Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for وهم العلمانية الرسمية

Channel

وهم العلمانية الرسمية

@Secularismillu

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,355subscribers

-94 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001292365724
TypeChannel
Username@Secularismillu
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Secularismillu

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,3479,4499,3986 August 2026 — 9,449 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,446 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,442 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,441 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,438 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,427 subscribers21 August 2026 — 9,429 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,437 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,418 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,422 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,407 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,400 subscribers12 September 2026 — 9,401 subscribers16 September 2026 — 9,394 subscribers1 October 2026 — 9,365 subscribers8 October 2026 — 9,359 subscribers13 October 2026 — 9,362 subscribers16 October 2026 — 9,353 subscribers19 October 2026 — 9,347 subscribers26 October 2026 — 9,352 subscribers29 October 2026 — 9,354 subscribers1 November 2026 — 9,357 subscribers4 November 2026 — 9,369 subscribers7 November 2026 — 9,362 subscribers10 November 2026 — 9,355 subscribers9,3556 August 202610 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 96 days, net -94. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,332–9,464 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 23:559,355-7
7 Nov 2026, 16:459,362-7
4 Nov 2026, 11:069,369+12
1 Nov 2026, 08:289,357+3
29 Oct 2026, 13:519,354+2
26 Oct 2026, 04:579,352+5
19 Oct 2026, 19:209,347-6
16 Oct 2026, 17:059,353-9
13 Oct 2026, 15:059,362+3
8 Oct 2026, 01:229,359-6
1 Oct 2026, 03:579,365-29
16 Sept 2026, 05:399,394-7
12 Sept 2026, 20:149,401+1
9 Sept 2026, 06:209,400-7
3 Sept 2026, 14:019,407-15
31 Aug 2026, 09:289,422+4
27 Aug 2026, 23:159,418-19
24 Aug 2026, 20:029,437+8
21 Aug 2026, 10:189,429+2
18 Aug 2026, 15:349,427first reading

Engagement

155 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.22%
avg views ÷ 9,355 subscribers
Avg views / post
488
64 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
64
of 155 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 60 of 64 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held155 (4 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total31,226
Reactions total1,182
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 22:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
20m 29s
Average length
2m 34s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,689 reactions across 151 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,40152.1%
👍43716.3%
🤬29811.1%
🤣29310.9%
🤡1355.02%
🔥521.93%
👏291.08%
😱250.93%
😢190.707%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 151 of the 155 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,689 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 155 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 27 of 64 posts held from the last 30 days (42.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 19:16 UTC171 views8 reactionsread 10 November 2026

هذه جزء من محاضرة لتيم وايز الناشط الأمريكي ضد العنصرية "لم يكن هناك شيء اسمه "البيض" في القرن السابع عشر. لم يكن الأوروبيون يطلقون على أنفسهم "بيض". كانوا يطلقون على أنفسهم الإنجليز، الإيرلنديون، الألمان، الإيطاليون. وكانوا يكرهون بعضهم البعض. كان الإنجليز يحتقرون الإيرلنديين. لم يكن الإيطاليون الشماليون يعترفون حتى بالإيطاليين الجنوبيين كأنداد. قاتل الألمان الجميع. لم يكن هناك "فريق أبيض". لا هوية مشتركة. ف…

❤8

10 Nov 2026, 09:41 UTC358 views17 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

المراهق البريطاني الأبيض الذي طعن الفتاة لأنها رفضت مواعدته وصاحب المحل الذي حاول الدفاع عنها ،لم يحصل على يوم واحد سجن لأنه "طفل بريء وحرام يضيع مستقبله"، حصل على فترة مراقبة بسيطة وأمر بتجنب الفتاة وصاحب المحل لمدة ثلاث سنوات، هل لو كان من عرق ثاني كان سيتغير الحكم؟ طبعا، عندما يفعلونها هم فالموضوع بسيط عندما يفعلها غيرهم فهي مصيبة وشر، خذ عندك الكوميدي الأمريكي الأسود ديف شيبيل الذي قال بأنه مرتاح لموت تشارلي كي…

