Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Кабан Дроп-хантер

@Kaban_Drop

Not marked by Telegram, checked 10 August 2026

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,907subscribers

-96 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002116314171
TypeChannel
Username@Kaban_Drop
DescriptionНа этом канале освещаем максимум проектов, где можно получить дроп. Без строгой фильтрации. Основной канал @TheCryptoBoar Связь с админом - @bigsur_pepper
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Kaban_Drop

Growth

22,90723,00322,9557 August 2026 — 23,003 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,002 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,984 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,971 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,947 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,929 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,907 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -96. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,893–23,017 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 13:1422,907-22
11 Aug 2026, 14:0222,929-18
10 Aug 2026, 13:2422,947-24
9 Aug 2026, 15:1722,971-13
8 Aug 2026, 15:4722,984-18
7 Aug 2026, 16:5123,002-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:4623,003first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,000
Videos
157
Links
1,340

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

659 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁26540.2%
👍13019.7%
8913.5%
🔥649.71%
🫡243.64%
182.73%
😢121.82%
🤯121.82%
👻81.21%
💯71.06%
🤝71.06%
👀60.91%
😱50.759%
🤩40.607%
👏30.455%
👌20.303%
😎20.303%
❤‍🔥10.152%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 659reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2025 to 27 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Kaban_Drop. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2025 to 27 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Sept 2025, 20:22 UTC≈10,200 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Вспомнил: ещё с багом в системе сталкивался когда-то в Сильпо. У меня с карты списывались деньги и через несколько секунд возвращались обратно. Но не спешите завидовать — общая сумма такого абуза составила около 150 грн, а на следующий день баг пофиксили.

😁237🔥6👏3

24 Sept 2025, 09:35 UTC≈11,300 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

👍 Вчера умельцы поимели Маркет подарков Portals. Если коротко, уязвимость позволяла продавать подарок, получать вознаграждение, но при этом подарок оставался у продавца. Как именно работала механика бага — хз. Для меня самым большим багоюзом остаётся минт ваучеров НотКоин через баг с заданием: тогда мы с товарищем на двоих смогли вынести около 200 ваучеров, баг работал около 4 часов.

13👍7👻1😎1

24 Sept 2025, 06:30 UTC≈8,460 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌿 Небольшие обновления по Grass: Немного обновили интерфейс. По текущей инфе, дроп за 2 сезон должны раздать до конца этого года. По состоянию на сейчас токен торгуется по $0.88, что составляет около 25% от ATH.

👍254😁21

19 Sept 2025, 06:33 UTC≈10,100 views56 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤝 Дроп: 5000 активаций по 0.25 HOT без условий. Как забрать дропы: ➡️ Вступить в чат Кабана @chat_kabana11 ➡️ Забрать дроп Дроп, как обычно, без привязки, так что вступление в деревню не обязательно — но приветствуется ;)

🔥24😁14👍94🤝3🤯2

16 Sept 2025, 06:34 UTC≈7,800 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤔 Хантим дроп от ПолиМаркета? Полимаркет хочет получить $10 млрд на раунде финансирования. Учитывая то, что SEC теперь мягкий и никого особо не доёбывает, вероятность того, что проект выпустит токен, не ниже 90%. 🧐 Что делать? Заходить и греть там свои кошельки. На рынке прогнозов полно халявы по типу того, что в течение месяца не скинут ядерку или что Трамп не отправит миротворцев в Украину. У Полимаркета очень

👍204🔥1

15 Sept 2025, 17:56 UTC≈5,870 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

А я думаю, че никто не пишет. Забыл, что закрывал комменты.

😁17🫡83🤝2

15 Sept 2025, 16:15 UTC≈5,200 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Зашёл посмотреть, кто в списке лидеров NFT трейд-конкурса от HOT'а. Что-то старых лиц вообще не вижу или не узнаю — может, аватарки сменили. В общем вопрос к Вам: это старожилы "потерялись" или хорошо качнули свежую кровь?

🔥6👍3🤩2😁2

15 Sept 2025, 14:59 UTC≈5,010 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💎 Апдейт доходности по Voxel. что делать, что качать, а кто теперь "пенсионер" На скрине можно наблюдать, как изменился фарм коллекций, приносящих нам TON. Белой строкой отмечена почасовая добыча коллекции, жёлтой — посуточная, в зависимости от уровня прокачки. ✍️ Что произошло? Базовая скорость добычи была снижена в 8 раз: если ранее коллекция, к примеру, покемонов приносила 0.384 TON в сутки, то теперь приносит

5😁3👌2😢21👍1🤯1

15 Sept 2025, 06:34 UTC≈5,970 views103 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤝 Дроп: 5000 активаций по 0.25 HOT Как забрать дропы: ➡️ Вступить в чат Кабана @chat_kabana11 ➡️ Забрать дроп Дроп, как обычно, без привязки, так что вступление в деревню не обязательно — но приветствуется ;)

👍50😁2317🔥12😱1

21 Aug 2025, 12:34 UTC≈9,100 views64 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Дал ИИ задачу поискать слухи по листингу HOTа, в итоге GPT сослался на Кабана. Новых слухов нет, получается) Еще нашёл упоминание, что Extended Seed закупили HOTа по $2.31 за токен на одном из раундов финансирования. Но возможности оценить эту инфу нет. За что купил — за то продал, так сказать)

😁5012❤‍🔥1🔥1

21 Aug 2025, 09:32 UTC≈7,520 views9 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚽 Забавная ситуация на рынке подарков REDO. Понятное дело, полноценного рынка ещё нет — только голый OTC-маркет. Но цены там скачут очень жёстко. За несколько минут можно увидеть объявления, где один пытается продать по 70 TON, а другой уже готов скупать по 90. После небольшого мониторинга стало ясно: REDO сейчас торгуются в диапазоне 50–140 TON (по объявлениям на OTC). Отсюда два варианта: 🔵 Либо это шикарная а

71👍1

21 Aug 2025, 06:32 UTC≈5,650 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🏃‍♀️ В Not Games начался крафт карточек и скинов от VOID. Всего существует 8 различных карточек и 8 уникальных скинов, это добро можно продать на маркетплейсах. 🤔 Что по чём? Самые дорогие Meme Card — их цена достигает 15 TON, но большинство торгуется в пределах одного TONа. 🤔 Кому доступно? Тем, кто играл в VOID: различные карточки относятся к определённым тематическим ачивкам, которые вы могли достичь. @notga

😁15🤯4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Kaban_Drop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,041,458 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

HOT DROPS 🎁
@drops_on_hot · 907,842
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кабан Дроп-хантер” (@Kaban_Drop), 22,907 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kaban_Drop.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.