Channel
@Kurdish79
On this record: Topic · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,703subscribers
-470 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001969272577 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Kurdish79 |
| Description | إِنَّ وَلِيِّيَ الله. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Kurdish79 |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 00:07 | 8,703 | -26 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 05:25 | 8,729 | -25 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 02:20 | 8,754 | +4 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 05:21 | 8,750 | -8 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:37 | 8,758 | -11 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 23:27 | 8,769 | -14 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 04:59 | 8,783 | -24 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 06:01 | 8,807 | -13 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 06:27 | 8,820 | -11 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 12:15 | 8,831 | -4 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 15:01 | 8,835 | -33 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 00:57 | 8,868 | -32 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 20:22 | 8,900 | -12 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 8,912 | -30 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:01 | 8,942 | -20 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:41 | 8,962 | -19 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 05:00 | 8,981 | -26 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:04 | 9,007 | -13 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 9,020 | -16 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 9,036 | first reading |
51 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 51 (4 July 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 18,975 |
| Reactions total | 340 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 14:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,361 reactions across 51 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 642 | 47.2% | |
| 👍 | 251 | 18.4% | |
| 💯 | 250 | 18.4% | |
| 👌 | 94 | 6.91% | |
| 💔 | 87 | 6.39% | |
| 🏆 | 37 | 2.72% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,361 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Kurdish79. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 51 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (9.09%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
"أخشى أن تستيقظ بعد أعوام وأنت في الأربعين من عُمرك، ولا زلت ثابت أمام هاتفك ترد على رسالة هذا وتعليق هذا وتتفاعل مع منشور هذا، قد عُلِّق قلبك بهاتفك، وأكثر وقتك في الدنيا الفانية، بعيدًا عن الآخرة الباقية." لصاحبه.
💔21❤6💯6👍2
التواصل الخاص بين شاب وفتاة أجنبيّان عن بعضهما مزلّة أقدام.. مصيدة للصالحين الطيّبين.. فخّ عظيم ينصبه الشيطان لهم. ولا تبدأ الأمور بأكثر من سلام كيف الحال، ولن يطول الوقت قبل أن يفقدا السيطرة ويستغربا كيف وصلا لهذه المرحلة وهذا الحال.. والكلام هنا للطيّب والطيّبة.. لا غيرهم.. إن كان لكما نيّة زواج.. سلّما بعضكما معلوماتكما الرسمية وكل ما تحتاجانه للوصول وطرق الباب، ثم انسحبا حتى تتم الأمور.. وإن لم يكن لكما ن…
❤22💯16👍8👌5🏆1
المكتبات جَنَّةُ الدنيا في عيون طلاب العلم؛ يجدون فيها ضالَّتهم من العلم والمعرفة، ويأنسون بالجلوس بين رفوفها، وتسرُّ أعينهم بالنظر إلى خزائنها وكتبها، فكأنهم في رياضٍ لا يملُّون المقام فيها.
❤9👍4
قال عبد الرّحمن بن مهديّ (رحمه الله): «ليتّق الرّجل دناءة الأخلاق كما يتّقي الحرام، فإنّ الكرم دين». مكارم الأخلاق (١٢).
❤17👍7
من آداب التواجد في مواقع التواصل أن يتابع الرجل والمرأة الحسابات النافعة، فيأخذَا منها الفائدة دون حاجة إلى فتح أبواب الفتنة.
❤18💯11👍7👌4🏆2
قال ابن رجب الحنبلي - رحمه الله -: من علامات العِلْم النافع؛ أنّهُ يدل صاحبه على الهرب من الدُّنْيا، وأعظمها الرياسة والشهرة، والمدح. فضل علم السّلف - (صـ ١٠٨).
❤16👍8💯6
«عليك بتقوى الله، والزم العزلة، واشتغل بنفسك، واستأنس بكتاب الله». سفيان الثوري رحمه الله.
❤30👍6💯3💔2
احفظي قلبكِ يا فتاة إن كنت تودين أن تسكني قلب أحد الصالحين.
❤20👌9👍1💔1
لمَّا هُدِمت حجرات النبيِّ ﷺ لتوسعة المسجد= بكى مَن حضر من الصحابة كسهل بن حنيف، وأبي سلمة، وخارجة بن زيد حتى أخضلوا لِحاهم بالدموع، وقال أبو أمامة: "ليتها تُرِكت ليقصر الناسُ عن التَّهافت على الدنيا، ويرون ما رضيه الله لنبيه وخزائن الدنيا بيده". الفتاوى/ لابن تيميّة رحمه الله.
❤20💯9💔6👍5
قال أبو عثمان في كتابه الحيوان: "إذا مَرَّ بك الشِّعر الذي يَصْلُح للمَثَل وللحفظ، فلا تنسَ حظَّكَ مِن حِفْظه".
👍16🏆4❤1
"لا أَرى حِصنًا يُنَجِّي أَهَلهُ كلُّ حَيٍّ لفَناءٍ ونَفَد فدَعِ الباطِلَ واعمِد لِلتقى وتُقَى رَبِّكَ رَهنٌ لِلرشَد وقُلِ المَعرُوفَ فيمَن قاَلهُ وأمنَعَن نَفسَكَ مِن قيلِ الفَنَد"
❤8💯3
قال أبو حازم -رحمه الله-: "إذا آخيتَ رجلًا في الله فأقِلّ مخالطتَه في دنياه". سؤالات ابن الجنيد ليحيى بن معين (٤٨٤).
💯17❤9👍7
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @Kurdish79. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
We recorded 2 posts on @Kurdish79 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“عبدالرَّحمن الغريب” (@Kurdish79), 8,703 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kurdish79.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.