A new whitepaper in collaboration with Sovra and LamdaClass. Introducing Propia. https://x.com/alignedlayer/status/2088025967184716034?s=20

Channel
Aligned Layer
@alignedlayer
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
20,258subscribers
-974 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002102301151 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alignedlayer |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alignedlayer |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 16:15 | 20,258 | -201 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:15 | 20,459 | -42 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 16:36 | 20,501 | -29 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:56 | 20,530 | -27 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 20,557 | -38 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 20,595 | -86 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 20,681 | -54 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 20,735 | -37 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:56 | 20,772 | -40 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 20,812 | -23 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 20,835 | -35 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 20,870 | -24 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 20,894 | -18 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 20,912 | -18 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 20,930 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 20,938 | -30 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 20,968 | -20 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:42 | 20,988 | -57 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 21,045 | -45 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 21,090 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 18 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
A new article with a LambdaVM status update https://x.com/alignedlayer/status/2083293801460727923?s=20
A new article explaining Aligned Wallet-as-a-Service: https://x.com/alignedlayer/status/2069499511517692193?s=20
https://x.com/alignedlayer/status/2043742604811219138?s=20
The Aligned Token Sale https://x.com/alignedlayer/status/2039843532723089531?s=20
New ALIGN tokenomics update: https://x.com/alignedlayer/status/2039116019654861141 Please be aware this is just an update and a website to check the airdrop allocation. The claim of the token is not live.
First public demo of Aligned’s Wallet as a Service https://x.com/rj_aligned/status/2027151355320631381?s=46
The trillion dollar financial gap explained by Ben Reider Understanding Aligned's partners, Loom Finance and Leveneu👇 https://x.com/twitter/status/2027019930315678060
Today we're excited to announce the Mainnet Alpha release of our Proof Aggregation Service. Why is this important? It allows proofs to be verified (using aggregation) with the full security of Ethereum, meaning ZK-rollups and other high value applications can use ZK on Ethereum at low costs. This complements our Proof Verification Layer (AVS) and gives developers flexibility depending on their use case. It's also …
ZK News is now the Weekly Ethereum Bulletin! While we'll still be covering the latest developments in ZK we're expanding our scope to cover the most important news of the week across the Ethereum ecosystem. Check out volume 1 here: https://blog.alignedlayer.com/weekly-ethereum-bulletin-vol-1/ Remember to subscribe to our blog to receive these straight to your inbox every Friday 📥 We'll also be publishing these as…
In 2025 we went from a single focus on making ZK proof verification fast and affordable to offering a full stack that lets enterprises and institutions upgrade to Ethereum. Read our full 2025 recap on X: https://x.com/alignedlayer/status/2008590746945818996 Also available on the Aligned blog: https://blog.alignedlayer.com/aligned-2025-recap/
After a busy December and some time off for the holidays our team is back and energized to keep building. Check out what we got up to last month with our December recap: https://x.com/alignedlayer/status/2008300103337902092?s=20 Stay tuned for our 2025 recap and reflections, coming soon!
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @alignedlayer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Bitrue_official · 9,17410 postsMEXC Listing Announcement
@MEXC_ENchannel · 14,7842 posts𝙎𝙝𝙖𝙠𝙞𝙡 𝙏𝙚𝙘𝙝 𝘽𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙡𝙖
@ShakilTechBangla25 · 27,2962 postsImrozTricks
@ImrozTricks3 · 21,0371 postANHKY>>PHỞ + MÌ TÔM
@kizume · 7,4371 postMey Airdrops
@meyairdrops · 10,5601 postSolotop Channel 🦉
@Solotop_Alpha · 11,1781 postThreading on the Edge
@threadingontheedge · 7,7981 post𝗩𝗜𝗣 𝗘𝗔𝗥𝗡𝗜𝗡𝗚𝗦 𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗖𝗘
