Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ready to Fight | Official Channel

@rtfight_com

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

87,270subscribers

-819 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001374308052
TypeChannel
Username@rtfight_com
DescriptionBoxing office in your pocket Founded by Oleksandr Usyk @Usyk17 & Sergey Lapin 📲 rtf.social
Created3 September 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rtfight_com

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

87,27088,08987,679.56 August 2026 — 88,089 subscribers7 August 2026 — 87,981 subscribers8 August 2026 — 87,842 subscribers9 August 2026 — 87,716 subscribers10 August 2026 — 87,586 subscribers11 August 2026 — 87,403 subscribers12 August 2026 — 87,270 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -819. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 87,147–88,212 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:2487,270-133
11 Aug 2026, 14:4287,403-183
10 Aug 2026, 14:1287,586-130
9 Aug 2026, 12:3387,716-126
8 Aug 2026, 09:3287,842-139
7 Aug 2026, 10:1187,981-108
6 Aug 2026, 15:4788,089first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.305%
avg views ÷ 87,270 subscribers
Avg views / post
266
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held12 (3 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total3,196
Reactions total70
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,780
Videos
1,440
Links
2,810

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

70 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4158.6%
🔥1521.4%
👍68.57%
👏22.86%
💯22.86%
😁22.86%
👌11.43%
😎11.43%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC100 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ON THIS DAY: AJ vs. HELENIUS 🥊💥 August 12, 2023. Robert Helenius took the fight on a week's notice after Dillian Whyte's failed test. Joshua stayed composed, dissected his opponent, and closed the show with a massive right hand at 1:27 of the 7th round. ЦЕЙ ДЕНЬ: ДЖОШУА — ХЕЛЕНІУС 🥊💥 12 серпня 2023 року. Роберт Хеленіус погодився на бій за тиждень до виходу в ринг після того, як тест Ділліана Вайта виявився позити

3

11 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC195 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

THE KINGS OF HAND SPEED ⚡️ Precision, rhythm, and lightning-fast combinations. Here are 5 fighters who turned hand speed into a deadly weapon. КОРОЛІ ШВИДКОСТІ РУК ⚡️ Точність, ритм та блискавичні комбінації. Ось 5 бійців, які перетворили швидкість рук на смертоносну зброю.

🔥42👏1

10 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC225 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

We’ve put together some of the most powerful mindset quotes from Oleksandr Usyk. These words are pure fuel for those who are chasing their own dreams. ______ Ми зібрали найпотужніші мотиваційні цитати Олександра Усика. Ці слова — справжнє паливо для тих, хто йде до власної мети.

5😁2🔥1😎1

10 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC243 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

THE LONGEST UNBEATEN STREAKS IN BOXING HISTORY 🥊 Consistency is the ultimate weapon. These fighters proved that perfection isn't a fluke — it’s a career-long commitment. НАЙДОВШІ НЕПЕРЕМОЖНІ СЕРІЇ В ІСТОРІЇ БОКСУ 🥊 Стабільність — це найсильніша зброя. Ці бійці довели, що досконалість — це не випадковість, а результат роботи протягом усієї кар'єри.

🔥32👍1

7 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC346 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

AFTER THE DISQUALIFICATION: ROY’S REVENGE ⏳ August 7, 1997. After a controversial disqualification in their first meeting, Roy Jones Jr. came out on a mission. He didn't just win — he erased any doubt, knocking out Montell Griffin in the 1st round to reclaim his WBC Light Heavyweight title. ПІСЛЯ ДИСКВАЛІФІКАЦІЇ: РЕВАНШ РОЯ ⏳ 7 серпня 1997 року. Після суперечливої дискваліфікації у їхній першій зустрічі, Рой Джонс

3👍2🔥2👌1👏1

6 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC351 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

THE BEST BODY PUNCHERS IN BOXING HISTORY 🎯 To take down an opponent, you have to break them from the inside out. Precision, timing, and brutal power to the ribs — the hallmark of a true master. Check out our Top 8 ranking! НАЙКРАЩІ МАЙСТРИ УДАРІВ ПО КОРПУСУ 🎯 Щоб повалити суперника, потрібно «зламати» його зсередини. Точність, таймінг та жорстока сила по ребрах — ось візитна картка справжнього майстра. Переглянь

3💯2

5 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC321 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

TOP 5 MOST CONTROVERSIAL BOXING DECISIONS🥊⚖️ Boxing has seen some legendary battles, but these five fights are remembered as much for their scorecards as they are for the action in the ring. From controversial split decisions to shocking judges' scorecards, these nights defined what boxing fans call a "robbery." Swipe through to see our Top 5 list of decisions that left the world in shock ➡️ ТОП-5 НАЙСУПЕРЕЧНІШИХ

4🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC256 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

THE ROAD TO THE FIRST TITLE 🥊🔥 Every legend in this lineup walked a different path to their first world championship belt. From 20 fights to 30, it’s not about how fast you start — it’s about being ready when the ultimate opportunity knocks. ШЛЯХ ДО ПЕРШОГО ТИТУЛУ 🥊🔥 У кожної легенди в цьому списку був свій унікальний шлях до першого чемпіонського пояса. Від 20 до 30 боїв — справа не в тому, як швидко ти починаєш,

4👍2🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC289 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

THE BEST FEMALE BOXERS OF ALL TIME 👑🥊 The global rise of women’s boxing is undeniable, fueled by high-stakes thrillers and incredible skill. Each of them fought to earn the respect, the platform, and the spotlight that women’s boxing commands today. НАЙКРАЩІ ЖІНКИ-БОКСЕРКИ УСІХ ЧАСІВ 👑🥊 Стрімкий розвиток жіночого боксу — це факт, який підживлюється неймовірними поєдинками. Кожна з них боролася за право на повагу,

5🔥2👍1

4 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC304 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

THE EVOLUTION OF HEAVYWEIGHT ICONS 🥊👑 From amateur rings to world titles. We’ve broken down the stats for 6 boxing icons. ЕВОЛЮЦІЯ ЛЕГЕНД ХЕВІВЕЙТУ 🥊👑 Від аматорського рингу до світових титулів. Ми розібрали статистику 6 боксерських ікон.

8

3 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC283 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Cast your vote! 🥊

  1. Len Wickwar24%
  2. Billy Bird18%
  3. Archie Moore41%
  4. Wilfredo Gómez12%
  5. Carlos Zárate29%

The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC283 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

BOXING’S UNTOUCHABLE RECORDS 🥊 Numbers that will likely never be touched again. 139 KOs? 473 fights? Respect the grind. Respect the history. Which name on this list is the true boxing GOAT for you? 👇 НЕЗДОЛАННІ РЕКОРДИ БОКСУ 🥊 Цифри, до яких, швидше за все, ніхто більше не наблизиться. 139 нокаутів? 473 бої? Повага до важкої праці. Повага до історії. Хто з цього списку для вас є справжнім GOAT (найвеличнішим в іст

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @rtfight_com. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTCAnonymous Poll17 voters

Cast your vote! 🥊

  1. Len Wickwar24%
  2. Billy Bird18%
  3. Archie Moore41%
  4. Wilfredo Gómez12%
  5. Carlos Zárate29%

The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 200,959 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ready to Fight | Official Channel” (@rtfight_com), 87,270 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rtfight_com.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.