$HEEHAW: токен сделал 2x с момента поста
❤🔥10

Channel
@MEMEcrypted
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,075subscribers
+533 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002179783161 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MEMEcrypted |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MEMEcrypted |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:01 | 19,075 | -18 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 01:21 | 19,093 | -23 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:19 | 19,116 | -7 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 07:36 | 19,123 | +123 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:56 | 19,000 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:46 | 19,008 | -10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:54 | 19,018 | -12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 19,030 | -35 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 19,065 | +20 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 19,045 | +8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 19,037 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 19,044 | +5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 19,039 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 19,040 | -17 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 19,057 | -32 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:37 | 19,089 | -10 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 19,099 | -17 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:43 | 19,116 | -10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 19,126 | -25 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 19,151 | first reading |
49 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 49 (28 July 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 10,474 |
| Reactions total | 56 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 01:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
369 reactions across 38 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5449683594425410231 | 224 | 60.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 103 | 27.9% | |
| 🦄 | 27 | 7.32% | |
| ⚡ | 15 | 4.07% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 369 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$HEEHAW: токен сделал 2x с момента поста
❤🔥10
$HeeHaw: токен ручного ослика Мем-токен на фоне скандала в США. Полиция застрелила домашнего мини-ослика. История разлетелась по СМИ, а сообщество переводит часть комиссий с торгов фермерам. Нарратив повторяет вирусный сценарий белки $PNUT. Сейчас находится в зоне, где возможна вторая волна пампа на фоне новых новостей CA: EEpng77ZPn9FbgbT4xsRjwuxNCcMBYq3HTwEscyTpump DYOR ⁉️ Что делать и с чего начать в мемах? В…
❤🔥7⚡2
🔝 Лучшие коллы за неделю. @MEMEcrypted_Chat (24 - 30 августа): 🥇 SUE — $21K → $1.8M = 83x 🥈 ARCHITECTURE — $7K → $349K = 51x 🥉 GROKSTREET — $13K → $561K = 42x 4️⃣ ANTSEM — $32K → $931K = 29x 5️⃣ PINK — $326K → $5.8M = 18x 6️⃣ X17Z — $90K → $1.3M = 14x ⁉️ Что делать и с чего начать в мемах? Важный пост-инструкция. ➕ Комната ожидания в закрытое сообщество Incrypted+ — WaitingRoom. Chat | Channel | Onboarding
❤🔥3custom 54496835944254102313
$BOW: утилити-токен лендинг-протокола на Robinhood под RWA, который позволяет брать займы в стейблкоинах. Комиссии идут на выкуп токена и выплаты стейкерам. Привлек внимание бывшего директора по маркетингу Nike. DYOR 0x451b42a15100c340ca12f7c66de06fac5ea2d751 ⁉️ Что делать и с чего начать в мемах? Важный пост-инструкция. ➕ Комната ожидания в закрытое сообщество Incrypted+ — WaitingRoom. Chat | Channel | Onboardi…
❤🔥2custom 54496835944254102311
▶️ $250 000 на сливе GTA VI | Обнуление госдолга США | Рекорды Nvidia | Бизнес бросает Claude https://youtu.be/V_CSQuNs8Ig В эфире 301-й выпуск еженедельного дайджеста криптоновостей. Сегодня обсудим: - как автор сливов GTA VI заработал $250 000 на собственном мемкоине; - зачем предлагают «обнулить» госдолг США; - какие новые рекорды поставила Nvidia; - почему бизнес начинает отказываться от Claude; - как криптоим…
$OBS: Приватный DEX с кэшбеком в RWA Токен протокола на Robinhood Chain, который работает без KYC и платит кэшбек токенизированными активами на кошелек просто за торговлю. Движок агрегирует цены с разных платформ, выстраивает лучший маршрут и скрывает размер и направление ордера, защищая вас от сэндвич-атак и MEV-ботов. На проект уже обратил внимание лично основатель Robinhood Влад Тенев. Риски присутствуют так как…
❤🔥7⚡2custom 54496835944254102312
🗓 Как не пропускать гемы? Спойлер – все собрано в этом посте. Последнее время мемы радуют все больше, и после небольшого затишья снова начали появляться нормальные раннеры. Robinhood Chain выдал целый мем-сезон, следом BNB перетянул ликву обратно, а мы за последние недели забрали 15x на $PIPEDOG, 27x на $CASHCAT, 26x на 币有 и 27x на $DOOM. Если есть желание вернуться или погрузиться в мемы, пока они кормят, дочитай…
❤🔥5
Последний раз мы писали про lock in в январе 2025, в разгар хайпа TRUMP, который оживил мемы и случился второй мем-сезон, когда в чате коллили щитки на десятки и сотни иксов каждый день. Будет ли "Lock In" актуален в этот раз – мы не знаем, но очень надеемся. В любом случае, за последнее время получилось поймать много хороших раннеров, это видно по кейсам. И много кто пишет, что мемы возвращаются, так что... Собери…
custom 54496835944254102314❤🔥3
Are you ready to lock in?
❤🔥5
🔝 Лучшие коллы за неделю. @MEMEcrypted_Chat (17 - 23 августа): 🥇 TOADS — $26K → $499K = 20x 🥈 PANTS — $173K → $3.2M = 18x 🥉 CYBERLEEK — $1.7M → $29M = 17x 4️⃣ BOLLOCKS — $65K → $884K = 14x 5️⃣ MINDVIRUS — $24K → $318K = 13x 6️⃣ HUT — $2.9K → $36K = 12x ⁉️ Что делать и с чего начать в мемах? Важный пост-инструкция. ➕ Комната ожидания в закрытое сообщество Incrypted+ — WaitingRoom. Chat | Channel | Onboarding
custom 54496835944254102315❤🔥4⚡2
72x на $CVXV666 и зарождение новой мини-меты Вчера в Incrypted+ наше внимание привлек свежий токен $CVXV666. За ним стоял довольно необычный нарратив: разработчик antpalkin собирает собственный AI trading floor на базе Grok Bot. Вместо обычного трейдинг-деска у него работают шесть AI-агентов, каждый отвечает за свой участок: анализ моделей, макроэкономику, контроль рисков, рыночные потоки, исполнение сделок и управ…
❤🔥4custom 54496835944254102312⚡1
32x на новостях о сливе GTA VI (и при чем тут войсы в Incrypted+?) Каждый четверг в нашем закрытом комьюнити проходит мем-войс, где мы вместе с мемберами в лайв-формате разбираем актуальные нарративы, токены и то, куда прямо сейчас перетекает внимание рынка. И вот в прошлый четверг мы обратили внимание на $CYBERLEEK. Для контекста: в эти дни в сети как раз начали появляться слитые геймплейные ролики GTA VI. Поверх…
❤🔥3⚡2custom 54496835944254102312
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @MEMEcrypted. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MEMEcrypted” (@MEMEcrypted), 19,075 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MEMEcrypted.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.