👍10❤5🤬2

10 Nov 2026, 08:04 UTC364 views25 reactionsread 10 November 2026

روسيا تعلم الفتيات العفة وكيف يصبحن ربات بيوت وامهات صالحات ضمن مشروع الحكومة الروسية حديثاً في مكافحة إنخفاض النمو الديموغرافي اطلقت رسمياً برنامج تعليمي يهدف إلى تعليم الفتيات من عمر 10 إلى 16 قيم الأسرة التقليدية والأمومة والأنوثة تدخل الفتيات ضمن دورات لتعليم الطهو والنظافة ومهام المنزل التقليدية وسقي الزهور كما فرضت المدارس التي استجابت للبرنامج على الفتيات زي موحد هو "فستان ازرق وياقة بيضاء وجوارب" واعتبرت إ…

❤18👍4👏2🤣1

9 Nov 2026, 19:24 UTC440 views28 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

الجمعة الماضية قامت بريطانيا بمنع أنواع محددة من الإباحية تشمل الخنق أو الإختناق وزنا المحارم وصارت تجرم عليه، المشكلة أن الغربي وذنبه العالماني معاق ذهنيا، وبما أن زنا المحارم يسمى incest و زواج الأقارب يسمى نفس الشيء ، صارو يقولون لماذا تمنعون الإباحية وتسمحون للمسلمين بالزواج؟ طبعا حشر المسلمين في كل قضية أصبحت متعود عليه فهم لقرون لا يعيشون بدون هذه الإعاقة الذهنية، أنا مشكلتي مع هذا النوع من التفكير أن الغربي وا…

👍21🤬4🤡2🤣1

9 Nov 2026, 15:47 UTC435 views14 reactionsread 10 November 2026

يرجى إرسال هذا الآدمن لدورة تعليم خاصة ليعرف معنى العلم والعقل والإنسانية، فيبدو أنه متخلف جدًا لدرجة عدم معرفته بشوارعهم النظيفة التي تشفع لهم في كل شيء

🤣14

9 Nov 2026, 11:31 UTC444 views23 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

⬅️سأضيف هذه معها، قصف قوارب صغيرة يقال أنها لمهربي مخدرات ، ولم تقدم الحكومة الأمريكية لو دليل واحد على أنها قوارب لمهربين، يكفي فقط عرض فيديو لقصف القوارب وإلقاء تهمة وينتهي الموضوع، عشرات القتلى الأن مذنبين بدون دليل، ومستحقين للإعدام في نظام أوروبي يجرم عقوبة الإعدام ويعتبرها لا إنسانية ويشيطن اي دولة تفعلها إلا لو فعلها الغربي نفسه، تخيل أنها دولة أخرى غير غربية هي من فعلت هذا؟؟

❤16👍7

9 Nov 2026, 10:03 UTC430 views27 reactionsread 10 November 2026

#خواطر هناك أشياء فعلها الغرب لو فعلتها أي أمة أخرى لصاح الغربي في إعلامه معترضا ومشيطنا ، لأن سلاح الغربي الأول هو الإعلام ، ولولاه لرأى الجميع همجيته ونجاسته، سأعطيك أمثلة على ما أقصد: ⬅️ستيفن هوكنج تم تشخصيه بعمر 21 بمتلازمة الضمور العصبي الجانبي (عام 1963)، وهذا التشخيص بمثابة حكم بالموت ،فأقصى مدة يعيشها المريض بعد التشخيص هي خمس سنوات، ستيفن عاش 55 سنة بعد التشخيص، بل وأكمل الدكتوراه بعد التشخيص بسنوات وألف …

❤21👍6

9 Nov 2026, 05:57 UTC403 views13 reactionsread 10 November 2026

أعني أن معظمهم يتفقون الآن بعد 30 عاماً على أنه كان يجب عليهم الاستمرار وتحمل أي نوع من النتائج التي كانت ستترتب على ذلك. الدرس رقم 29: أحياناً تكون السباحة إلى بلد آخر أفضل من محاولة الوصول إلى المناطق الآمنة الخاصة بك. في حالتي سريبرينِتسا ورزبا، فإن بعض الأشخاص الذين قرروا السباحة عبر نهر درينا إلى صربيا أنقذوا بالفعل من خلال القيام بذلك. بينما آخرون، ركضوا في الاتجاه الآخر وحاولوا شق طريقهم عبر الجبال فقتلوا. الد…

