Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Neafiol's diary

Channel

Neafiol's diary

@neafiol_blog

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

27,626subscribers

-189 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001471048839
TypeChannel
Username@neafiol_blog
Descriptionmove fast and break things
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/neafiol_blog

Growth

27,62627,81527,720.56 August 2026 — 27,815 subscribers6 August 2026 — 27,815 subscribers6 August 2026 — 27,813 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,793 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,776 subscribers9 August 2026 — 27,763 subscribers10 August 2026 — 27,754 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27,744 subscribers12 August 2026 — 27,728 subscribers13 August 2026 — 27,715 subscribers14 August 2026 — 27,689 subscribers16 August 2026 — 27,658 subscribers17 August 2026 — 27,626 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
13 measurements spanning 11 days, net -189. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,598–27,843 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 12:3727,626-32
16 Aug 2026, 03:3627,658-31
14 Aug 2026, 10:2827,689-26
13 Aug 2026, 05:0627,715-13
12 Aug 2026, 07:4327,728-16
11 Aug 2026, 07:3127,744-10
10 Aug 2026, 07:4027,754-9
9 Aug 2026, 05:0227,763-13
8 Aug 2026, 04:1327,776-17
7 Aug 2026, 04:2227,793-20
6 Aug 2026, 07:3127,813-2
6 Aug 2026, 02:0127,815no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:4827,815first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
181
Videos
23
Links
97

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 12s
Average length
1m 12s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,833 reactions across 20 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2,30633.7%
👍1,64824.1%
1,55422.7%
🎉2834.14%
🍾1922.81%
👏1372.00%
😁1141.67%
🏆1091.60%
👎1051.54%
❤‍🔥941.38%
🍌721.05%
🐳310.454%
👀240.351%
🥰240.351%
210.307%
🤨190.278%
🤣170.249%
🌚160.234%
😐160.234%
🤯160.234%
7 further kinds350.512%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,833reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2025 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
470
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 20 we hold a reading for · 95%
Most on one post
101
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @neafiol_blog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 January 2025 to 31 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Dec 2025, 21:18 UTC≈4,110 views139 reactions21 Starsread 17 August 2026

Всех с новым годом! 🎄 У нас есть канал, куда пересылаем яркие моменты с чатов/сапорта/немного внутрянки, наши эльфы собрали лучшее за 2025ый Это самый точный рекап того, как мы провели последние 12 месяцев, приятного просмотра ❤️ https://t.me/HOT_people_moments/4442

🍾6235🔥30👎5🍓3👍2👏2

3 Dec 2025, 22:54 UTC≈18,500 views277 reactions10 Starsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Мы опубликовали Whitepaper, описывающий дизайн HOT Protocol. HOT Protocol это ключевой компонент всех продуктов HOT. Это сеть MPC-нод, которые хранят распределённые приватные ключи и верифицируют доступ к ним. Когда вы создаёте MPC Wallet, вы, на самом деле, резервируете себе ключ, хранящийся на HOT Protocol, которым затем можете подписывать транзакции. Когда вы делаете мост, вы, на самом деле, запрашиваете подпис

🎉103🔥8643👍19👏10🍌7👎4😢3

3 Dec 2025, 03:45 UTC≈22,800 views182 reactions21 Starsread 17 August 2026
Photo

HOT Exchange (HeX) Вот и пришло время рассказать про нового члена нашей экосистемы - торговую площадку HeX. Как вы, наверное, догадываетесь из контекста свапать на ней нужно именно omni-токены. Идея проста. Вам нужно обменять USDC с Base на Bitcoin. Вы заводите деньги на HeX (как перевод на биржу), покупаете внутри Bitcoin и выводите (так же, как вывели бы с биржи). Это позволяет нам делать обмены без газа и написа

82🔥61👍32👏4🎉3

8 Nov 2025, 02:20 UTC≈9,870 views366 reactions22 Starsread 17 August 2026
Photo

400M$ оборота на HOT Bridge за октябрь 🤯. Как начинался HOT Omni и куда полетел Предыстория В феврале 2024-го мы запустили @hot_wallet. Он очень быстро стал расти, и мы сразу столкнулись со всеми проблемами multichain кошельков. Помимо технических нюансов каждого блокчейна, газа, мостов это ещё и необходимость интегрировать зоопарк разных протоколов, чтобы работал базовый функционал кошелька. Для одних только свапо

