Channel
@sunnay6626
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Declared links · Cite this entry
8,074subscribers
+399 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001915364135 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sunnay6626 |
| Description | ▪️ الحقائق المزعجة خير من الأوهام المريحة القنوات التابعة : @Sunnay_Channels https://allmylinks.com/sunnay6626 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sunnay6626 |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 15:17 | 8,074 | +12 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 00:41 | 8,062 | +3 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 04:08 | 8,059 | +26 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 22:46 | 8,033 | +20 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:16 | 8,013 | +9 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 02:57 | 8,004 | +13 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 20:28 | 7,991 | +16 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 00:27 | 7,975 | +10 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 22:41 | 7,965 | +18 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 16:37 | 7,947 | +44 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 20:16 | 7,903 | +16 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 02:20 | 7,887 | +34 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:00 | 7,853 | +20 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:01 | 7,833 | +19 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 09:35 | 7,814 | +24 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 7,790 | +22 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:42 | 7,768 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:59 | 7,765 | +6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 7,759 | +3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 7,756 | first reading |
70 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 70 (26 July 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 30,961 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 01:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 30 posts held from the last 30 days (20.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
هذا بحق أهل الذمة والعهد ( بلاد المغرب كلها فتحها المسلمون ) فلا ضامن لهم سوى هذا . أما الحربي إن فعل فيه هذا فمُلكه لسيده ثابت ولا يلزم رده ثم كيف يكون الرق في الدنيا أصلا ، يطرقون أبوابهم ويستأذنونهم في بيع أنفسهم رقيقاً ؟! إن كان مناط السبي هو الامتناع عن حكم الإسلام فأي إسلام لأمم الكفار الحربيين ليحل لهم سباء غيرهم من الكفار الحربيين ؟ منتهى هذا القول حرمة شراء أي مملوك من الكفار إلا بشرط إطلاقه وهذا لا يقول ب…
🟥 ابتذال المرأة #نسوية #الإسلام_كرم_المرأة
بل تقبل توبة الحربي المُغتصب وليس عليه شيء أصلاً . إنما هذه النصوص في حفظ حقوق أهل الذمة والعهد (وقال إن سبه - ﷺ - حربي ثم تاب بإسلامه، قبلت توبته إجماعا) للآية والحديث السابقين 📚 كشاف القناع عن متن الإقناع - ت مصيلحي – البهوتي (٣ / ١٤٤) وهذا بحق النبي ﷺ - علماً أن حقه لا يسقط لو سبه ذمي أو مُعاهد - لا بحق بغايا وموامس حربيات أغلبهن تطبعن مع الأمر وبذلن أنفسهم بلا مُكرِه . #نسوية #الاغتصاب
[[ قلت لأبي مَا تَقول فِي تَزْوِيج الْأَب الصَّغِيرَة قَالَ أما الْأَب فَيجوز تَزْوِيجه على الصَّغِيرَة وَلَا خِيَار لَهَا وَذَاكَ أَن النَّبِي ﷺ تزوج عَائِشَة زَوجهَا أَبُو بكر وَهِي بنت سبع فَلَا خِيَار لَهَا إِذا هِيَ أدْركْت وَلَيْسَ ذَلِك لغير الْأَب أَن يُزَوّج صَغِيرَة حَتَّى تبلغ تسع سِنِين لِأَن النَّبِي ﷺ دخل بعائشة وَهِي بنت تسع فَإِذا بلغت تسع سِنِين استؤمرت فَإِذا أَذِنت فَلَا خِيَار لَهَا وَيجب عَلَيْهَ…
بعد مطالعتي لبعض أدلة الحنفية في اصطلاحهم عن #النجاسة_الحكمية ظهر أن الخلاف اصطلاحي في الحقيقة مع اختلاف طفيف في التوصيف الذهني والواقع الخارجي للمسألة وليس من خصوصياتهم كذلك . فالمسألة لا تتعدى حيز الراجح والمرجوح وإلا لا علاقة للمسألة في المذاهب الأربعة بمناقضة الإجماع أو الحديث والسنة , والله أعلم
« ثم نقول للنصارى: اعندكم ان من حمل السيف كان مبطلا؟ فإن قالوا: نعم، قلنا: فالمسيح اول المبطلين، لأنه عندكم ارسل موسى عليه السلام وغيره من الانبياء بالسيف وقتل الرجال والنساء المخالفين له، واحلّ له في بعض الحروب قتل الرجال وكل امرأة ضاجعت رجلا واستبقاء الأبكار، واحل له الغنائم واخذ الاموال ودفعها الى بني اسرائيل، وكذا سائر الانبياء الذين تتولونهم وتقولون إنهم على الحق، الى ان جاء المسيح وظهر للناس، وقال: ما جئت مخالف…
♦️ الصوفية وفناء النار
🟥 « وليس الذكر كالأنثى » أي لأنه أقوى وأطهر [[ «وليس الذكر كالأنثى»، لأن الذكر أقوى على الخدمة وأقوم بها، وأن الأنثى لا تصلح في بعض الأحوال لدخول القدس والقيام بخدمة الكنيسة، لما يعتريها من الحيض والنفاس ... ٦٨٧٨ - حدثنا ابن حميد قال، حدثنا سلمة قال، حدثني ابن إسحاق: «وليس الذكر كالأنثى»، لأن الذكر هو أقوى على ذلك من الأنثى. ٦٨٧٩ - حدثنا بشر قال، حدثنا يزيد قال، حدثنا سعيد، عن قتادة:«وليس الذكر كالأنثى»، كانت المر…
♦️ النجاسة الحكمية وختام المبحث استدل بعض من انتصر لعدم صحة إطلاق وصف النجاسة على الحدث في مقابل من قال أن الطهارة ضدها النجاسة ، أن من جدد وضوءه هو على طهارة حكمية و الوضوء طهارة بالإجماع ! قد تظن هذا استدلالا قوياً إلا أن الردود عليه تبين ضعفه وركاكته « وذلك أن تارك اللواط متطهر كما دل عليه القرآن ففاعله غير متطهر من ذلك فيكون متنجسا؛ فإن ضد الطهارة النجاسة؛ لكن النجاسة أنواع مختلفة: تختلف أحكامها » 📚 مجموع الف…
♦️ فضل نكاح الجميلة - لا تدفع مالاً في بضاعة دون . #نسوية
🟥 كيد النساء وكيد الشيطان #نسوية
🟥 الكاهن عالي وولداه [[ ٢١٨ - قال: حدثنا أبو بكر عبد الله بن محمد بن أبي الدنيا قال: حدثنا إسماعيل بن إبراهيم بن بسام، قال: حدثنا عامر بن يساف، عن مالك بن دينار، قال: «بينا حبر من أحبار بني إسرائيل متكئ على سرير، إذ رأى بعض بنيه يغامز النساء 1️⃣ ، قال: مهلا يا بني، كهيئة التعذير. 2️⃣ فما كان بأسرع من أن أتته العقوبة من الله عز وجل، فصرع عن سريره وانقطع نخاعه 3️⃣، وأسقطت امرأته 4️⃣، وقيل له: هكذا غضبت لي؟ اذهب، فلا ي…
Showing the 12 most recent of 70 posts we hold for @sunnay6626. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@sunnay6626 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 39 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association — we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سُني” (@sunnay6626), 8,074 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sunnay6626.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.