Channel
@grinderyai
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
183,715subscribers
-1,797 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001985840298 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @grinderyai |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/grinderyai |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 183,715 | -303 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:29 | 184,018 | -270 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:22 | 184,288 | -329 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:11 | 184,617 | -207 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 184,824 | -342 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 185,166 | -230 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 185,396 | -116 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 185,512 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
280 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 184 | 65.7% | |
| 😁 | 34 | 12.1% | |
| 🔥 | 29 | 10.4% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 8.93% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 1.43% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.07% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.357% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 280reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2025 to 27 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚠️ Grindery Telegram Wallet Hey everyone, it’s overdue: we're sunsetting the Grindery Telegram Wallet. The reason is simple: The world does not need yet another wallet. 👉 Here more about that And we're not going to pretend otherwise. It’s been a hard fight in 2025, and Telegram's decision to go exclusive with TON was in hindsight the nail in the coffin. Sentiment around the token has been impossible to turn aroun…
❤44😁15🔥9⚡4👍4🥰2
Welcome to Aventino Beta Testing! 🚀 Hi @channel, please join our pilot testing program for Aventino.ai 🎯YOUR MISSION: Help us make Aventino the best hackathon platform by testing our features and providing honest feedback. 🎥 Please Record your testing session and share the recording 📝 WHAT TO TEST (15-20 minutes): 1️⃣ CREATE YOUR ACCOUNT - Sign up at aventino.ai - Complete your profile 2️⃣ EXPLORE HACKATHONS - Br…
❤33😁5
🚨 Community Update: GX Consolidation Grindery enters a new phase, consolidating GX liquidity on Polygon as part of its long-term vision. 👉Read the full update on our blog https://blog.grindery.com/community-update:-gx-consolidation
👍6❤3
🚀 New Model on Grindery.ai ✨ Nova Lite 1.0 (Amazon) ⚡ Fast · 💰 Affordable · 🧠 Reliable Best for quick tasks, summaries, and daily use — with lightning-fast responses. 🔗 Try it now → Grindery.ai 📚 Learn More
❤10👍2
📢 New Model Live on Grindery.ai ✨ Aion-RP 1.0 (8B) by AionLabs 🎭 Immersive · Persona-driven · Engaging 👉 Best for character chats, storytelling, and roleplay scenarios. 🔗 Try it now → Grindery.ai 📚 Learn More
❤7👏1🔥1
✨ New Models on Grindery.ai AionLabs: Aion-1.0 & Aion-1.0 Mini are now live! ⚡ Aion-1.0 → Balanced, reasoning-focused, great for analysis & creative tasks. ⚡ Aion-1.0 Mini → Faster, cheaper, best for quick brainstorming & short text. 👉 Test them now at Grindery.ai 📚 Learn More
❤6🔥1🥰1
✨ New Models on Grindery.ai We’ve added AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 and AI21: Jamba Mini 1.7 🚀 ⚡ Jamba Mini → fast, cheap, perfect for everyday use 🧠 Jamba Large → smarter, bigger context, great for research & analysis 👉 Try them now → Grindery.ai 📚 Learn More
❤9😁2
For the Grindery User: @GrinderyAIBot is currently experiencing issues and delays with interactions in Telegram, causing a malfunction. Our technical team is working to fix it within the next few hours. We apologize for the delays caused.
❤8👍2
✨ New Model on Grindery.ai Agentica DeepCoder (14B Preview) is now live! 💻 Strong code reasoning & generation ⚡ Efficient performance 🔧 Debug, refactor, and explain code 👉 Use it for functions, algorithms, and developer workflows 🔗 Try it now → Grindery.ai 📚 Learn More
❤10🔥3👍2😁2
we're experiencing some technicall issues with our most recent model Nano Banana, so we're disabling it for now to work on it and give you the best possible experience, stay tuned!
🔥5❤3👍2
✨ New Model on Grindery.ai Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash – Image Preview) is live! 🎨 Generate images ✏️ Edit visuals ⚡ Fast 💰 Cheap 👉 Perfect for creative campaigns, social posts, and design mockups. 🔗 Try it now → Grindery.ai 📚 Learn More
❤5
📢 New Model on Grindery.ai Science Assistant (Gemini 2.5 Pro) is now live! 🔬 STEM-ready • 📊 Research-oriented • 📚 Large context 👉 Excellent for research, problem solving, and technical analysis. Whether you’re a student, engineer, or researcher, this model is your go-to for structured, accurate answers. 🔗 Try it now → Grindery.ai 📚 Learn More
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @grinderyai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 144,061 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Grindery.AI 🤖 Updates 📣” (@grinderyai), 183,715 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grinderyai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.