Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Wolf Of Your Street

Channel

The Wolf Of Your Street

@TheWolfOfYourStreet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,226subscribers

-93 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001368880129
TypeChannel
Username@TheWolfOfYourStreet
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live20 August 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 20 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TheWolfOfYourStreet

Growth

12,22612,31912,272.56 August 2026 — 12,319 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,318 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,310 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,306 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,305 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,295 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,289 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,278 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,269 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,264 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,258 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,246 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,241 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,226 subscribers6 August 202620 August 2026
14 measurements spanning 14 days, net -93. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,212–12,333 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Aug 2026, 18:0612,226-15
19 Aug 2026, 21:0212,241-5
18 Aug 2026, 17:4212,246-12
17 Aug 2026, 14:3612,258-6
16 Aug 2026, 05:4712,264-5
14 Aug 2026, 17:2812,269-9
13 Aug 2026, 11:2612,278-11
12 Aug 2026, 12:0712,289-6
11 Aug 2026, 13:5412,295-10
10 Aug 2026, 16:0812,305-1
9 Aug 2026, 14:1712,306-4
8 Aug 2026, 11:4112,310-8
7 Aug 2026, 08:2012,318-1
6 Aug 2026, 21:1512,319first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 20 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.1%
avg views ÷ 12,226 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,600
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held22 (20 June 202617 August 2026)
Views total9,584
Reactions total126
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

493 reactions across 22 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁27455.6%
8717.6%
🔥6613.4%
285.68%
👀173.45%
🤯112.23%
😢51.01%
🥰51.01%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 493reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 22 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TheWolfOfYourStreet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 June 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC764 views13 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/_RichardTeng/status/2089378036986826895?s=20 Binance придерживается единых стандартов взаимодействия с правоохранительными органами во всех странах. Компания рассматривает и отвечает на законные запросы в соответствии с применимым законодательством, санкционными требованиями, правилами конфиденциальности и комплаенса. На самом деле сам факт ответа на законный запрос не означает поддержку какой-либо ст

🤯1111

10 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC≈1,450 views27 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

"Накрыли" обменку Money 24/7 Буд-то бы они вообще прятались 🤣 Ебали людей на протяжении долгого времени, не отдавая деньги. И это уже не первый кейс "черных" обменок. (спасибо гетьманцеву, что это все еще черный блять рынок) Не реклама, а просто личный опыт: Юзаю @YourKiev на протяжении долгих лет Ручаться на 100% естественно не буду, ведь нету рефки 🤣 Уже даже перестал проверять везде курс, у ребят всегда самый

😁1210🥰5

4 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC≈1,640 views27 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Не забываем ставить лайк и подписываться на самый трушный канал про крипту! Мы с вами прошли через многое, но впереди еще больше! 🔥

🔥14😁103

4 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC≈1,560 views15 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Пиздец я бык по рынку, ни разу в жизни не шортил! Пока идет лето, основательно занялся менталкой и приостановил трейды. Как раз видно, что рынок готов к росту. На сегодняшний день имеем отличные твх практически на любом токене. На следующей неделе вернусь к терминалу, будем лудить дальше. К этому времени скорее всего будем ловить луз стрик 😅 Целился бы в памп до сентября, а там уже будет основная развязка, скорее

😁9🔥42

25 Jul 2026, 08:32 UTC≈2,190 views36 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Как же заебал Bullrun..

😁31😢4🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC≈1,980 views8 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Заносим в Gno.lаnd Gno.lаnd - L1-блокчейн и ОС от CEO проекта — Jae Kwon фаундера экосистемы Cosmos и создатель консенсуса Tendermint BFT. Регистрация на сейл Сейчас идет ICO проекта в формате аукциона, который закончится уже 27 июля. В сейле работает динамическая система бонусов и сейчас идет 2-й этап из 4-х, где участники получают +10% бонуса к токенам. 🔗Ресурсы проекта: Website: https://gno.land/ X (Twitter):

4🔥3😁1

14 Jul 2026, 13:10 UTC≈2,040 views10 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Binance исполнилось 9 лет https://www.binance.com/en/blog/community/3347048952542892038 К девятилетию запустили кампанию Built by You с призовым фондом до $4,5 млн. За 9 лет чего только не произошло, но Binance так и остался моим основным СЕХ для жизни. - 300+ млн зарегистрированных в 100+ странах - совокупный объем торгов $156,4 трлн - в этом полугодии розница выросла на 7%, институционалы на 9% Крипта, акции,

52😁2🔥1

7 Jul 2026, 12:35 UTC≈2,080 views7 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Лутаем призы за использование BPay Global Уже писал про новый удобный способ пополнения на Binance, а теперь еще и добавили плюшки. Делаем депозиты в USD через BPay и получаем шанс выиграть: - MacBook Air M3 и iPhone 17 - Токен-ваучери: 2х 500 USDC, 3х 400 USDC, 10х 250 USDC, 10х 100 USDC - 12 мерч-боксов Binance - ТОП-20 юзеров получат гарантировано по 350 USDC (мин. деп $3000+) Призы раздадут в формате лотереи,

👀42🔥1

4 Jul 2026, 14:47 UTC≈4,670 views88 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

когда увидел цены на альту в портфеле

😁6419🔥4😢1

1 Jul 2026, 15:21 UTC≈2,330 views37 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Хорошие новости для молодых криптовалютчиков! Маркет мейкер не сможет ебать украинцев до 21 года!

😁351🔥1

1 Jul 2026, 13:47 UTC≈2,020 views19 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @all_in_gambleVideo

Подведем итоги недели Баланс: $100 -> $301.74 100 -> 129.88 129.88 -> 328.38 328.38 -> 336.78 336.78 -> 236.45 236.45 -> 382.25 382.25 -> 301.74 За 6 трейдов, всего 2 убыточных, что очень даже не плохо. Было еще пару трейдов в бу. При этом убытки и бу, были по причине жадности и не желании фиксить и так нормальный профит. Дело в том, что цены слишком низкие и действительно хочется поймать разворотный трейд. На это

10🔥6😁3

1 Jul 2026, 09:08 UTC≈1,760 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Sale $QUID на Legion и Kraken Сейл уже стартовал, можно депать, детали: Детали: -цена: $0.045; -FDV: $45 млн; -собирают: до $2 250 000 (поровну на каждой платформе); -формат: переподписка; -лимиты: от $100 до $100 000. Продажа пройдет на платформах Kraken и Legion под эгидой Prime, как это было с YieldBasis и SportFun. Звучит как плюсовая история, поэтому точно закидываю несколько акков. TheWoYS | Main | Chat | N

👀41🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @TheWolfOfYourStreet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 288,287 of 1,568,528entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

DOUBLETOP
@doubletop · 71,680
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
Incrypted
@incrypted · 108,877
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Wolf Of Your Street” (@TheWolfOfYourStreet), 12,226 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheWolfOfYourStreet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.