@vip_earnings_force1 · 121,4191 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@CryptoHindiO · 24,098#1
@PlumeNetwork · 173,774#2
@alloranetworkannouncements · 53,425#3
@calderaofficial · 68,107#4
@allo_xyz · 77,040#5
@blumcrypto · 14,188,780#6
@glacier_news · 71,715#7
@verona_announcements · 115,563#8
@datafdn · 57,112#9
@nillionofficialannouncements · 18,379#10
@cryptogg · 101,711#11
@notcoin · 8,552,225#12
@RivalzAI_Ann · 48,546#13
@feature_earning · 59,406#14
@GaCryptOfficial · 37,602#15
@tabi_ann · 1,890,088#16
@BabylonAnnouncements · 18,226#17
@LM_Exchange · 9,387#18
@hotonnear · 4,631,154#19
@StratoVMAnnouncements · 19,949#20
@BlazpayAnnouncement · 28,432#21
@usualmoney · 7,101#22
@AirdropAdventureYT · 22,051#23
@ZecreyAnnouncement · 23,065#24
@freemejankari · 48,337#25
@Cats_housewtf · 7,850,625#26
@DanishYT2255 · 24,727#27
@sageairdrops · 43,477#28
@gopherannouncements · 44,323#29
@assisterr · 90,472#30
@binance_announcements · 3,415,966#31
@grinderyai · 173,362#32
@wizzwoods_game · 1,165,711#33
@OmniFDN · 19,905#34
@swisstronik · 43,919#35
@layeredgeannouncements · 6,463#36
@morenewsxyz · 31,586#37
@RIZE_Fi · 26,940#38
@DevelocityToken · 58,273#39
@ethicalcrypto1 · 18,435#40
@EarnByAbhi23 · 30,561#41
@selfchainxyz · 107,189#42
@gameechannel · 1,882,229#43
@airdropfind · 534,407#44
@nubit_announcement · 45,282#45
@AirdropAlertDaily · 21,588#46
@bnbchain · 74,385#47
@trickysharmajii · 19,061#48
@atleta_network · 111,852#49
@FuseAnnouncements · 12,152#50
@znsconnect · 45,003#51
@HybridAnnouncements · 54,095#52
@tokenpocket_channel · 100,940#53
@movewiffrens · 33,781#54
@QuaiNetwork_Announcements · 22,154#55
@AutoLayerPortal · 8,706#56
@ethicalearningbyavvs · 15,197#57
@FastLife0x · 9,918#58
@drft_party · 148,394#59
@MintBlockchain_Ann · 4,606#60
@fairdotclub · 12,823#61
@Dop_org · 61,360#62
@maranscrypto · 17,423#63
@godaylight · 5,262#64
@GOATNetwork_Ann · 11,403#65
@ShamsTabraiz · 134,058#66
@PentagonGamesOfficial · 512,071#67
@atoms_research · 16,890#68
@Novastro_chain_announcements · 18,058#69
@HappyCuanAirdrop · 28,282#70
@loadnetwork_channel · 949#71
@drops_on_hot · 865,843#72
@cookiedaoannouncements · 59,235#73
@okxwalletannouncement · 3,261,547#74
@dogs · 6,948,804#75
@dill_announcement · 57,900#76
@catizenann · 3,550,802#77
@new_airdropss · 41,546#78
@cryptovaibhav · 26,935#79
@vaibhavguptavg · 18,632#80
@stablejack · 42,512#81
@airdropofficial7 · 26,689#82
@artfi_announcement · 28,510#83
@RWA_Inc_Announcements · 40,495#84
@infiniteseasdev · 48,741#85
@EBAExtra · 17,642#86
@airdrop6officialchannel · 1,336,501#87
@freemesignal · 15,931#88
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@selfchainxyz · 107,189
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
@morenewsxyz · 31,586
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
@slinkylayer_ann · 40,830
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 August 2026
@ZecreyAnnouncement · 23,065
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
@datafdn · 57,112
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
@cultured_rwa · 66,563
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
@infiniteseasdev · 48,741
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
@glacier_news · 71,715
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
@verona_announcements · 115,563
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
@allo_xyz · 77,040
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
@hemi_news · 33,732
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026
@haustnetwork · 94,718
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
@BlazpayAnnouncement · 28,432
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
@dtectoken · 21,186
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 September 2026
@RivalzAI_Ann · 48,546
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026
@QuaiNetwork_Announcements · 22,154
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 September 2026
@prom_ann · 22,342
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 September 2026
@RIZE_Fi · 26,940
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
@znsconnect · 45,003
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 August 2026
@movewiffrens · 33,781
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 September 2026
@calderaofficial · 68,107
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
@alloranetworkannouncements · 53,425
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
@assisterr · 90,472
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 August 2026
@Aethir_Official · 131,500
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 44 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Aligned Layer” (@alignedlayer), 20,258 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alignedlayer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.