❤13

9 Nov 2026, 05:56 UTC353 views19 reactionsread 10 November 2026

هذا هارون محمدونفيتش، ناجٍ من مجزرة البوسنيين على يد الصرب، يعطي ثلاثين درسا للنجاة من الإبادات الجماعية وأراها كلام من ذهب ، وهذه ترجمة حرفية لكلامه: أنا ناجٍ من الإبادة الجماعية في البوسنة، وإليك 15 درساً للبقاء على قيد الحياة من الإبادة الجماعية في البوسنة. الدرس رقم 1: كن مسلحاً جيداً ومنظماً للغاية. في بداية حرب البوسنة، كان هناك حظر على الأسلحة فرضته الولايات المتحدة والغرب على المنطقة. لقد أضر حظر الأسلحة هذا …

❤16👍3

9 Nov 2026, 05:56 UTC389 views12 reactionsread 10 November 2026

بعبارة أخرى، كانت دعاية المتطرفين الصرب تعني دائماً أن "كل اتهام هو اعتراف". كل ما كان المتطرفون الصرب يخططون للقيام به، اتهموا الجانب الآخر بالتخطيط للقيام به. رقم 23: إذا تم تهديدك علناً بشيء مثل الإبادة، على سبيل المثال عندما جاء كارادزيتش (Karadzic)، الزعيم السياسي للمتطرفين الصرب البوسنيين، على التلفزيون وقال فعلياً: "إذا صوتت البلاد للانفصال عن يوغوسلافيا، فسيؤدي ذلك إلى موت جميع المسلمين". حسنًا، في ذلك الوقت،…

❤10👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 155 posts we hold for @Secularismillu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Secularismillu edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @Secularismillu as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
47 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Nov 2026, 22:43 UTCAnonymous Poll42 voters

هل أسوي مقال تحقيق للمسألة أم الشرح كافي؟

  1. اعمل مقال في تفصيل المسألة ومحل النزاع74%
  2. المسألة واضحة ما يحتاج أكمل لنا الفيديوهات باليوتيوب؟26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 155 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

الموسوعة القرآنية
@QuranPediaApp · 29,529
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
رواسخ
@Rawasekh · 31,554
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026
الدكتور هيثم طلعت
@ht90hh · 22,031
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 September 2026
د. سامي عامري
@Dr_Sami_Ameri · 29,337
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
محمود ميعاري
@MahmoudMiariRT · 21,687
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 21 September 2026
الماكثات في البيوت
@lmakitat · 30,390
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
التاريخ الإسلامي islamic history
@islamhis4 · 94,477
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 15 August 2026
(الذَهبي)
@Azahabi1 · 20,342
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 28 September 2026
شبكة رصد
@RassdNewsN · 47,690
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 26 August 2026
Daniel Haqiqatjou Official
@haqiqatjou · 24,728
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 September 2026
Aqua web | أكوا ويب
@aqweeb · 22,379
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 20 September 2026
شؤون إسلامية - Islamic Affairs
@ArabAffairsTV · 60,304
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
مجدي المغربي - فلسطين - قطاع غزة
@mogr7775 · 20,903
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 September 2026
القناة الإخبارية الدولية
@rsjlb · 45,846
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
وظائف الاردن - وظيفتك عنا
@jo_jobss · 19,305
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 30 September 2026
فاتحون🔻
@fathoon · 25,788
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
نورس للدراسات
@NORSFS2 · 109,033
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
واعي
@uraware2014 · 214,553
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
بُشريات أبطال واعي
@montada_wa3i · 29,810
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
أبلِغ لِغرناطة السلام. 𓂆
@Granada93 · 31,664
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
Learn Excel
@LearnExceIOnline · 21,186
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 23 September 2026
مُدونتي - مخيمر
@Mudawanti · 37,433
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026
- تَـرَح 🖤
@tar_ah5 · 21,229
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 September 2026
كتب مركز تكوين للدراسات والأبحاث
@ktbtakween · 21,824
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“وهم العلمانية الرسمية” (@Secularismillu), 9,355 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Secularismillu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.