180👍79🎉53🔥2314👏9🏆4👎4

14 Jul 2025, 07:09 UTC≈16,200 views316 reactions41 Starsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Мы запустили HOT Craft 🙊 — chain abstracted NFT маркетплейс Вы наверное задаётесь вопросом - зачем миру нужен ещё один NFT-маркетплейс, когда на каждом чейне есть по 2–3 остывающих трупа клонов OpenSea со времён 2021 года. Но тут важно не что, а как. HOT Craft построен поверх HOT Omni — того же chain abstraction-движка, что используется в HOT Bridge, NEAR Intents, Gas Refuel и пр. Теперь любые NFT это просто униве

143👍100🔥55🍌11👎5🐳2

7 Jul 2025, 22:49 UTC≈8,870 views91 reactions5 Starsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Андрей, listing..? right? 🙊

😁49🔥237🤯7🌭2🍌2👎1

1 Jul 2025, 07:35 UTC≈10,300 views86 reactions23 Starsread 17 August 2026

🤯 xStocks запустили токенизированные акции 50 крупнейших американских компаний Думаю, практически все уже видели новости, но история настолько большая, что считаю нужным вставить свои 5 копеек Идея токенизировать акции появилась примерно сразу же вместе с первыми ERC-20 токенами. Это же так удобно - торги 24/7, свободный доступ инвесторов и капитала к американскому рынку, DeFi, построенный на реальных активах, обес

41🔥27🤯9👏7👍2

6 Jun 2025, 03:21 UTC≈13,000 views264 reactions7 Starsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня Polygon добавили в NEAR Intents — все ассеты Polygon на NEAR созданы поверх HOT Omni Bridge ➡️ Intents — это мультичейн торговый движок, который разрабатывает команда NEAR. Он поддерживает обмен токенов из десятков разных сетей в одном месте. В большинстве случаев это 🪙HOT Omni токены (для Bitcoin и zCash на NEAR существуют врапнутые токены, построенные на базе lite client). В отличие от стандартных AMM, In

🔥157👍61👏22❤‍🔥105🍌5💯3👎1

12 May 2025, 22:10 UTC≈25,500 views384 reactions6 Starsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Мы добавили MPC-кошельки для Solana и TON 🔒🔒 Новые MPC-кошельки поддерживают все блокчейны — как EVM, так и не-EVM — и используют сид-фразу из 13 слов для упрощённого восстановления. Переход потребовал обновления протокола, так как вместо подписи хэшей транзакций, как в EVM/Stellar, здесь используется подпись всей транзакции непостоянной длины. Текущие кошельки Solana и TON пока работают в смешанном режиме, но вско

🔥23956❤‍🔥30👍24🤣14👏12👎5😐4

10 May 2025, 18:25 UTC≈25,900 views163 reactions20 Starsread 17 August 2026
Photo

HOT на Monad 🔥 После разделения ликвидности, о котором писал в прошлом посте, появилась возможность поддерживать тестнеты через HOT Omni. Мы начали с MON — добавили его в мост, gas refuel и firedrops. Теперь вы можете продать MON из тестнета за USDT и вывести средства в HOT Wallet на Solana, TON или NEAR. Также можно купить MON, но ликвидности пока немного. Сейчас для Monad существует OTC-рынок, который, вероятно,

🔥89👍3419👏8👎7🌚4🍌2

29 Apr 2025, 00:06 UTC≈17,500 views329 reactions15 Starsread 17 August 2026
Photo

➡️ HOT Omni Bridge V2! ➡️ 🔒 Улучшение безопасности. Теперь ликвидность разделена по сетям, и, например, атака на Base Locker не затронет средства, обеспеченные ассетами в других сетях. Это важно для LP и даст возможность привлечь гораздо больше ликвидности в мост, особенно в сетях вроде Stellar, TON и NEAR. ⚡ Совместимость с NEAR Intents. Теперь баланс HOT Omni совместим с NEAR Intents — это позволяет делать кроссч

🔥196👍7339🏆7🍌6👎3😁2❤‍🔥1

27 Apr 2025, 06:32 UTC≈22,300 views274 reactions10 Starsread 17 August 2026
Video

Как в глазах dev команды выглядит запуск IOS, Android и Chrome Extension 😅 Android | iOS | Web extension P.S. На банере скрин с ограничениями свободы web3 приложений внутри Телеграм в связи с недавними обновлением гайдлайнов

🔥143👍5430😁27🍌8👎83👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @neafiol_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 72,789 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Neafiol's diary” (@neafiol_blog), 27,626 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neafiol_blog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.