاع الهامور🪄
@siin_25 · 147
#34
FIFTH LEVEL PHARMACY💊
@M_Pharmacy1 · 921
#35
English Is Fun.
@Mo21G · 3,104
#36
" ‏رِيّحُ الشَهَادَة "
@mohammad_abu_rouhi · 1,421
#37
صيــــــدلانــــية 💙🩵🦋
@pharmacyme22 · 2,992
#38
Thamar Medicinal Chemistry
@thamarmedicinalchemistry · 1,401
#39
عند الله رجائي
@hameky · 631
#40
التاريخ الإسلامي islamic history
@islamhis4 · 94,372
#41
محاربة أهل البدع والأهواء والشركيات🎙
@mharbat_albedah · 508
#42
الخطاط هشام العسكري 🎨✍
@almani_222 · 257
#43
Reality || واقع
@EEZ81 · 11,704
#44
مملكة الروايات والكتب 📚
@ko_to_b · 16,821
#45
اقرب من الطب وغنيله²🔰
@Med_Is_Fun2 · 1,686
#46
Pharmacure Academy
@akram11alghubesi · 7,853
#47
أدهم شرقاوي
@adhamsharkawii1 · 84,936
#48
وارفة العلم
@omarFM1 · 62,334
#49
بيت كتب
@darkotob · 11,194
#50
التداول -الاستثمار مع _نـــواف_ ALAMLAT
@FOR6613 · 34,997
#51
قالَت العَرَب
@Arabsaid · 51,523
#52
وطن || watan
@Alalami_watan · 100,590
#53
أدهم شرقاوي
@adhamsharkw · 91,923
#54

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

محمد الجيلاني
@u222c · 81,752
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 17 August 2026
طور لغتك الانجليزية
@englishlearn36 · 82,782
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 17 August 2026
مطبخ أكلات شهية 🍔🍫
@Cooks_Food · 49,789
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
مكتبة إقرأ الإلكترونية pdf 📚
@books_p · 172,622
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 12 August 2026
قصة وعبرة
@storyonly3 · 62,578
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
عشوائيات..!
@jjjiig · 125,273
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“👑 فـريـق ألـعـبـاقرة للـتـداول 👑” (@TradingGeniuses), 40,950 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TradingGeniuses.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.